10 September 2015

ACT Government finally responds to school cage incident

| Marcus Paul
Join the conversation
67
stock-school-entrance

It’s been 165 days since the ACT Government discovered a cage was built in one of its schools for a 10-year-old student with autism.

We found out today that the school’s principal has been sacked, and will no longer be able to work at any ACT Government school. The inquiry, overseen at arm’s length from Minister Joy Burch’s office, found the principal was solely responsible for the incident.

Minister Burch told my radio program she felt physically ill after learning of the “cage-like structure”. She says the decision to erect such a thing was made without input, consultation or approval from the school or the directorate.

She also says the structure was commissioned by the school, under the instruction of the principal, and constructed by an external builder. Although reluctant to name it as a cage, the ACT Government has today confirmed it was constructed of pool fencing and had a roof.

It’s understood the structure was designed as a space for a student to calm down. It was also used when the student needed a quiet space.

So why was such a structure constructed in the first place? Well, according to the minister, the child was believed to have been physically abusive towards his teacher and other students. Was the cage was constructed for his explicit use? Unfortunately, yes.

This will not be the end of the issue, with another inquiry into the broader issue of special needs teaching in the ACT still underway.

Many parents with autistic children have contacted me. They are dismayed and angered by the current system, which they claim does not place enough emphasis on support services for children with special needs.

It is hoped this further inquiry will address the many concerns which remain outstanding. The ACT Human Rights Commission will no doubt strongly monitor the situation.

What is clear however, is that the ACT Education Directorate must now also go on notice. 165 days is simply too long to wait for today’s outcome. We were told by the minister that the initial inquiry would be handed down within weeks – and it seemed to take media pressure to finally end up with a result.

Whilst I appreciate that Education Director-General Diane Joseph needed some time to work through the issue, this has taken far too long. Too long and too much distress for the child’s family, and too long for the parents of other children here in Canberra with special needs.

Marcus Paul is the host of Canberra Live 3pm weekdays on 2CC.

Join the conversation

67
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I did find this whole situation very concerning, as do many people, but it is also necessary to remember and consider, how this came about.

It started quite a while ago, when people with special needs were moved out of special institutions and into the community. This was, in itself, a good thing. However, the money that had been in the institutions did not follow the people into the community.

That was a political slight of hand. The funds went in to general coffers.

Now, teachers who may not have the skills & training and do not have the time and other resources to manage these children’s behaviour & to teach them according to their needs, get blamed for the resaults of what was surely a forseeable situation, when that much funding is removed from these people.
This mainstreaming without adequate resourcing & training affects the learning outcomes of everyone in the classroom (those with specific learing or behavioural difficulties and every other child) and everyone’s general stress levels – staff, students & parents.

Not only has this affected the area of education, but massively affected the provision of mental health services & general health services as seen in the number of very ill people, who need specialised care, presenting in our A&E’s.

We really need to go back to basics to deal with this situation and not focus on the Minister and the poor benighted principal, who are desperately trying to deal with the symptoms of a problem that is not of their making, and over which they have very little if any control.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back7:21 pm 16 Sep 15

aussie2 said :

Great article Marcus-it just shows the sort of spin Minister Burch and her cronies are capable of. That they could sack that Principal is out of control. It is not the Principal’s problem. So many workplaces have to do workarounds because the money is not there to do what is required. I lay this TOTALLY in the Barr Government’s lap. Start reallocating your public funds so that these kids get a decent education. Hang the bleeding tram! Our kids future is at stake here. C’mon Canberra-WAKE UP!

It’s hard to see how spending the best part of a billion dollars to do a subset of something the buses already do is value when we have underresourced schools and issues in basic service delivery (e.g. health).

Big_Ed said :

In the latest addition to this saga, Ms Burch said “Clearly the principal alone made the decision and there were others within that school – and this remains a very sad point for me – that did not respond accordingly. That is a failure of their behaviour and they will be dealt with.”

Well, Joy Burch knows very well the answer to this – if a teacher reports on a principal then they can kiss their career goodbye. And those Directorate officials who “failed to stop the the construction” are of the same breed who mob good honest teachers and ram them out of the system on behalf of the far too numerous low-functioning school executives in the Directorate. People with passions for their careers and egos and not Teaching.

I’m glad that those teachers who have suffered at the hands of these in the past can now pick up a CT and enjoy their coffee and a hearty slice of validation.

You raise good points. I will suggest to anyone who knows more about this and cares about transparency should have a read of the public interest disclosure laws and then write to the auditor-general, not the Education directorate. This is because the auditor-general has published some good process and is also at arms length.

And if you do not care, just bleat here!

