10 September 2024

Yes we can: Lee brushes off planning questions for Acton Waterfront stadium

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
46

Canberra United’s Georgia Ritchie and former Brumby Ben Alexander discuss the Liberals’ stadium plans with Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee and Deputy Leader Leanne Castley at the announcement at Acton Waterfront. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee has dismissed planning hurdles to the Canberra Liberals’ proposal for a $700-800 million, 30,000-seat stadium on the Acton Waterfront, saying a Liberal Government would do whatever it takes to build the project.

The Liberals say they will start design work immediately and commence construction of a stadium with a clear EFTE roof in their first term.

But Chief Minister Andrew Barr said West Basin had already been investigated as a possible site for a stadium and had been ruled out.

Mr Barr said the site was designated land under the National Capital Plan and a stadium was not permitted by law.

He said it had strict planning controls and building heights, and the Federal Government, through the National Capital Authority, would have to approve it.

That would require a change to the NCP, which would be a lengthy process and require approval from both houses of the federal parliament.

Mr Barr said the NCP process began in 2004 and was agreed under the Howard Government.

“It is written very clearly in black and white down to finite detail, what can and can’t be built on that site,” he said.

“A National Capital Plan variation would take an entire parliamentary term, if not longer, to process, would need to be passed by both houses of parliament and would go through an extensive Federal Parliamentary Committee process.

“It took 10 years to get the National Capital Plan that we have now in place, so it would take at least that long to unwind that, and there would be considerable opposition to such a move given all the work that has been done over the last 20 years.”

Mr Barr said the only clear pathway was Labor’s proposal for a stadium in a precinct at Bruce with a revitalised Australian Institute of Sport.

However, Ms Lee said the Liberals had already begun discussions with the NCA, and she said they already had long-term plans to revitalise the area, possibly including hotels.

“This is where the stark contrast in the attitude of the current Labor-Greens government is, when they start with everything from a position of no,” she said.

“Under a Canberra Liberals government, we will start with a position of yes.

“We will continue to have these collaborative discussions with the NCA to ensure that we get this built.”

If a legislative change were required, Ms Lee said her government would “undertake whatever mechanisms are available to us to ensure that we get this major infrastructure project built because this is the kind of project that will signal to the entire country, to the world, that Canberra, as the nation’s capital of Australia, is open for business and is open to hosting world-class events.”

Ms Lee said the estimated cost was comparable with other stadiums of its kind, but she would be seeking a Federal Government contribution, given there were precedents for this, and also be open to a public-private partnership.

Other offsets were also on the table, including a reallocation of funding from other infrastructure projects.

This could include the Canberra Theatre redevelopment and the Northside Hospital, both of which have reached the tender stage for contractors and are slated to start mid-decade.

However, Ms Lee refused to commit to proceeding with these projects, saying she would have more to say about infrastructure closer to the election.

She said the costing would be submitted with other projects to Treasury before the election.

Mr Barr said the $700-800 million figure was about right for just building the stadium, but there were hundreds of millions of dollars of associated costs in developing a precinct, road and traffic management and parking.

“Moving 30,000 in and out of a venue is a significant endeavour,” he said.

Ms Lee said the design would include parking, and being close to the city made the site accessible from there, as well as there being vehicle access via the Glen Loch Interchange and along Parkes Way, particularly for southsiders, and public transport in light rail stage 2A, which the Liberals will complete.

She brushed off questions about running the convention centre and stadium builds concurrently, not to mention light rail stage 2A, in a nationally hot infrastructure market.

Mr Barr said the cost alone of these two projects was $1.5 billion.

“All year we have heard bluff and bluster from the Opposition about debt and deficit, and yet in the last three days, they’ve just dropped $1.5 billion without much scrutiny, ” he said.

“There will be a lot of scrutiny on this particular proposal.”

However, Ms Lee said the proposal would offer an enhanced spectator experience, a regional centre for sport and entertainment, and boost business and tourism.

“There is a reason why countries around the world build infrastructure projects of this kind in the city,” she said.

“That’s because of the broader economic benefits that will flow on through the entire community of having a major event attracting destination like this in the city.”

READ ALSO Canberra decides: Region’s live-streamed election forums to put candidates on the spot, and you can ask questions too

The proposal means the great public park planned for the site, Ngamawari, would not proceed, but Ms Lee said as much of it as possible would be retained in the stadium precinct.

Former Brumby and businessman Ben Alexander said the ACT had been talking about a stadium for 15 years and it was time for voters to decide where it should be.

“We call ourselves a world-class city,” he said.

“We need a place where people can get together and enjoy sport.

“I think sport brings so much to communities and brings people together, and we need safe, world-class events to bring people together to cheer, celebrate, commiserate, and then also go and spend their money in businesses around that precinct.”

Join the conversation

46
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Not The Mama2:16 pm 13 Sep 24

I think that, whether or not you are interested or in favour of a Stadium, Ms Lee and her team are – for the first time in decades, giving us all cause to think about alternatives on election day. All strength to her arm at the very least Mr Barr will may actually do something to get deserve our vote this time.

Every time a politician announces a new and costly project I’m less inclined to vote for them. Why? Because their extravagance has to be paid with rates, taxes and fees that come out of my income. And your income. And our kid’s income, way into the future because of the debt they’ll inherit living in a Canberra of budget deficits to pay for trams, unaccountable government expenditure and IT waste, mismanagement, overpaid consultants and contractors, excessive rates, unaffordable housing, planning debacles, cynical and farcical community consultation, kangaroo culls and tree canopy reduction. Cost of living crisis?
Not if you’re in the ACT Government. Why is it that households cannot get approval to remove one problem tree, but developers can bulldoze all trees off whole blocks, eliminate our green spaces for apartments and remove trees at whim and with ACT Government connivance? We have a legislative assembly of untrustworthy hypocrites and incompetents.
What I want and what electors should be demanding is a financially responsible politician who will cut the budget deficit, reduce debt, enforce government efficiencies, control rates, provide realistic affordable housing solutions for first home buyers, ensure effective community consultation, plant more trees and collect the garbage.
Instead of more Lib/Lab/Greens it’s time for an Independent with sensible ambitions and a record of community involvement to hold the balance of power.

