16 August 2024

When did we give up on fairness?

| Thomas Emerson
Join the conversation
74
Homelessness Canberra

If you become homeless in the ACT, you’re more likely to stay homeless than in any other state or territory. You’re even more likely to remain homeless if you’re Indigenous. Photo: File.

It’s time for an honest conversation about disadvantage in Canberra.

This city is an incredible place to live. I honestly believe there’s no place better. If you can afford it. If you can’t, you’re in trouble.

In many ways, facing economic, social or cultural disadvantage is worse for you in the ACT than in any other jurisdiction.

The inequity starts in childhood.

More than one in 10 Canberran kids live below the poverty line: 9000 children in our city don’t have access to the basic necessities of life.

READ ALSO Tributes flow: Terry Snow a great Canberran, says Barr

While the ACT has the best NAPLAN results in the country, socioeconomic status has a larger impact on a child’s education here than anywhere else in Australia, except the NT.

Disadvantaged Canberran students are four years behind their advantaged classmates when they reach Year 9.

Tonight, in our national capital, there are children who will go to bed hungry: 12,500 Canberrans ran out of food last year.

Over 2,000 people don’t have a bed to go to at all.

If you become homeless in the ACT, you’re more likely to stay homeless than in any other state or territory. You’re even more likely to remain homeless if you’re Indigenous. Far from being closed, that gap widened last year.

People are sleeping in cars parked around the lake and at your local shopping centre. The places with bathrooms that open until late are especially popular. Some of these people are vulnerable women fleeing violence. Some of them have children in the back seat.

Most of the Canberrans I’ve met on the campaign trail have a strong social conscience. They believe we should feed the hungry and house the homeless. They want to live in a fair society, but our public housing stock has decreased by almost 9 per cent since 2011. During the same period, our population has grown by 30 per cent.

Has our government made a conscious decision to let disadvantaged people fall behind in Canberra? Or is it just too slow-moving to respond to those who need our help? Our proportion of public housing dwellings in ‘acceptable’ condition is the second lowest in the country. It’s worse if you have a disability. In fact, being a person with disability has a greater negative impact on the condition of your home in our public housing system than anywhere else in Australia.

But don’t we have the most progressive government in the country? Apparently not for many Canberrans on the margins.

If you’re Indigenous, you’re almost 25 times more likely to be incarcerated here than your non-Indigenous neighbours – the largest gap in Australia.

READ ALSO Suicide prevention charity placed in hands of voluntary administrators RSM Australia, owes $1 million

Despite spending more per inmate than any other state or territory, we’re failing to create pathways to a better future for repeat offenders. Once you enter our criminal justice system as an Indigenous person, you’re more likely to re-offend here than in any other jurisdiction.

We tend to assume that services are in place to address these and other systemic disadvantages. In some cases, they are, but Canberra’s community services sector is at breaking point.

Only 4 per cent of community sector organisations say they are able to meet current levels of demand. Less than 10 per cent believe their funding actually covers the full cost of service delivery.

We have the highest median income in the country. Surely, the ACT, of all places, can afford to support the organisations that are relied upon by the most vulnerable members of our community.

Over 60 per cent of Canberrans voted Yes last year in the Voice referendum. This is a place that believes in positive change for those who most need it.

In an egalitarian society, the hungriest mouths should get fed first. That’s the kind of society I want my kids growing up in.

Instead, critical service providers are being left with no choice but to cut back on services due to insufficient funding.

Organisations from across the community sector shouldn’t be forced to band together, as they did recently, to launch a public campaign pleading for funding sufficient to meet the demand they see for critical services in our community.

A crossbench of Independents for Canberra MLAs in the Legislative Assembly will ensure those pleas aren’t ignored any longer.

Thomas Emerson is a former adviser to Senator David Pocock, founder of Praksis Movement Studio, leader of Independents for Canberra and a candidate for Kurrajong contesting the 2024 ACT Election.

