All work on the West Basin area should cease until a complete environmental and heritage assessment has been made, according to the National Trust (ACT).
The Trust has slammed the ACT Government’s redevelopment plans and accused it of treating the planning system as a cash cow and deliberately misleading the public for linking the Griffin Plan to the project.
In its submission to the National Capital Authority on the City Renewal Authority’s works approval application for the proposed next phase of development at the key site on Lake Burley Griffin, the Trust says it cannot support the overall redevelopment in its current form, which eventually will include apartment blocks.
The works approval application is for a 500-metre extension of the boardwalk from Henry Rolland Park, street lighting and street furniture, the removal of 120 trees, demolition of the former boat hire building and jetty, and land reclamation works between the current lake edge and the newly constructed boardwalk.
It is part of an overall plan for a waterfront, and public park and spaces, in front of possibly 2000 apartments.
Community activists, the Lake Burley Griffin Guardians, have fought the proposal from the beginning, and the Trust has now thrown its weight behind their arguments that the redevelopment will damage the lake environment and its heritage values.
It says the ACT Government has used the cover of the Griffin Legacy National Capital Plan to promote development of West Basin, calling such arguments misleading and irrelevant.
”The fact that Griffin and the National Capital Development Commission (NCDC) had given a more regular shape to East Basin, which was altered to its current shape when Parkes Way was constructed, is no justification to fill in part of the Lake to create a more regular shape now,” the Trust says.
It says it is false to claim Griffin had proposed urban development for West Basin.
The Trust cites Brett Odgers, a member of the Walter Burley Griffin Society, writing this month in the Walter Burley Griffin Society Journal, who says the Plan amendments have become “a charter for developers and source of land sale revenue”.
”It is also clear that the main focus of the ACT Government has been developing prime national land for revenue-raising and West Basin is just one part of this strategy. It is wrong that the national capital assets are treated in this way,” the Trust says.
It says the fact that the site has been run down and neglected for years is not a reason to create a high-density urban development there.
”The area can and should be made more attractive to Canberra residents and visitors through modest capital investment and more public facilities and concessions,” the Trust says.
”The public’s right of access and accessible parking should not be a casualty. We do not support a massive expansion of apartments between the city and the Lake which will impact on a range of heritage issues.”
The trust says the most recent heritage impact assessment was in 2015 and is now out of date, and environmental issues have not been addressed.
”There is no assessment of flora and fauna even though the Golden Sun Moth lives within the area, geological features on the Lake edge further around towards the National Museum of Australia, evidence of Indigenous presence in the area, and other water-related heritage and environmental issues, including wildlife habitats,” the Trust says.
”Also under threat from West Basin is the iconic view of the Brindabella Mountains from Commonwealth Avenue, south from City Hill and over the Lake. That this vista is potentially under threat is unconscionable.”
Calling the West Basin proposal part of a broader malaise in the planning system, the Trust says that since ACT self-government in 1989, the Commonwealth has in effect ceded control of national area planning to the ACT Government.
It says that the Commonwealth had failed after nearly a decade to act on proposals for the heritage listing of Canberra, which focus on the Lake and surrounds, mainly due to opposition from the ACT Government, which did not want its development options limited.
The Trust leaves the last word to the daughter of Sir Robert Menzies, Heather Henderson, who calls the proposal ”irrational, unnecessary, and, indeed, vandalism on a grand scale”.