8 February 2024

Fels report blasts corporate greed for hurting Australians

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
13
Cans of soup in supermarket

The ACTU-commissioned price gouging inquiry has delivered its report. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Consumer watchdog guru Allan Fels has officially told us what we already knew – that corporate greed is driving up inflation in Australia.

The former chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has delivered his report into price gouging and unfair pricing practices, which found supermarkets, banks, energy providers and airlines are hurting Australian consumers by exploiting their market power.

Professor Fels chaired an inquiry launched last August, conducting public hearings in Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Cairns. He received over 750 submissions and 20 detailed contributions from academics, think tanks, unions and businesses.

The report claims ‘profit pushing’ and price gouging, particularly in the wake of the COVID pandemic, were major contributing factors to the hardships many Australians are facing.

Nearly half of the public submissions to the inquiry were about supermarket prices.

READ ALSO State of the Regions report highlights challenges ahead for regional Australia

“Neither Coles nor Woolworths experienced declines in profit nor revenue over the pandemic as their main businesses were, rightfully, deemed essential services,” Professor Fels says in his report.

“This position allowed business continuity and retained their position in the market.

“What has occurred since the pandemic, though, is an increase in margins in both Coles and Woolworths food and grocery segments driven by low competitive forces and an ability to not pass on immediate cost reductions.”

The inquiry was commissioned by the Australian Council of Trade Unions. Professor Fels delivered his report to ACTU secretary Sally McManus at Parliament House this week.

Ms McManus, who has passed the report onto the Federal Government, said working people had suspected that some big businesses have added to inflation by having too much power over customers, workers and supply chains.

“This needs to be reined in,” she said.

“The gaming of the system in the wholesale energy market is particularly concerning. Generation makes up 30 per cent of our household bills and Fels asserts there is gouging in the system, causing workers to pay too much.

“Action here could have an immediate effect on our cost of living.

“The Inquiry itself already had a significant impact by shining a light on pricing practices that rip off ordinary people, such as those used by supermarkets.

“We are glad the inquiry’s findings and process played a part in the Treasurer’s recent referral of the supermarkets to the ACCC.

“We thank Professor Fels for his deep and considered look at pricing in our economy and we look forward to considering his findings in detail.”

Professor Fels said the power of corporations to unduly lift prices had been a central factor in the recent cost-of-living crisis affecting so many Australian households.

He noted companies have been able to leverage the disruptions and uncertainty that followed the COVID pandemic into unprecedented profitability.

“The ability of companies to charge unfair prices, amidst the unprecedented economic and social dislocation ensuing from the COVID pandemic, has significantly undermined the well-being of the Australians we heard from,” he said.

“Adding insult to injury, numerous individual allegations of price-gouging received by our inquiry dealt with unfair behaviour by large commercial banks, which have used their market dominance to extract even more profit from customers through higher interest costs and other charges.

Professor Fels pointed to a “gap in government policy” to address rising prices due to corporate greed.

“It does not pay sufficient attention to high prices. It needs to,” he said of the Federal Government.

“It needs to investigate and expose their causes and, as far as possible, remedy the problems – ineffective competition, vulnerable consumers and exploitative business pricing practices.”

READ ALSO Stage 3 tax-flip gives government a boost on Parliament’s first day

The report found many businesses to be resorting to bizarrely named dodgy pricing practices such as loyalty taxes, drip pricing, excuse inflation, rockets and feathers strategies, and confusion pricing.

Professor Fels also found many sectors were insufficiently competitive or insufficiently regulated, leading to poor consumer outcomes and higher prices.

His report makes 35 key recommendations relating to prices, mergers and divestiture, and competition policy, with 20 recommendations related to issues in specific industries.

The Australia Institute, which made a major submission to the Fels inquiry and appeared before its public hearing in Melbourne last year, said the review confirms that price-setting strategies by corporations have contributed significantly to the cost-of-living crisis afflicting Australian households.

“Since the current inflationary cycle began after COVID lockdowns, there has been too much attention on wages, labour costs, and consumer spending as the supposed drivers of higher prices,” the institute’s chief economist Greg Jericho said.

“This inquiry marshals abundant evidence from official statistical agencies, international economic organisations, think tanks and academic research to show that corporations have taken advantage of the pandemic and its aftermath to exploit consumers and drive up inflation.”

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
John Citizen9:15 am 09 Feb 24

Gone are the days when people ran a business out of the goodness of their heart, rather than to make money…

@John Citizen
I don’t think anyone in history has run “… a business out of the goodness of their heart …”, they have to make money to survive. However, in days gone by, the owners of businesses would balance profit motive with being good corporate citizens … sadly those days are well and truly gone – nowadays, the share price and/or bottom line is the holy grail and all that counts.

John Citizen3:18 pm 09 Feb 24

I thought my sarcasm was obvious. Apparently not.

@Capital Retro
I have to admit, CR, you are improving. This time, by implication (“ACTU which has strong links to Industry Super Funds”), you are only telling half truths.

Yes, the largest industry super fund, Australian Super, is jointly owned by the ACTU. The other joint owner being the employer peak body, the Australian Industry Group.

What’s the joke in a super fund that is jointly controlled by representatives of workers and employers?