Join the conversation

74
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

A well written op ed but it doesn’t mean diddly squat. There’s only one thing you should be addressing.
The question of who you will support as CM if you hold balance of power – more of the same with Andy Barr or a change with Elizabeth Lee?

Thomas Emerson4:15 pm 22 Aug 24

It depends (a) who wins the most seats, (b) who commits to supporting our policies (see independentsforcanberra.com/policy – more coming soon) and (c) if either party is wedded to policies that are objectionable to people in my electorate. Eg I don’t meet many people in Kurrajong who are keen to go backward on climate action.

Gregg Heldon9:27 am 20 Aug 24

I hate the labels “progressive” and “conservative”. People tend to forget that the majority of Australians, and indeed, Canberra’s, are centre left and centre right. And a smaller group live right in the centre.
Some commentators, both here on Riotact as well as in the media forget that someone who is centre right can care about homelessness or school class sizes and someone centre left can care about police numbers and small business surviving.

Thomas Emerson4:19 pm 22 Aug 24

I tend to agree with you, Gregg. I don’t find the labels all that helpful but they’re so commonplace that it’s become hard to avoid them. Most of the Canberrans I’ve met actually want pretty similar things – transparency and accountability from a government that looks after people who need it, ensures everyone can access quality healthcare, housing & education, and is working to support a thriving economy.

Gregg Heldon9:17 am 20 Aug 24

If you genuinely want to help house homeless people, there are a few ways to help that are not being done in Canberra.
Modular homes. I believe that they are not allowed in Canberra at present due to legislation. Happy to be proven wrong though.
Making homes out of shipping containers. Clad the inside and outside so they don’t look like shipping containers. Two together is a studio room. Again, not allowed under current legislation, I believe.
Re-zone some of the abandoned brown field sites we have, especially in Fyshwick, into residential. Some of those sites have not been used for 10 years or more.
I know that these measures aren’t a magic wand, but they may help alleviate some of the pain the homeless are suffering.
We need to start thinking outside the box.

It is easy as an Independent Thomas Emerson to snipe and cherry pick from the sidelines without offering any alternatives. What solutions does your party offer voters in the way of tackling homelessness and inequality in our city, challenges which all governments face?

You have high-profile name recognition of which I expected better. Your party seems to be running on the same anti-government, anti-tram negativity we see from the Liberals and candidates who stood unsuccessfully in previous elections.

You were recently in the news demanding that the CM stand down from his Treasury role. You were rightly criticised for your ignorance in seeking to use your party as a vehicle to become Kingmakers in deciding who has portfolio responsibilities in the government, rather than as an independent.

You will have to do better!

Jack D thinks pointing out obvious failures of governance in the current Legislative Assembly is somehow a bad thing.

The first point of change is acknowledging the problems.

Unfortunately Jack D and the government can’t even do that, so they will never be able to solve those problems, particularly when so many of them are of their own making.

Thomas Emerson4:21 pm 22 Aug 24

A very effective way to tackle homelessness would be to build much more social housing, and to look at innovative ways of doing that in a lower-cost way. For instance, did you know Housing ACT pays rates to the ACT Government? Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me. There are solutions here that I will push for as an independent.

Not sure about the claim I was ignorant in calling for a split between the Chief Minister and Treasurer. I understood the legislation and background, including history of people sharing the role. The Chief Minister himself said he would cede Treasury after the last election – it doesn’t strike me as unreasonable to insist that he follow through.

If they illegally arrived on a boat, the Governments would look after them. Sadly if your already here, your at the bottom of the pile for help.

devils_advocate12:50 pm 19 Aug 24

Just FYI it would cost the ACT government very little to build quality sustainable public housing.

The cost of running infrastructure to land is very little compared to the price that the individual blocks go for. Remove the exorbitant land costs, development charges and stamp duties/GST, and a house would cost a fraction of what they routinely sell for.

The cost of the actual building materials and labour is not actually that much, less so if building at scale and with a focus on utility rather than aesthetics.

