17 November 2021

States and Feds won't support territory rights to legislate on voluntary assisted dying

| Lottie Twyford
Join the conversation
Shane Rattenbury

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury is calling on his interstate counterparts to support the ACT’s right to legislate on assisted dying. Photo: Dominic Giannini.

The ACT and Northern Territory have been unable to secure the support of the states for the right to legislate on voluntary assisted dying, but they remain undeterred.

ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury and his NT counterpart Selena Uibo used Friday’s (12 November) Meeting of Attorneys-General (MAG) to ask all state Attorneys-General to support territory rights.

However, Mr Rattenbury said they left the meeting without being able to reach a resolution with the states and had found the Federal Government remained resolute in its refusal to support the change.

Since 1997 when the Commonwealth passed the Euthanasia Laws Act (also known as the Andrews bill), both territories have been prevented from passing legislation concerning euthanasia or voluntary assisted dying.

Yet since 2017, every state apart from NSW – which has introduced a Bill into its parliament – has legislated for voluntary assisted dying.

In NSW, the debate on voluntary assisted dying laws began last Friday (12 November).

READ ALSO No simple solutions: Government rejects call for a review into ‘housing crisis’

Speaking after Friday’s MAG, Mr Rattenbury said he and Ms Uibo had put forward a strong case, and they would continue to pursue the issue with all states in the coming weeks.

He’s described the current situation as “untenable”, as well as “unfair and undemocratic”, and has committed to continuing to build pressure in the Federal Parliament.

“This law will eventually change,” he said.

Mr Rattenbury also says the inability to legislate on voluntary assisted dying has allowed residents of the territories to be treated as second-class citizens.

“The imposed restriction on our ability to legislate on voluntary assisted dying is inequitable and undemocratic,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“Voluntary assisted dying is a deeply important issue to people in the ACT, and we should be permitted to consider this issue within our own democratically elected parliament.”

Tara Cheyne addressing the Legislative Assembly

Earlier this year, Human Rights Minister Tara Cheyne wrote to the federal government to outline her concerns with the current situation and slammed the response the ACT received. Photo: Dominic Giannini.

On a local level, there is tripartisan support for the ACT to have the ability to legislate on voluntary assisted dying.

Only last month, federal Attorney-General Michaelia Cash confirmed the Commonwealth Government has no plans to introduce legislation to repeal the Euthanasia Laws Act as she responded to a letter outlining the concerns of ACT Human Rights Minister Tara Cheyne and Ms Uibo, which was sent to former federal Attorney-General Christian Porter earlier this year.

The ACT Legislative Assembly passed unopposed a motion denouncing the response and criticising the fact the ACT had been left out of a bill raised by outgoing NT Senator Sam McMahon, which called on the federal government to reinstate the right to legislate on the issue in the NT.

The ACT had been left out after Senator Zed Seselja indicated he wouldn’t support it, according to Senator McMahon at the time.

READ ALSO Why isn’t the ACT allowed to make our own laws about euthanasia?

Last week, however, Senator Seselja argued the resolution, which the Assembly had adopted, contained “serious inaccuracies and falsehoods” by suggesting he had deliberately blocked an attempt to reinstate territory rights.

Ms Cheyne and Mr Rattenbury’s motion said the ACT had been left off Senator McMahon’s bill at the “explicit request” of Senator Seselja.

Senator Seselja said a letter written to Senator Katy Gallagher from Senator McMahon in which she said the decision to leave the ACT out of her bill had been made of her own accord had been public knowledge and, therefore, the MLA code of conduct had been breached.

Opposition whip Jeremy Hanson failed to pass a motion calling on Ms Cheyne and Mr Rattenbury to write to all federal senators and members of the Assembly to apologise for misleading them.

Ms Cheyne dismissed the motion as an argument about semantics while Mr Rattenbury said the English language could be “flexible”.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

Can we stop with the completely illogical arguments about this being “undemocratic”.

It is nothing of the sort, this is all about the split of powers between different levels of government. Currently, the democratically elected government in charge of this issue for the ACT has made a call. Whether you agree with it or not (I don’t).

If people want to argue about structural changes to way the different levels of government operate, I agree there are issues.

Personally I think the states shouldn’t exist at all.

davidmaywald1:49 pm 18 Nov 21

Fully support both Shane and Tara, and commend their efforts… It’s undemocratic and offensive to have States legislate on this, while the Territories are constrained by the Commonwealth.

Stephen Saunders10:05 am 18 Nov 21

On this issue, as on most, it’s absurd to think Morrison and Perrotet can keep religion “separate” from politics. Their religion is their politics. Perrotet gave the Vatican speech against NSW assisted-dying legislation – never mind what voters want.

I’m not sure why you have you singled out Morrison and Perrotet due to the personal faith positions.
There are and have been plenty of politicians from both sides who have expressed their personal faith. Penny Wong, Kevin Rudd and John Howard come to mind.

In Mr Perrotet’s case, yes, he has publically said that he does not support assisted dying, yet he’s the one who has allowed the NSW Parliament a free conscious vote on the issue.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.