Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Opinion

Canberra’s Leading
Relationship Lawyers

Canberra visual arts have been Turnbulled

By Paul Costigan - 16 May 2016 4

CCAS-P1180217

Last Friday 13th May was sad day, and very much a black Friday, for many in the arts across Australia. It was not simply that many small to medium organisations had lost all or most of their Australia Council funding. What made it hurt even more was the reasons for this drastic situation.

What was being rolled out last week was the inevitable result of the decision by the present Federal Government to cut a whole swag of money from the Australia Council. Some of the missing funds are now under the minister’s own program – curiously called Catalyst – which while informed by a committee of experts, is still subject to the minister’s own will.

This style of potential political interference is exactly why in the 1970s the arms length model as practiced by the Australia Council was established. Several ministers over the years before have thought about interfering in this arms length process, but it took this particular brand of conservative federal government to apply that devastating blow.

CCAS-2014-P1050270

All these actions remain the responsibility of the current government led by a Prime Minister who had portrayed himself as being committed to cultural development and to innovation. What a load of … !!!

Locally the most devastating news was that a most cherished and very successful visual arts organisation received that dreadful call about the loss of their funding. That organisation is the Canberra Contemporary Arts Space (CCAS) – currently based at the Gorman Arts Centre with a separate exhibition space in Manuka.

Before I say much more – a declaration: I was the first chair of the CCAS way back when we oversaw the amalgamation of two very successful visual arts spaces – namely Bitumen River Gallery and the Arts Council Gallery. In more recent years – I have little to do with the space beyond the occasional visit. Enough of that.

CCAS-2014-P105021

I am sure that the CCAS will do something to carry on, but life is not going to be easy for all the volunteers and the low paid artworks involved. This is just the first layer of the casualty – as the work they are committed to doing is to assist artists in their early years and to promote contemporary visual arts practice.

All this and more is exactly what the Prime Minister says his government stands for. HA!!

For the moment at least – CCAS can say that they have joined the many arts, community and social NGOs across the country that are being Turnbulled out of existence.

CCAS-P1180210

I understand completely what the Australia Council had to do. It had lost a load of Commonwealth funds and this had to result in some programs being downsized. Understood. Sort of.

There are statements that arts organisations such as the CCAS have not been cut-off as they can now apply for project funding. What the Australia Council failed to explain was that such project funding is only ever short term (maybe only months – not years) and comes with no guarantee that there may be any more in the next round.

This ignores the many years of advocacy and negotiations that have taken place to achieve some certainty for key medium size arts organisation. Having multi-year operational funding stopped arts workers having to allocate so much of their time filling out various project grant applications. It allowed the organisations to concentrate on doing the things they are there to do – working with and for the artists. It was never a lot of money.

Of course there were also many winners around the country. Locally the Canberra Glassworks has achieved multi-year funding for the first time. This has been a long time in coming.

The concept for the glass workshop commenced way back in the late 1980s. There was a stage when many letters and reports were being landed on various agency desks. The number of meetings and the amount of advocacy was just amazing. Eventually the place as we know it today came into existence.

It was always envisioned that there would be suite of arts organisations across the city to function alongside each other working servicing the cross section of artists/craftpeoples and assisting the community to participate more in the arts. So it is really great to see the glass centre succeed at last.

CCAS-P1180224

I have to also mention the sad note that Ausdance national has suffered a similar cut to the CCAS. This also really stuns me given the important work I know they have done. One important aspect was their work on the safety issues around being a dancer. All that and more is now under question. There are tough times ahead for those advocating for dance nationally.

To finish where I began.

The visual arts remain an important aspect of the cultural life here in Canberra. The Canberra Contemporary Arts Space is a vital link in the local arts scene and deserves to be funded well and in a manner that provides multi-year certainty – not just through ad hoc project funding. All those volunteers, those under paid workers and the many new artists are worthy of real support.

I wish them all well. Being Turnbulled is not going to be much fun.

——————————————-

Here are some background links:

The Canberra Times on this funding – click here

The word from CCAS themselves – click here

About Ausdance – click here

What’s Your opinion?


Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
4 Responses to
Canberra visual arts have been Turnbulled
Rustygear 4:23 pm 02 Jun 16

Paul makes the point that perhaps art funding is being ‘interfered with’ by politicians. The best way to solve this perception beyond all doubt is to discontinue all arts funding. Personally I don’t think that’s a problem at all. People do all sorts of culturally related things other than ‘art’ that are part of public life and they don’t get funding. So why fund so-called ‘art’? Most of it is pathetically uninspired and talentless. Its a clique thing, that’s all – people of a certain type feeling entitled to public money because they fancy themselves as ‘artists’. Who cares. Alternatively, I should get funding for my interest in 19th century industrial machinery … oh, you’re not interested in that? Even though I could discuss at length the insight, intelligence, creativity, sustained logic, ingenuity and social context of that machinery? Still think its boring? Well then, that’s about the same as me being flatly uninterested in ‘art’. Stop arts funding now.

Queanbeyanite 6:48 pm 19 May 16

The were CFMEU’d Paul,

The Unions rack up $400 billion in debt, with no surplus in sight ’till 2016, something has to give. Over $1 billion a month interest…

5% of the population are paying 30% of the tax now, if they all decide to have a ‘gap decade’ in their Monaco holiday homes we’ll be cutting more than public art mate.

wildturkeycanoe 6:24 am 17 May 16

Alexandra Craig said :

What do we get with no government funding for The Arts?
Van Gogh, Turner, Arkley, Banksy.

And with government funding?
A big owl and a pile of rusty girders.

I don’t think you can buy talent, when it comes to Art, you just have to let it happen.

Art is a passion, not a trade that you can learn like plumbing or carpentry. Should artists get free money to follow their passion? Name one other skill, craft or hobby that gets funding for producing something that doesn’t sell and continues to do so regardless of repeated failure to make any returns on the product being manufactured. If you cannot make any money from selling your art and need funding to continue producing more of it, then I think it is a failed business model and they should try doing something else. Throwing money at people just because it is in the country’s cultural interest, should be bringing something of value in return. If it is sold to the National Gallery or in a market, then the artist has earned their reward from that sale, but tax payers shouldn’t have to pay their living wages, especially if the art just ends up in a worthless pile in somebody’s garage.
If producing art is an artist’s passion, they will continue to do it even without government funding. Why should they be any different to athletes, musicians, singers or actors, who have to earn their living by doing what they do well and turn to something else if they can’t make a living from it?

HenryBG 3:06 pm 16 May 16

What do we get with no government funding for The Arts?
Van Gogh, Turner, Arkley, Banksy.

And with government funding?
A big owl and a pile of rusty girders.

I don’t think you can buy talent, when it comes to Art, you just have to let it happen.

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
www.the-riotact.com | www.b2bmagazine.com.au | www.thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site