18 January 2023

Building resilience out of disaster is a task for the whole Canberra community

| Emma Davidson MLA
Join the conversation
Communities@Work_Photo1_bushfire recovery growth

Recovery from bushfires is a task for the whole community. Photo: Supplied.

When four lives were lost in the Canberra bushfires of 18 January 2003, and almost 500 homes were destroyed, our city changed forever.

Almost 500 people were treated at hospital, including 49 as inpatients at Canberra hospitals, and several transferred to Sydney hospitals. More than 5000 people were evacuated to emergency relief centres, and more than 50,000 residents lost access to electricity or water during the ten-day state of emergency.

When this many people experience trauma, it changes both individuals and communities. How can it not? We exist not just as individuals, but interconnected to other individuals, and made more than the sum of our parts through those relationships. When we lose members of our community, when they suffer injury or loss, we all feel it and we are all changed by it.

A study of more than 500 Canberrans who had registered with the ACT Government’s Bushfire Recovery Centre found that three years later, many people said their relationships with family, friends and community were worse after the fires.

But for others, the shared experience of adversity, and how they responded to it together, strengthened relationships. Six years on, in-depth interviews with 25 adults directly impacted by the 2003 Canberra bushfires found that people with strong, supportive relationships were still doing better than those whose relationships had become distant or strained.

Community recovery focuses not on restoration of a pre-disaster state, but on greater community resilience. What this means is the ability to understand and adapt to what has happened, to better prepare for future disasters, to create a stronger sense of place and belonging within the community, foster a stronger and more diverse economy, and a more economically and socially integrated community.

Once the immediate emergency management has passed, community recovery includes addressing individual financial impacts and on the economy as a whole, physical and mental health, and community cohesion. It involves understanding the experiences of those who have been through the disaster and integrating those experiences into the community’s understanding. It is renewal, not restoration.

READ ALSO Canberra author says 20 years on, there are still many reasons to heal the firestorm’s scars

In the aftermath of the 2003 fires, community recovery groups grew organically from local streets. A few creative individuals started organising, and others joined in. They organised bushwalks, barbecues and street parties to provide space for people to acknowledge their shared experience.

In this moment of reflection, it is important to recognise that our ability to recover was community led. Government – and particularly the Bushfire Recovery Centre – played an important role in that recovery. But the community knew what would most help their friends, family, and neighbours.

That community-led recovery began as the disaster itself was unfolding. On that day in 2003, my neighbour knocked on the door and told me what was happening. I’d been out of town all morning and my car radio was broken. I could see the fires burning into the suburbs as I drove west into Woden, but I hadn’t heard any of the emergency warnings.

People opened their door to strangers to offer a safe place to stay, gave clothes or furniture, offered a cup of tea and a listening ear to someone who looked like they were having a hard time.

Workers in some government agencies recognised the value in community-led recovery activities in 2003 and attended some of the events themselves. It meant they could hear more directly from community members and understand their experiences and needs.

This is the paradox for governments. Encouraging and empowering social activism and community self-organising is important in resilience and recovery. But it also means listening to criticism of government’s role in prevention, response, and recovery from the disaster. It requires trust from both community and government to work collaboratively and creatively.

READ ALSO 20 years on from 2003 disaster, council’s bushfire warning must be heeded

It takes courage for governments to act in this way. It requires governments to support community through their grief and loss, listen when the community is ready to articulate what kind of future they want, and provide the resources to rebuild a better future together.

We didn’t get everything right in 2003. But we can learn (and have learnt) from what we went through together, and we can be better prepared in future. As the frequency and intensity of bushfires increases as a result of climate change, it’s critically important to do the work to become a kinder, more connected community now.

Architectural styles along Eucumbene Drive in Duffy are quite different in 2023 to those in other parts of the suburb, reflecting the 200 homes lost in that suburb alone.

Canberra in 2023 is different in so many other ways than it was in 2003. The kindness and connection to each other during the fires, and in the years after, have shaped the community we are.

Emma Davidson is an MLA for Murrumbidgee and the Minister for Mental Health, Assistant Minister Families and Community Services.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
Capital Retro7:51 am 20 Jan 23

I’m glad you wrote that article Emma because until now I have never heard of you.

And I was unaware the ACT had a Minister for Mental Health.

By the way, you are wrong about climate change increasing the frequency and intensity of bushfires. In fact, it was your party that prevented early action on the fires in 2003.

You have never heard of Greens MLA Emma Davidson CR despite all of your posts highly critical of Labor and the Greens? Your posts seem to come straight from the ACT Young Liberals’ Facebook page. Please enlighten readers and reveal where in any of the reports released following the 2003 bushfires is there any mention that the Greens were responsible for the lack of early action and the fire’s intensity. There was only one Greens member elected to the Assembly at that time as well as a Democrat. I fail to see how the Assembly’s makeup and this one person could have been responsible. I await your response with bated breath!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.