20 February 2009

Bike lanes for motorcycles?

| goose
Join the conversation
42

Motorcycle riders using bicycle lanes

I would love to hear everyones opinion on motorcycle riders using bicycle lanes to get past traffic jams.

I myself don’t like it it, but I guess if I was stuck in traffic on a motorcycle sucking in car fumes I would do it as well.

Join the conversation

42
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Innovation said :

Motorcycles (without sidecars) should be allowed in on road bicycle lanes and verges if they are speedlimited to 40km/h..

i agree, but i think 20-30km hr would be a better “limit”. That way they’re really only used as an alternative to lane splitting.

Motorcycles (without sidecars) should be allowed in on road bicycle lanes and verges if they are speedlimited to 40km/h.

This would reduce congestion in places like Northbourne Avenue. It would lessen the temptation for bikes to illegally lane split (and potentially scratch cars as they go past). The slower speed limit would help to stop motorbikes monstering cyclists (some of whom can do well over 40km/h) or create dangerous situations by going too fast past slower moving cars. It would also allow me to take my teenage daughter to school (slowly) on a motorbike and have her better protected than if she was riding a bicycle on the road.

Motorbike rider6:18 pm 05 Nov 10

I go down the bicycle lane every single day on my motorbike. I would stop doing it if I had a good reason to, but I’ve not read any or heard any from anyone.

The main reason I could think of would of course, be safety. We have had many posts here assert it is somehow more dangerous. But a motorbike in the bicycle lane does not necessitate dangerous use any more than a car in a car lane necessitates dangerous use. Firstly, like changing any lane, I check my mirror and blindspot – thus entry into the bike line is just as dangerous as changing lanes. Secondly, I respect that bicycles travel slower and people expect slower speeds from vehicles in that lane – thus I limit my speed to a respectable 35kph in the bicycle lane. Finally, I recognise I’m a little bigger than a bike, so I never overtake anyone in a bicycle lane – even if they’re doing 10 kph. Given this use, I see no way in which me being in the bike lane is more dangerous than any other bicycle being there. Indeed it is not uncommon to see bicycles going down the lane at 50 kph plus and overtaking other bikes – which is clearly more dangerous than my behaviour.

What other reasons are there? I love the one that its a ‘bicycle lane’ so only ‘bicycles’ should be there. Its brilliant reasoning, truly reflective of the minds that use it. I suppose for the same reason it is unethical to use the internet through your ‘telephone line’ or play with a ‘beach ball’ in your back yard. Clearly backwards reasoning that cannot be taken seriously.

The final reason is that it could be law. I actually have no idea if it is legal or not. But I believe the law should make sense, and if this is against the law, I would like to know the reasons the law has come up with, because I have failed to come up with any of my own.

I understand people could use the lane in a dangerous way, but people can do anything on the road in a dangerous way. Legislation should be in place to address the dangerous behaviour and not the safe behaviour. I’d fully support a speed limit on the bike lane (applied to all bikes and motorbikes alike), but, if done in a safe manner like all other road use, I don’t see what is wrong with a motorbike using the lane.

For the record it saves me about 30 to 40 minutes a day and is the primary reason I ride a motorbike. I also get yelled at about once or twice a week, and sometimes people throw things at me. My main safety concern is actually some jerk getting out of his car and trying to thump me through pure jealousy, not me having an accident.

Piratemonkey said :

Hold on bd84… You saying bikes in strange places on the road deserve to be hit? So i guess the same goes for children running out on the road at strange times eh?

“It happened quickly its not my fault the kid is dead”
I hear fu*kwits saying.

It works in real life, the driver that hit the rugrat who ran out of the car onto the road in Fyshwick a few years ago wasn’t charged with anything, the same for drunk adults doing stupid things on the road. There’s a limit to how fast you can react to someting happening just ahead or beside you, that’s why I’m careful about passing cyclists, in case they fell over towards my car.

The whole point of cycle lanes is to get slower, lightweight vehicles with no protection out of the way of heavier high speed vehicles. Consider the weight and speed differentials between your average cyclist and motorcyclist, and its obvious that allowing motorcycles into cycle lanes defeats the whole purpose of having cycle lanes in the first place.

Add this to the aggression of motoryclists who illegally use them and you have a recipe for disaster. I have on several occasions had the experience of cycling along the Northbourne Avenue cycle lane with a motorcyclist right on by back wheel, screaming and swearing at me to get out of the way. My policy in such a situation is to stop my bicycle, put it at right angles across the bike lane, completely blocking their path, and ensure they pay with thier time (unable to go forward or to the right into the queued traffic)for their dangerous conduct. I have been threatened with assault on a number of occasions doing this, but being prepared to defend myself with my steel U-lock has deterred any further aggression.

