27 March 2023

New report reveals the ACT's prison system is 'screaming out for reform'

| Lizzie Waymouth
Join the conversation
11
Two man and four women standing in front of the Legislative Assembly

The Justice Reform Initiative members Robert Tickner, Dr Mindy Sotiri, Professor Lorana Bartels, Gary Humphries, Kate Carnell and Indra Esguerra. Photo: Lizzie Waymouth.

A new report released by the Justice Reform Initiative has highlighted the urgent need for a shift in the ACT’s criminal justice system.

The ‘State of Incarceration: Insights into Imprisonment in the ACT’ report by the multi-party alliance revealed that 77 per cent of prisoners in the ACT are repeat offenders – the highest rate of prior imprisonment in the country.

At a doorstop meeting in Civic Square on Monday (27 March), Justice Reform Initiative chair Robert Tickner and patron and former chief minister Kate Carnell spoke about the urgent need for the ACT to “break the cycle of repeat offending” by investing in community-based programs to tackle issues such as substance abuse and mental health problems.

READ MORE New Inspector of Correctional Services says all voices in Canberra’s jail need to be heard

As Mr Tickner and Ms Carnell explained, many offenders in the ACT have drug or alcohol problems, mental health issues or some other form of social disadvantage, and due to the lack of community support and rehabilitation efforts, end up reoffending.

“Judges tell me all the time that they struggle when they’ve got somebody in front of them that obviously needs help … and there’s nowhere to send them,” Ms Carnell said.

According to the report, this issue is even more pronounced for Indigenous Australians, who are 21 times more likely to end up in prison.

As Mr Tickner highlighted, intergenerational incarceration is a major issue. A recent Institute of Criminology study in NSW found that 66 per cent of Indigenous people had a parent who was previously incarcerated.

Without the support of schools and the wider community, these young people are on a “railway track to adult prison and a life of poverty and marginalisation”, he said.

This high rate of incarceration has been extremely costly.

As the report explained, the ACT’s prison system costs approximately $190,000 per prisoner per year, but given that it “fails to rehabilitate, fails to deter, and fails to keep the community safe”, the Justice Reform Initiative has called for a change in the way this investment is directed to prevent a prison system that perpetuates a cycle of reoffending.

READ ALSO New Inspector of Correctional Services says all voices in Canberra’s jail need to be heard

As Ms Carnell noted, prisoners are bored and lack the training and support they need, resulting in a higher chance they “end up back in jail, at significant cost to the taxpayer”.

Mr Tickener added: “The evidence says to invest in people and programs, particularly in the community sector, and you’ll see this massive saving in the cost of running prisons.

“It’s a win, win, win outcome”.

Though there is still progress to be made, the report noted that the ACT has taken some positive steps, including the government’s Reducing Recidivism Plan, which aims to cut reoffending rates by 25 per cent by 2025.

“Broadly, the ACT is on the right policy track, but that is not enough unless you invest in necessary resources to make a difference,” Mr Tickner said, adding that the prison system is still “screaming out for reform”.

READ ALSO ‘Bigger, brighter and bolder’ National Folk Festival has shaken off last vestiges of COVID

It is hoped that the report will encourage a renewed interest in criminal justice reform in the ACT and pave the way for it to become a national leader in community safety.

“We believe that the ACT can lead Australia by taking an evidence-based approach to criminal justice reform,” he said.

“This is a fixable problem and we’re really hoping that both sides of politics in the ACT can come together as they often do to send that message to the community that this is the pathway to a safer and more humane community.”

State of Incarceration: Insights into Imprisonment in the ACT can be found on the Justice Reform Initiative website.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

A case of arrested development?

Tom McLuckie7:56 pm 29 Mar 23

Hi John, you do realize Christine in a pseudonym? I remember the Bulger case well, but I think.you misunderstand my intent. I have called for a review of our corrective services framework and rehabilitate programs as part of my campaign for improved road safety. I broke down the respective Directorate annual reports over the last three years to understand spending in these areas. For dangerous motor vehicle crimes the re-offending rate from an FOI with CS was 48 out of 49 offenders. With such minimal support in housing (around 40% of those leaving prison according to the report experience homelessness) and high rates of joblessness), mental health and addiction issues it is no wonder after years of doing nothing we have a core group of people in Canberra stuck in this cycle. Policy statements won’t fix this – investment in long term programs will.

