15 November 2024

Aerial shooting of wild horses: NSW inquiry chair condemns final report as 'unbalanced'

| Edwina Mason
Join the conversation
5
inquiry into aerial shooting of wild horses

The seven-month Upper House inquiry included five public hearings and examined 540 public submissions. Photo: NSW Parliament.

The chair of a NSW Upper House inquiry into the aerial culling of wild horses, or brumbies, in Kosciuszko National Park (KNP), has fiercely criticised the committee’s final report, calling it “completely unbalanced”.

The report, which was released on Wednesday (13 November), endorses the controversial continuation of aerial shooting as a primary method to control wild horse populations.

Animal Justice Party MLC Emma Hurst, who chaired the inquiry, claims the report diverges drastically from her initial recommendations.

She alleges that NSW Labor and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) “gutted” her draft to produce a document that endorses the NSW Government’s aerial culling strategy, a position she says misrepresents public opinion and the evidence presented during the seven-month inquiry which included five public hearings and examined 540 public submissions.

READ ALSO As aerial shooting begins in Kosciuszko, locals fear for the future of heritage brumby herds

Ms Hurst further asserts that Labor members actively prevented her from writing a chair’s foreword for the report, which she sees as an effort to obscure critical information from the public.

“Labor and SFF have twisted this report to support the government’s shooting agenda, ignoring community concerns and the clear evidence that the aerial shooting program is causing immense suffering among brumbies,” she said.

In a dissenting statement included in the report, Ms Hurst calls for an immediate halt to aerial shooting, an independent population survey of brumbies, and funding for humane alternatives such as fertility control and rehoming programs.

The inquiry was launched following the NSW Government’s August 2023 proposal to reintroduce aerial culling to manage the brumby population in KNP, with a goal of reducing the numbers from an estimated 12,000–21,000 to a legislated 3000 by 2027.

Proponents of the plan, including Environment Minister Penny Sharpe, argue that reducing wild horse numbers is essential to protect the park’s fragile alpine ecosystem from further damage.

Ms Sharpe welcomed the findings.

“The report looked in detail at the way wild horses are managed in Kosciuszko National Park,” she said.

Environmental advocates, including the Invasive Species Council (ISC), have also backed the findings of the report, with ISC advocacy director Jack Gough describing aerial shooting by trained professionals as, “the only viable way to reduce brumby numbers and protect these sensitive ecosystems.”

Mr Gough further urged parliament to repeal a provision prioritising feral horse preservation over native species within the park, describing opposition to culling as “anti-science”.

“No one likes to see animals killed, but the sad reality is that we have a choice to make between urgently reducing the numbers of feral horses or accepting the destruction of sensitive alpine rivers, and the decline and extinction of native animals and their homes,” he said.

READ ALSO Grim scenes as Kosciuszko opens again to the public after seven-month aerial shooting cull

Ms Hurst emphasised testimony from the inquiry detailing incidents where horses suffered prolonged deaths due to inaccurate shots, arguing that the report’s focus on aerial shooting disregards community preferences for non-lethal solutions.

“The report’s emphasis on aerial shooting over humane solutions fails to respect the wishes of the community, who are overwhelmingly against this brutal method of control.

“I have never seen such a blatant attempt to bury one side of the evidence in an inquiry,” Ms Hurst said. “I am particularly disappointed that the Shooters Party, longtime advocates against aerial shooting, have decided to fully support aerial shooting and the National Parks & Wildlife Service (NPWS) killing program going forward.”

NSW Nationals MLC Wes Fang also voiced support for Ms Hurst, calling the report biased and expressing disappointment over the SFF’s alignment with NSW Labor on the issue.

“This report demonstrates despite their commitments, they simply sided with Labor as they typically do,” Fang said.

As the NSW Government prepares to formally respond to the report in early 2025, Ms Hurst has vowed to continue advocating for more humane brumby management solutions, stating, “This is far from over.”

Original Article published by Edwina Mason on About Regional.

Join the conversation

5
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

This is a good example of our parliaments’ committee systems working.

Emma Hurst from the AJP and Wes Fang from the Nationals commenced this inquiry with preconceived ideas on their preferred outcome. The NSW parliament has gone through the proper inquiry processes and they are now crying foul, whingeing at the outcome claiming that the report is biased and unbalanced despite Ms Hurst chairing the committee.

There were 540 submissions to the inquiry including from the ACT and NSW governments, scientists and animal welfare groups including the RSPCA.

The vast majority of those submissions supported the government’s aerial culling efforts as the most humane and effective control option which delivers better animal welfare outcomes.

The outcome of the inquiry is clear and the government has the full support of the Animal Welfare Committee to continue its culling program.

Stephen Saunders8:12 am 17 Nov 24

The brumbies are a magnificent expression of our timeless and inclusive Anzac culture. If we just give a few of them a new home, with a blankie and some hay, that will fix thing. Meantime, it’s wonderful to be in a pristine natural environment carpeted in mud wallows and horse poo. It reminds me of Manhattan in the late 19th century.

The feral horse advocates really have no shame.

Surely after significantly more horses have been culled than the total they claimed existed with their “independent counts”, they would stop their ridiculous claims. But apparently no.

Edwina Mason has again provided a biased account of this issue. She is so one-eyed that some of the most interesting aspects of the story have gone unmentioned. The process to develop the 2021 horse management plan was unusually democratic. The process to amend the plan was ,as well. And both times, the scientific advice was largely followed, with a few notable exceptions. But then in 2023, NSW politicians Emma Hurst (Animal Justice Party) and Wes Fang (Nationals) tried to over-ride that official process by commencing this unexpected inquiry in the Animal Welfare Committee of the NSW Legislative Council. They were entirely within their rights to do so, but what politician sets up an inquiry without giving some thought to where it might end?

MAYBE Emma naively expected the inquiry to produce the kinds of recommendations contained in her dissenting report, which would prevent NSW from heli-shooting the hundreds of thousands of horses, pigs, deer, and goats that they now remove each year with this method. I don’t know the rules around how NSW parliamentary inquiries are conducted but it looks now as though Emma Hirst did not know them either, because the official report from the inquiry WHICH SHE CHAIRED, strongly and simply tells NSW Government to keep on going as they have been.

MAYBE naievety is the explanation. But it seems more likely that Emma, her advisers and the inquiry secretariat staff would know the rules (how could they not?). Therefore this outcome was predictable. But the proviso for dissenting reports enabled Emma and Wes to have their cake AND eat it. The dissenting report is for show, simply to keep her animal liberation and compassionate conservation allies happy that she is fighting for their cause (and for Wes to keep John Barilaro happy). Edwin is helping. But the inquiry seems to have come at a very heavy cost from the the brumby lobby perspective, first because now the responsible minister (Penny Sharpe, Labor) can truthfully say that the government has the full and almost unconditional support of the Animal Welfare Committee of the NSW Legislative Council for heli-shooting and for their horse counting method. And second, because Emma Hurst and Wes Fang will seem to some people to be even more naive and ineffective than they did before this.

As if you put the animal justice party kook in charge of this inquiry. The only thing unbalanced is her opinion.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.