Ultimately, allowing motorcycles into cycle lanes is a political decision. If it were ever to be seriously considered, then for the minority of motorcyclists supporting this move, they want to put people at risk of death or serious injury purely for the convenience of gaining a few seconds. For cyclists, this would be a life and death, die in the ditch issue. They would change thier votes over this one thing in an election.

It’s simple- If you want to ride in a cycle lane then get a bicycle!

It’s often safer for us to “go pedestrian” at traffic lights…
Funnily enough, it’s often safer for a motorcyclist to filter or get through traffic than sit there. Been tapped on the back a few times (one time by a car doing 50. That hurt). Never had a problem filtering :).

Aeek said :

Cycling on Barry Drive, I stay out of the Bus Lane heading into to Civic; but the micro lane heading out? As soon as I enter the intersection I should be heading left, across anyone legally using the bus lane. Legal not = safe.

I always veer off into the side streets on Barry Drive just before the Bus Lane starts when headed into Civic because I think that section is too dangerous in traffic – the buses only just fit as it is and I woulnd’t be comfortable with a bus on my left and cars on my right.

Belconnen bound I sometimes go straight up Barry drive because it is much quicker (only in off peak) and I agree with you that it’s far too dangerous not to use the bus lane at the traffic lights just before going up the hill.

And I could say the same. You want bike lanes? Then stick to them and don’t become a pedestrian as soon as the lights are red. Oh, and stay out of the way of cars when a bike lane is available.

It’s often safer for us to “go pedestrian” at traffic lights, particularly when turning right. Not to mention the fact that we often don’t trigger sensor controlled traffic lights
Also, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a cyclist push their luck with traffic when going through a red in pedestrian mode or otherwise – do you have a legitimate safety complaint, or just complaining because it’s illegal?

It certainly wasn’t pleasant breathing in his exhaust which was direct straight at me, unlike cars or trucks

Yeah, like that 30 cm difference between the car lane and the bike lane made a difference…

Actually, yeah – it does.

The only exhaust I usually notice though is from buses when I stop behind them when they are setting down passengers and I don’t think I can make it around before they pull out again – such a thick blanket of warm smelly fumes

I should add that I don’t use the bike paths on my motorcycle.

Don’t like my driving? Then stay off the footpath!

Piratemonkey2:13 am 21 Feb 09

Hold on bd84… You saying bikes in strange places on the road deserve to be hit? So i guess the same goes for children running out on the road at strange times eh?

“It happened quickly its not my fault the kid is dead”
I hear fu*kwits saying.

Its people who have views like that who never watch whats going on on the road who are the real problem.

If everyone would wake the hell up on the roads and constantly look out for the unexpected, our roads would be much safer. Then those on bikes can lane split with confidence and safety all the while reducing congestion on our roads. For the record i dont ride a motorcycle.

Cycling on Barry Drive, I stay out of the Bus Lane heading into to Civic; but the micro lane heading out? As soon as I enter the intersection I should be heading left, across anyone legally using the bus lane. Legal not = safe.

Thumper, absolutely, that’s what bicycle lanes are for – to get cyclists out of the way of cars. Yet the Motorists Party wanted to get rid of them!

On east Belconnen way onto Barry drive, car doors aren’t a threat (excluding criminal dickheads). I’ve been gaining fast on a moto there wondering what to do if (s)he didn’t merge back. Didn’t come to that.

It’s illegal plain and simple. As is lane filtering, both in moving traffic and instationary traffic at traffic lights and in traffic jams.

The rule are there for everyone, and i’m sure 99.9% have broken a law at some point, but some people clearly have a death wish while driving or riding. Motorcyclists riding a machine with the least protection keep putting up campaigns like “watch out for motorcyclist”. Guess what? when you’re filtering lanes or riding in bike lanes or the emergency, most drivers will not see you until the last minute. No sympathy for hearing about any rider being knocked off in that way.

Makes the cab quicker to pick up the next person though… so what’s the problem? They’re legally allowed to use it.

I ride a motorbike, and I generally avoid using bike lanes, but I won’t say I don’t. Like any kind of filtering, it’s done at low speeds with two fingers already on the front brake, and scanning the traffic and ahead for something coming up – and behind for any cyclists that are going along at least as fast as I am.

Never really seen that though – why would it be safe for a cyclist to be going faster than a motorbike in the bike lane… I guess if you enjoy gravel rash and picking burnt lycra out of your legs when you come off – the same risks of cars opening their doors and generally being tards applies to cyclists as motorbikes.

