5 March 2006

Is the end in sight for the Canberra Cabs monopoly?

| johnboy
Join the conversation
23

The Canberra Times (who have an excellent amount of interesting local stories this Sunday) have a good story by Markus Mannheim on plans to fine the generally unloved Canberra Cabs if their services don’t improve.

Canberra Cabs defence of itself is really quite amusing…

Canberra Cabs chief executive Mark Bramston attributed the recent problems to chronic staff shortages, unprecedented demand, a difficult roll-out of new technologies, and ongoing roadwork on Kings Avenue, which has impeded traffic from the airport.

Difficult new technologies? Meaning they stuffed up? And the Kings Avenue roadworks which I cross every evening in rush hour seems to be going quite smoothly to me. But wait, it gets better.

But he defended the company’s service record, saying it processed more than 200,000 jobs a month and had a complaint rate of just 0.02 per cent.

And how are we to make our complaints, wait for hours on hold? If .02% are putting pen to paper and writing a letter then we can only wonder how many are quietly seething.

He said the company was investing in new technology to help cope with peak workloads, but had struggled to recruit enough staff for its call centre

Sounds like a clear cut case of failure by management.

Most delays were because the growing use of mobile phones and phones that withheld their numbers, which could not utilise the automated booking system, he said.

Hmm, that one’s only been coming for 20 years.

Mr Bramston also claimed impatient customers had contributed to the system gridlock by double booking jobs.

Ah, right. It’s the customers to blame. The customers of which only .02% are unhappy, because they’re so overjoyed with the dealings with Canberra Cabs that they want to call up again!

Apparently rather than bringing in competition (as Steve Pratt rather sensibly suggests) the government is looking to hit Canberra Cabs with fines. An interesting approach when the company appears to be suffering from under-investment.

The ABC is also covering the Steve Pratt plan. Competition isn’t the only answer however, the taxi licence fees might be a great little earner for the government, but they’re always going to cripple the service given to the public at their current rate.

Join the conversation

23
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Trying another operator is a useful trial. If someone wants to take the risk.

However with banks you only end up with oligopoly where they all charge fees and cut services in tandum.

Also I remember Compass airlines finding it unrealistic to compete in a market that is a natural monopoly.

However by merely increasing the presence of Queanbeyan cabs, you are getting existing cabs, entering our market much cheaper – they have already paid their startup costs. The cost of having a Queanbeyan cab in Canberra is in effect their marginal cost.

The problem is not the number of cabs, but rather there is no market mechanism to ensure they cover all of the demand. Cabs tend to congregate where prospective fares are maximised. Other passengers get serviced only when convenient.

Canberra cabs would want the issue to dealt with by introduction of another full competitor, as they would feel quite confident of killing them off relatively quickly. However they do not want alternative supply of car services from existing alternatives such as Queanbeyan, ACTION, hire cars or ComCar.

Sunday Canberra Times: I like the sunday paper, it’s the only CT I’ll bother reading.

Taxi mob: typical defensive whiney response you get from too many Australian businesses, blaming the customer and pulling in red herrings. What Kings Ave roadworks? I battle through the airport traffic mess twice a day and the mess is generated BY the airport and BBP. Roadworks my arse.

Action buses: they cut out the airport bus in 78. And there is some kind of funny-looking bus, isn’t there? Maybe they need a few more buses, and smaller ones to make more frequent runs.

Open it up to Qbn Cabs, at least they don’t go around tailgating everyone.

Look that argument doesn’t wash.

Its not up to the govt to decide on the market potential for taxi services. Let private enterprise sort that one out by almost total deregulation minus the obvious HSE matters or should say OH&S in aussie.

Anyway I have it on good authority that there is in fact another operator about to open up in Canberra after the Jan slow down period so FEB March i think.

Simple competition will not solve Canberra’s taxi problem as, unfortunately, the size of the market makes it a natural monopoly. Also as we want high quality taxi cars, entry capital requirements are high.

However regulated competition, for example allowing Queanbeyan greater access to Canberra trips and radio services, within chosen times, plus routing ACTION right to the terminal building may be worth experimenting with.

Maybe temporary daytime only or night-time only plates could help adjust the market. This could provide cheap entry for new entrants as the permancy premium would be wiped-out.

I have seen acres of taxis piled up at the airport because the average ditance from there is high. Taxi’s tend to avoid suburban zones if trips are shorter.

Maybe the government could regulate fares so that all taxi departures from the airport are at a lower tariff. This may reduce the airport servicing syndrome.

The current service for disabled passengers is just appalling, and many disabled people are on low incomes. They will always need a subsidised service.

