6 September 2024

Early intervention and diversion to continue reining in reoffending, says Rattenbury

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
19

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury launches the next phase of the ACT Government’s Justice Reinvestment plan. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

The ACT will continue investing in keeping people out of prison where possible, building on a 20 per cent fall in repeat offending since 2018.

The second phase of the government’s Justice Reinvestment plan to reduce recidivism by 25 per cent by 2025 will focus on early intervention and diversion from the justice system, including more than $340,000 for a co-design process for the establishment of a Justice Futures Fund.

This is to ensure initiatives are tailored to the specific needs of people whose circumstances make it more likely that they will reoffend.

READ ALSO Bail inquiry: Cain urges presumption against bail in family violence cases

The government says Phase 1 of the plan (2020-2023) contributed to a 19.6 per cent decrease from the 2018-19 recidivism rate through new programs, including housing support for those at risk of reoffending and offering culturally appropriate support for First Nations people, who are overrepresented in the ACT’s prison population, navigating the justice system.

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said the goal of the co-design process was to ensure that existing and future programs met real needs and avoided unnecessary duplication of services.

It would also help the government establish a new resource to support justice reinvestment and identify new ideas and programs to invest in.

Mr Rattenbury said the average cost of keeping somebody in jail for 12 months was $198,000.

He said Justice Reinvestment had the twin goals of reducing the cost of the justice system and making the community safer by cutting reoffending.

“We can alleviate the social and financial burden associated with crime, which benefits both the individuals themselves and, of course, the broader community,” Mr Rattenbury said.

Initiatives that had made an impact on the reoffending rate included the Drug and Alcohol Court, the culturally safe Yeddung Mura reporting site and the Ngurrambai bail support program for First Nations people, and the Justice Housing Program that provides accommodation for people released from custody.

Mr Rattenbury said the plan was to help people at both ends of the justice system through early intervention and supporting people exiting prison so they didn’t return.

“We’ve seen the benefits where kids are going to school more often as well, even better health attention, but it’s also intervening in that criminal behaviour through it,” he said.

“At the other end of the programs, there’s justice housing where people who are getting parole and coming out are getting housing support.”

READ ALSO Review of jail inmate’s brutal stabbing finds gaps in information management

Mr Rattenbury said some people needed to be jailed for justice reasons and the protection of the community, but it was untenable to keep expanding the prison.

He said a large segment of people in custody at any one time were cycling through for assaults and property and drug-related offences.

“The choices are, yes, we can have more police, we just keep picking them up and arresting them and put them through court, and they’ll get out a couple of years later, but everyone who goes to jail gets out at some point,” he said.

“The question is, what’s going to happen when they come out of jail?

“That’s the bit I’m focused on because I want to make sure when they come out, they go on a different path, and they don’t go and knock over somebody’s house again.”

Join the conversation

19
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I think the Greens MLAs should provide their spare room at their place for housing to assist those just released from prison. I am sure they could provide some paid employment at their electoral offices. ……..didn’t think so.

When prisoners are released insurance companies won’t touch them whether that’s car, personal or business, banks can close accounts and refuse service. Most likely their credit will be ruined and real estates ask about criminal conviction and time served. Few banks will actually allow them to have bank accounts. Think about how difficult it is for the men and women who have served their time and actually want to rehabilitate to participate in society. They’re the ones we should be assisting. Not the ones who use the revolving door.

Tom McLuckie11:21 am 07 Sep 24

There has not been a 20% fall in reoffending. The recidivist rate only measure those who return to prison within 2 years of being in prison. Lies, lies and statistics. It does not measure those reoffending on bail, good behaviour orders, intensive corrections orders, drug and alcohol treatment orders, suspended sentences and those on parole who have not been in prison for the last two years, or juvenile offending. The actual reoffending rates if you look at convictions in the supreme court where previous criminality is listed is closer to 80%.

I’m guessing the ACT’s decriminalisation of serious drugs has reduced the chances of reoffenders going back to jail. (Noting I support the law changes, but just pointing out a potential cause of any reduction in reoffending statistics).

I’m.so hoping Rattenbury gets ousted in a few months.

Rattenbury is so incompetent, he cannot even lie properly. Recidivism data is reported nationally in the Productivity Commission’s Report on Government Services (ROGS). Justice is in Volume C, which includes Corrections outcomes (Policing is in the beginning of Volume C… take a look and see how few crimes and offenders the ACTP actually solve and arrest).

https://www.pc.gov.au/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2024/justice

When comparing 2018-19 to 2022-23, (scroll down to Figure C3 and put in 18-19 and 22-23), the ACT has the highest recidivism nationally (and if you trawl through the policing section you will see ACTP solve the lowest % of crimes… so many recidivist crims likely are not getting caught…umm… Shaaaaane!), anyway, you will see:
– 2018-19 was the highest year for ACT recidivism, so Ratts has cherry-picked the high-point since 2013;
– the supposed 20% drop in recidivism since 2018 occurred in the first year (between 2018-19 and 2019-20)… before these intervention/diversion programs operated;
– the ACT is using community corrections (aka ICO’s) far more frequently than any other juro, and ICO’s do not work.

Jailing is not failing, its that the ACT does not jail properly (we don’t do anything here properly). If the cost per prisoner is so concerning, can we please go back to 17 MLAs, and use the $2m per extra MLA to jail another 80 dangerous offenders pls? Now there is an actual community benefit, instead of more pollies and staffers providing negative value.

Nah just raise the age of criminal responsibility even higher so you get even more kids learning there are no consequences for serious crimes. Gives them a great path to adulthood.

Yeah right

important not to forget that keeping people out of prison isn’t necessarily the most important thing, for if that were the case, then you could just decriminalise everything…..oh, wait

More blah blah blah from Greens, meanwhile Operation TORIC has made its 500th arrest.
“Of those charged, 200 were on bail at the time of their arrest, while 118 were subject to conditions such as good behaviour orders, intensive corrections orders, or parole.”
https://the-riotact.com/watch-what-you-gonna-do-when-they-come-for-you-act-policing-releases-video-of-hiding-spot-fails/801198

Stop it. My ribs hurt from laughing

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.