My ire is raised, and jealousy rages, when empty (except driver) cabs use the bus lanes and ‘B’ lights at the various intersections around town. When occupied, fair enough, but a red rag to a bull otherwise.

I mostly stay in the lane, only occasionally do I slip around beside cars (with or without bike path). And I only do that if I am turning the corner, not simply to get to the front. And only if the traffic is stopped.

I occasionally break other road rules too, but am happy with the decisions I make. What $hits me on the road is not people deciding to break the rules in some small way, but unthinkingly doing retarded things that don’t benefit anyone.

I actually caught up to one riding along Northbourne when I had to run an errand at Dickson before heading to work, otherwise I normally avoid Northbourne like the flu.

It was interesting, I yelled out (as politely as one can) if he wouldn’t mind going back to his legal lane so that I could pass. He apologised, moved over… but then continued to use the bike lane. It certainly wasn’t pleasant breathing in his exhaust which was direct straight at me, unlike cars or trucks. The noise, well I’m not fussed when commuting, but I imagine many people who just ride to commute may get startled- not good.

They’re currently conducting a trial in London of sharing the many bus lanes (in which bicycles are allowed to use). Although they are restricted by speed. I think a trial in the ACT may be worth looking into. However the problem that I see here in Canberra is that most bicycle commuters aren’t experienced enough in city traffic (because well, we don’t really have a lot) and might be startled and have an accident; the boons that ride their bikes pretending they’re a MotoGP rider are an issue; I guess most simply- bike lanes aren’t just wide enough to allow a bicycle pass another but a moto is much wider.

One must remember that every motorbike that moves into a bike lane creates a space for a car, thereby lessening congestion.

I can understand motorbike riders being annoyed by bicycle lanes. At lights, lanes are now so close together that it isn’t easy to pass between vehicles. I find the narrow lanes more difficult and more stressful to drive within. A three lane road was that wide to allow 3 vehicles to navigate it safely. There are bike lanes in Canberra that I haven’t seen as single rider in 6 months. And you get groups of riders, 2 or three abreast, in places where there are no lane, slowing traffic to a crawl. They don’t stick their fingers up at you, just their arses. And I suppose we have to take it cause their saving the planet.

The Brad said :

I wonder what they do if they come up to a cyclist? Do they go around, go back into traffic, or tailgate the cyclist until it’s safe to pass. I hope they go back into traffic.

I’ve had motorbikes share the cycle lane with me on Barry Drive a couple of times and I’ve had them trail behind me and also overtake me – I’m not a fan of the overtaking as it’s unexpected.

Jealous anyone?

yebbut, thumper, a cyclist is already a car fewer on the road – if you wanna ride a m/bike, stick to your lanes…

i got a great look from a tosser in an open top boxter parked mostly across the bike lane on nthbourne as he waited in stationary traffic 100m or so from where he was indicating he wanted to turn left (at least he was indicating – i supppose that’s something) and as i inched by between him and the gutter in my cycle lane, i looked at him and asked, “you’re parked in my lane, why?”

he looked aghast, then sheepishly away.

Motorcycles are allowed in any bus lane at all, and they are also allowed to proceed on a ‘B’ light – no restrictions.

http://www.tams.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/14054/buslanesad.pdf

And from the MRA ACT website: “ACT Motorcyclists permitted to use ‘bus only’ lanes”

“Unfortunately, there still seems to be a lot of confusion, and aggravation, about motorcycles using Bus Lanes, even though signage and road markings are clear.”
http://mraact.org.au/?page_id=103

@#10 – unless it’s a T2 lane, then motorcycles are allowed, along with buses, taxi’s and cars with more than two occupants.

The quality I value the most in all road users is predictability. Many accidents happen when somebody does something unpredictable.

…like undertaking me where there is no traffic lane, appearing suddenly from out of my blind spot and expecting to instantly rejoin the flow of traffic.

Two things I don’t want inscribed on my tombstone:
1. “Rest In Peas.” (um, actually that’s kinda “me”!)
2. “He died trying to save 2.1 seconds on the way to work.”

In my hometown (not Canberra) I once cycled past an accident on the side of the road. A small delivery van was sort of crumpled in on itself. It was only later that I found out there was a motorbike (and it’s rider) stuck in there. You couldn’t see him, or his bike.

He’d been zooming down the side of the road, avoiding the stationary cars, when the van (coming in the opposite direction) had turned across the lane (the cars had kindly left room for the van to turn across the traffic into the side road).

Musta been doing quite a clip eh?