In the latest addition to this saga, Ms Burch said “Clearly the principal alone made the decision and there were others within that school – and this remains a very sad point for me – that did not respond accordingly. That is a failure of their behaviour and they will be dealt with.”

Well, Joy Burch knows very well the answer to this – if a teacher reports on a principal then they can kiss their career goodbye. And those Directorate officials who “failed to stop the the construction” are of the same breed who mob good honest teachers and ram them out of the system on behalf of the far too numerous low-functioning school executives in the Directorate. People with passions for their careers and egos and not Teaching.

I’m glad that those teachers who have suffered at the hands of these in the past can now pick up a CT and enjoy their coffee and a hearty slice of validation.

Great article Marcus-it just shows the sort of spin Minister Burch and her cronies are capable of. That they could sack that Principal is out of control. It is not the Principal’s problem. So many workplaces have to do workarounds because the money is not there to do what is required. I lay this TOTALLY in the Barr Government’s lap. Start reallocating your public funds so that these kids get a decent education. Hang the bleeding tram! Our kids future is at stake here. C’mon Canberra-WAKE UP!

No one suggests that the parents are failures if they have a child with autism but they have to accept responsibility for finding a way of helping the child instead of expecting others to do this. A teacher goes to school to educate and children go to learn. Neither should be placed in danger while they are there. Very often parents can’t control their child yet they expect a teacher to do so with twenty odd other students to manage. This incident should not have happened but unfortunately it did. I wonder how much assistance was offered this school? I’m sure Ghettosmurf87 would not like to be abused and assaulted in his workplace.

No one is suggesting it is failure of parents if child is autistic Ghettosmurf87 but it is their responsibility to find the help their child needs not expect everyone else to do it. If the child had help all day I’m sure it would not have happened but this is not available in mainstream schools. No teacher or child should have to be afraid of the extreme behaviour of others. I’m sure if you went to work and was physically assaulted or constantly waiting for it to occur you wouldn’t hang around. Teachers go to school to educate and children go to learn . It should be a happy and pleasant experience, free from bullies and fear. Unfortunately this is not the case.

I have a few points to make on this. Firstly, ACT schools are required to have an action plan to deal with aggressive students. When a student has special needs the school is required to have an action plan for that student developed in consultation with the parents, learning support team and a host of others (often with input from department officials) – so go figure why we have had to wait 165 days, significant brass gave input or signed off on this dumb caper and have been desperately trying to cover their behinds since.

Why because putting a child in a cage is child abuse and possibly unlawful imprisonment.

The CT has reported Directorate staff may be sanctioned over the matter after becoming aware of the cage. Well let’s not kid ourselves, directorate staff would have been contacted prior to the construction by the principal for advice. She may have had poor judgement but she’s not a complete moron. Someone else has ticked it off.

Which brings me to, what action is to be taken against the School Network Leader (SNL)? This person is akin to the principal’s direct supervisor. Did the SNL know about the cage prior to the CT? What advice did the SNL give to the prinipal prior to the construction? Unless we are meant to also believe in unicorns, if the principal’s head rolled then the SNL’s head should roll too.

Sadly this saga indicates that within the Directorate there are still quite a few very low functioning people in very high positions of responsibility. What concerns me is how they got there and how to stop the rot.

Ghettosmurf879:06 am 11 Sep 15

HenryBG said :

If parents want to dump their failures on the public education system, a cage is, in at least one instance, a good place to keep them.

Why in the world is the behaviour of a child who has a mental disorder the failings of the parent? There is no suggestion in this story whatsoever that the child was a delinquent just out to cause trouble. There are plenty of mechanisms for dealing with that. It seems pretty clear that the child had a condition that rendered them a danger at times. That is not the parents fault, unless you suggest they should have controlled how the genetics of the child was constructed???? To blame the parents and call them failures in this situation is about the equivalent of blaming a parent for their child being born deaf or mute or with down syndrome.

There is no excuse for treating children like animals or criminals, which is what placing them in a cage is doing. Especially when their behaviour is not within their own control.

Nilrem said :

Of course, another way to comply with your WHS obligations is not to have the kid in the classroom in the first place. Clearly someone in the Directorate dropped the ball.

I’ve had umpteen comments along this line sanitized.

Ultimately, society expects taxpayers’ money to be spent reasonably.

If parents want to dump their failures on the public education system, a cage is, in at least one instance, a good place to keep them.

Belco77 said :

Clearly this was not the best way to deal with child who has special needs however under the new workplace health and safety laws that principal (an officer) is under a legal obligation to protect the teacher (employee) from harm . If the principal knew that the teacher was in danger of bodily harm from this child , then the principal risks jail time if the principal doesn’t do everything reasonably possible to prevent that harm .

