Skip to content Skip to main navigation


Charity and fundraising auctions for the Canberra community

Water Quandaries

By che - 17 December 2007 22

With all the rain we’ve had over the last 6 weeks things must be getting complicated for the folks at ACTEW. Thoughts must be going something like this, “Theres so much rain people aren’t watering their gardens and making us money. I know lets up the price of water so when they do use it, it costs more. Yeah and then lets decrease the restrictions so that they use even more so that makes us even more money. Yeah thats a great idea too. Wow, we are teh roxors.”

Stories from the ABC on the recommended water price hike, why a water price hike is bad for low income earners (also lets us know that there will be public hearings on the proposed price hikes in Feb) and possible lessening of restrictions to allow use of sprinklers.

What’s Your opinion?

Post a comment
Please login to post your comments, or connect with
22 Responses to
Water Quandaries
51modelBloke 4:17 pm 17 Dec 07

Actually I do have an alternative, my 850 Litre tank on my broadacres at Watson, until they do as Mr. Evil suggests and start charging for rain water

josh 4:05 pm 17 Dec 07

the riotact: news? no! whinging? yes!

Mr Evil 3:15 pm 17 Dec 07

“@Sammy: I think MrE will agree with you, he’s just a bit more cynical than you, that’s all.”

Cynical – Me? 🙂

Mælinar 3:00 pm 17 Dec 07

Go to your nearest lake with your pot and fill it up – there’s your alternative option.

GregW 2:44 pm 17 Dec 07

I have seen worse, I didn’t realise actew were particularly bad at this. You’ve got it admit it is generous of them to “voluntarily offset the additional greenhouse gases generated by the projects”

51modelBloke 2:31 pm 17 Dec 07

I don’t have a problem with water prices rising if it is justified, however I think it a bit rich with the amount of money they [Actew] spend on self gratification and pour into every function and public event and that happens, not to mention glassworks etc. If I want to give money to these organisations, I’ll do it myself. Perhaps if they didn’t waste so much money the price of water, electricity etc. could be reduced. And we don’t even have the option of going elswhere because now they’re going to buy the opposition…

Snahons_scv6_berlina 12:13 pm 17 Dec 07

sux to be you… my 90KL tank is almost full due the rain over the last few months 🙂

Holden Caulfield 11:55 am 17 Dec 07

@aa: Sure, the middle east may not have water issues, but their hardly an ideal long term environmental model to wish for. Eek!

@Sammy: I think MrE will agree with you, he’s just a bit more cynical than you, that’s all.

Sammy 11:48 am 17 Dec 07

To the contrary Mr Evil, those with rainwater tanks should be given an ongoing rebate for both lessening the need for increased water storage infrastructure, and reducing the stress on the stormwater infrastructure.

Mr Evil 11:33 am 17 Dec 07

I’m waiting for ACTEW to suugeest that all rainwater tanks be registered so they can start charging people for collecting rainwater off their own roof!

GregW 11:10 am 17 Dec 07

In ‘planning’ I believe. To have a specific figure of 78 GL for the enlarged cotter dam implies some planning has certainly taken place.

Other things happening:

I believe now organisations can obtain free recycled water as a result of improvements to the Molonglo Treatment Works..

Middle eastern countries often use desalination since they have little other choice and ample fossil fuels. I would imagine recycled water is a more viable solution here.
I believe due to the upgrades of the

aa 10:51 am 17 Dec 07

We have been paying for years now for a new dam in Canberra, but where is it? One thing you got to look at is why countries in the middle east that are deserts don’t have water restrictions or problems with water? I think our biggest problem is that in 5 years from now when we don’t have issues with water, we forget about it and don’t do anything to prevent it. It’s not just water, its everything in general, once the crisis is over, people forget about it and rarely do anything to prevent it from happening again.

astrojax 10:47 am 17 Dec 07

i agree gregw, water is undervalued and should be priced according to its real value; then we’ll see genuine behaviour change effecting real environmental benefits.

i also think, though, that water rsstrictions should include some capacity for growing food (vege gardens) domestically.

GregW 10:24 am 17 Dec 07

There is no allowed water usage, just a target.

I’m a low income earner but I myself am sick of ACTOSS’s whining, water is undervalued. If these price increases are going to fund infrastructure as claimed by Actew then get on with it..

aa 10:00 am 17 Dec 07

One idea we were talking about at my work the other day was changing the allowed water usage based on how many people live in a house. eg, why should a house that is occupied by 1 person be allowed the same amount of water as a house with 5 or 6 people in it?

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Copyright © 2017 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. | |

Search across the site