Verisimilitude, it seems reasonably unlikely to me that a motorbike would hit a cyclist from behind in a cycling lane, given that the speed of the average cyclist is roughly 8x higher than that of the average motorbike in the same position! 🙂

jube_V8Fairlane_235kw1:27 pm 20 Feb 09

Why thankyou WMC, but living in Canberra may be a pre-requisite…

Verisimilitude1:21 pm 20 Feb 09

As a cyclist who uses road bicycle lanes, I sometimes wonder what it would be like to be hit from behind by a traffic-dodging motorbike. Probably a bit better than being hit by a traffic-dodging Pajero, I guess.

Holden Caulfield1:20 pm 20 Feb 09

Well, driving home the other day I saw a cyclist on the city bound side of Commonwealth Ave riding towards Parliament House, against the oncoming flow of traffic. So, on that basis, a motorcyclist in a bike lane is quite fair and reasonable, haha.

Woody Mann-Caruso1:05 pm 20 Feb 09

jube for Chief Minister.

tylersmayhem1:02 pm 20 Feb 09

I’m a cyclist and I’m with The Brad on post #2 with this one.

jube_V8Fairlane_235kw12:34 pm 20 Feb 09

I am a full time motorcyclist (in Canberra I was part-time as the drivers are too reckless – in rural Bundy though, no problem!), and my attitude is simple – I am a road user, and those rules apply to me as well. I get frustrated at ALL road users (cyclists, motorcyclists and cage) that flaunt these – what gives you the right? I know it is an impossibility, but the simple fact remains that if we all obeyed the road rules, it would be a much more pleasant commute each day!

The exceptions for motorcycles being allowed to use bus lanes are bus interchanges (and only bus interchanges, afaik).

I think motorbikes should specifically be allowed to filter through stationary traffic and I would allow the use of bike lanes for that purpose, as long as due care is taken to not crash into cyclists.

It is completely illegal to do so right now though so I don’t do it.

aidan said :

Are motorbikes allowed in bus lanes?

Yes, as are taxis.

I’m sure there is an exception to this somewhere in Canberra though.

Are motorbikes allowed in bus lanes?

captainwhorebags said :

Is it okay for smart cars to use bike lanes? Minis? They’d fit too.

Bike lanes are for bicycles. Not motorcyclists who think waiting in traffic is for “cage drivers”.

I’ll concede that most opposition to lane splitting between stopped cars is just jealousy but I think there’s a real safety issue with motorbikes in bike lanes.

Your argument is fundamentally weakened by your analogy. A smart car is much wider than a motorcycle. You don’t need to make this leap of logic to make your point (which I agree with as a motorcycle rider).

I think there’s a real safety issue with lane splitting. I see that a lot, even in fast moving traffic, and I think they’re lunatics.

And as a general statement which is probably not clear from my last post, Captain, I agree that motorbikes don’t belong in bicycle lanes. I’m picturing Northbourne in peak hour here, and I think it would definitely be a safety issue.

captainwhorebags10:46 am 20 Feb 09

Is it okay for smart cars to use bike lanes? Minis? They’d fit too.

Bike lanes are for bicycles. Not motorcyclists who think waiting in traffic is for “cage drivers”.

I’ll concede that most opposition to lane splitting between stopped cars is just jealousy but I think there’s a real safety issue with motorbikes in bike lanes.

I haven’t seen this, but I probably live on the wrong side of town where there is a paucity of bike lanes. However, along Canberra Avenue between Harman and Fyshwick, you see it a fair bit in the morning peak hour. Difference is that they’re riding on the verge rather than in a marked bike lane. I ride a motorbike, and I’ve given in to the temptation to do it sometimes. I’d move back into traffic if a bicycle was in the area.

I got pulled over by two Mr Plods one morning, motorbike coppers. There was roadworks on the Monaro and traffic was very slow, with no lane markings. I slipped over to the left and was making reasonable but cautious progress when they pulled me in. They were good humoured. We shot the breeze on how car drivers don’t like bike riders much, and especially when we’re overtaking them in jams. So he waggled his finger at me for a while until he deemed enough drivers had seen me being chastised, then stopped the traffic and let me back in. He did say that the one bike that had tried to scoot away from them had been booked, but the rest had the finger waggling. Technically, he probably couldn’t book me because there were no line markings, but for me, it was good PR exercise by the police. And I’m almost reformed…

I don’t have a huge problem with them doing it. Sure, it’s illegal and cheeky. I’m jealous, and frustrated at the traffic, but not annoyed at the motorcyclists.

But if I ever heard of a cyclist getting injured as a result of one, I’ll be furious.

I wonder what they do if they come up to a cyclist? Do they go around, go back into traffic, or tailgate the cyclist until it’s safe to pass. I hope they go back into traffic.

the bike lanes are there for bicycles, it is as simple as that.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.