27 August 2024

PM says productivity will be boosted by right-to-disconnect laws. Canberra businesses ask, how?

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
28
Hon Anthony Albanese MP, Prime Minister of Australia

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says right-to-disconnect laws will improve productivity. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says productivity in the workplace is likely to go up now that right-to-disconnect laws have kicked in, but Canberra businesses don’t see how that will be the case.

Canberra Business Chamber chief executive Greg Harford believes most employers in the ACT are already doing the right thing by their employees.

He doesn’t expect the new laws will have a great impact on local businesses, and he can’t see how they could be a vehicle for boosting productivity.

“The reality is good employers are already treating their employees well and they are not needlessly bothering them,” Mr Harford said.

“Compliance is the bigger issue and whether this has the potential to create a litigious environment, which isn’t helpful.”

From today (26 August), workers at businesses with 15 or more employees have the right to disconnect once they knock off.

That means they are now protected by law for refusing contact outside their working hours unless that refusal is unreasonable.

Employees can refuse to monitor, read or respond to contact from an employer or a third party.

Owners of smaller businesses and their employees have another year before the changes apply to them.

While the Coalition has criticised the move saying it will put a dent in productivity, the Prime Minister reckons the new laws will see improved workplace performance.

“You know what it’ll do? It’ll boost productivity,” Mr Albanese told ABC radio.

“Because when people are actually loyal to their employer and focused on what they should be doing and not being distracted during 24 hours a day – but focused on eight hours a day, or if they’re working longer hours than that, longer – you’ll get a more productive workforce.

“The idea that you should be on call at 10 o’clock at night if you work a 9 am to 5 pm job isn’t reasonable, and [the new laws] will lead to better relations in the workplace.

“It will mean that employers and employees have to have a common sense conversation about what’s reasonable and what’s not reasonable, and that will lead to better workplace relations.”

READ ALSO Shorten urges public to have confidence in NDIS changes

The Opposition has taken to the media to decry the introduction of the new rules. Shadow finance minister Jane Hume said they are unfair on employers.

She also questioned whether the term “unreasonable” could be agreed on between bosses and employees.

“It isn’t going to spark a conversation. It’s actually wrapping employers up in additional red tape and making some jobs completely unworkable,” she said.

“Adding more rights for workers for something that is just part of a normal working relationship is unreasonable, particularly for small businesses here, who just need to go and get the job done.”

The Business Council of Australia also questioned the impact the changes will have on productivity.

Chief executive officer Bran Black suggested the new laws could even adversely affect the nation’s commercial competitiveness.

“These laws put Australia’s competitiveness at risk by adding more cost and complexity to the challenge of doing business, and that means less investment and fewer job opportunities,” Mr Black said.

“At a time when productivity has flatlined and insolvencies are increasing, we can’t risk making it harder to do business with added red tape.

“Combined with the recent intractable bargaining and same job, same pay changes, we’ve now risked creating an environment in which it’s harder to employ people.

“I hear constantly from businesses large and small that the burden of increased workplace red tape is harder and harder to bear.

“We want to see more workplace arrangements set at the enterprise level to drive productivity and lift participation, and less heavy-handed government intervention with a one-size-fits-all approach that simply creates more red tape, rule complexity and cost.”

READ ALSO All branches of the construction arm of the CFMEU placed in administration

Unions have welcomed the new laws as a “cost-of-living win” and a “historic day for working people”.

ACTU president Michele O’Neil said the union movement had won the legal right for Australians to spend quality time with their loved ones without the stress of being forced to constantly answer unreasonable work calls and emails.

“The average person does five to six hours of unpaid work every week. Thanks to the introduction of this new law, Australians can now be paid for those hours of work,” Ms O’Neil said.

“Cost-of-living is the number one issue for working people. [Opposition Leader] Peter Dutton’s pledge to abolish the right to disconnect would risk the end of the weekend.

“It would mean longer hours, lower wages, and more stress in workers’ lives. We deserve leaders who are on the side of working people instead of the pockets of big businesses.”

The new laws also improve the rights of casual workers.

The Prime Minister said it would operate well because good employers have good relations with their employees.

“If someone is working part-time at the local supermarket and they want to go in and do an extra shift because someone has not turned up or someone’s called in sick, you know, that’s fine, that’s up to them,” he said.

“But they can’t be told, ‘No, you didn’t answer the call to work on Sunday when we texted you on Saturday night at 11 o’clock. Therefore I’m not going to give you any shifts, and I’m going to penalise you in the workplace.”

The Prime Minister said the whole intent of the law is to make sure that “just as people don’t get paid 24 hours a day, they don’t have to work for 24 hours a day”.

Join the conversation

28
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

How would any member of this Labor Government know what it takes to run a business? Most of them have never worked in private enterprise. They have come from the trade union movement, and university and political staff office roles.

