Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Quality childcare in a
welcoming & supportive environment

Blog Post: A silver lining to a tough budget?

By Emily Morris 18 May 2014 27

silver-lining

On Thursday morning I popped out to do a bit of shopping and ran into a friend.  I have known him a long time – more than 30 years and he is a mild mannered and generally fairly quiet man.  We said hello and I asked how he was going, expecting our usual mid shopping centre light chat before moving on for my coffee.  But, I was surprised when he stopped, looked me dead in the eye, threw his arms in the air and said ‘I’m just so angry about the budget.’

This started a long conversation about the contents of the budget, our social philosophies (we agreed on some things, disagreed on others) and where we would like to see the country going.  We talked passionately, unaware of what was going on around us, deep in thought and contemplation over what has happened to the country and what may be yet to come.

I must confess I walked away quite invigorated.  I have never spoken with this friend in this way before.  We usually talk kids and life and light stuff.  And it made me wonder if perhaps this would be one of the more positive outcomes in this changing country of ours.  I wonder if it will cause more of us to engage in our community and its politics, to really understand what is going on, what community leaders and politicians are planning, to be part of the discussion.

I remember watching Q&A a few weeks ago when the students protested.  I will freely admit that it annoyed the cr*p out of me.  Not the idea of protest, but the way it was done.  Ask questions, have your voice heard.  Don’t just interrupt for the sake of interrupting.  Tell us what you think of wrong and how you think it can be fixed, in real terms.

Will this budget make us more engaged as a Nation?  I say that knowing that the majority of Rioters are already pretty d*mn engaged, but for those of us out there (like me) who used to fill conversations with general ‘chit chat’, will the tone of those discussions now change?

I hope so.  I really hope this gives us the very positive outcome of people being more aware of what is going on, better ‘versed’ in the process, more interested, more vocal – not just to complain but to stand up and say ‘I disagree, and this is what I’m going to do to change it.’

Maybe it’s time for us all to take a more proactive stance in our politics.  I don’t mean to get people into the streets, but to meetings, have their opinions tabled, join political parties or start their own discussions.  Or, merely have a meaningful conversation with an old friend to get that thinking happening.  It’s good for the soul.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
27 Responses to
Blog Post: A silver lining to a tough budget?
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
dungfungus 3:54 pm 25 May 14

JC said :

justin heywood said :

For myself, I am shocked at some aspects of the Liberal budget and dismayed by Abbott’s performance as PM so far. The only thing that could possibly be worse than this mob would be the other mob. That people can wish for the return of the shambolic, dishonest and dangerously reckless regime we endured under the Rudd/Gillard baffles me. But then I am probably biased as well.

Serious question, what exactly was dishonest about the last government? Now don’t give me Julia Gillards supposed ‘lie’, because that isn’t a good example of dishonesty. That was a case of changing policy due to changing situation, specifically the people not delivering a majority in the house. You could probably cain Gillard for changing her mind or back-flipping to get power, that would be fair, but at least she wasn’t going to sell her bum to get into power unlike your bloke. He might have got there except Tony Windsor has some standards and didn’t want his bum.

Craig Thompson, maybe though his dishonesty was before he got into government so don’t see how the government can be blamed. Their protection of him, maybe but then again this country does have a strong belief of innocent until proven guilty. Peter Slipper maybe, but oh he wasn’t actually government was he, he was Liberal turned independent and again innocent until proven guilty. Though in this scandal Mal Brough and Abbott still have some questions to answer.

Also what was wreckless? Keeping the economy out of recession? Yeah that’s right isn’t it?

And yes I am biased, but I too a baffled as to how anyone could have seriously believed the c$#p that came from Abbots’s mouth before the last election, or the lies they have spread about the economy for the last 3-4 years. Though at least Abbott did have the common sense to tell the truth about the economy at least once, when overseas. Guess the guy was silly to not realise that something he says overseas can pretty quickly be transmitted to our screens in Australia. Anyone would think he was living in the 50’s, where he wants to send the country where comments such as they may never have made it home, except maybe over he telegraph.

I find it ironic that everything Rudd said before the previous election about the trustworthiness of the PM and about the Noaltions direction they wish to take the country have come true.

“Serious question, what exactly was dishonest about the last government?”
Do you mean the first Rudd government, the first Gillard government, the first Gillard minority government or the first Rudd minority government?
Reason I ask is that if you say “all of them”, my response will be four times as long.

JC 12:31 pm 25 May 14

justin heywood said :

For myself, I am shocked at some aspects of the Liberal budget and dismayed by Abbott’s performance as PM so far. The only thing that could possibly be worse than this mob would be the other mob. That people can wish for the return of the shambolic, dishonest and dangerously reckless regime we endured under the Rudd/Gillard baffles me. But then I am probably biased as well.

Serious question, what exactly was dishonest about the last government? Now don’t give me Julia Gillards supposed ‘lie’, because that isn’t a good example of dishonesty. That was a case of changing policy due to changing situation, specifically the people not delivering a majority in the house. You could probably cain Gillard for changing her mind or back-flipping to get power, that would be fair, but at least she wasn’t going to sell her bum to get into power unlike your bloke. He might have got there except Tony Windsor has some standards and didn’t want his bum.

Craig Thompson, maybe though his dishonesty was before he got into government so don’t see how the government can be blamed. Their protection of him, maybe but then again this country does have a strong belief of innocent until proven guilty. Peter Slipper maybe, but oh he wasn’t actually government was he, he was Liberal turned independent and again innocent until proven guilty. Though in this scandal Mal Brough and Abbott still have some questions to answer.

Also what was wreckless? Keeping the economy out of recession? Yeah that’s right isn’t it?

