15 September 2024

Stay off my grass! Canberra's nature strips shouldn't be parking lots

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
345

It’s illegal: this is no place to park your four-wheel drive. Photos: Ian Bushnell.

Green spaces and trees are at a premium in a townhouse and apartment complex, so any that come with your new home should be treated like gold.

Unfortunately, the lovely wide grassy setback that separates the complex from the street, planted with beautiful young pin oaks that, in their maturity, will bless the streetscape with their green canopies and shade in the heat of a Canberra summer, seems to be an invitation for some to see it as as a parking lot.

We could have had to accept just a narrow concrete path between the front of the complex and the street and no trees at all. Sure, there could be more visitor parking but the vehicles in those spaces seem to be too regular to be just dropping by.

It’s not as if residents have missed out on parking with double garages and basement spaces. Sometimes I wonder just how many cars people need.

READ ALSO Liberals to establish Strata and Building Commissioner

As it is, we have had to put up no parking signs inside the complex to stop vehicles from clogging up the internal access.

Out front, vehicles large and small are being parked on the nature strip next to the young oaks. Already the grass is suffering and I hate to think what will happen come summer.

cars parking on grass

Just a few safety issues here, and the grass won’t last much longer under that traffic.

The other fear is that as the ground compacts around the trees, that will take a toll on their root systems. Remember, they can be worth thousands of dollars each and priceless when it comes to amenities.

The Saturday morning running meet only exacerbates the situation, despite a nearby car park. They can jog multiple k’s but can’t walk 50 metres to and from their cars.

It is also a safety hazard, obstructing lines of sight, especially near intersections or complex driveways, and impeding pedestrians. Vehicles going where they are not supposed to be presents a danger to those around them.

It’s an accident waiting to happen, and I’m surprised there haven’t been more bingles.

The thing is, it’s illegal, yet Canberans are notorious for doing this.

The Traffic Infringements Guide says: “In any built-up area, a motorist must not stop on a bicycle path, footpath, shared path, dividing strip, or a nature strip.”

Will it take a blitz along the street to remind people where cars belong? Because an email from the building executive committee sure as hell hasn’t worked.

One can only imagine the whinging about a police state if parking inspectors swooped and stung offenders with tickets.

READ ALSO Updated Oliphant masterpiece is more than a slice of history in Ainslie

It’s a big move to be the dobber, but will I have to witness the desiccation of the verge and the slow death of trees with decades of living and nurturing to do?

So here’s my plea: STAY OFF THE GRASS! Walk a few more metres. Observe the law. Everywhere.

Otherwise, governments and developers might wonder what the point is of providing the amenity that can make high and medium-density living more bearable.

Join the conversation

345
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Karina Morris9:09 pm 22 Sep 24

ACT Govt refuses to take any enforcement action, even where violations are excessive and long-standing. Example: Numerous vehicles parked on the nature strip outside a house on a residential street near a major intersection. The vehicles include cars, a large delivery truck and a car trailer. Despite complaints lodged by local residents, ACT Govt refuses to take any action.
Latest development: Occupant of the property personally intimidated and threatened a local resident who, from a position on public land, gathering photographic evidence of the illegally parked vehicles.

Not sure why this has become an area of regulation the government and its lackies studiously avoid. It is quite simple really. There is a set of road rules that include where one can park and where one cannot park. Parking incorrectly should attract a pecuniary penalty. The Government is running a deficit and has no idea how to pay it down. Well, there might be a subtle hint here that driving those vans with cameras around 24/7 may well yield enough funds to make a dent in the deficit.

Who cares? Bored neighbourhood busybodies are the only people with enough time on their hands to care about something as petty as parking on a nature strip. Get a life.

Tricky one and very much location oriented. But I notice that parking on nature strips and streets is on the increase even in our established suburb. Time for some review and guidance perhaps.

Someone should research the mental anguish and health and economic impacts caused to the community by FOMO on a parking space..