Of course, another way to comply with your WHS obligations is not to have the kid in the classroom in the first place. Clearly someone in the Directorate dropped the ball.

Umm, am not a parent and don’t know much about ACT schools, schooling and/or education policy but why is a child who has the potential to cause harm to others (or him/herself) being educated in a mainstream school? I dare say someone will respond that kids with special needs should be allowed to be educated with others for no doubt very good reasons – socialisation, good educational outcomes etc – with which I would agree, up to a point, depending on the ‘special need’, the degree of disablement, the potential for good for the child; all of which, though, surely would have to be balanced against any potential for harm. But I’m sure that if I were to have children I would be very loath to have them attending a school where there was a potential for violence, disturbance and harm because of the presence of a child whose behaviour was so disturbed. I also think that the carers of the child involved in this incident bear as much responsibility as the principal; they must know/have known about their child’s potential to cause problems and should have been monitoring the situation accordingly. Were the parents/carers aware of the ‘cage’ and the purpose to which it was put? If they weren’t, they can’t have been keeping too close an eye on what went on at the school. If they were then the principal would seem to have been dealt with very harshly. Further, what would have been the liability of the principal, the education department and the child’s parents if serious injury or harm were to have been caused by the child to other pupils or to staff?

Clearly this was not the best way to deal with child who has special needs however under the new workplace health and safety laws that principal (an officer) is under a legal obligation to protect the teacher (employee) from harm . If the principal knew that the teacher was in danger of bodily harm from this child , then the principal risks jail time if the principal doesn’t do everything reasonably possible to prevent that harm .

Nilrem said :

Have we got our policy settings rights when one sick child can disrupt the whole class regularly? Should such a child be in the mainstream education system?

Yup, that’s right. The PC brigade are once again working themselves into a lather as to why one person’s behaviour should hold everyone else to ransom. What about all the other kids’ right to an education and a safe environment? Whether this kids’ behaviour was due to autism, personality, or a combination of factors, why should he not be restrained if he is a menace and there is no specialist intervention? This is all bizarre and stupid.

The principal provided a practical solution in the interests of the majority. If the education head bureaucrats want a different solution, then they should provide the special care required (they might even get a free 5-star two-week holiday to Europe to ‘study’ a solution). Re-instate the principal, and send the boy off to wherever his behaviour can be dealt with or accommodated or creatively enabled or whatever the PC phrase is for that.

Ghettosmurf87 said :

london said :

I still don’t believe it was a cage.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/cage-for-autistic-child-at-canberra-school-a-shocking-wakeup-call-20150909-gjictu.html

looks quite cage like to me…

One persons cage is another persons refuge..possibly

HiddenDragon5:58 pm 10 Sep 15

Masquara said :

HiddenDragon said :

Nilrem said :

“The inquiry, overseen at arm’s length from Minister Joy Burch’s office, found the principal was solely responsible for the incident.

Minister Burch told my radio program she felt physically ill after learning of the “cage-like structure”. She says the decision to erect such a thing was made without input, consultation or approval from the school or the directorate.

Errr, so the Principal was running the school like some kind of rogue dictatorship? He/She consulted no-one else in the School? They didn’t provide any input or feedback to the Principal? Really? So someone has been executed and now everything is dandy? Please explain.

Yes – the official response, so far, looks like the standard “bad apple” strategy.

A lifelong ban from teaching in public schools is just a ridiculous price for this principal to pay. What price has Joy Burch paid for the many mistakes she has made that resulted in damage to vulnerable children?

Just to be clear, I’m not suggesting the principal is a “bad apple”, rather that this case has been handled in an all-too-common fashion – which is to avoid, so far as possible, acknowledging broader issues and more widespread responsibility for the circumstances in question, and then pin responsibility on one, or a very small number of, individual(s) – in the hope that the public and the media will be satisfied that “something has been done” and move on.

gazket said :

Can Joy Burch ever tell the truth. She is making like nothing happened and lets quickly forget about it..

Very bad minister from a very bad government. The teacher or principle should never had to resort to something like this. Where was their support to deal with such a child.

Strangely not one out cryabout the cage from the lefty social media freaks who now run our governments.

What are the bureaucrats doing besides getting a healthy pay check to cut back public services???
It seems there is no money for anything but feel good electricity, trams and refugees, it’s a joke.

You lost me by going all political. I’m a leftie. I think Burch should resign. Now.

Can Joy Burch ever tell the truth. She is making like nothing happened and lets quickly forget about it..

Very bad minister from a very bad government. The teacher or principle should never had to resort to something like this. Where was their support to deal with such a child.

Strangely not one out cryabout the cage from the lefty social media freaks who now run our governments.