Thomas Emerson4:22 pm 22 Aug 24

Very, very, very good point.

What’s “fair” about one group of people constantly having to fund people who never contribute?

Gregg Heldon9:20 am 20 Aug 24

Are you including mums and kids who are escaping domestic violence and end up sleeping in their car, in your statement there? Or who all sleep on the same mattress in the spare room at their Grandparents house in your statement there?

Are you drunk?
That’s about the only way I could see somebody going on that rant based on the question I asked.

Gregg Heldon9:42 am 21 Aug 24

I don’t drink. I think it’s a fair and reasonable question. Not everyone is to totally blame for the situation that they find themselves in.

It’s not a reasonable question based on what I had asked. It’s a crazy rant completely off topic.

Gregg Heldon11:57 am 21 Aug 24

The topic is about fairness, so not off topic.
A rant? I don’t think so. Ironically you should know about rants as you like to go off on them, but you obviously don’t.
Still haven’t answered the question though. Which makes it open to interpretation.

Incidental Tourist10:49 am 19 Aug 24

Labor and Greens erected a steep paywall around ACT. There is entry ticket price and ongoing cost of living fee. On a surface they sell utopia with all sorts of bells and whistles. But it does not make people better off. It works another way around. Utopia leaves those “better offs” in and pushes “worse off” out. The narrative about ACT remaining affordable given its average income is like story that all penthouses in NY around central park been affordable in relation to the average wealth of residents who can afford it.

Yes… In the name of “fairness” we should give homeless people who sit on the street & do nothing all day free money while the rest of us have to work 40 hours a week to avoid homelessness…

I think you are being very harsh Vousie. Our Local Council members sit in judgement on Canberrans all day and do nothing yet we still give more money than they are worth.

It’s very hard to contribute when you’re struggling to find your next meal, or put a roof over your head.

I would encourage you, Vousie, to go around and have a talk to some of the people that are experiencing homelessness. See if they are willing to discuss how they started down that path, though of course never force it if they are unwilling. The answers might enlighten you and you might soon learn there is a lot more to being homeless than just being a lazy bum.

I think we still value fairness, just not for those borne in Australia.
Our neighbour, still lives in a 4 bedroom public house on her own and will do for decades to come, all while homeless families sleep in their cars tonight.
Public housing should be made available to all, but you must be prepared to move when requested, you don’t own these houses.

“But don’t we have the most progressive government in the country? Apparently not for many Canberrans on the margins.”

“Over 60 per cent of Canberrans voted Yes last year in the Voice referendum. This is a place that believes in positive change for those who most need it.“

Thomas, you’ve made 2 quite telling motherhood statements above. The inference from both is that we are an enlightened city of highly educated citizens looking out for each other. The other inference is that we are all so clever we know what’s best for everyone else.

Well, funnily enough, the statistics you quote show the opposite. We have an ALP government that’s been in power for well over 20 years, they have been in coalition with the Greens since 2012.

Since 2012 the city has gone backwards. Our housing supply mix has gone from approx 80% housing/townhouses and 20% apartments, to 80% apartments/townhouses and 20% houses.

Public housing has decreased 9%, disadvantage has increased, but lo and behold we’ve had the most progressive government in the country for the last 12 years.

Could it be that we have been conned?

After all, insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.

HiddenDragon8:57 pm 17 Aug 24

Part of the problem being described here is that money often does not go as far in Canberra as it does in many other parts of Australia.

The Canberra private sector (such as it is) has long since perfected the art of pushing local prices up to the level that the median local market will bear and the ACT public sector has, in a similar vein, developed a knack for finding the slowest, most costly and least effective way of doing just about everything.

There’s not all that much that the ACT Legislative Assembly can do about the shenanigans of the private sector (although it could do more), but any independent candidates hoping to be elected to that body could show real independence by breaking with the orthodoxy which assumes that the solution to every public policy problem begins with increasing the overall size of the ACT public sector.