Can some body please please explain to me. Why the govt thinks that keeping a monopoly is a good thing for the people of Canberra.

Today I needed to call a cab from the Hospital because I had no choice. (believe me.)

All this talk about competition – I think a simpler way is to boycott the cabs altogether and use as many gas guzzlers as we can. Until the Government grows a backbone and sells their shares in that organization nothing’s going to change. If the company was serious about improving it’s service it would simply hire an operator. The owner’s should take home the el-cheapo answering machine and play with it till it’s out of their system.

oh, and Maelinar – Canberra Cbs are white, Eite taxis are white and Silver Service taxis are white or silver (never seen an orange cab in this town – may explain why some of you have trouble catching them – jk!)

A couple of points to note again:

Johnl, Canberra Cbs is no longer a co-operative – it became a company known as Aerial Consolidated Transport a couple of months ago. But the cabs are still individually owned and operated. Your other points are extremely valid, too, by the way.

In regrd to wheelchair transport (having driven them in the past) – when there were 6 cars operated by 1 owner, the problems were a lot less than now with 14 accessible cabs on the road. There were 23 of them, but as they are commercially unviable (very expensive vehicle, very high running costs, little to no extra income from a standard cab) they keep coming off the road. The point of pre-allocation being near impossible is true, (as was previously said) because you can’t predict where any cab will be at any time of day. The jobs are put out for bidding 11 – 16 mins in advance, but if the nearest car is 18 kms away, you can’t talk them into driving all that way empty with the high fuel costs, and a job to get them there isn’t always available either. A solution was available abouit 5 years ago, but the Government of the time (Brendan Smyth / Urban Services) were grabbing for plate money and dedcided to effectively de-regulate the wheelchair fleet, resulting in today’s mess.

De-regulation – makes Governments rich, leaves the public wanting.

I’ve been puzzled by cabby reaction to the current problems. As a coop the management should answer to the cabbies, and this seems to be a fairly big and ongoing management screwup.

As this is clearly costing the cabbies money, if there hasn’t been moves against the management yet I think that there has to be one in the works.

Johnl,

While the excuses are legion and reasons are many at the end of the day a city of this size is unusual in having a commercial monopoly taxi provider.

And it’s also unusual in the crapfullness of the taxi service.

The two might not be related, but maybe it’s time to try something else?

One thing that i’m willing to bet would be fixed if we had competition would be “Call on approach”.

And that’s just one on a very long list of things that competition would sort out very fast in the customer care stakes.

Most of the previous comments on this subject display a fundamental ignorance of the Canberra Taxi industry and the way it works.

Firstly – Canberra Cabs is not a company as most people understand it, it’s a co-operative. That co-operative is made up of all the individual taxi owners who are all these seperate small businesses, all in competition with each other. Believe me, introducing another “company” into the town and duplicating the existing despatch infrastrure won’t add to this competitive invironment….. and a likely outcome in overloaded times will be that people will ring BOTH phone numbers, and multiply the chaos and ineficiencies.

Secondly – All those individual small businesses are staffed by people who are struggling to make ends meet in a commission only (no jobs = no pay), low-pay, high-risk (including physical risk) invirionment. Virtually every driver works at least five 12hour days per week – no sick leave, no holiday pay, no security, if they have the smallest accident in the cab they pay the excessive excess the insurance companies won’t pay. And when you drive the distances these people do day after day the odds of you making a human error (or being involved in someone elses’) is pretty high. So these drivers are not being lazy. It can be nothing short of heartbreaking to not get a job for a couple of hours in the small hours of the morning and finding out it’s a prank call and there’s noone there. Then you go back onto the end of the queue and it can be another hour and a half before you get another job. So, believe me, there’s plenty of competition out there……

I know I’m talking here about quiet times, but that is one of the points people miss in this argument. That the number of taxis in town is worked out as a balance between the number the town can support in the quiet times and the overloaded times.

So, just putting more cabs out there isn’t the solution.

And, adding a new “company” into the town probably isn’t the solution either.

The answer to both the specialised disabled cabs letting customers down and the solutions for peak/overloaded times where customers are let down probably are not able to be solved with taxis. The taxi system doesn’t nead to be changed. There needs to be ANOTHER way to get people to and from peak load areas to common destinations that runs ONLY at peak times. And there needs to be a service that supliments the health system in town that looks after the transport needs of the town – and people who are frail or disabled are probably not going to be the most well off around so we’re probablt talking of government subsidies here.

Then the taxis can do what they do best and the drivers and owners are a chance to make some money (albeit in a work environment we all can only look forward to with Commonwealth Government Goverment workplace “reforms” – but that’s another subject).