What are the bureaucrats doing besides getting a healthy pay check to cut back public services???
It seems there is no money for anything but feel good electricity, trams and refugees, it’s a joke.

Alexandra Craig4:34 pm 10 Sep 15

tim_c said :

“the child was believed to have been physically abusive towards his teacher and other students.”

While not suggesting a cage in this case is appropriate, I’d like to know what some of the strongest voices suggest a school SHOULD do when they have someone physically abusing others in the school (yes, I’m looking at you Alexandra)? Surely you wouldn’t advocate for a moment that the school shouldn’t take steps to protect others from this student’s physical abuse – so then, what steps should they take? How can I be sure that my daughter in kindergarten is safe from the physical abuse of other students? Should the school have just built a bigger cage so the teachers and the rest of the students could shelter in it every time one uncontrollable student ran rampant?

What about the “cage-like structure” beside the Monaro Highway just north of Hume – isn’t a primary purpose of that to protect the rest of the community from people who would physically abuse others? Perhaps if a few more kids had an early taste of “gaol time”, they mightn’t be so inclined to need it later.

Isn’t there an outcry (as there should be) every time a woman is killed by her boyfriend/husband who has not been restrained despite the woman’s previous pleas? If a child is free to physically abuse others, but an adult is not, when is the time at which it becomes unacceptable, and how is this to be taught to such people?

When I was in primary school, there was one kid in particular I remember that had extreme behavioural issues. I was only in maybe year 4 or 5, so I don’t know whether he had autism or another condition but anyway he used to have violent outbursts quite frequently. He had a teachers aide/carer most of the time and she managed to get him out of the classroom nine times out of ten before things got really out of hand. There was only one or two instances that I remember when the male principal had to physically remove the child from the room.

When I was in high school, another kid had a condition (again, I can’t remember what it was) but he was prone to similar outbursts. He had a teachers aide/carer too. If he started to get worked up the teachers aide/carer could obviously spot this a mile away and would take him out of the classroom quickly for a walk so he could calm down.

I don’t think you can compare this to a prison. This is a child we’re talking about. Locking him in a cage every time he has an outburst is not going to fix anything.

“the child was believed to have been physically abusive towards his teacher and other students.”

While not suggesting a cage in this case is appropriate, I’d like to know what some of the strongest voices suggest a school SHOULD do when they have someone physically abusing others in the school (yes, I’m looking at you Alexandra)? Surely you wouldn’t advocate for a moment that the school shouldn’t take steps to protect others from this student’s physical abuse – so then, what steps should they take? How can I be sure that my daughter in kindergarten is safe from the physical abuse of other students? Should the school have just built a bigger cage so the teachers and the rest of the students could shelter in it every time one uncontrollable student ran rampant?

What about the “cage-like structure” beside the Monaro Highway just north of Hume – isn’t a primary purpose of that to protect the rest of the community from people who would physically abuse others? Perhaps if a few more kids had an early taste of “gaol time”, they mightn’t be so inclined to need it later.

Isn’t there an outcry (as there should be) every time a woman is killed by her boyfriend/husband who has not been restrained despite the woman’s previous pleas? If a child is free to physically abuse others, but an adult is not, when is the time at which it becomes unacceptable, and how is this to be taught to such people?

YZ250 said :

Ghettosmurf87 said :

london said :

I still don’t believe it was a cage.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/cage-for-autistic-child-at-canberra-school-a-shocking-wakeup-call-20150909-gjictu.html

looks quite cage like to me…

This is an absolute outrage. I am disgusted by what I read in that article. $5200 to build a cage out of pool fencing? That is highway robbery. I don’t know how the builder sleeps at night.

Ha ha, special government procurement rates. Shame. That’s our rates. We pay Minister Burch’s salary too. Shame. Please resign. The pokie sellout to the clubs and now this. Please resign.

Ghettosmurf87 said :

london said :

I still don’t believe it was a cage.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/cage-for-autistic-child-at-canberra-school-a-shocking-wakeup-call-20150909-gjictu.html

looks quite cage like to me…

This is an absolute outrage. I am disgusted by what I read in that article. $5200 to build a cage out of pool fencing? That is highway robbery. I don’t know how the builder sleeps at night.

Ghettosmurf87 said :

london said :

I still don’t believe it was a cage.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/cage-for-autistic-child-at-canberra-school-a-shocking-wakeup-call-20150909-gjictu.html

looks quite cage like to me…

Why does it have a roof? – no kid could climb over that pool fencing.

