8 June 2018

Why Katy Gallagher has decided to give the Senate another go

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation

Katy Gallagher says she has grown to love the Senate.

The former Labor Senator for the ACT, Katy Gallagher, will attempt to reclaim her Senate seat at the next Federal election, initiating a factional pre-selection battle with her replacement, Senator David Smith, who has no intentions of stepping aside.

Her decision comes after an acknowledged period of soul searching after the “humbling experience” of being turfed out of the Senate by the High Court last month for being a British citizen at the time of her election in contravention of Section 44 of the Constitution.

It also keeps open Labor pre-selection for the new central seat of Canberra, which many thought could be her way back to the Hill.

But Ms Gallagher, from the Left faction, said she preferred the Senate where she was Opposition Manager of Business and had developed a strong relationship with Senate Leader Senator Penny Wong.

She said Canberra’s interests were well represesented in the House and the Senate was where she felt she could be most useful.

“I have learned to love the Senate. Its very like the Assembly, it requires crossbench negotiations, its a very collegiate chamber, which is part of my history, and I love working with Penny Wong,” she told ABC radio.

“I was in the shadow cabinet and I could be a representative of Canberra at that table. I could be useful there. I think Canberra could benefit from having someone there with my knowledge.”

Although Ms Gallagher admitted the time since departing the Senate had been tough and she had questioned her future, Labor Leader Bill Shorten and other senior party figures had been very persuasive in wanting her back.

Ms Gallagher emailed party members this morning (Friday) advising them of her decision and seeking their support.

She was quick to point out that nobody owned a seat in Parliament and that she would need to win the support of party members, who in the ACT each had a vote in the pre-selection process.

As was Senator Smith, who had no intentions of being a seat warmer for Ms Gallagher. The Right faction member said he had received a huge amount of support from party branches but the position was for Labor Party members to decide.

“The pre-selection is important but more important is to ensure that ACT people are effectively represented in the Senate and that’s still going to be the thrust of the work that I’m involved in, but in doing that I’ll be going out to talk to Labor members round the branches as I have been in the last couple of weeks,” he told ABC radio.

Ms Gallagher said many people had been supportive and encouraged her to continue in politics, and she realised that she still had the drive to serve the community.

“There’s something in me and I want to give it another go,” she said.

Meanwhile, lobbyist and former federal and Territory government adviser Kel Watts has thrown his hat into the ring for the seat of Canberra, with current member Gae Brodtmann confirming that she will contest the new southern seat, nominally called Bean.

Mr Watt said he had been asked by many ALP members, community group leaders, business owners and working people to run.

“My supporters have asked me to run, saying I represent the best all-round life experience and determination to represent the ALP and community,” he said.

“My commitment to the people of Canberra and the local community flows through my veins. I am a seventh generation local. I live in Braddon with my wife Louise. My ancestors were farming this region before the ACT borders were even drawn.”

There has been speculation about a host of local party figures running in Canberra but none have so far confirmed their intentions.

The Australian Electoral Commission has redrawn the ACT’s electoral boundaries, adding a third seat due to the Territory’s growing population.

Canberra will become an inner city seat, where the Greens will figure strongly and hope to upset any Labor candidate.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

Um…because she is selflessly sacrificing the much higher pay she could be receiving in the private sector on account of her high level of skills in the area of…of….

Capital Retro8:57 am 09 Jun 18

Ha, ha – lol!

Capital Retro4:18 pm 08 Jun 18

Let Smith keep his seat and let Gallagher run against Seselja. Is that possible?

Are you’re suggesting that Labor pre select Smith as the No 1 senate candidate and Gallagher as the No 2? With such a scenario the 2nd seat may well come down to Gallagher and Seselja, however all Zed has to do to get elected is get to 33.33% of the vote before Labor hits 66.66%. Given results in recent elections Gallagher would have to be a rank outsider and pursuing such a strategy would be tantamount to ending her parliamentary career. From some comments I heard today, it seems Smith may be a Labor right faction catholic social conservative, so I don’t see the ALP progressive left gifting him the No 1 spot in some low percentage hope of winning both seats.

In the Senate they’re all running against each other in each state.

The ALP Senator will be whoever goes first on their ticket, so it will be up to the members ti decide either Gallagher or Smith.

Capital Retro8:56 am 09 Jun 18

Thanks for clarifying that – I sort of forgot it was a Senate matter and looking at what Garfield said I guess there is no way Labor could get the two Senate seats that are allocated to the ACT.

Why does the mechanics of Australian politics and government have to be so complicated? No wonder young people lose interest.

How is it complicated? House and Senate use exactly the same system. To get elected, a candidate needs to win one vote more than (total votes divided by (number of seats to be filled plus one)).

In a House election, there is one seat per electorate, so a candidate needs one half the votes plus one to win.

In the ACT Senate, there are two seats available in the ACT electorate, and a candidate needs one third the votes plus one.

In a State Senate election there are usually six seats to be filled, so a candidate needs one seventh the total vote.

In the ACT, Labor generally gets a third plus a bit more, and Liberals get a third minus a bit. The real action is amongst the minor parties, but there’s always been enough preferences flowing to the Liberal candidate to get them elected.

There’s a certain amount of swinging votes based on the candidates personally, but the biggest factor is how much of a goose the two party leaders are. With Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten, it’s a real battle of the giants there.

Blen_Carmichael3:39 pm 08 Jun 18

Good luck with that. Given she was coy about her dual citizenship (while being vocal in criticising the LNP members for not being upfront about their s44 status), Gallagher has lost much support. Also, what about the allegation she held Ecuadorean citizenship?

She swore blind that she had legitimately qualified for the Senate, but the truth is that she hadn’t been eligible when appointed, and she hadn’t been eligible to stand for election.

The High Court showed that she was lying, so how can we trust anything she says now?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.