Advertisement

Five new Official Visitors!

By 10 January 2014 23

Simon Corbell has announced not one but five official visitors for the ACT have been appointed:

“Official visitors work to protect the most vulnerable members of our community, across diverse environments,” Mr Corbell said.

“They perform an invaluable service to our community, as communicators and problem solvers, observers and reporters.

“They are the eyes and ears of Ministers and provide statutorily independent oversight on a range of services. ”

Dr Judy Putt has been appointed as an official visitor for the Corrections Management Act 2007.

Ms Tracey Whetnall has been appointed as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander official visitor for the Children and Young People Act 2008 and also remains the official visitor for the ACT’s adult correctional facilities.

Ms Dianne Lucas is appointed as an official visitor for the Housing Assistance Act 2007.

Ms Sue Salthouse and Ms Narelle Hargreaves have been appointed as official visitors for the Disability Services Act 1991.

“These appointments have the strong support of Ministers Burch and Rattenbury, the Ministers responsible under the Official Visitor Act 2012 for the operational areas covered by the visitors,” Mr Corbell said.

“The appointments have also been endorsed by the Office for Women.

UPDATE: Shane Rattenbury has also announced the visitors.

Please login to post your comments
23 Responses to
Five new Official Visitors!
IrishPete 9:38 am
11 Jan 14
#1

Good to see.

Judy has lots of relevant experience.

I wondered why Ivan wasn’t completing his contract, but I see he is moving onto SAB which explains it.

Tracey does a great job.

I don’t know the other three and they are outside my area, but Ms Hargreaves’ name is strangely familiar.

IP

gooterz 11:01 am
11 Jan 14
#2

Glad to see men are represented once again

Antagonist 4:05 pm
11 Jan 14
#3

gooterz said :

Glad to see men are represented once again

I was thinking it …

gooterz 9:31 pm
11 Jan 14
#4

Antagonist said :

gooterz said :

Glad to see men are represented once again

I was thinking it …

Same old story for act government. 66% of its service is female.

These five women approved by a minister for women but not by a minister for men.

“vulnerable members of our community”, i thought they went into prisons aka those of whom needed to be separated from the rest of us for preying on the most vulnerable.

I’m sure this just translates into female prisoners though.

joingler 11:22 pm
11 Jan 14
#5

Can anyone explain in laymans terms what these ‘official visitors’ are for. Do they oversee any inquests into their related fields or is it something else?

As for them all being women, I am 22 year old male and I couldn’t care less. I wouldn’t be whinging if all 5 were male so I won’t whinge about them all being female either. I have faith that the right processes were gone through and the best candidates got the job.

That being said, I do find it peculiar that we have a minister for women but not a minister for men. Very peculiar…….

gooterz 12:39 am
12 Jan 14
#6

The 12 person ministerial advisory council for women is also only women.

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/women/ministerial_advisory_council_on_women

gooterz 12:50 am
12 Jan 14
#7

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/hcs/policies/domestic_violence_policy#definition

Does it worry anyone else that domestic violence by the act definition is only against women.

“Domestic violence is an abuse of power perpetrated mainly (but not only) by men against women in a relationship or after separation.” Domestic violence is about far more than physical violence. It is about systematic, patterned and repeated abuse of power and control.”

Men are never the victims. They are only second class

gazket 5:25 am
12 Jan 14
#8

joingler said :

Can anyone explain in laymans terms what these ‘official visitors’ are for. Do they oversee any inquests into their related fields or is it something else?

As for them all being women, I am 22 year old male and I couldn’t care less. I wouldn’t be whinging if all 5 were male so I won’t whinge about them all being female either. I have faith that the right processes were gone through and the best candidates got the job.

That being said, I do find it peculiar that we have a minister for women but not a minister for men. Very peculiar…….

From rattenburgers statement they seem to do his prison portfolio for him but give them a non descript title visitor. Seems to be only for aboriginals. I’d like to see how much tax the aboriginals put towards these money sucking programs

Woody Mann-Caruso 9:34 am
12 Jan 14
#9

There there, gooterz.

/spits on hanky, wipes away sook-snot

Antagonist 9:37 am
12 Jan 14
#10

joingler said :

As for them all being women, I am 22 year old male and I couldn’t care less. … I have faith that the right processes were gone through and the best candidates got the job.

Pwaaaaaahahahaha !!! Your 22 year old naivety is hilarious :) On a more serious note, it concerns me that no men were considered suitable for the role. Gender *balance* is the key word here. 5 out of 5 positions for women does not appear balanced at all.

gooterz said :

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/hcs/policies/domestic_violence_policy#definition

Does it worry anyone else that domestic violence by the act definition is only against women.

It does indeed bother me. Domestic violence is gender neutral. Perpetrators of domestic violence can be young, old, male, female and so on. This is the issue I have with White Ribbon Day which also focusses solely on domestic violence against women, rather than domestic violence as a whole.

poetix 10:05 am
12 Jan 14
#11

gooterz said :

The 12 person ministerial advisory council for women is also only women.

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/women/ministerial_advisory_council_on_women

I’m sure they’d welcome you onto the Council, with your insight and all.

IrishPete 11:00 am
12 Jan 14
#12

gazket said :

From rattenburgers statement they seem to do his prison portfolio for him but give them a non descript title visitor. Seems to be only for aboriginals. I’d like to see how much tax the aboriginals put towards these money sucking programs

Well, the land the prison is built on was stolen from them in 1788, or not long after. I think that’s contribution enough.

