15 July 2024

Open light rail leg to Parliament first, urges public transport lobby

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
35
render of light rail stop

The proposed light rail stop at Kings Avenue near Parliament and the Barton precinct. An operational leg to Sydney Avenue or Hopetoun Circuit would find Federal Government support, the public transport lobby says. Image: ACT Government.

Construction of light rail to Woden from Commonwealth Park should be done in progressive stages, with the first one being to Sydney Avenue next to Parliament House, Canberra’s public transport lobby has urged.

In its submission to the consultation on the proposed Light Rail Stage 2B, the Public Transport Association (PTCBR) also urges changes to the station designs, the surrounding infrastructure and that a stop be considered for the proposed North Curtin residential area.

PTCBR says it is not advocating the project procurement be split, but believes a staged approach would bring sections of the line into operation sooner rather than waiting for the entire line to be completed.

READ ALSO ‘Bumblebee or chainsaw’: Murrumbateman residents concerned about noise, fire risk of battery storage power station proposal

This would benefit Parliament House and the growing Barton precinct in particular, something the Federal Government would support.

“Progressive commissioning could realise significant benefits of LRS2B earlier than anticipated and more rapidly serve the currently developing office precinct in Barton, the visitor attractions in the National Triangle and Parliament House,” the submission says.

“PTCBR believe this would be welcomed by the Federal Government, not only the precinct’s major employer and landholder but also an expected joint funder of the project.”

The submission notes three new offices under construction in Barton, including the new Tax Office, are expected to house 2000 staff by 2026 and that construction of the 5000-strong National Security Precinct on the corner of Brisbane Avenue and State Circle will commence in 2025.

“This location will have a high occupancy rate, as there is likely to be little scope for employees at this precinct to work from home,” the submission says.

“Good transport connections will therefore be essential.”

map of proposed ligt rail routes

Possible light rail station locations and connections. Image: PTCBR.

PTCBR says a track cross-over and battery recharging would be needed at Sydney Avenue to enable return trips.

An alternative first operational stage could terminate at Hopetoun Circuit, where overhead power is expected to resume.

PTCBR has also proposed alternatives to the Kent/Novar Street stop that would be closer to North Curtin, where a new 1300-home residential development is planned.

This could be at an extended Cotter Road at the northern end of the North Curtin residential area or the southern end.

The submission says the area around the light rail stops needs to be more pedestrian-friendly, urging the elimination of slip lanes and the building of a marked pedestrian crossing, as well as weather protection, including covered walkways and waiting areas.

PTCBR says that light rail should open the way for reuse of surface car parks near stops.

render of light rail stop

What the Kent/Novar Street Stop could look like. PTCBR is urging more weather protection. Image: ACT Government.

At Albert Hall, redeveloping the surface car parks in the National Triangle into new precincts and attractions should be considered.

At the Phillip Oval stop in Woden, the submission says nearby surface car parks could be consolidated into a multi-level parking facility and the remaining sites released for mixed-use retail.

PTCBR urges planning to start integrating the new line with bus routes, including new bus stops and safe and easy active travel links between the two modes.

Chair Ryan Hemsley said that PTCBR urged a holistic approach to planning and design for Light Rail Stage 2B that accounted for future development slated along the alignment, the need for safe and convenient pedestrian access to stations, and the passenger experience at light rail stations.

“We want passengers to feel comfortable at stations, which will require excellent lighting, protection from the weather, and measures to reduce noise from surrounding roads,” he said.

“We also know from Canberra’s first stage of light rail that the median passenger walks 600 metres to a stop, and some regularly walk up to twice that distance. So we want people to access the stations safely and conveniently, and that means co-locating bus stops and improving active travel infrastructure on the approach roads.”

While the National Triangle route is still to be decided and there are differences of opinion within PTCBR, the submission is based on the preferred State Circle route.

The project hinges on the October election result, with the Canberra Liberals pledging not to proceed with Stage 2B.

Join the conversation

35
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Leon Arundell3:18 pm 17 Jul 24

Any group that genuinely supports public transport (as distinct from the profits of a private consortium) would prioritise the extension of Adelaide Avenue’s transit lanes as (A) one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce public transport delays (and thus retain public transport patronage) during construction of stage 2, and (B) a project that will provide travel times of around 15 minutes (compared with about 30 minutes for light rail), and can meet anticipated public transport volumes along the route until at least 2046.

Canberra’s so named Public Transport Association (PTCBR) is a deceptive name for an organisation pushing light rail above other forms of public transport. The renaming is an attempt to broaden its support. Deceptive advertising is not an honest or transparent way to do that.

