The ABC have this article on a 29 year old drug dealer who has upto 48 aliases, including 17 different licences and yet he’s been released on bail. Does anyone else see this as a problem?
Only problem is he’s causing havoc amoung all the mandatory detainees there, he tells them too much information…
VG – Only you could get into a fight over a point of agreement!
So long as he paid bail for each of his 48 aliases, I don’t think I’d have a problem.
You say tomato, I say tomato….whatever!!!
Anyway, the bottom line is – the perpetrator shouldn’t have been bailed !
I think it’s more the fact that it’s not “The other unintelligable thing”, it’s “exactly the same unintelligable thing, just reworded” that che’s getting at.
Sorry, so I can’t agree? How remiss of me…..but you did ask if anyone else saw it as a problem
thats kinda what I was getting at vg
The other unintelligible thing is the magistrates decision to bail him despite the clear risk. What odds the chap doesnt front next time?
Is Canberra's signature dish: