Skip to content Skip to main navigation

News

Skilled legal advice with
accessible & personal attention

‘New dawn’ for Manuka as ACAT tree decision paves way for hotel development

Ian Bushnell 29 July 2019 25

Going: the large London Plane tree on Franklin Street in question. Photos: Ian Bushnell.

Construction of the first stage of the Manuka hotel development could be under way by Christmas after the large London plane tree blocking the project lost its protected status.

In a mediation hearing in the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal on Friday between the Liangis family and the Conservator of Flora and Fauna, who had refused the family’s application to have the tree removed from the ACT tree register, it was agreed the tree could go if the family supported local Landcare groups and included a ‘green’ wall in the hotel project.

The Liangis had gone to ACAT to challenge Conservator Ian Walker’s decision in May to uphold the protected status of the tree, which had grown up between the Capitol Theatre building and another on Section 96.

“While I understand that members of the community will be unhappy with the loss of this special tree, a consideration of all latest information indicated the removal of protected status for the tree was appropriate,” Acting Conservator Gene McGlynn said.

He said the mediated outcome would see a 15-metre tall green wall added to the development that would ensure a visible bit of living vegetation to the top of the new building, as well as support for flora in the region.

The process for nomination and assessment of trees remained unchanged.

John Liangis said it was a rational and amicable decision to remove the tree, and he hoped it meant that more scrutiny would be applied when trees were nominated for the register.

“When people nominate trees there’s got to be more of an investigation into the ramifications of actually registering the tree,” he said.

They should have to meet the register’s stringent criteria and be in a proper location suitable for their species.

But he didn’t believe the decision would be detrimental to other registered trees because not many were in the situation this tree was in.

The base of the Manuka tree between the buildings.

Mr Liangis said the decision and the development’s go ahead would usher in a new dawn for Manuka.

“It provides an opportunity to redevelop the entire Section 96, and we aim to provide a hotel, with a cinema component, and ground floor commercial,” he said.

“It’s going to make a huge difference to Manuka, and there’s a lot of things happening around Manuka. Stuart Flats are going to be developed, density is going to be increased. It’s going to really create a renaissance in the area.”

The decision would also get the ball rolling on Stage 2, which was in at the preliminary design phase. Stage 1 could be complete by early 2021.

Griffith Narrabundah Community Association president Leo Dobes said the outcome was not unexpected but still disappointing, particularly as the Association was not allowed to join the mediation due to various procedural reasons.

“There’s always going to be some tendency to move things the way the developer wants and it’s happened again,” he said.

He believed there was something wrong with ACAT, as the Kingston Barton Residents Group had had similar experiences with the Tribunal.

A drawing of the proposed hotel development, designed by Cox Architecture.

He said the development could have accommodated the tree, as the Aubergine Restaurant building at Griffith shops had done with a large tree only a metre away.

“It was a very similar case there. The community objected to it being chopped down and the developer then found a way to build right up near the tree.

“It’s becoming the norm, you can build next to a tree providing you’ve got a good architect, and that could have been done in this case. But it wasn’t considered,” he said.

The Liangis family argued that the location of the tree meant it was impossible to include in the design.

The Inner-South Business Council said the outcome was a victory for the Manuka Group Centre, local businesses, residents, and the local hotel and hospitality industry.

“This project will go a long way in further developing the character of the Manuka Group Centre. It will expand the customer base for local businesses, create jobs, and help to revitalise Manuka back to its former glory,” said chair John-Paul Romano.

“This outcome means more customers for Manuka businesses; it means that empty commercial spaces will be filled, and that the area will become more vibrant and its character will further develop.”

Mr Romano said trees were crucial to Manuka’s fabric, but had to be in the right place. “One of the things that visitors and locals alike love about the Inner South is its beautiful tree canopy,” he said.

What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
25 Responses to ‘New dawn’ for Manuka as ACAT tree decision paves way for hotel development
Paul Russell 8:05 am 02 Aug 19

Shame! Shame! Shame!
What an absolute outrage!
At least I know of four businesses in Manuka that I will never enter again…

    Tom Willow 5:32 pm 02 Aug 19

    There were over 80 surrounding business signatures on the petition… I will assume you will be boycotting those too?