I still don’t believe it was a cage. I have worked with children such as the one mentioned and realise what stress can be placed on staff and students. The education ministers jump in to say what makes them look good but fail to provide support for the child and teacher.When I had a diagnosed autistic child in a class I was given two hours a week support. The poor child needed help in playground but not provided. School staff have best interest of all concerned and if a child is out of control there are few options available. Seems as if child should not have been mainstreamed and parents should be held accountable for own child’s actions.

miz said :

This whole incident points to big problems and unrealistic expectations about ‘mainstreaming’ children with disabilities. it’s so much more complex than wheelchair ramps – in fact I’d go so far as to say wheelchairs are the easiest thing to manage!
Any child with incontinence or unmanageable behaviour should be somewhere else, it is wrong to expect teachers to deal with such.

Not sure about the incontinence bit, but agree that I don’t want my kids to be the collateral damage in futile experiment that inflicts out of control kids on their peers. And I still think we are entitled to know which school it was.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back12:36 pm 10 Sep 15

CaptainSpiff said :

Mysteryman said :

Finally, if the child truly feels safe in the cage, and prefers that option when needing to calm down, then who the hell cares how the cage would be perceived by others?

So true. Unfortunately in this social media driven age of instant judgment, the perception of others seems to be the only thing that matters.

What should have mattered is how the child and the parents experienced the situation. Yet, in all the hyped coverage of this event, no-one asks what they think, and whether they considered the “cage” to have been an abuse.

Instead we hear all about what Joy Burch and her directorate think.

Spot on.

This whole incident points to big problems and unrealistic expectations about ‘mainstreaming’ children with disabilities. it’s so much more complex than wheelchair ramps – in fact I’d go so far as to say wheelchairs are the easiest thing to manage!
Any child with incontinence or unmanageable behaviour should be somewhere else, it is wrong to expect teachers to deal with such.

CaptainSpiff said :

Mysteryman said :

Finally, if the child truly feels safe in the cage, and prefers that option when needing to calm down, then who the hell cares how the cage would be perceived by others?

So true. Unfortunately in this social media driven age of instant judgment, the perception of others seems to be the only thing that matters.

What should have mattered is how the child and the parents experienced the situation. Yet, in all the hyped coverage of this event, no-one asks what they think, and whether they considered the “cage” to have been an abuse.

Instead we hear all about what Joy Burch and her directorate think.

Time for the Parents and the Principal to come out, and get the truth of the matter out.

CaptainSpiff11:03 am 10 Sep 15

Mysteryman said :

Finally, if the child truly feels safe in the cage, and prefers that option when needing to calm down, then who the hell cares how the cage would be perceived by others?

So true. Unfortunately in this social media driven age of instant judgment, the perception of others seems to be the only thing that matters.

What should have mattered is how the child and the parents experienced the situation. Yet, in all the hyped coverage of this event, no-one asks what they think, and whether they considered the “cage” to have been an abuse.

Instead we hear all about what Joy Burch and her directorate think.

Xtra said :

My understanding from speaking with a representative from the Education Directorate is that the structure was built with the full knowledge and agreement of the teacher, parent’s and principal. The cage is the autistic child’s safe place and a calming place. The autistic child did not feel caged. The principal is the unfortunate scapegoat. I believe that the principal thought that she was acting in the child’s best interest, however, she failed to analyse how the cage would be perceived by others.

And there it is. The common sense missing from this whole debate.

I got shouted down by some idiots when I suggested there must have been a very good reason for the principal and teacher to think a cage was a good idea. Apparently I was “blaming the child” and was draconian in my way of thinking.

I couldn’t imagine a situation where putting a child in a cage was a good idea, but I don’t work with children and certainly not those that require special considerations. Equally, I couldn’t imagine a situation where both a teacher and a principal built a cage with public money and imprisoned a child in full view of the class, without believing that they were doing the right thing.

I’ll be interested to see if the people/lynch mob who claim to possess the knowledge of what’s best for a child they don’t know, continue on their high horse, or if they admit they got it wrong. I’m not holding my breath, though.

Finally, if the child truly feels safe in the cage, and prefers that option when needing to calm down, then who the hell cares how the cage would be perceived by others? These are the same “others” who have no idea of the state of the child, or what the child needs to function and thrive. To hell with what they think.

Xtra said :

My understanding from speaking with a representative from the Education Directorate is that the structure was built with the full knowledge and agreement of the teacher, parent’s and principal. The cage is the autistic child’s safe place and a calming place. The autistic child did not feel caged. The principal is the unfortunate scapegoat. I believe that the principal thought that she was acting in the child’s best interest, however, she failed to analyse how the cage would be perceived by others.

If this is true, the Minister really has to go, for her behaviour after the fact.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back9:29 am 10 Sep 15

Nilrem said :

VYBerlinaV8_is_back said :

London to a brick there’s a lot more to this story than has made the media.

