10 December 2024

If Katy's an 'underdog', Albo's really in trouble

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
39
Woman in front of display

Senator Katy Gallagher is still a firm favourite to retain her Senate seat, despite her public protestations. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Is Katy Gallagher really that nervous about her ACT Senate seat, or has the general malaise in the Albanese Government put her on edge?

Senator Gallagher, a former ACT Chief Minister, has always been popular with Canberrans and is usually considered a shoo-in at election time.

But she has made it known that her seat should now be considered marginal given the rise and rise of David Pocock.

He will be first elected, she says, bolstered by a cashed-up campaign that will outspend hers.

Declaring yourself as the underdog is a time-honoured tradition to bring any waverers – Greens, anyone? – back into the fold and betrays a government with the jitters.

Senator Pocock’s stature has only grown over the past couple of years. Not that he is perfect, as any Liberal Party member will tell you, but he commands respect and is seen as an honest negotiator who steps up for his constituents.

Senator Gallagher is probably right that he is unlikely to be a one-term senator, but suggesting that his popularity means Labor will battle to fill the other Senate spot is extraordinary.

Unless she has seen some polling that has Labor tanking even here in the People’s Republic of the ACT, her view must reflect a general fear in the government that voters will punish Labor over cost of living.

And if going to Peter Dutton is a bridge too far, voters will be looking around for an independent.

READ ALSO Will Canberra bashing work for Dutton where it didn’t for Morrison?

Coincidentally, Voices of Canberra – a community group that will seek Climate 200 funding – last week unveiled midwife Jessie Price as its candidate in the southern Canberra seat of Bean, held by Labor’s David Smith.

Mr Smith is on a 12.9 per cent margin and Ms Price has already said Labor is taking voters there for granted. It will be an ask for her, or a Liberal candidate for that matter, to bridge that gap.

Yet the nervousness suggested by Senator Gallagher’s comment remains.

In 2022, many, including me at first, thought Senator Pocock would go close, but the Liberal core would hold enough to thwart him. Of course, he pulled off a famous victory and appears to have changed the Senate dynamic in the ACT.

But there are a couple of factors that should see Senator Gallagher returned.

The first is that the lead Liberal candidate, Jacob Vadakkedathu, has been virtually invisible in Canberra, to the extent that there has been talk party figures are unhappy with his low profile and are prepared to replace him.

Mr Vadakkedathu’s pre-selection was a surprise and some speculate it was part of a longer game the old guard right was playing, in view of at least two terms of Labor, to keep an avenue open in 2028 for the return of the man Senator Pocock defeated, Zed Seselja.

Mr Seselja is now a NSW party member, and while his ambitions to become a NSW senator were thwarted, it is understood that he still wants to return to the Senate.

So Senator Gallagher is not facing an opponent with a high public profile or arguably the full and unequivocal support of the party.

READ ALSO Minister says expect to see more APS Code of Conduct breaches

The other factor is preferential voting. Senator Gallagher will outpoll the Greens, whose preferences, if needed, should be enough to get her over the line.

For many voters, the two sitting Senators will be their top two choices, in whatever order they prefer.

So I don’t expect much to change in the ACT, but the fact Senator Gallagher is nervy, along with the end-of-year manoeuvring, suggests an election may be coming sooner than we think.

If not, it’s is going to be a long four months to May, the latest it can be held.

Join the conversation

39
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Oh no Katie will need a job, she is unfit for private enterprise. Maybe she can get a position as advisor the the opposition leader after the next election.