Residents isolating and refusing to leave home lest they lose their parking space, residents obsessively checking whether their vehicle parked on street has been sideswiped, residents refusing to use secure basement parking lest their vehicles be broken into, residents forgoing social engagements (FOMO on return home), residents filling their garages with “stuff” but not their cars, Govt ineptitude on the housing crisis causing young adults and their multiple cars to stay longer at the family home, domestic stress and argument caused by FOMO (parking), neighbourhood dust ups and disputes, EVs not being charged because the vehicles can’t park near their home power source.

I wonder whether the Chinese have a one car policy?
And there is more ….

Wow, I can’t recall an article with more responses.

I guess many respondents don’t understand that you get the policies of the political parties that you (the majority) vote for.

Seems to me a big discontinuity between ACT Green policies (and Lab too ) to densify suburbs, restrict the amount of parking inside developments, yet ignore obvious citizen lifestyle preferences and behaviour patterns.
Results as written in article and comments.

Like I say, you get what you vote for.

I always thought it was because Canberrans can’t count… let me see, how many car spaces at this apartment/townhouse we’re planning to rent/buy… how many cars do we have? Oh, it’s all too complicated…
(if the buyer demanded sufficient parking, the developers would have to provide it, otherwise their apartments wouldn’t sell, but many people are content to buy/rent with inadequate parking and then blame other people for their compromise)

If road pavements were wider and sight distances longer, then parking on the road would not be such a hassle. But if you don’t want your car totalled, better to get it off the road altogether when you can. (I’m afraid that traffic engineering in general is still not one of the ACT’s strong points.)

Reid CIT is the same. Notify both NCA and ACT Gov…. Nothing done!

Sanjay PrepEdge7:51 pm 17 Sep 24

I don’t really see why the ACT government is not doing anything to prevent this.

Benjamin Thompson7:28 am 17 Sep 24

This is an ongoing issue of unauthorised parking on green spaces in our community. This situation mirrors a broader pattern of regulatory failures in the ACT, exemplified by the recent case of an illegally constructed fence being allowed to remain despite violating sale conditions, which Minister Steel and his Compliance, Monitoring & Inspections Team have condoned.

These instances highlight a concerning trend: the ACT Government’s apparent reluctance to enforce existing regulations. Whether illegal parking damages our urban greenery or unapproved structures compromise planning integrity, the lack of decisive action sends a dangerous message that rules can be flouted without consequence. I will forward you the correspondence related to the fence and the ACT government’s response(s).

As we approach the election, voters deserve to know how their government intends to uphold the law and protect community interests. It’s time for accountable, consistent enforcement of our regulations.

Where do trades park? You want work done but don’t provide parking. Ute’s and vans don’t always fit in underground parking because its not high enough.

Yeah look, did you fail to mention that 8 metre trees in your own backyard are protected, which includes the 2 square metres beneath them??? Does this mean Labor/Greens will also be fining you for parking under a tree in your own private property backyard??? What gives?

HiddenDragon8:47 pm 16 Sep 24

Cramped inside –

https://the-riotact.com/does-downsizing-have-to-be-all-flatpacks-and-baby-furniture/634395

and somewhat less than ideal outside – nice to see the occasional reality piece to balance all the pro-densification propaganda on this site.

I live in a Close and if people did not park on the graveled verge areas there would be no where for them to park without blocking the narrow street. I have no issue with not parking on grassy/treed bits but they are few and far between in some areas of Canberra.

Its all very well and good to say “take a bus” but that does not always work for people, due to connections, times or need to lug heavy bags/food offerings ect.

No one has garages or carports (or driveways)??

Hear here, too true. I find it amazing that it is OK to block a narrow street rather than park on a graveled verge as in the case when I visit my physio who works from home!