Other observations I can make include:
Another operator in town would add to the chances of jobs being stolen by a competing taxi from the other co-operative.
People don’t realise just how hard it is for drivers to predict where they’ll be at ANY time on any day, making pre-assignment of early booked jobs TOTALLY impractical. A driver might want to be at the Airport or Bruce stadium at a certain time, and a customer will hop in and, as is their right, take the driver to ANY part of the town or keep them waiting for ANY period of time. So, jobs that are time-booked ALL come into the despatch system at the same time and are bid on by the closest car, and that driver isn’t told where the job is going, because that might lead to drivers cherry-picking the “best” jobs and leaving others lamenting. So it ends up being irrelevant weather someone has booked last week, or an hour ago.
At busy times the jobs that cars/drivers get almost always take them AWAY from other work. So if there are heeps of planes arriving at the same time the people who get the cabs take the car/driver to the outer suburbs when they are needed again at the airport, half an hour away. This also happens in many other circumstances across the industry.

There’s many other complexities which I won’t bore you with but I hope this adds more informed comment to this discussion.

yes its like telstra and telstra countrymile

Areaman posted the ownership details of Elite cabs something like 2 weeks ago. You’ll find that they are just the same as the orange type, only painted silver and seemingly more ‘executive’.

there is another company providing taxis in canberra now… ? I forget what they are called, but i’ve seen them…

The gummint should allow another company to operate cabs, and rid us of this tiresome monopoly.

im yet to see any instances where private sector monopolys offer benefits to the public, except to the monopolists shareholders.

i think one of the major flaws is that in any proper service delivery framewrok you need to factor in surge capacity.

this taxi capacity surge occurs every time parlt sits.

what about a licensing scheme where some taxis only operate for a limited period of time – so you could pay x amount of dollars for a taxi plate which operates only when parlt is sitting.

of course if we had a decent mass transit public transport system then the people who resort to taxis because the bus is unreliable could avail themselves of that option and lessen demand on taxis.

On Saturday I noted two ACTION buses driving past the Airport, and lamenting the fact I didn’t have a camera on my person, drove on.

(the buses were full of Raiders, doing some sort of funrun, and drove straight past the airport).

So we’ve established that ACTION can actually drive to the airport, now it’s just a matter of getting them to stop there.

I wonder if those drivers complaining about extra plates had thought a better service might actually stimulate public demand.

I know I’ve stopped using Canberra Cabs as you just can’t rely on one showing up in time (assuming you can get through the booking service first).

I reckon more people would factor Canberra Cabs into their plans if they could rely on the service.

Jube, the thing about opening a competitive environment is the government doesn’t have to worry about how it all works.

Set up a regulatory framework to govern minimum standards and then let investors decide for themselves what model is going to work.

ideally they’d split the despatch system off from the taxi’s, but it’s not like duplication will kill us.

lets see if the pollies are willing to try and get home from civic on a friday or saturday morning, when its the only public transport available…

It’s bad when you’ve booked a cab for your disabled mother – in advance – and then you have to drive from Tuggeranong to Gungahlin to take her to her appointment in Dickson.

The cab arrived just as we were returning from the appointment – over an hour later.

I don’t know about you but if you book a cab, you’d expect a cab to be allocated to you at that time as you are the one paying for it.

I have worked in the transport industry for the last 13 years, 6 of them with Canberra Cabs both driving and in the base (where I currently work). I am not going to claim the system is perfect (far from it), but here are a few points to ponder.

1. Competition – a great idea in theory: I say this because of 2 reasons. One, to open an effective competitor to the current system, you would require a minimum of 50 taxis to cover the Canberra area – it offers its own challenges operating across such a spread out town. When you can find someone willing to invest the $15 million or so to buy the plates and set up a dispatch centre, let everyone else know. The second reason is there is only so many fares to go around: Yes, there aren’t enough cabs in Parliament weeks, but take a look at any CIty cab rank on a Monday night in a non-sitting winter week ( I guarantee you won’t have a problem finding one then – or January for that matter). If more cabs are on the raoad, each car amd driver (who are on commission) makes less money, quality of cars drops, quality of drivers drops, industry goes to hell (who’s that saying Sydney cabs?).

I could argue these points until I am blue in the facew, but the reality is another 10 – 15 cabs on the road would reduce load across the board, but the 40 being spoken about is too many, and another company would flood the market with disastrous results.

I’ve yet to find a phone system that is worse then canberra cabs new system. Even telstra is better. I have yet to get through to a person in less then 10 minutes.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.