    I sure do hope so. Judging by your childish attitude, I am sure it would be a welcome relief to all 80 of those businesses…

Neme Blanco Neme Blanco 5:54 pm 30 Jul 19

Finally some common sense in getting that tree cut down for gods sake it was an English plane tree not a native !

k452 4:30 pm 30 Jul 19

Good decision. The tree has to go.
As you are well aware Judy Hancock, Brendan Smyth used his call-in powers way back in the days when he was Planning Minister in the Carnell govt. to have the old Manuka cinema bulldozed down.

Jeff Kerr Jeff Kerr 12:36 pm 30 Jul 19

Don’t mention developing Manuka Oval

Capital Retro 12:08 pm 30 Jul 19

“……can’t believe the Liangis’ knocked down a beautiful piece of Canberra history to build that ?.”

Actually, they didn’t.

TuggLife 8:47 am 30 Jul 19

Another win for developers. They always win in this town, and for what? A donation and a wall feature that won’t be maintained. The stench of entitlement is the reason Manuka is dying, not a lack of investment.

Sharon Hunter Sharon Hunter 1:11 am 30 Jul 19

A ‘protected status’ is obviously meaningless.

I wonder what made it so easy to be changed????

    Dan Rayner Dan Rayner 12:46 pm 30 Jul 19

    Sharon Hunter I’m not sure this one tree should have been protected in the first place - it’s an introduced species (London Plane tree?) and they are all through Kingston/Manuka.

Anna Francesca Clancy Anna Francesca Clancy 11:09 pm 29 Jul 19

Canberra is not very good at protecting its trees

    Phillip Scharf Phillip Scharf 7:47 am 30 Jul 19

    Anna Francesca Clancy turns out yes can grow back to the question is whether they keep up the creation of green space and replacement trees

Russell Nankervis Russell Nankervis 9:51 pm 29 Jul 19

Will they replace it though? We need to be planting more trees!

    Danny Corvini Danny Corvini 9:57 pm 29 Jul 19

    They've agreed to a wall garden and to plant a certain number of trees somewhere else around CBR

Shan Gao Shan Gao 9:28 pm 29 Jul 19

Another one bites the dust

HiddenDragon 6:20 pm 29 Jul 19

“…..it was agreed the tree could go if the family supported local Landcare groups and included a ‘green’ wall in the hotel project.”

And the Nadia Comeneci Award for setting a precedent without setting a precedent goes to….

Steve Jones Steve Jones 6:14 pm 29 Jul 19

Geocon building it??

David Newman David Newman 4:56 pm 29 Jul 19

Why can’t they keep the tree as part of the design? Losing to many money-making rooms?

    Andrea Kerr Andrea Kerr 4:56 pm 29 Jul 19

    David Newman because it us a nuisance

    David Newman David Newman 4:58 pm 29 Jul 19

    Andrea Kerr, a nuisance to whom?

    Brian McKenzie Brian McKenzie 5:21 pm 29 Jul 19

    David Newman it is lifting paving in the street and roots have completely blocked the drains of the building behind. I’d consider that a nuisance

    Brian McKenzie Brian McKenzie 5:23 pm 29 Jul 19

    Why not replace it with a nice native instead of some troublesome Spanish native?

    David Newman David Newman 5:24 pm 29 Jul 19

    Brian, that is my point. It appears that it will just be replaced by a concrete building

    Barry Finch Barry Finch 5:30 pm 29 Jul 19

    David Newman . Maybe a win-win is to plant some other tree or trees to replace it in an area not so prone to potential damage be it roads, kerbs, footpaths, stormwater and or sewer. No wonder it looks so healthy.

    Frederica Heacock Frederica Heacock 8:11 pm 29 Jul 19

    Barry Finch that’s what’s been agreed to.

Barry Finch Barry Finch 4:07 pm 29 Jul 19

Manuka retailing/commercial zone certainly needs a massive rejuvenation. Long past it’s prime.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2019 Region Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site