GrumpyGrandpa5:55 pm 16 Sep 24

And this is what happens when government makes planning decisions based on ideology.
We live in a complex that has 3 visitor carparks. Those parks, and all of the street parking within hundreds of metres are permanently occupied.
2 bed apartments need 2 car parks. Complexes with 80-100 residences need more than 3 visitor car parks.
Government, not everyone can catch public transport. It either takes too long, isn’t flexible enough or as is often my bellyache, it only runs every 2 hours on a Saturday afternoon or on a Sunday.

So you’re saying that everyone who buys a 2-bedroom dwelling must be forced to buy two car parking spaces whether or not they have a car or if they only have one car. That’s a funny version of freedom of choice old fella.

GrumpyGrandpa9:04 pm 17 Sep 24

astro2,
Sure, 2 bedders come in different configurations. Some with 1 car, some with 2 cars. Some with 1 bathroom, some with 2.

My concern stems around a lot of new developments offering reduced car accommodation and even now where we live, there is a shortage of car accommodation and our complex isn’t new.

Ideally, all 2 bedders should come with 2 car parks.

My views are based on my nephews advice. He is a draftsman for a major construction company (outside of Canberra). His advice is that anyone buying a 2 bedder with only 1 car spot, severely limits their future sale options. If you only have 1 car, there will be someone prepared to rent your spare space (unless it’s a tandem).

I would happily buy a 2 bedder with 1 bathroom, but 2 car parks are essential for future saleability.

If this government seriously wants to make some money and reduce our rates, they will fine everyone who parks on the nature strip, the footpath or anywhere illegally. It seems that they’re not serious though, just all talk and bullsh-t.

@psycho
Is it actually illegal to park on the nature strip? If it is, then send out the inspectors. If it’s not, could be a legislative job for the new assembly.

There were some beautiful trees planted out the front of our complex many years ago and the owners invested in an underground watering system which was destroyed by tenants and visitors parking on it.

It is not only cars parked on verges, which is bloody annoying it is also hedges and plants growing over footpaths and vehicles parked across pathways making it dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists. The government should clamp down on this kind of behaviour as it seems to be acceptable to park anywhere on government land (Dickson near the pool and Majura Avenue are just a few that come to mind) and would not be tolerated by governments and councils in other capital cities.

Hey Rustus, You might like to read your Crown Lease and the related legislation before you talk about what is and isn’t Law!

One of my pet hates is people parking on nature strips — particularly when they’ve parked on a nature strip that we have been looking after to protect old trees or, worse, that we’ve been regrowing the grass. My experience (in Turner) was, when asked if a car/ute/truck could please be moved, always followed by abuse. Together with excuses as to the need to park on the nature strip — generally to do with “there’s nowhere else”, “it’s public property”, “I need to be close to my tools for a job I’m doing up the street”, etc. None of these excuses are acceptable.

I agree re the grassy treed ones, but many “nature strips” are just gravel in closes/places ect. and if you park on road you effectively block the road- so clearly if you live in one of these areas you can not have a few friends over for a party/bbq

“The Saturday morning running meet only exacerbates the situation, despite a nearby car park. They can jog multiple k’s but can’t walk 50 metres to and from their cars.” – this is so accurate I actually snorted with laughter.

Yep, ever seen people parking at the gym?! If that’s their lifestyle it’s no wonder they’re so unfit they have to go to the gym….

I’m for parking on the footpath. I live in a street with a blind corner. When cars are parked on the apex, you cannot see what is coming around the corner. It is very dangerous. Unfortunately, people have driveways but do not use them

The problem witg parking on the footpath is that it blocks access for disabled and mobility limited people. It’s also ubsafe to force pedestrians into the road to walk around your car

Incidental Tourist11:24 am 16 Sep 24

The problem is the lack of parking around apartments. People can’t walk for a kilometre with hands full of shopping bags and toddlers because there are no parking nearby.

Greens government already permitted residents growing “vegetable gardens” on nature strips. Such “garden” with a compost bin next to it will permanently damage lawn let alone attract rats, pests and sometimes snakes. So you should remove your car and dump organic waste on its place claiming it to be your veggie garden?