Tom McLuckie4:16 pm 29 Mar 23

Good Old Christine Stevens. Only he could take a scathing report highlighting 11 years of Green / Labor Coalition in Government failings and flip it to bash up the Liberals. I know he prefers Liberal bashing than actually reading, so here is a quick highlight. In the last 10 years, our prison population grew by over 46% during the period of 2012 to 2021-22 far outstripping our actual population growth of 21%. So much for the progressive government policies working. The ACT has the highest rate of prior imprisonment in Australia, with 77.2% of people in prison in the territory having been in prison before. This rate is even higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, with 92% – and lets be honest that is NOT the reoffending rate which will be MUCH higher. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people imprisoned in the ACT has grown by 105% over the last decade. We have the higher costs per prisoner by a country mile in the country. In 2019 2019 they announced they would redirect funding into community programs, legislative reforms and policy initiatives, including accommodation and support for people on bail, and a reintegration centre. Yet in the last three years of budget figures only $21M can be determined being spent on said programs – measly amounts never going to address the problems facing those caught in the cycle of criminality. I suggest you take your blinkers off and face some unpleasant realities.

Tom – disregarding your ad-feminam attack on Christine Stevens, (“Only HE”?) – I don’t have the data at hand, so I won’t disagree with the data you present, but I do think that there are factors you don’t understand. Firstly, as I’ve already posted, the return-to-prison rate is an awfully bad measure or reoffending – the ACT does a better than average job of tracking ex-prisoners because it’s such a compact jurisdiction, and any default by the ex is vastly more likely to be detected than in geographically bigger jurisdictions. That results in higher rates of OBSERVED reoffending, which is what the Productivity Commission’s poorly constructed measure actually measures. Secondly, the ratchetting up of sentencing is totally a result of the “tough on crime” policies of the political right in Australia. You might be interested to know that in the late 1980s Margaret Thatcher – that heroine of the political right – recognised that imprisonment was [a] totally ineffective at reducing crime – maybe even counter-effective; and [b] absurdly expensive compared to the benefits generated for the community by crime prevention and offender re-education measures. I worked then with the UK Home Office to develop policies like that. Ask the then-Deputy Under Secretary of State, David Faulkner, about our Friday drinkies policy-making discussions. Sadly, a pair of ten year-olds murdered a three year old in a Manchester railway yard, and the “hangers and floggers”, ably assisted by Murdoch’s extreme right media, used this totally irrelevant case to justify their “lock-’em-all-up” policies. These, sadly, were taken up by the political right in Australia, with disastrous consequences for crime prevention, the Taxpayers’ budgets, and with absolutely no measurable impact on crime rates. Please correct me it any of this is wrong. Cheers.

Tom McLuckie7:56 pm 29 Mar 23

Hi John, you do realize Christine in a pseudonym? I remember the Bulger case well, but I think.you misunderstand my intent. I have called for a review of our corrective services framework and rehabilitate programs as part of my campaign for improved road safety. I broke down the respective Directorate annual reports over the last three years to understand spending in these areas. For dangerous motor vehicle crimes the re-offending rate from an FOI with CS was 48 out of 49 offenders. With such minimal support in housing (around 40% of those leaving prison according to the report experience homelessness) and high rates of joblessness), mental health and addiction issues it is no wonder after years of doing nothing we have a core group of people in Canberra stuck in this cycle. Policy statements won’t fix this – investment in long term programs will.

GrumpyGrandpa10:05 pm 28 Mar 23

What! It costs $190,000 per year to incarcerate someone on the AMC!
It’d be cheaper to release every prisoner from the AMC and put them on a good behaviour bond conditional on them not reoffending, or staying clean etc for 12 months. If they don’t re-offend etc, just give them a $100,000 reward!
Ok, I’m not serious, but we can’t keep spending $190,000 per year on repeat offenders and if people keep re-offending then the government’s rehabilitation programs simply aren’t working.

I’m 99% agreeing with these findings, but the fact that the ACT has the highest rate of return to prison is misleading. It’s not the best measure to focus on. Because the ACT is a small compact jurisdiction, it is comparatively very easy to monitor offenders post-release, particularly those on parole/probation orders. The Productivity Commission’s measure is an extremely poor one. What they count is OBSERVED re-offending. The greater the level of supervision, the greater the chance of observing re-offending behaviour.

The report’s recommendations are 100% on the mark.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.