That is not to say that there would be no sympathy for increased public spending (and thus borrowing/taxation) to deal with pressing social issues, but public support would likely be greater if more Canberra taxpayers were satisfied that the extra spending would go to the genuinely needy, rather than being creamed off to fund comfy jobs for time-servers and ticket-clippers in top-heavy bureaucracies.

Hidden Dragon I’d be more concerned about the shenanigans of this Labour/Greens clowns than the Private Sector. Fuel is more expensive here than in Queanbeyan. Rates and Land taxes are through the roof. The Private sector increases their prices to cope with the added burden of a government that is financially inept.

Independents for Canberra7:54 am 19 Aug 24

I think you’re on the money here by speaking to the (in)efficiency of our spending. Eg we spend more per capita on healthcare than any other jurisdiction and have the longest emergency wait times. What’s going on? We need independents to scrutinise spending not to make a political point, but to push for better outcomes & ensure our taxpayer dollars go as far as possible.

When the economic sphere and major parties taking their advice were fooled into the idea that free markets deliver it by Hayek & Friedman. Markets concentrate wealth in the hands of small percentage of winners. This wealth buys political influence and favorable policies like light taxation of land and capital gain, it buys up assets and economic rents pushing pensioners and low income earners onto the street.

GrumpyGrandpa4:28 pm 17 Aug 24

It’s disappointing that this is an article, written by a would-be politician, who in all likelihood will not be elected or even if elected, won’t be in a position to influence government.
I have no opinion as to whether the candidate would be a good representative or not.
My point is, where are the existing politicians? What is the current government doing on this space? All we hear about is development, Light Rail. Ultimately, all of this development and LR come at a significant cost to the government budget, and it’s capacity to fund other needs.
Canberra is definitely a city of extremes, with higher than average incomes, and with that, mostly secure employment.
With those higher secure incomes comes an ability to finance higher debts levels and push housing prices, to levels where those with lower incomes can’t afford somewhere to live.
All of this is heightened by government policy of restricted land release and our punative Land Tax that ultimately gets passed to tenants via higher rents.
We were in the City during the week and walked past many empty commercial premises; some owned by banks, vacant now that those branches have been closed. While these are not public property, wouldn’t it be good if the local government could negotiate lease terms to utilise these properties, as temporary premises during winter? I can’t imagine what it’d be like to be sleeping rough in this city during winter!

Thomas Emerson4:23 pm 22 Aug 24

I share your disappointment and have the same question – it’s why I’m running.

That’s a lot of stats. Is it possible to quote the sources for those? Also, you have pointed out a lot of problems, but not a lot of solutions. How would you fix each of the problems you raised?

Thomas Emerson9:52 pm 17 Aug 24

Homelessness, public housing, indigenous incarceration & inmate education – from the Productivity Commission’s Report on Government Services.

Child poverty & community sector funding – from ACTCOSS.

12,500 Canberrans ran out of food – from VolunteeringACT.

Educational disparities – from Equity Economics.

Solutions – sharing some solutions, based on what we’re learning from people with boots on the ground about what needs to change, here: https://www.independentsforcanberra.com/policy

Barr dominates in all decision-making and spending, as Chief Minister and Treasurer. His decisions have created this situation. His focus is narrow, short-term and self-indulgent with attention paid only to the issues of interest to him and that benefit him. This does not include children, older people, disabled people or indigenous people, nor those with less money, power and education. Those who’re homeless or incarcerated move back and forth between those places unseen by him and his mob.

Progressive policies are on special interests for him, not considering the needs of broader groups in the population such as those in poverty, unemployed or others on fixed incomes. This is the result with many are left behind. There is no long term focus on Canberra as a community, just on special narrow little communities in line with his beliefs. Time to get a local government that is egalitarian and that does not ignore of forget those doing it tough, but helps them to get a leg up.

John Koundouzis6:46 pm 17 Aug 24

Well written.
Canberra deserves better.
The Barr Autocracy has been devastating for us.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.