Hilary Penfold off to the ACT Supreme Court

Having tried to make sense of her posts and site, she seems to be of the cat wielding & throwing variety of rambly blogger woman, with a grudge against CIT, the court system.

I’ve seen more entertaining & crazier people with better blogs, so she’s not even refreshing or innovative.

For those who are wondering, Chester is off the deep end again and has been returned to active moderation for her repeated and deliberate infringements.

Defaming supreme court justices is serious business and having honestly tried to make sense of chester’s grievances I’ll admit to lacking the intelligence or patience to understand them.

Knock yourself out on her site if you’re interested.

May I ask ED if you were pressured to censor my post? It’s just I am aware they have applied pressure to various individuals with one member of the medical profession admitting such to me.

I’d hardly say questioning **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** ****************************

**************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** **************************** ****************************

**************************** **************************** ****************************

[ED – OK Chester back to the mod queue for you, what you consider to be truth and what we know to be truth are not the same thing, link it to your own publication if you’re that sure of it.]

Just when one might think the SC couldn’t fall into anymore disrepute, it just did. What a joke the ACT judiciary is.

But seeing you insist 😀

ccraven.blogspot.com

You’ll note I even predicted his latest sleazy little move up the old cronyism tree.

Skitt’s law again as I’ve managed to place a question mark inappropriately.

Sigh…VN, I do believe I am right.

Seriously?

I assumed you meant to say “you might get some bites if you are lucky”.

Otherwise you’re talking about Ingee’s lucky. Ingee’s lucky what? exactly? Doesn’t make a while lot of sense, does it?

Don’t worry about them, Raving Environmentalist, this is the internet. You’ve got to expect that everyone voices their opinion, even if it’s based on nothing but hot air. I’d love to see these people take on her Honour Justice Penfold in just a civil conversation!

Well well.. what a nasty, mean spirited, little bunch we have here. Hilary Penfold is an extremely intelligent, straight talking and morally strong public servant who did her duty for a government she may or may not have supported – right in the spotlight. When I was in Canberra a few years back she was revered as one of the best senior managers in the APS. How the rats who didn’t have to make the tough decisions desert the ship, when the going gets rough. Looks like some of the mealy mouthed incompetens she was no doubt forced to deal with are now getting their own back – HERE! (Or are you just malicious gossips who don’t know the lady in question and are just enjoying repeating hearsay?)

For most pubes, I think the answer is c)

Sorry, that was completely set up. I had to.

As well, from the looks of it, she seems to be one of the Liberal’s cronies – which is why she’s fleeing to the supreme court.

Deadmandrinking

Sure there is nothing good about the way Tampa was handled, or the legislation, But what should pubes do when confronted with instructions from an elected government?
a)do their job
b)resign
c)do a half arsed job

If you are in the public service sometimes you will find yourself working for the yellow running dog of capitalist imperialism.

All I am saying is wait and see,

Is the judge herself not entitled to the presumption of innocence, or does the golden thread not stretch that far?

Look, shut-up with all the internet laws. Who cares?

Crikey, should the Police be reducing themselves to the levels of violent and abusive subjects?

On the topic, this woman sound very scary. Why should anything to do with the Tampa affair be considered good?