As to the safety – overgrown grass blocking road view is far more dangerous. Let alone old trees on nature strips which drop branches on cars, properties and pedestrians.

arthwollipot11:23 am 16 Sep 24

“Nature” strip is a misnomer. There is nothing natural about imported lawn and trees.

Neris Bryden10:57 am 16 Sep 24

In some instances, a ban or a limit to the amount of cars a business or individuals running used car sales as their main business or side hustle would help.
I have noticed quite an increase of individuals running car dealerships, wreckers and hire especially within the Gungahlin are where space is already at a premium. These business or activities need to be moved back to industrial areas. Just look at car sales on Facebook Marketplace and you can zero in on the culprits. A lot of these individuals are the ones undertaking this sort of parking or its the residents doing it because of these indiviuals.

There is a bit too much car-brain happening in the comments here. I fully agree with this article. There should be more enforcement to protect these valuable public amenities.

Leon Arundell10:05 am 16 Sep 24

Parking on nature strips is set to become more common. The new Territory Plan does not seem to require any residential development to provide more than one car parking space. Rule 50 of the Inner North and City District Policy provides only MAXIMUM numbers of car parking spaces for multi-unit developments. Here’s the link: https://www.legislation.act.gov.au/ni/2023-540/Current

People should be fined for parking on nature strips. A 60 year old gum across the road was recently killed because of constant parking around it.

I find the parking inspectors pretty responsive where the parked cars are unsafe (blocking the path so walkers need to detour, parked too close to crossings, obscuring lines of sight). So next time you call one in (132281), just mention the safety issue and you’ll have them out there in a jiffy. You might have to do it several times to make sure the message gets home to the errant parkers though as we know that someone else will fill the space the next day.

To help protect our street trees and verge plants we have to place rocks along our nature strip. I really wish we didn’t have to put the large rocks there as they look rather aggressive, but too many idiots have already severely compacted the soil. Yes, we don’t own the nature strip but we do look after it and everyone benefits from a greater urban canopy.

The number of people who cite the issue of driving down the road if cars are parked on it shows exactly why people think it’s their right to park on the nature strip. You literally just wait until the car has passed you and carry on. Possibly all of 10 seconds of your time.

In my street we had new footpaths Putin. Guess what? People, residents and visitors park on them. My street is also a circuit and on my side there are no houses opposite, just trees. Visitors to the street regularly conduct u-turns there even though the street is a circuit and they could have an easier time just driving on the tarmac.

Notifying the government does nothing as in their triage system, it’s never prioritised.

Leon Arundell8:33 am 16 Sep 24

If you park on the nature strip, please leave enough space for people to walk past without having to detour onto the road.

Capital Retro8:02 am 16 Sep 24

A couple of points, Ian.
You caption the pic of the HiLux as no place to park a 4WD. Would you prefer to have a Tesla there? They are about the same weight.
As usual, you are an apologist for the current government who have for the past 21 years eliminated car parks everywhere.
And if there is to be a blitz on illegal verge parking a lot of ACT Government EV’s used mainly by parks and garden will have to be fined as well so, what the point?

What? You read an article about illegal parking and then have a rant about EVs? Yes, we all get your ongoing dislike for EVs, but try to keep to the subject.
Otherwise, I only see Parks and Conservation vehicles (flatbeds and not EVs) parked on grass areas under maintenance, but I’m sure you’ll just see what you want to see. Sigh.

Capital Retro11:09 am 16 Sep 24

In the land of the blind StuartM, the one-eyed man is King.
You are in the first group.

And in the land of the informed, the uninformed must turn to insults.

The ACT has a huge issue with illegal parking, be it nature strips, loading zones or overstaying time limited street parking. The only way to stop it is have parking officers active on the streets daily as it’s culturally engrained into our society now.

Maybe provide more parking and not let developers provide minimal or nil

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.