So, has the media been compromised by their symbiotic relationship with pollies, or are they simply incompetent, or both?

On every occasion where a story has been posted by local media that I have had personal knowledge of (and in my job it happens occasionally), the facts are incomplete or slanted toward a certain conclusion. Why would this be any different?

VYBerlinaV8_is_back said :

London to a brick there’s a lot more to this story than has made the media.

So, has the media been compromised by their symbiotic relationship with pollies, or are they simply incompetent, or both?

Alexandra Craig said :

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Not saying this ‘solution’ was even remotely right, but the argument you have just made is totally irrelevant. Quite clearly this child’s issues were at the extremities, so how many other children have been effectively ‘dealt’ matters not.

Masquara said :

What price has Joy Burch paid for the many mistakes she has made that resulted in damage to vulnerable children?

Your telling the story, what mistakes has she personally made that has resulted in damage to vulnerable children?

Ever thought that perhaps the only person being protected is the minister … Probably a school she’d visited or has a connection to!

My understanding from speaking with a representative from the Education Directorate is that the structure was built with the full knowledge and agreement of the teacher, parent’s and principal. The cage is the autistic child’s safe place and a calming place. The autistic child did not feel caged. The principal is the unfortunate scapegoat. I believe that the principal thought that she was acting in the child’s best interest, however, she failed to analyse how the cage would be perceived by others.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back6:30 pm 09 Sep 15

London to a brick there’s a lot more to this story than has made the media.

HiddenDragon said :

Nilrem said :

“The inquiry, overseen at arm’s length from Minister Joy Burch’s office, found the principal was solely responsible for the incident.

Minister Burch told my radio program she felt physically ill after learning of the “cage-like structure”. She says the decision to erect such a thing was made without input, consultation or approval from the school or the directorate.

Errr, so the Principal was running the school like some kind of rogue dictatorship? He/She consulted no-one else in the School? They didn’t provide any input or feedback to the Principal? Really? So someone has been executed and now everything is dandy? Please explain.

Yes – the official response, so far, looks like the standard “bad apple” strategy.

A lifelong ban from teaching in public schools is just a ridiculous price for this principal to pay. What price has Joy Burch paid for the many mistakes she has made that resulted in damage to vulnerable children?

HiddenDragon5:22 pm 09 Sep 15

Nilrem said :

“The inquiry, overseen at arm’s length from Minister Joy Burch’s office, found the principal was solely responsible for the incident.

Minister Burch told my radio program she felt physically ill after learning of the “cage-like structure”. She says the decision to erect such a thing was made without input, consultation or approval from the school or the directorate.

Errr, so the Principal was running the school like some kind of rogue dictatorship? He/She consulted no-one else in the School? They didn’t provide any input or feedback to the Principal? Really? So someone has been executed and now everything is dandy? Please explain.

Yes – the official response, so far, looks like the standard “bad apple” strategy.

Alexandra Craig4:50 pm 09 Sep 15

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Alexandra Craig said :

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Like I said before – the only option of when some kids get out of control is to evacuate the whole class and leave the child inside to get over the state they are in – usually the class will return to many upturned desks and damaged property. This puts a massive disruption on the class as the other students get worried, anxious and worked up from the incident that it is near impossible to get any lessons done for the remainder of the day. Depending on the child, this could happen once a week – that is a lot of lost teacher to student time lost.

Yes, I can see the child being the main victim here, but what about the other students? What about the teacher?

Now I am speaking of what I don’t know – but I am going to put a few things out there.
– The ‘cage’ was not what you are thinking this cage is and was more of an enclosure. It wouldn’t have been jail like and it wouldn’t have been threatening.
– The parents of this child probably knew about this enclosure.

I’ve seen the picture – it looks like a cage to me.

From memory, early media reports suggested that the parents actually didn’t know about the cage.

Masquara said :

According to the ABC666 news just then, Joy Burch had not seen a photo of the cage. That’s appalling. 666 said they had published a photo on their website – but I haven’t been able to find it. They sent a copy of the photo to the minister, apparently despite her not wanting to view it and know what has been going on under her watch.

Yep, the Minister has emerged from her slumber and flicked the switch to “outrage”.

If the principal

Masquara said :

According to the ABC666 news just then, Joy Burch had not seen a photo of the cage. That’s appalling. 666 said they had published a photo on their website – but I haven’t been able to find it. They sent a copy of the photo to the minister, apparently despite her not wanting to view it and know what has been going on under her watch.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-09/photo-of-cage-used-to-restrain-boy-autism-at-canberra-school/6762404

GardeningGirl4:27 pm 09 Sep 15

murf6333 said :

. . Now saying that I know from experience that the ACT schooling system is under resourced to deal with these children . .

