6 November 2024

McKenzie red-faced over the amount of free flight upgrades she hasn't declared

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
16

Nationals Senator Bridget McKenzie has some upgrading to do on her parliamentary register over free flight upgrades. Photo: Bridget McKenzie Instagram.

The Nationals senate leader and shadow transport minister Bridget McKenzie failed to declare more than a dozen flight upgrades during her time in the Federal Parliament, despite recently leading the charge against Anthony Albanese’s travel arrangements.

The Prime Minister was forced to fend off accusations he used his influence and friendship with Alan Joyce to gain 22 free upgraded Qantas flights in the days when Mr Joyce was the airline’s boss, and Mr Albanese was the transport minister (and then the Opposition leader).

Those allegations were made in a new book by Joe Aston, but Mr Albanese has denied asking for the perks or initiating any calls for Qantas upgrades.

Senator McKenzie has threatened to have Mr Joyce hauled before another parliamentary inquiry to answer the claims over Mr Albanese soliciting flight upgrades.

“We really do need to understand the influence that the Prime Minister’s personal and financial gain through these upgrades for he and his family have had on his personal intervention in protecting Qantas from competition,” she said last week as part of a media campaign over the issue.

By Friday (1 November), the Nationals senator had to backpedal over statements she made about her own travel declarations.

While initially insisting she had never received an upgrade, Senator McKenzie told ABC Radio she actually had and was wrong to have said she hadn’t.

READ ALSO ‘Upgrade’ Albo shoots the messenger as Qantas claims take off

“I think it was wrong of me to be so emphatic earlier this week,” she said.

“I don’t probably believe I should be subjecting other people to standards I’m not prepared to subject myself to … The difference between myself and the Prime Minister is that the Prime Minister was the minister for transport.

“He was actually in charge of regulating the aviation sector.”

Senator McKenzie instigated an audit of her travel to determine how many more upgrades she has received and wrote to Qantas, Virgin and Rex airlines asking for details.

The airlines have all written back and the Senator is cross-checking the information with her own records before updating her parliamentary register of interests.

A report in The Australian Financial Review, however, claims Senator McKenzie received more than a dozen free flight upgrades over a number of years from Qantas and Virgin.

Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor has leapt to Senator McKenzie’s defence, saying if there has been an error on her part, the record should be corrected, but he added that the circumstances were a “completely different thing” from those of the PM.

He also questioned whether the media report of his Coalition colleague’s free upgrades was accurate.

“I think the real issue here is this, we have a Prime Minister who, when transport minister, is alleged to have actively reached out and lobbied for personal upgrades. That’s inappropriate,” Mr Taylor told ABC Radio.

“If there’s been any error on that, then it should be corrected. I mean, that’s very simple.”

Senator McKenzie is expected to make a statement soon and will likely argue that she did not ask for the upgrades.

READ ALSO Backtracking Coalition hits turbulence in attack on PM over free flight upgrades

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has also had to correct statements that he hadn’t asked for a free flight on billionaire mining magnate Gina Rinehart’s private jet in 2022.

He has since acknowledged that he actually did seek and accept the free flight from regional Queensland to Sydney to attend a Bali memorial ceremony and then on to Mackay.

“We asked the government for a RAAF flight, they played games, and they didn’t offer that flight, and at that point, I think we had a charter estimate, which was about $40,000 to fly from Rockhampton to Sydney and then back to Mackay,” Mr Dutton said.

“I thought that was very expensive, and the cheaper option for the taxpayer was for my office to speak to Mrs Rinehart’s office as to whether the plane might be available.”

The Opposition Leader said he saw no problem with accepting a free flight from a billionaire.

“That was at zero cost to the taxpayer,” he said.

The ongoing scandal is resulting in MPs and senators across the spectrum rushing to upgrade their travel arrangements on their parliamentary registers.

Parliamentary rules insist senators and members should declare gifts within 28 days of receipt.

Join the conversation

16
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Not just conflict of interest, but the hidden reason that upgrades are provided: influence. If a politician gets lounge access, upgrades, they’re going to think more positively about that company.

None of the comments so far acknowledge that the real problem with Albo’s solicited flight upgrades is not so much the “perks” as the conflict of interest vis a vis he was minister of transport at the time.

@Rustygear
You make a valid point concerning ‘conflict of interest’.

Given that Albo’s stint as Transport Minister – when the alleged ‘requests to Joyce’ were made, is part of history, don’t you think that an opposition would have investigated every decision that Albo made in the role, to determine if there was any ‘quid pro quo’ arrangement? Perhaps you have undertaken such research, and can point to instances where the conflict of interest was realised.

Or are you suggesting that the ‘conflict of interest’ is a sufficient hanging offence? In which case will you also be calling for Dutton’s hanging over the ‘conflict of interest’ he had, as the potential future PM, in accepting free flights from Gina Rinehart?

I think a lot of rational Australians would just see this whole ‘story’ as clickbait, or, at worst, typical ‘snouts in the trough’ by politicians.

My first reaction was also snouts/trough, bad look and inappropriate for public officeholders. No it’s not seriously a dismissible offence. If it were, and that level of offense were applied consistently over time and across all appointed governments, would put us on par with Italy. But it’s a stretch to apply the same level of condemnation to Dutton. He wasn’t in power at the time. That’s just partisan sledging, and that’s what makes Australian politics so petty and boring.

@Rustygear
OK. So a commenter, with progressive views, suggests that the Leader of the Opposition asking a billionaire for a free lift on her private jet, is a conflict of interest. But no, it’s seen by a conservative commenter to be partisan sledging.

But that same commenter, still thinks there’s an issue with the historical instance of the PM, when he was the transport minister, getting a free upgrade on a flight on which he had a paid ticket to travel.

Hmmm … the words hypocritical and double standards spring to mind, but of course that would just be partisan sledging.

The Opposition Leader said he saw no problem with accepting a free flight from a billionaire.

“That was at zero cost to the taxpayer,” he said.

This just about summarises up nicely all that is wrong with Australian politicians.

There is no such thing as a free lunch….

Colour me shocked lol….

As I predicted a couple of weeks back, this was always either going to come back to bite the opposition in the face, or it would ultimately get swept under the carpet in some form because they are all in on it.

She clearly confused ‘green’ free upgrade from airline, with ‘red’ had to pay for own fare and no upgrade in her spreadsheet. Easily done.

Hypocrisy in the extreme.

Should’ve checked the spreadsheet!

What a joke. The Opposition thought they were on a winner and it blew up in their faces.

Time to move on.

Capital Retro6:02 pm 06 Nov 24

How could one get an upgrade on Rex? It was economy or economy.

They had ex-virgin business class seats on all the capital city 737s they were flying that sent them broke.

There’s empty vessels and vacuous shrills. Choose which you prefer

Not the sharpest tool in the shed…

Really! So you must have brilliant CV! Your title suggests you were packaged out (54/11) as a public servant. In her case, she had a family, then did a double degree (App Science, maths), was a School teacher then lecturer, and then became a Senator in 2010. That’s not bad. She is sharp – but clearly not as bright as you of course.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.