Gallagher should be worried. She has played a leading role in a Government that has lurched from one disaster to another. She was part of the “mean girls” brigade. Hopefully the voting public will remember the failure she is come election time

Incidental Tourist5:29 pm 10 Dec 24

The problem with Pockock is that he is confined to backbench (read endless opposition). We didn’t have independent frontbenchers, and never will. So no matter how much you like Pockock he will always be sitting on the opposition backbench with no real power regardless if Labor or Liberals run the government. In a sense he is symbol of Canberra bubble detached and unrepresentative to the rest of Australia. As his political value is next to zero, we shall see ever popular, easy target, election time Canberra bubble bashing. Even the best candidate with apparent lack of political power is a worst choice to advance Canberra’s interests. Don’t get me wrong – he may be excellent “progressive” candidate to make entire world happier in 1000 years. But it will be achieved by sacrificing today’s Canberra needs – like preserving federal Canberra’s jobs, attracting federal funding to Canberra projects and addressing today’s cost of living issues for Canberrans.

@Incidental Tourist
Oh so former front bench senators Lundy and Seselja, plus current front bench senator Gallagher have done wonders for Canberra while holding their portfolios have they? The funding to which you refer comes to the ACT because the ACT submits a grant application / project proposal – not because of the ‘power of a minister’.

His vote actually counts in the Senate, as opposed to the lame duck, mutually cancelling one Labor/one Liberal vote of previous parliaments. More lame duck votes – that’s real political power … not!

I’d rather the Canberra bubble than the delusional world you obviously inhabit.

William Teach8:23 pm 10 Dec 24

South Australia has had a few independent front-benchers. It’s generally recognised as a poison chalice though: you tend to get shafted and then have to accept the blame for everything else the government does. You’re better off blocking government bills until you get your policies enacted, though even then a lot of independents accept worthless promises instead of genuine action.

OTOH, having a front-bencher who refuses to use her position to carry out the directions she received from the branch that nominated her, and who instead shafted the workers supposedly represented by the union she climbed to get into parliament, isn’t any use either.

Incidental Tourist12:01 am 11 Dec 24

Yes, @William Teach, even if miracle happens and independent will be in front bench (which didn’t happen in recent federal history) they will have to become either a puppet or a scapegoat for easy attacks from all sides. This proves my point that good independent candidate is worse that bad candidate of a ruling party.

@JustSaying What public see is a tip of the iceberg. In the delusional world you refer to, the policies and legislation are cooked in the political kitchen behind closed doors with regard to taste of marginal seats. When cooking done, the menu is published to general public in the form of grants or project proposals. And you can certainly order anything you want from this menu, but neither dish is made to independent’s taste because independents never enter kitchen.

If somebody thinks that polices are made by robots who don’t care of re-election then I think they live in an idealistic bubble inside real, often delusional and imperfect world.

@Incidental Tourist
Aplogies – I can’t respond to your latest rant, as I can find nothing in it that makes any sense whatsoever, let alone warranting rebuttal.

Greg Snufferlopher4:47 pm 10 Dec 24

Bring on DOGE(Aus) and clean out this bloated overhead on taxpayers.

We don’t need to follow the good old US of A in everything they do. But they do need to cut spending. This can be done in a very effective way without ripping the economy apart. DOGE is only a wat to make Americas Oligarchs even richer.

Last election, I was a Pocock sceptic. But he hasn’t turned into some green crazy. He’s actually been very thoughtful, careful and effective in representing his electorate as an independent. Of course Labor will win the other ACT senate seat, with whoever it nominates so Gallagher’s concern is either misplaced or characteristically manipulative.

William Teach8:25 pm 10 Dec 24

Unless she’s annoyed enough people that she’s genuinely afraid of below-the-line votes.

Labor’s hubris will be their undoing again.

Gallagher is one of the worst people Canberra has ever produced. Her behaviour in the Senate has always been awful. She also wasn’t a good Chief Minister, saved only by how bad Barr is. That Stanhope allowed her to replace him reflects badly on him (he was a good Chief Minister). That Lundy allowed her to replace her reflects badly on her (Lundy was a good Senator).

HiddenDragon9:30 pm 09 Dec 24

There’s obviously some wounded feelings around the town about the relative lack of federal generosity towards the infrastructure hopes and pretensions of Canberrans who care about that stuff, but the relative generosity towards the APS very likely means it will be some time yet before Katy strolls off to the NRMA/industry super fund etc. directorships which await her.

