21 August 2024

ANU's pro-Palestine protestors decamp over electricity supply issues

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
13

The ANU Gaza Solidarity Encampment set up camp in April 2024. Photo: Supplied.

The pro-Palestinian encampment at the Australian National University (ANU) was the longest-running protest of its type in Australia, but after 110 days, they decided to pack up the tents and marquees on Monday (19 August).

In a statement, ‘ANU for Palestine’ said the group had enjoyed success, but a dispute with the university over electricity supply to the site has made continuing the protest “completely untenable”.

“Despite claiming to support our right to protest, the ANU has called the police on us, censored us and lied about us,” the students said in a statement.

“They are now putting our basic safety at risk by telling us we are now not allowed to turn on a single light at night time. This decision is completely arbitrary and has made it completely untenable for our protest movement to continue in the form of an encampment.”

READ MORE ANU’s decision to stop controversial weapons investment slammed as ‘PR manoeuvre’

The ANU said power to the site was switched off last month after the students did not allow staff to inspect the site for safety hazards, but denied issuing any direction about not using light at night.

The students set up camp on the university grounds in early April, initially in the Kambri area, before they were ordered to move further down University Avenue on account of blocking off a fire evacuation area.

The frequent rallies have called for the ANU to divest from its ties to companies with connections to the military equipment.

Freedom of information documents requested by the students reportedly showed that the ANU had held investments in Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, Boeing and Saab – valued at more than $1 million.

Gaza encampment at ANU

The group held regular rallies, calling for the ANU to divest from companies with military connections. Photo: Supplied.

After a decision earlier this year to update the university’s investment policy, the ANU Council announced last week it would change its long-term investment policies and would “not invest in controversial weapons manufacturers and civilian small arms manufacturers”.

The “controversial weapons” include anti-personnel mines, cluster munitions, chemical weapons, biological weapons and nuclear weapons outside of the NPT (the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons).

“Production of these controversial weapons is an automatic exclusion,” the council said in a statement.

“This is a principles-based decision. The university has decided it will not invest in companies that derive revenue from those activities.”

But it seems not all protesters agreed this was enough.

“It will have a marginal impact on their investments and no impact whatsoever on their research partnerships,” Nick Reich from Students for Palestine told Region.

“It’s fairly clear that a lot of the weapons companies we’ve been campaigning against will not be included in this announcement.

“Ultimately, it seems like they are just doing a PR manoeuvre.”

READ ALSO Woman accused of walking towards plane at Canberra Airport tries to dismiss charges

Associate Professor of Public Policy at ANU’s Crawford School, Elise Klein, was “one of a small number of academic staff” approached by the encampment early on to act as intermediaries and praised the protesters.

“Whilst the movement is far but over and there is more to come, it is important to pause and state that there is no doubt that the ANU encampment has led to changes,” she posted to Twitter/X.

“Over the past two months, this small intermediary team has met on three occasions with the Vice Chancellor to mediate around the encampment demands.

“I want to say that I have been disgusted by how the university has treated our students. Cutting power and letting our students shiver through Canberra winter? All this instead of simply working with the students to divest in genocide.”

Elise Klein

ANU Associate Professor Elise Klein has come out in support of the protesters. Photo: ANU.

The ANU welcomed the protesters’ decision to decamp.

“The decision to disband the encampment on the university’s Acton campus was entirely voluntary and made by those involved in the protest,” a statement read.

“The safety of our community and our campus has been our priority throughout this process. The encampment raised several issues relating to safety and respectful conduct.

“For this reason, the decision to remove the encampment is the right one for the university community as a whole.”

The ANU Jewish Students Society and the Australian Jewish Association have both raised concerns about certain alleged actions by protesters over the past few months, including a Nazi salute and death threats aimed at Jewish students.

Two students were expelled for what vice-chancellor Genevieve Bell described as “significant violations of the code of conduct”.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
GrumpyGrandpa9:50 pm 21 Aug 24

Seriously, the protesters ended their protest because their electricity was cut-off. 😂.

wildturkeycanoe4:25 pm 21 Aug 24

Why did they have electricity in the first place? If they want to camp in tents then stay in them for the duration, not just in rotating shifts. How the university put up with this for so long is an embarrassment. The cause is just but the protest itself is just highlighting how this generation thinks they have the right to do whatever they want if they believe in it enough.

Julie Lindner4:08 pm 21 Aug 24

I applaud the students for standing in support of the Palestinian people. Whereas the cowardly politicians are nowhere to be seen. Shame on them.

Cowardly Hamas with AK47s killing 1200 Israelis attending a music festival

Max_Rockatansky12:42 pm 21 Aug 24

“I think that people need to have a conversation with their kids and their grandkids, with their next-door neighbours, just about how evil the current Greens party is, that they’re nothing about the environment, they’re all about radical causes, and somehow Adam Bandt, who I think is unfit to be in public office, he has led a party now that is central to what we’re seeing on campuses, and the distribution of hate and antisemitic messages online, the chanting of ‘river to the sea’ and ‘intifada’ etc, and people, as we’ve talked about before, in the Jewish community, are living in fear, and when people say that this is a repeat of the 1930s, every decent honourable Australian should stand up to make sure that it’s not.” Peter Dutton, The Ray Hadley Morning Show, 2GB, 6 June 2024.

Peter Dutton, zionist puppet.

Unhinged. Imagine having nothing better to say than to quote Dutton.

Queenie-Lou Hilario3:23 pm 21 Aug 24

Australian politician Sir Thomas Walter White spoke against opening the borders for Jewish refugees fleeing persecution from Nazi Germany, declaring, “as we have no real racial problem, we are not desirous of importing one by encouraging any scheme of large-scale foreign migration”.

Sound familiar?

I support the Greens.

I suppose I ought to get a straightening out by my 77 year old Mum (I’m 55).

Oh, hang on, that won’t work, she supports them too.

(I am NOT an anti-Semite. I am, however, anti war crimes).

@Max_Rockatansky
Nice demo of your cut ‘n’ paste skills.

This is the third time you have posted exactly the same Dutton speech from Hadley’s show. It doesn’t get any worthier of reading each time you post it.

Max, thinking the Greens can only be about the environment because it seems to be implied by their name is like thinking the Liberals can only be about economic liberalism or liberal democracy, or the Nationals can never be about local government.

Again, it’s hard to imagine how the Greens are “central” to questioning Israeli policies when the International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel’s policies are illegal.

And it’s hard to image, isn’t it, that any fear Jews here may have is anywhere near the fear, let alone the intolerable suffering, of Palestinians who have lost 40,000 of their fathers, mothers, husbands, wives, children and babies because a few Zionists are still following their god’s commandment to”kill everything that breathes” in the country they are colonising.

Roy, the Old Testament violence was enacted only against societies that were purely evil, that were sacrificing their children to stone idols, for instance, and other intolerable things. Any normal person should have an immense repulsion to such behaviour, which unfortunately excludes the freaks on the Left, whose sickly souls are only attracted to rubbish, hence the communists, for example, holding the world record for murder, annihilating tens of millions of people who were (relatively) like angels.

In terms of modern day Israel thinking it’s in continuity with the Israel of old, it is of course dreaming, but the condemnation must be smarter than yours, and not just something picked up from, say, a Hitchens or a Dawkins, in the mistaken belief that it’s more brilliant than a Women’s Weekly editorial.

John Koundouzis6:48 pm 22 Aug 24

So HAMAS is innocent. It’s those bad israelis

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.