ChrisinTurner7:41 pm 29 Aug 24

How does it work for volunteers?

devils_advocate4:00 pm 28 Aug 24

Might actually require managers to be organised and structured about how they approach work during normal business hours.

Just a word of warning. If you are annoyed at being contacted on weekends or out of hours, you will more than likely not be bothered again. Not many are contacted. That call might be about a lucrative shift, a better opportunity or some issue that crops up. Sometimes it might be a call from a colleague unsure about something at work. When I was a political staffer it could be from your Minister or his senior officials. As a senior public servant sometimes you would get a call on a matter. When I had a business I never bothered staff out of hours. Just fix it yourself if you can.

To make things even worse career-wise, work from home. Once you are slightly disconnected from the main work group, you are liable to be sidelined. Even public sector workers may be on the outer (and not even know it). Welcome to the real world.

“I spent my life working for free like a stooge! You should do it too and have no life like me!”

LOL

Employers don’t own people when they’re not at work. These are good laws. If you want to be able to call people when they’re not working pay them for it.

I wonder how Albo will go when he needs an urgent meeting with his staff on weekends. I’m so glad I’m not in business any more. This would ruin many. Of course Albo doesn’t understand the private sector hence this has occurred. Stand by and watch it fail.

He will call a meeting I expect. Their roles are on call. What did you expect?

Are you saying that no business survived prior to accessibility of staff by mobile phone? Very odd, I am sure I recall some existing. Perhaps they wrote them a letter.

You’re a genius byline. Clearly you weren’t alive when the planet had landlines and I don’t need to be lectured by someone who clearly has never run any business. Go back to achieving sustainable outcomes on an hollistic level.

It is constantly amusing to watch ringing declarations ex ignorantia.

Your opening claims were obviously silly and now you want to be pedantic over satire. Too funny.

With good reason, I’m always on alert when it comes to Labor. A quick search should help anyone understand that whether it’s Labour in England or Labor in Australia, both are deeply connected with the Fabian (socialist) Society, which is anything but for the working man, but merely found it politically expedient to pretend to be that way, much like their overtures towards democracy over the years, with the hidden intent of simply using it to get their way – socialism, which really has nothing to do with helping the poor, but has been identified (by the rich behind Fabianism or other socialisms) as a nifty way of getting and securing ultimate power.

In short, what’s in store is an Islamo-Stalinist United States of the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia, where any nation which dares to resist can expect to be cut off from investment and credit by the European Central Bank, IMF and the World Bank.

That Labor actually cares very little for the working man should be getting clearer and clearer by the day, as nothing that’s ever done truly gives him a break, with all attention being given to ideology and intellectualism – in keeping with Fabianism’s/socialism’s/Labor’s truest colours.

As all of this applies to the current matter, it might be seen as an overall insignificant gesture for the working man while at the same time as striking yet another blow to small business (which unlike big business can’t afford the regulations), at a time when being in business is almost impossible enough – small business/private property not mixing well with monopolistic socialism.

Certainly, I don’t mean for businesses to abuse their workers, but the abuse of the Islamo-Stalinist state above seems far worse, making it necessary for us to come to a happier medium

Aren’t you forgetting the anarcho-syndicalist-theocracy? What about the plutocratic plebeians party?

Here, have some cake. There is lots of fruit in it.

Tempus Viator11:30 am 27 Aug 24

This is a sensible rule as the vast majority of employers care for the mental health of their employees (ie helps productivity).
I’d be interested to see how this will be in practice within the APS. For years I’ve seen EL2/EL1 call after hours APS level (eg level 3s’ or 6s’) staff to do work activities and if the APS staff member doesn’t respond/action on the EL2/EL1 terms, they ‘unofficially’ have their career opportunities limited by the particular EL2/EL1.
More focus needs to be placed on Manager’s behaviors rather then Owners/Leaders of businesses, which I hope this new rule will do.

This is one of the only Labor and union policies I have agreed with in decades.

Unless you are being paid an on-call allowance, there should be no expectation that you be availble to your employer outside of work hours. Seen way too many places, since mobile phones became common, just expect free work from people and for them to be contactable 24×7, with very little, if anything in return.

You have surprised me with a logical well-supported view.

You don’t care about logical or well thought out. You only care that it aligns with your view. Lets not play make believe.

Ah, you’re now claiming to be a mind-reader, but like most people who profess to do this, you get it wrong.

So, the businesses’ main point is “if you legally require us to not expect our employees to be contactable at 10 pm then that would be really bad for us because we already don’t call employees that late.” 🤦🏻‍♀️

Like, either they already don’t call employees outside of work hours, in which case this law would have zero effect on them, or they do, in which case their employees really need the protection that this law provides.

Exactly! There is no impact of this legislation on good employers with good staff relationships. So, no problem, except for the unreasonable boss who demands too much.

Coming from a PM so weak that fighting his way out of a wet paper bag would be a significant challenge

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.