By comparison, the humongous defined benefit pension awaiting Albanese may, one way or another, be triggered somewhat sooner than he would have anticipated on election night in 2022.

Capital Retro7:38 am 10 Dec 24

That’s exactly the way I see it too, HD.

Capital Retro9:03 am 10 Dec 24

Actually, it was not widely reported but Bill Shorten was the only Labor politician to visit the scene of the Melbourne synagogue fire. One would wonder why a politician on the cusp of retirement would do this, especially in the absence of the PM who has been criticized for not visiting the scene instead choosing to play a game of tennis in Perth.
And, why would Shorten want to take up the job at the financially crippled Canberra University where he faces a hostile council?
Shorten has a burning ambition to be PM especially after he lost the unlosable election to Morrison (thanks to Chris Bowen) and recent events have opened the door for him to have another go.
I am suggesting that Albo will resign before Christmas and Shorten will then stand for leader of the ALP. This would make him an un-elected PM and if he immediately sacked Chris Bowen and a few others he could chart a course for the re-election of Labor at next year’s election.
Call it a conspiracy if you like but it could happen.

Keep fantasising CR, that’s what you do all day long anyway.

That is not happening, it is as simple as that. Especially given the fact an ALP leadership change now is a multiple step process that isn’t done overnight as it once was…..

And who exactly has criticised anyone over not attending the site, beyond your buddies at Sky News, and I assume Dutton who would criticise everything and anything at this point in the news cycle.

Indeed, even Dutton isn’t making that criticism. So its the Sky After Dark crew and that’s it.

Incorrect. Josh Burns for one visited the synagogue fire.

Capital Retro1:26 pm 10 Dec 24

If a Labor leader resigns there is no leadership “spill” so those new rules do not apply.
I note you watch Sky News too. If you don’t believe anything they report, why bother?

@Capital Retro
“If a Labor leader resigns there is no leadership “spill” so those new rules do not apply.”
Is that so, CR?

Rather than accusing you of fabricating facts to suit your jaundiced narrative, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, and ask you to state the reference to support your assertion.

If such a reference exists, then it certainly doesn’t accord with this 16-Nov-2022 Parliamentary Library article on “Party leadership changes and challenges: a quick guide” (https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/Quick_Guides/2022-23/PartyChangesChallenges).

The article refers to Bill Shorten’s resignation as Labor leader following the 2019 election and that the process for filling the position was initiated by the ALP National Executive. It then states:
“Nominations for the position of leader opened on 23 May 2019 and closed on 27 May 2019. A candidate requires 20 per cent support of the caucus to nominate. If there is only one nomination, no ballot will occur. If there are two or more nominations, then there is a ballot of both the parliamentary party and grassroots members. A postal vote of members was to take place from 31 May to 27 June.”
We know, that there were no other nominees, and the ALP party room met on 30 May 2019, and Albo was elected unopposed.

Nevertheless accroding to the Parliamentary Library, the new rules definitely did apply.

Capital Retro7:00 pm 10 Dec 24

And if Labor are to survive, Shorten will be the only nomination.

@Capital Retro
… but the new rules will still apply, CR. QED

GrumpyGrandpa8:51 pm 09 Dec 24

I didn’t vote for Pocock last time, however, I think he’s a decent candidate and deserving of re-election However, in a left-leaning town, is Katy really the underdog?
I think Katy is just playing underdog politics, trying to foster support (perhaps financial support) from the party faithful (or not so faithful).

Canberra vote Labor, take a breath Katy, doesn’t matter how hopeless you might be, that’s the way they vote.

I still find it mind boggling she’s the Finance Minister. Might as well get Bowen to be health minister.

it is highly unlikely Katy will lose her seat or, that her vote will fall behind Pocock’s based on the ACT’s voting history. Especially to the Liberals and the uninspiring candidates they have on offer. In left leaning Canberra Labor takes its vote for granted but the party is not what it used to be with its support falling now for over 20 years.