The official visitors are not just for indigenous people. There’s one for everyone and one for indigenous. You have misunderstood the media release.

IP

gooterz 12:07 pm
12 Jan 14
#13

IrishPete said :

gazket said :

From rattenburgers statement they seem to do his prison portfolio for him but give them a non descript title visitor. Seems to be only for aboriginals. I’d like to see how much tax the aboriginals put towards these money sucking programs

Well, the land the prison is built on was stolen from them in 1788, or not long after. I think that’s contribution enough.

The official visitors are not just for indigenous people. There’s one for everyone and one for indigenous. You have misunderstood the media release.

IP

So the council of ladies is all women to represent only women. One of the visitors needs to be aboriginal to represent aboriginals. Yet most of the population is men but they can be represented by five women.

This coming after we did a study on the prision but could only afford to study the women in prison.

gooterz 12:09 pm
12 Jan 14
#14

poetix said :

gooterz said :

The 12 person ministerial advisory council for women is also only women.

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/women/ministerial_advisory_council_on_women

I’m sure they’d welcome you onto the Council, with your insight and all.

i’m sure if i started a council of men that women would violently be against it.

Pork Hunt 3:00 pm
12 Jan 14
#15

gooterz said :

poetix said :

gooterz said :

The 12 person ministerial advisory council for women is also only women.

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/women/ministerial_advisory_council_on_women

I’m sure they’d welcome you onto the Council, with your insight and all.

i’m sure if i started a council of men that women would violently be against it.

Can I watch?

gazket 3:44 pm
12 Jan 14
#16

IrishPete said :

gazket said :

From rattenburgers statement they seem to do his prison portfolio for him but give them a non descript title visitor. Seems to be only for aboriginals. I’d like to see how much tax the aboriginals put towards these money sucking programs

Well, the land the prison is built on was stolen from them in 1788, or not long after. I think that’s contribution enough.

The official visitors are not just for indigenous people. There’s one for everyone and one for indigenous. You have misunderstood the media release.

IP

we stole the land did we. How can Aboriginals move forward when people like your type keep dragging them down to keep some kind of political fascism alive.

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 4:08 pm
12 Jan 14
#17

Check your privilege, idiots.

sepi 4:36 pm
12 Jan 14
#18

gooterz said :

poetix said :

gooterz said :

The 12 person ministerial advisory council for women is also only women.

http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/women/ministerial_advisory_council_on_women

I’m sure they’d welcome you onto the Council, with your insight and all.

i’m sure if i started a council of men that women would violently be against it.

There is already a council of men – Tony Abbot’s government.
What more do you want?

Pork Hunt 5:30 pm
12 Jan 14
#19

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd said :

Check your privilege, idiots.

What does that even mean? Please explain.

IrishPete 5:31 pm
12 Jan 14
#20

gazket said :

we stole the land did we. How can Aboriginals move forward when people like your type keep dragging them down to keep some kind of political fascism alive.

Love that idea. Take their land. Wipe them out deliberately as well as accidentally through disease. Take their children. Confine them all to grim “missions”. Finally start counting them in the Census, conveniently too late to measure the effect of the genocide. Then a generation or two later tell them to get over it. Genius.

Here’s how indigenous people might get ahead – pay rent on the land taken from them (currently a lot that rent goes to the governments, e.g. pastoral leases, mining). (Giving the land back simply isn’t practical any more, when that means cities and towns.) Put that money in a big trust fund to pay the “welfare” that so many white Australians resent paying, and to also invest in activities which can create proper jobs. So much of the investment that does happen at the moment seems to go astray http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/land-council-ups-pressure-for-uluru-resort-inquiry/story-fn9hm1pm-1226786201054 and the biggest beneficiaries from Native Title claims seem to be the legal profession.

Rudd’s apology may be the positive thing he will be most remembered for, but it was a first step, not an end point, and we haven’t taken any more steps.

IP

chewy14 6:47 pm
12 Jan 14
#21

Who cares if they’re all women as long as they can do the job?

I’m as likely to care about gooterz point as I am about feminist whinging relating to Abbotts ministry.

sepi 10:16 pm
12 Jan 14
#22

chewy14 said :

Who cares if they’re all women as long as they can do the job?

I’m as likely to care about gooterz point as I am about feminist whinging relating to Abbotts ministry.

I think you mean:
I’m as likely to care about gooterz whinging as I am about the feminist point relating to Abbott’s ministry.

chewy14 10:51 pm
12 Jan 14
#23

sepi said :

chewy14 said :

Who cares if they’re all women as long as they can do the job?

I’m as likely to care about gooterz point as I am about feminist whinging relating to Abbotts ministry.

I think you mean:
I’m as likely to care about gooterz whinging as I am about the feminist point relating to Abbott’s ministry.

Nope, I didn’t mean that, they’re the same type of whinging.

I think it would be worse if Abbott promoted women just to fit into some sort of appeasement quota when those women should be forced to connive, backstab, kiss ass and all around lie for years to get ahead just like the male politicians do.

Anyone that thinks that politics is a meritocracy is either very naïve or stupid.

Follow
Follow The RiotACT
Get Premium Membership
Advertisement
The-RiotACT.com Newsletter Sign Up

Images of Canberra

Advertisement
Sponsors
RiotACT Proudly Supports
Advertisement
Copyright © 2014 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.