Ezy said :

. . It is clear that this child required something special to be put in place so as not to hurt the other students or the teacher. The big question is why did this child not have a carer . .

I don’t know but what I have read seems to emphasise the emotional outrage at the idea of ‘caging’ a child but I haven’t seen any answers to the real questions about what procedures and facilities are available when a child needs to be removed from the rest of the class. Why wasn’t there a carer and a space for the child and carer to use until the child was able to rejoin the class? Does the real problem lie not with the principal’s somewhat desperate creative but not politically correct attempts at a solution or the lack of adequate funding from higher up?

And let’s not forget the right of the other children to a safe and productive learning environment.

According to the ABC666 news just then, Joy Burch had not seen a photo of the cage. That’s appalling. 666 said they had published a photo on their website – but I haven’t been able to find it. They sent a copy of the photo to the minister, apparently despite her not wanting to view it and know what has been going on under her watch.

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Alexandra Craig said :

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Like I said before – the only option of when some kids get out of control is to evacuate the whole class and leave the child inside to get over the state they are in – usually the class will return to many upturned desks and damaged property. This puts a massive disruption on the class as the other students get worried, anxious and worked up from the incident that it is near impossible to get any lessons done for the remainder of the day. Depending on the child, this could happen once a week – that is a lot of lost teacher to student time lost.

Yes, I can see the child being the main victim here, but what about the other students? What about the teacher?

Now I am speaking of what I don’t know – but I am going to put a few things out there.
– The ‘cage’ was not what you are thinking this cage is and was more of an enclosure. It wouldn’t have been jail like and it wouldn’t have been threatening.
– The parents of this child probably knew about this enclosure.

Have we got our policy settings rights when one sick child can disrupt the whole class regularly? Should such a child be in the mainstream education system?

Alexandra Craig said :

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Alexandra Craig said :

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

Like I said before – the only option of when some kids get out of control is to evacuate the whole class and leave the child inside to get over the state they are in – usually the class will return to many upturned desks and damaged property. This puts a massive disruption on the class as the other students get worried, anxious and worked up from the incident that it is near impossible to get any lessons done for the remainder of the day. Depending on the child, this could happen once a week – that is a lot of lost teacher to student time lost.

Yes, I can see the child being the main victim here, but what about the other students? What about the teacher?

Now I am speaking of what I don’t know – but I am going to put a few things out there.
– The ‘cage’ was not what you are thinking this cage is and was more of an enclosure. It wouldn’t have been jail like and it wouldn’t have been threatening.
– The parents of this child probably knew about this enclosure.

Alexandra Craig2:56 pm 09 Sep 15

Ezy said :

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Even so, I still don’t think a cage is appropriate whether it’s permanent or not. Like I said, how many other children with behavioural problems have been dealt with effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty.

dukethunder said :

Watch this for context. https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/louis-theroux-extreme-love-autism/ZX9254A001S00&ved=0CGMQFjAJahUKEwjJ4u6EuefHAhUELqYKHferAlA&usg=AFQjCNGRiejIAm6587ddMUfhaZWYPsiBaQ

When this surfaced, I thought there’s no way this doesn’t implicate some level of ACT government incompetence. Where do you start? Lack of training,lack of resources(see the facilities in the vid), lack of monitoring.. Appreciate this is a horrible incident but without hearing the principals side I wouldn’t move to indict just yet.

How can we move at all? We don’t know very much. The Government, with the collusion of the media, are keeping us in the dark. With no convincing justification for such behaviour. Incompetence and lack of transparency. Standard operating procedure. And I would never vote for conservatives.

Alexandra Craig said :

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

It was not a permanent spot.

Watch this for context. https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/louis-theroux-extreme-love-autism/ZX9254A001S00&ved=0CGMQFjAJahUKEwjJ4u6EuefHAhUELqYKHferAlA&usg=AFQjCNGRiejIAm6587ddMUfhaZWYPsiBaQ

When this surfaced, I thought there’s no way this doesn’t implicate some level of ACT government incompetence. Where do you start? Lack of training,lack of resources(see the facilities in the vid), lack of monitoring.. Appreciate this is a horrible incident but without hearing the principals side I wouldn’t move to indict just yet.

alllenthough7:19 pm 08 Sep 15

I have just read the city news and its summary of facts and outcomes on the CAGE LIKE STRUCTURE or cage as I like to call it. Points 9 to 11 are laughable. To say that ACT teachers and principals have access to specialist behavioural support is true, as they have recently filled positions and restructured the teams SINCE this incident. Teachers have just taken a hit in pay to ensure their are more school counsellors, so they obviously believe their is not enough support from counsellors or would not have had this put in their enterprise agreement. What most reflects the state of executive management of the education department is Diane Joseph placing more directors between herself having to accept any responsibility rather than fund support kiddies

I totally agree London,
But a cage takes planning and forethought and organising, surely something else could have been done?
There have been time that even even the autistic unit the special teacher aides had to call my wife or I to come and at least try and calm our son!
Maybe this is a parent thing, maybe the child was never formally diagnosed which means the avenues of support aren’t open.
The other children and the children’s welfare are paramount but only an animal belongs in a cage!