Acton,
whilst I agree with your general point around fiscal responsibility, developers and builders face very similar issues around tree management as landholders. They aren’t simply allowed to “bulldoze” all trees and they face significant responsibilities for tree protection and replanting.

For example, all trees bulldozed off the large site allocated to the Iranian embassy. Severe culling of trees/willows along the LBG and Weston Park foreshore. Trees removed around Albert Hall. Light rail resulted and will result in extensive removal of trees. On many knockdown-rebuilds, huge residences approved and taking up most of an average size block where once there stood a modest dwelling and a shady garden. Or on new smaller blocks, mansions built where there could have been a smaller dwelling and a shady garden. The evidence is in our declining tree canopy. Less tree cover means fewer birds and more suburban heat.

Yes, Let’s go back to the “good old days”..! As I see it, the only activity that humans do looking backward to go forward is rowing a boat!

Having just watched a developer cut down a mature street tree in Griffith for no obvious reason except that it was centrally in front of their planned apartments and advertising sign, as well as allowing workers to park all over the nature strips in the street for the past year right next to other mature trees (such that home-owners have erected barriers to stop them), I disagree.

Psycho,
Except you have absolutely no idea the amount of hurdles that developer would have had to go through to be able to do that, the costs and other requirements put on them if it was done legally.

If it wasn’t done legally, they will be in a world of hurt with massive fines and legal action.

What have you done to find out the details of the tree removal?

The idea that developerd have some special rights to do what they want is only made by people who don’t know what they’re talking about or have any idea of the significant amount of regulatory controls in place.

It would be fantastic for the ACT. Let’s get on and build it!

More planning obstacles…I am amazed that anything ever gets built in the ACT.

Andrew Cooke2:47 pm 11 Sep 24

Ah the Tardis stadium proposal, much bigger on the inside.

Seriously did they pay even look at the scale for these renders? It looks like it’s been drawn for 1/2 size people, or they got a stadium model off a 3D model website and scaled it to fit.

Firstly, the merits of this proposal are open to critique and there is very little supporting information to assess it, which would need to be developed and assessed in future years if the Libs actually formed government, which isn’t likely. Considering other projects in other states, the economic rationale for a new stadium is questionable.

But this issue just highlights perfectly why its so difficult for the current government to lose power due to the partisan and rusted on nature of so many voters in the ACT.

The hypocrisy seen in many of the comments arguing against this proposal is laughable in its enormity. We have the same people who agree with ALP proposed projects that have the same planning and feasibility problems arguing vociferously against this one.

People saying that we should all be catching public transport whinging about parking, when the site is right next to a light rail stop.

People worrying about costings when the current government us proposing billions in infrastructure projects with limited or no detailed costings.

Bringing the NCA in, when identical problems exist for light rail routes along with the current government’s plans for this site.

Etc.etc.

Any alternative government will always face an uphill battle because too many people are far more interested in the ideology of the party/politician making the proposal rather than the supporting evidence and facts behind it.

Just start building it! That’s what Barr did with his tram

The Liberals are taking us to our fourth light rail election and voters have been decisive in voting for it!

Jack D,
You still haven’t pointed out when “light rail” was an option on the ballot?

The Liberals took a policy to the last election supporting light rail and actually lost votes. Your weak, partisan arguments don’t pass muster.

Gregg Heldon1:46 pm 11 Sep 24

I want to bring back a old word just for you Jack.
Windbag.
You, Jack, are the epitome of a windbag.

That’s a bit cruel Gregg Heldon! Considering it’s your comments that remind me of the hypocrisy and ineptitude of the Liberals, rousing me to respond!

Gregg Heldon8:08 am 12 Sep 24

Some would say not cruel at all, nor harsh enough, Jack.
Pray tell, what exactly was my comment that inspired you to respond?

Absolutely we should build this stadium in the city but brushing off planning questions shows as ever that the Liberals are not a serious alternative government.

Of all the things that plague Canberra and need to be addressed and they come up with the.crap idea. We are so poorly served.

If you drink this stadium idea up, really, critical thinking isn’t your forte.

this stadium brain fart would have to be the grandest own-goal by Canberra Libs since, ever.

Thanks for giving us 4 more years of Labor.

She’s claiming they have commenced discussions with the NCA. What? Whether she likes it or not, she is still just the Opposition Leader, who has no authority to act on behalf of the citizens of the ACT. Also, is it appropriate for a federal agency to be in discussions/negotiations with an opposition party? Is someone in the NCA assuming the election results?

Gregg Heldon8:57 am 11 Sep 24

It may have been as simple as a question.
“We are thinking of building this here. Is it something you would look at?”
Personally, I don’t think that that is wrong to do. But not everyone will agree.

So Megsy, we have one rusted on Labor supporter saying she has no right to be commencing discussions and then another rusted on Labor supporter (Seano above) saying they are brushing off planning questions so they can’t be a serious alternative government. It doesn’t matter which way the Liberals go, the rusted ons will slam them every which way. They can’t be any worse than the Chris Steel muppet in the Labor party. Failed HR system anyone?

Asking the NCA if it would consider such a thing is called due diligence, megsy. I know this is a foreign concept to Labor and their supporters.

“Our lack of planning approval for my train set is just fine, but when the Libs do it, it’s bad!”
-Andrew Barr

LOL
The irony is off the charts.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.