I remember the signs you refer to Jayce and had the same experience as you at the last election when a volunteer came over to me and tried to engage me in a conversation on what the senate would like without Katy. Things have become desperate and as a Labor voter I found it quite belittling to have someone try and engage me in such a silly “what if” conversation to win my vote.

I never hear anything from Katy and the only correspondence I ever receive from her is when the party wants money.

Sounds about right for ACT Labor.

One totally useless and evidently quite mean left politician (re Kimberly Kitching) worried about being replaced by an even further left so-called independent candidate. Who cares? Pocock or Gallagher will be in opposition shortly. Also left independents have zero power under an LNP government and neither will the TEALS or the Communist Greens. Happy days!

@Rob
Wow – that’s a lovely show of blind, but sadly deluded, loyalty on your part.

When was the last time any federal government actually controlled the Senate?
A: 2004 … which was 24 years (1980) after it last happened … and before that it is necessary to go back to the early 1960s to find such a Senate majority for the government.

So even if Dutton gets up, at the next election, history suggests his LNP government will still have to negotiate with independents and/or the Greens to get legislation through the Senate.

PS Even though I’m not a fan of them, your constant puerile pejorative reference to the “Communist” Greens is so asinine.

Even if Dutton wins he won’t win with a clear majority in both houses, you’ve only once again demonstrated that having zero understanding of Australia politics doesn’t stop some people from posting about it relentlessly.

At the last election, Katy didn’t do anything much until Pocock was gaining in popularity. Then, there was a flurry of activity with local organisers putting up signs saying “Imagine the Senate without Katy.” To their great surprise, a lot of us could. I remember, having one Labor organiser coming up to a crowd of us on voting day and saying, “think about Katy. We don’t want her to accidentally lose her seat, do we?” Accidentally lose her seat?! My thought at the time, was who does she think she is, that the seat should rightfully be hers?! I think we should all be a bit disturbed with any local member who complains that their seat is now competitive and that they have to fight for it. No seat is rightfully anyone’s.

Agree Jayce.

And If the next parliament is close as the polls seem to indicate and we have two independent Senators for the ACT the thing I can “imagine” is the ACT finally getting looked after by the federal government.

Oh really Seano? The ACT Senators are NOT independent and will never be so. Which side of the politics have they voted for and will they vote for into the future? The LNP or ALP/Communist Greens? Hmmmm!

Champ they’re independent, You not liking that they take climate change seriously as any moderate, sensible and aware of the science people do doesn’t change that.

Your dislike of the Canberra independents doesn’t say anything about me… (or whatever this nonsense is “The LNP or ALP/Communist Greens? Hmmmm!”) it says more about your rusted-on far right-wing politics that isn’t about important issues and how they will impact ordinary Australians it’s about convincing ordinary Australians to vote against their own best interests usually through fear of the other by the rich and the powerful.

Gallaghers track record is pretty abysmal since her ACT days, health minister, sent it on its trip down the gurgler and is still stuffed today, minister for Mr Fluffy, leave it to me I’ll get half back from Feds, oops Gallagher we ‘ACT’ copped the lot in the knees thanks to you so then as Chief Minister you jumped ship leaving that klutz Barr holding the reins while low and behold you where conveniently parachuted into the Feds, now your howling I’m the under dog, so be it.

Katy is an underdog because Pocock has done a good job highlighting that Canberra will only get looked after by the Labor/Liberal Parties if it’s no longer a safe seat.

I know I’ll be preferencing sensible independents first again.

Bilbo Baggins6:38 pm 06 Jan 25

Me too. I have a favourable impression of Pocock having met him a couple of times. A minority Labor government with support from progressive independents would be the best outcome for the country. I will be voting for Pocock.

Capital Retro9:44 am 07 Jan 25

Pocock is in the Senate, remember.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.