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

This.

It is clear that this child required something special to be put in place so as not to hurt the other students or the teacher. The big question is why did this child not have a carer?

My wife is a teacher and has had to evacuate her classroom a number of times due to children behaving in a manner that is extremely violent. This is not an uncommon problem either and now students are suffering due to the teacher having to manage these sorts of disruptive behavioural problems.

At the end of the day, there needs to be more support staff for teachers to allow them to teach the rest of the class whilst the disruptions are dealt with safely and professionally.

As a child with autism let me say that “no child, special needs or not should not be put in a cage” and I would argue any parent that would like their child locked up like a caged animal!
Now saying that I know from experience that the ACT schooling system is under resourced to deal with these children and also that some children with special needs can never cope in mainstream schooling.

Evilomlap said :

There were some kids at my school who probably *should* have been kept in cages.

Seriously, what exactly took 165 days? For the principal to be fired? Or for this to be made public?

This was truly the Colonle Kurtz of the ACT public education. But it never happened, or at least no-one else was involved…so what kind of oversight does the Directorate exercise over schools? How does a principal get to do stuff like this with no-one raising an eyebrow?

Alexandra Craig said :

Nilrem said :

Marcus Paul said :

I have chosen NOT to name the school or principal out of respect for the child’s family.

How does it respect the child’s family to not name the school or principal? It keeps the rest of the community in the dark, and I can see no benefit whatsoever to the child and his/her family to be gained from withholding that information.

If the family wanted to be known I’m sure they’d come out and make themselves known. Their privacy should be respected.

But why would releasing the details of the school or principal affect their privacy? Provided any indetifying details were removed from any material released, their privacy would still be preserved, and the citizens and parents of the ACT might find out more about a scandal that is being very incompetently covered up, with the collaboration of unquestioning journalists.

“The inquiry, overseen at arm’s length from Minister Joy Burch’s office, found the principal was solely responsible for the incident.

Minister Burch told my radio program she felt physically ill after learning of the “cage-like structure”. She says the decision to erect such a thing was made without input, consultation or approval from the school or the directorate.

Errr, so the Principal was running the school like some kind of rogue dictatorship? He/She consulted no-one else in the School? They didn’t provide any input or feedback to the Principal? Really? So someone has been executed and now everything is dandy? Please explain.

There were some kids at my school who probably *should* have been kept in cages.

Seriously, what exactly took 165 days? For the principal to be fired? Or for this to be made public?

Alexandra Craig4:35 pm 08 Sep 15

Nilrem said :

Marcus Paul said :

I have chosen NOT to name the school or principal out of respect for the child’s family.

How does it respect the child’s family to not name the school or principal? It keeps the rest of the community in the dark, and I can see no benefit whatsoever to the child and his/her family to be gained from withholding that information.

If the family wanted to be known I’m sure they’d come out and make themselves known. Their privacy should be respected.

Alexandra Craig4:33 pm 08 Sep 15

london said :

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

I’m not disputing that the child has behaviour that’s difficult to manage, but how many other kids, exactly like him, have been managed effectively without having to resort to a cage? Plenty, I’m sure.

And early reports suggest that it was not an area for the child to reflect and calm down, it was the child’s permanent spot as far as I’m aware.

I don’t believe any school principal would put a child in a cage. If it is an area for a child to calm down and reflect that is completely different. Why should other children and teachers be at risk from badly behaved children. Teachers are at school to educate not manage the behavour of out of control students. Parents should be called to school to do this job. If you have never experienced this type of child out of control you should not comment.

Alexandra Craig4:12 pm 08 Sep 15

Masquara said :

Why hasn’t the principal been named?

Marcus Paul said :

I have chosen NOT to name the school or principal out of respect for the child’s family.

I noticed that the Canberra Times aren’t naming the principal either. Basically so people don’t find out who the child is. Poor kid.

Marcus Paul said :

I have chosen NOT to name the school or principal out of respect for the child’s family.

How does it respect the child’s family to not name the school or principal? It keeps the rest of the community in the dark, and I can see no benefit whatsoever to the child and his/her family to be gained from withholding that information.

I have chosen NOT to name the school or principal out of respect for the child’s family.

Why hasn’t the principal been named?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.