Rainbow Crossings for everyone

Barcham 19 April 2013 16

rainbowcrossing

The DIY Rainbow Crossing Revolution is spreading across Australia and even appearing overseas.

Josh Chaffey spotted this beautiful example right by the lake.

Anyone fancy buying some chalk and joining in? If so send us a picture to images@the-riotact.com won’t you?


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
16 Responses to Rainbow Crossings for everyone
Filter
Order
Henry82 Henry82 9:30 pm 19 Apr 13

dph said :

Oh no, somebody drew a rainbow using dissolvable chalk on ‘tax payer funded’ cement. In Canberra of all places. Outrageous!

Fight the power!

Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 9:02 pm 19 Apr 13

Love these things

gooterz gooterz 8:22 pm 19 Apr 13

Zebra crossings… They choose black and white because half the work is already done.. Typical lazy Canberra government.

grump grump 4:57 pm 19 Apr 13

arrrgh, are any of these rules or codes, more like guidelines, arrgh??

dph dph 4:26 pm 19 Apr 13

Oh no, somebody drew a rainbow using dissolvable chalk on ‘tax payer funded’ cement. In Canberra of all places. Outrageous!

imarty imarty 4:17 pm 19 Apr 13

For those who haven’t heard, New Zealand just passed another new law with the gay marriage one which legalised marijuana*. The fact that gay marriage and marijuana were legalised on the same day makes perfect biblical sense because Leviticus 20:13 says “If a man lies with another man they should be stoned.
It would seem we just hadn’t interpreted it correctly before!
*May not actually be true

Henry82 Henry82 4:04 pm 19 Apr 13

Needs more instagram filter.

#lame #wasteoftime

Deref Deref 2:29 pm 19 Apr 13

poetix said :

Love the kiwi and ‘yis’.

It’s very suxy.

rosscoact rosscoact 1:57 pm 19 Apr 13

NoImRight said :

rosscoact said :

eh_steve said :

I don’t want any ambiguity, if I walk out on the crossing I don’t want a driver having to decide if they need to stop for me or not because they aren’t sure if they need to obey non conventional line markings.

It’s a fundamental rule of the road that drivers give way to pedestrians, no ambiguity there.

In the history of the Rainbow Crossing movement nobody has ever been hit by a car while using a crossing.*

BTW, they have permanent rainbow crossings in other parts of the world and urban activism gets people to put their own pedestrian crossings where they are needed.

* made up statistic

Not sure its a “fundamental rule of the road”? Maybe Code of the West?

Fundamental rules of the road in Australia

Give way to pedestrians

Keep to the left

Fundamental rules of the west

Never steal another mans horse

Never try on another man’s hat

Never pass anyone on the trail without saying “Howdy”

NoImRight NoImRight 1:31 pm 19 Apr 13

rosscoact said :

eh_steve said :

I don’t want any ambiguity, if I walk out on the crossing I don’t want a driver having to decide if they need to stop for me or not because they aren’t sure if they need to obey non conventional line markings.

It’s a fundamental rule of the road that drivers give way to pedestrians, no ambiguity there.

In the history of the Rainbow Crossing movement nobody has ever been hit by a car while using a crossing.*

BTW, they have permanent rainbow crossings in other parts of the world and urban activism gets people to put their own pedestrian crossings where they are needed.

* made up statistic

Not sure its a “fundamental rule of the road”? Maybe Code of the West?

poetix poetix 1:14 pm 19 Apr 13

Love the kiwi and ‘yis’.

How_Canberran How_Canberran 1:06 pm 19 Apr 13

rosscoact said :

eh_steve said :

I don’t want any ambiguity, if I walk out on the crossing I don’t want a driver having to decide if they need to stop for me or not because they aren’t sure if they need to obey non conventional line markings.

It’s a fundamental rule of the road that drivers give way to pedestrians, no ambiguity there.

In the history of the Rainbow Crossing movement nobody has ever been hit by a car while using a crossing.*

BTW, they have permanent rainbow crossings in other parts of the world and urban activism gets people to put their own pedestrian crossings where they are needed.

* made up statistic

A fundamental rule of the road that drivers give way to pedestrians?
I’m just waiting for the bicycle brigade to demand a slice of that pie!

How Canberran.

Thumper Thumper 12:34 pm 19 Apr 13

eh_steve said :

I don’t understand the whole rainbow crossing movement, isn’t it somewhat misplaced activisim?

Ones like this are cool, but when they mix with traffic it seems a bit dangerous.

When it comes to something functional like a pedestrian crossing, I quite literally want it laid out in black and white. I don’t want any ambiguity, if I walk out on the crossing I don’t want a driver having to decide if they need to stop for me or not because they aren’t sure if they need to obey non conventional line markings.

Apparently unicorns can’t see things in black and white and therefore quite often get run over at zebra crossings.

Of course, it is a well known fact that zebras can’t see colours and often get run over while trying to cross roads when the little red man is displayed. Zebras are also notoriously bad at distinguishing between road crossing displays.

rosscoact rosscoact 12:19 pm 19 Apr 13

eh_steve said :

I don’t want any ambiguity, if I walk out on the crossing I don’t want a driver having to decide if they need to stop for me or not because they aren’t sure if they need to obey non conventional line markings.

It’s a fundamental rule of the road that drivers give way to pedestrians, no ambiguity there.

In the history of the Rainbow Crossing movement nobody has ever been hit by a car while using a crossing.*

BTW, they have permanent rainbow crossings in other parts of the world and urban activism gets people to put their own pedestrian crossings where they are needed.

* made up statistic

eh_steve eh_steve 11:52 am 19 Apr 13

Ps, love the related content articles for this one.

eh_steve eh_steve 11:50 am 19 Apr 13

I don’t understand the whole rainbow crossing movement, isn’t it somewhat misplaced activisim?

Ones like this are cool, but when they mix with traffic it seems a bit dangerous.

When it comes to something functional like a pedestrian crossing, I quite literally want it laid out in black and white. I don’t want any ambiguity, if I walk out on the crossing I don’t want a driver having to decide if they need to stop for me or not because they aren’t sure if they need to obey non conventional line markings.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top

Search across the site