The corporate (big pharma, in this instance) greed during covid certainly didn’t help either; everyone forced to stay at home under lock and key until they were willing to accept the big pharma response to the pandemic, which at every turn failed to correspond with what science and medicine would dictate. Always remember, therefore, that, as it stands, two big pharma companies in America (I forget which ones; Merck, for one, is a possibility) have paid out the biggest fines in U.S legal history, for fraud and other misdemeanours; meaning that these companies are among the biggest criminals of all. Why on earth would anyone you trust them?

After that, sure, I can accept that other corporations have taken advantage of the aftermath; and in many cases they’ll be the same ones which lecture us on love, unity, inclusivity and all things fair dust. A perfect example of this, of course, is Woolworths sounding its trumpet in support of reconciliation, all the while ripping Australians off blind, including the Aborigines, at the checkout.

And that’s just par for the course, of course, with leftism: to monopolise everything at the top, either through the state or through a mixture monopolistic capitalism and socialism and tell a ripping good yarn for why they’re doing it, and for why the 99.9% at the bottom, who now own nothing, should not only believe it but militantly support it; which is exactly what is happening in the world today; this is the WEF ET AL using equality, feminism, inclusivity, immigration, climate etc. as the trojan horse

Vasily, Area 51 called, they said “stop spilling the beans, or else”.

Hi Vasily. I agree with much of what you say, particularly about the cynicism of Woolworths’ stance on reconciliation. I just find it strange that you think of ‘monopolising everything at the top’ as leftist. I identify with the left of politics precisely because the left stands against the power of giant corporations. I do not consider the Labor party a party of the left since Gough Whitlam. I’m not sure what you mean by saying that ‘equality, feminism, inclusivity, immigration and climate change’ are ‘Trojan horses’. Who are the Greek army and who is the city of Troy in your analogy?

Hi Mousicle. What you need to understand is that the left isn’t against giant corporations; it is the giant corporations.

Confused?

Think about the 60s cultural (and leftist) revolution. It was obviously said to be against the establishment and yet demonstrably had the establishment’s support, including cops, media, entertainment and education. (I.e. cops didn’t stop the drugs; media and entertainment promoted and recorded the artists; education bred activists, etc. This is all 100% verifiable. The book Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon by Dave McGowan is a useful starting place)

In short, since about that time, the monopoly capitalists/the establishment have been pretending to be the anti-establishment, using all the peace, love, happiness and power to the people catch cries they can find to both keep themselves concealed and win the support and confidence of the people, all the while selling them down the river more and more every day.

Leftist dupes therefore see globalism, borderlessness, one world, unity, love etc., when what the monopoly capitalists are working at is their monopolisation of everything, made possible by people disowning their countries, private property etc. and thinking they’re being humane for doing it.

Think Fabian Socialist Society, which literally has the wolf in sheep’s clothing as its emblem, is elitist to the core but pretends to be humanitarian, has long been associated with *Labor, and wants to implement a mix of monopolistic capitalism and socialism, where they rule with an iron fist and the people, having been tricked, end up eating sheet.

*there’s a video on YouTube called Julia Gillard responds to Fabian Society question on the AC/DC remastered channel. Watch her yourself get found flat footed and admit to her, Hawke’s and Labor’s association with it…and then go and start your anything but mainstream research.

As for the Libs being any better, not really, but that’s for another time

Hi Mousicle. Understand that the left isn’t against giant corporations; it is the giant corporations.

Think about the 60s cultural (leftist) revolution. It was obviously said to be against the establishment and yet demonstrably had the establishment’s support, including cops, media, entertainment and education. (I.e. cops didn’t stop the drugs; media and entertainment promoted and recorded the artists; education bred activists, etc. This is all 100% verifiable. The book Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon by Dave McGowan is a useful starter)

In short, since about that time, the monopoly capitalists/the establishment have been pretending to be anti-establishment, using peace, love, happiness and power to the people catch cries to both keep themselves concealed and win the support and confidence of the people, all the while selling the people down the river.

Leftist dupes therefore see globalism, borderlessness, one world, unity, love etc., when what the monopoly capitalists are working at is their monopolisation of everything, made possible by people disowning their countries, private property etc. and thinking they’re being humane for doing it.

Think Fabian Socialist Society, which literally has the wolf in sheep’s clothing as its emblem, is elitist to the core but pretends to be humanitarian, has long been associated with *Labor, and wants to implement a mix of monopolistic capitalism and socialism, where they rule with an iron fist and the people, having been tricked, end up eating sheet.

*there’s a video on YouTube called Julia Gillard responds to Fabian Society question on the AC/DC remastered channel. Watch her get found flat footed and admit to her, Hawke’s and Labor’s association with it…and then start your anything but mainstream research.

Regarding the Libs being any better, not really, but that’s for another time

Capital Retro10:15 am 08 Feb 24

What a joke. The ACTU which has strong links to Industry Super Funds which has huge share investments in the corporate price gougers who are making record profits which are distributed back to the super funds which in turn enriches their managers and last of all, their members.

And the Australia Institute had their 20c worth also.

Really, your first paragraph says it all.

Given that industry super funds repeatedly out-perform retail funds in returns to members, would you say that retail fund managers are inadequate investors or just creaming off more return for themselves?

If you agree with the first paragraph then what is the joke? Your response?

I think I have discovered why no facts enter the walled garden of your mind; there is no logical pathway.

con tricolas1:40 pm 08 Feb 24

Do you have any Super CG?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.