And yes I am biased, but I too a baffled as to how anyone could have seriously believed the c$#p that came from Abbots’s mouth before the last election, or the lies they have spread about the economy for the last 3-4 years. Though at least Abbott did have the common sense to tell the truth about the economy at least once, when overseas. Guess the guy was silly to not realise that something he says overseas can pretty quickly be transmitted to our screens in Australia. Anyone would think he was living in the 50’s, where he wants to send the country where comments such as they may never have made it home, except maybe over he telegraph.

I find it ironic that everything Rudd said before the previous election about the trustworthiness of the PM and about the Noaltions direction they wish to take the country have come true.

astrojax 1:03 pm 21 May 14

the op speaks [obliquely] to the real issue here, which is the dearth of understanding of civics by the broader population, a significant failing of the education system. which is being further cut – clearly, this is a government who wish to keep the masses uninformed. when will their three word slogans become invitations to the colluseum..?

we have no formal civics education in our curriculum yet expect [nay, demand] all citizens to cast a valid vote. how can such a dullard community be said to exercise ‘democracy’?

watto23 12:35 pm 21 May 14

HiddenDragon said :

After last night’s Q&A, I’d say good luck to any political party/parties who have to deal with Australia’s economic realities over the coming years and decades. Certainly, there are less than clever and sensible elements to the recent Budget, and it has not been particularly well explained, but there are serious long term fiscal problems to be dealt with, and no amount of soothing words about “there’s no emergency” and “the credit ratings agencies think we’re bonzer” will change that.

There will be a silver lining if Labor eventually puts forward workable realistic policies to address these issues – then there could be a real debate, not just a big national dummy spit, cheered on from the sidelines.

Sounds like you’ve swallowed the magic pill as well.
There is no budget emergency. That is all made up by one party to spread fear. Both parties are to blame for the current budget situation, however they don’t need drastic changes to fix it. The only reason drastic changes are needed because the coalition is sticking to wasting money the way they like to waste money vs the way labor likes to waste money. If you think the coalition is good for the country then you have a problem. Before you start calling me a lefty, Labor as well has it flaws and both parties are blinded by their ideological values that they refuse to budge from just for the sake or winning an election by lying to the public. They both have done it.

But please the budget emergency is a myth, when you can afford to spend more than the last budget, add additional spending, cut several sources of income and taxes. If I have a budget problem at home, I certainly don’t stop earning income from one source, buy some new shoes but go without food on the table. By all means bring in the ideological based decision but do it in 2 years when your so called budget emergency is over.

HiddenDragon 11:29 am 20 May 14

After last night’s Q&A, I’d say good luck to any political party/parties who have to deal with Australia’s economic realities over the coming years and decades. Certainly, there are less than clever and sensible elements to the recent Budget, and it has not been particularly well explained, but there are serious long term fiscal problems to be dealt with, and no amount of soothing words about “there’s no emergency” and “the credit ratings agencies think we’re bonzer” will change that.

There will be a silver lining if Labor eventually puts forward workable realistic policies to address these issues – then there could be a real debate, not just a big national dummy spit, cheered on from the sidelines.

VYBerlinaV8_is_back 10:13 am 20 May 14

davo101 said :

VYBerlinaV8_is_back said :

Being a self-made multimillionaire, building and running a successful business, he’d be a great PM.

Didn’t say he wouldn’t be. Just not going to happen as leader of the Liberals. Remember he was rolled for having the temerity of saying that climate change is real and that an emission trading system would be the best response. He’s going to have to develop a far more anti-science view of the world before the dries are going to let him drive the bus.

Yeah ok, good point…

dungfungus 9:54 am 20 May 14

milkman said :

chewy14 said :

The problem is that there is a large proportion of the population that is ignorant and self centred when it comes to financial matters. They see a good budget as one in which they get extra government money and a bad budget is one in which they don’t get government money or even *shock horror* have government money taken off them.

There is plenty wrong with this budget but the number one problem is not what they have cut, it’s what they haven’t. The general populace will p$ss and moan about this budget for a while but it won’t engender any long lasting political awakening or engagement. Next year the process will be exactly the same, “what’s in it for me?”

Best comment of the thread.

I agree, good comment.
Joe Hockey is like the collection agent who knocks on the borrower’s door in the evening to try and come to an arrangement for the borrower to get the arrears paid on the car loan and restore the contract to a current basis. This would normally be by way of increasing future monthly payments (a levy) until the arrears (deficit) is cleared.
He would get two responses aligned to the people who answer the door.
First “the takers” who will abuse and threaten him and blame everyone but themselves for being in arrears and they usually cite the “greedy” bank or finance company for exploiting them ignoring the fact that they signed the contract. It will transpire that the borrowers at this address are heavily in debt and pursue a lifestyle that means they are not prepared to realign their priorities. Payment of the current rental will be made when the next welfare entitlement arrives but the borrowers do not have the resources to rein in the arrears so they will struggle on to the next crisis incurring overdue interest as they go. The collection agent is not looking forward to calling again.
The second group would be “the givers” who are facing a temporary hardship usually resulting from matters beyond their control. They are polite but embarrassed and contrite and immediately put forward an acceptable arrangement to pay the arrears and collection costs. This arrangement would probably involve foregoing other planned expenditure like a holiday.
The collection agent leaves the address knowing he will probably never have to return as the borrower has accepted sole responsibilty for debt incurred in his/her name and he/she is not likely to be in a position where income is reliant on welfare.
If the defaults cannot be corrected then the borrowers will recieve a call from a repossession agent who has instructions to collect the arrears and costs in cash (not sovereign bonds) or lose the car.
If you ever think no one cares about you, miss your car payments for a couple of months.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site