Gungahlin and inner North residents are reaping the benefits of the tram. A clean and smooth mass transport system which is 99.9% on time and satisfaction rates amongst commuters is high. A transport system whose expansion to Tuggeranong will benefit generations to come and a city expected to grow between 700,000 and one million citizens in the next decades.

The scale of development and the growth of businesses along the corridor is impressive. Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and Adelaide have seen the benefits of light rail in their cities and are currently expanding their networks.

What do the Canberra Liberals have to offer, two days out from the three month countdown to the Territory election? No policies that I know of and a cheap and nasty rewrite of their last three election proposals for a bus only public transport system that has existed in our city over the last nearly 100 years. An option that does not make it down Commonwealth Avenue and on to Woden or take account of our city’s future growth !

Bring on the light rail 🚊👍

Leon Arundell3:21 pm 17 Jul 24

Canberra Metro services don’t run to a timetable. Light rail station indicators show that they on average run a minute behind time.

What a wonderful sounding project Jack D,

Perhaps you can link me to the business case that clearly is the basis of your support for such a project.

Surely taking this approach would add hundreds of millions extra in construction costs.

You’d have to duplicate multiple design, approval and construction steps. That’s an extremely inefficient way to undertake a major construction project.

Splitting stage 2A to Commonwealth park is proving to be five times more expensive per metre than stage 1 to Gungahlin was. Can we expect more of the same massive cost blowouts under this proposal?

It is a suggestion. If the numbers you have pulled from the sky or wherever are correct it just won’t happen. If the cost increase is marginal, it should happen and everyone should expect it happen.

This project is a game changer for driving more intensive land use along the corridor. I personally see this corridor looking like St Kilda Road when the LR is completed.

Bigred,
Yes a suggestion from a lobby group who has no interest in the economics of what they/you are suggesting.

If the project was such a “game changer” as you describe, the business case would outline the clear investment benefits to support the project.

Perhaps you can link it?

Or are your beliefs, pulled from the sky?

The route from Commonwealth Park to Adelaide Avenue still hasn’t been decided yet. Running it past Old Parliament House and then down through Barton is still on the cards.

These are excellent suggestions which I hope the government pays heed to.

Continually promoting submissions from a light rail lobby group is about as objective as asking Dracula his opinion on blood bank management.

Whilst they may have changed their name, they are still the ACT Light Rail group in effect.

Guess it is a bit awkward promoting submissions from people posting on discussion sites using clumsy pseudonyms

Bigred,
Why would you think that’s the alternative?

I would have thought reporting a balanced view would be more informative than simply cutting and pasting press releases from lobby groups.

Although good to hear that you want to read about other submissions as well, shame they aren’t public yet.

I will read all the submissions on my work supplied computer, while having my morning coffee break. Hope there isn’t too many.

The tram has become an expensive joke that those who support it are blind to. It already costs more than $110m each year, on top of fees collected, to operate. The legacy it will leave will ensure Canberra’s future generations will pay dearly.

I support the idea that the line be opened through to Sydney Avenue first. It’s a pity though that the NCA still obsessively insists the bridge crossing have no overhead wires, driving up costs. But hey, they’re gentry leftists, so expect pointless and misguided rigid ideology.

I don’t know why you’d think that position is “leftist”, it’s actually a very conservative position and exactly in line with decisions they’ve made elsewhere since pretty much their formation. No matter which political party is in government federally.

Visual impacts from any development in areas under their control is always one of the key considerations.

If they want it to go faster, why is the tram slower than a bus. Why not use more buses.

The green left would love to slow down all the cars to 40km along the route to force you to use the tram.

Go blue

For goodness sake! Stop voting for Andy Baaa’s clownshow! Wake up! The city is being ruined and rates are insane!

The bus network is bad enough, now you want to try convince us lets spend billions that we don’t for a system that was done by the buses. Cheaper and better.

Yeah let’s increase your rates even more to pay for it..

The current distances between bus and light rail stops ensures that Canberra’s public transport is exclusively for the use of young fit able-bodied people. The locations are often inconvenient for those with disabilities, with children and who need to stop off at various points to shop or pick up children from school or their extracurricular activities. The Mitchell stop is a joke, being so far from anything useful.

This is the fundamental compromise of this entire project – you get neither the short stopping distances and local connectivity of a tram service nor the fast inter-district speeds of a (light or heavy) rail service.

Mr Hemsley needs to stick to public transport because while it is a very good idea to continue stage 2A on to Barton and open that as soon as possible, the proposal to extend Cotter Road to Denison Street in Deakin is profoundly stupid. What’s needed there is the ability to go west from Yarra Glen onto Cotter Road and vice-versa, thereby keeping through traffic off local streets in Deakin (and Curtin). There is already a connection from Cotter Road to the north end of West Deakin via Dudley Street.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.