9 October 2024

Independents for Canberra prepared to cut deals but won't hold a government to ransom

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
17
Thomas Emerson

Independents for Canberra leader Thomas Emerson: “We want to be a constructive force, not an obstructive one.” Photo: Michelle Kroll.

All Independents for Canberra candidates have agreed to only support a government that meets the group’s 20-point statement of expectations if it holds the balance of power after 19 October.

The group said that any successful Independents for Canberra candidates would not join a coalition government but sit on the crossbench and exert pressure from there.

The top three include introducing a Future Generations Act requiring the development of a community-led vision for Canberra and establishing a Future Generations Commissioner; respecting and protecting the rights of people of all cultures, races, ages, abilities, genders, and sexualities; and taking no backward steps on climate action, voluntary-assisted dying or abortion access.

The statement covers IFC policy points across housing, education, health, the environment and the economy.

READ ALSO Greens candidate apologises after door cam catches her removing Canberra Liberals pamphlet

Leader and candidate in Kurrajong Thomas Emerson said that unlike opaque negotiations leading to Labor-Greens governing agreements, IFC would be clear about its intentions.

“Community members are asking who independents might support in government,” Mr Emerson said.

“Today, we are asking the major parties: who in our community will you support in the next term of government? What standards will you uphold? Which unmet needs will you take action on?

“Who will commit to making the ACT the first jurisdiction in Australia to legislate a Future Generations Act?”

But Mr Emerson admitted there would be no guarantees as was the case whenever independents ran.

He said that depending on the composition of the Legislative Assembly, deal-making would still have to be done, but it would be conducted based on the statement.

“What we have committed to is conducting ourselves in accordance with the principles we’ve all voluntarily signed up to, which include ensuring every voice is heard and pushing hard to actually deliver results for the ACT,” he said.

“We want to be a constructive force, not an obstructive one, and making sure that decisions are based on our community’s interests, not vested interests or party interests.”

Mr Emerson said it would be up to the independents elected to come to a decision, not the IFC organisation, and they would be free to go whichever way they wanted.

“If we reached an impasse again, there’s nothing within our organisation that could force someone to do one thing or another,” he said.

“But we wanted to issue a statement of expectations to make clear to people what it is that we’ll be fighting for.”

Mr Emerson added that the IFC was not about holding a government to ransom but was focused on getting the best deal for the community out of each piece of legislation.

He said the Greens worked with Labor to form a de facto majority government, shutting down debate and policy solutions.

IFC would not strike a governing agreement, preferring to keep its options open.

“We’d rather have some core commitments that we are focused on early on but continue the policy development process throughout a term,” Mr Emerson said.

“Something that we’ve heard has been a concern about communities being stuck within a four-year election cycle on the basis of those governing agreements. Something that doesn’t get into the governing agreement, it’s very unlikely to happen, which means we have a less adaptable and responsive government, which is a really common complaint for people in our community.”

READ ALSO It’s hard being independently independent in this ACT election

Mr Emerson said the statement came from the community after months of engagement.

“We’ve hosted many public community meetings over the last nine months, spent hundreds of hours at street stalls, had thousands of doorstep conversations, engaged in continued online interaction with people from across the ACT, and had 20 community members from diverse backgrounds put their hands up as candidates,” he said.

“People want more accessible and responsive MLAs. They want more accountability, increased transparency, and an honest assessment of the challenges we’re facing. Above all, people tell us they want real action, not just talk.

“If Canberrans decide to elect an independent crossbench on October 19, we will do all we can to ensure the next government delivers on these expectations.”

Join the conversation

17
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Any Independent that supports the current Barr government, gambling and the extension of the tram will not get my vote. They need to show us what they do support.

@Jack D.
Same old sycophantic blithering and scaremongering … these Independents/independents are causing you to get into quite a lather aren’t they?

Are the Independents for Canberra a grouping with vastly different desires refusing to compromise their beliefs should they win balance of power or are they a party of independents under the one banner Thomas Emerson?

Mr Emerson has said any independents elected would be free to go whichever way they wanted and there is nothing within the “organisation” that could force them to do one thing or another. Does that mean that any independents elected can ignore the commitments they made prior to their elections? The IFC’s website is light on details and the statement of expectations raises concerns!

What is stopping IFC candidates joining coalitions should they win power? IFC will not commit to a governing agreement with the government to deliver their key priorities and commitments! Independents elected in previous parliaments in our city do not have a very good track record when it comes to working collaboratively with the governments of the day. Causing mayhem, supporting one side of parliament and flip flopping around on issues. Bringing no confidence motions and switching sides, with one independent joining the Liberals to become a minister!

I have no confidence in Mr Emerson’s so-called independents (or organisation?) who may possibly control the balance of power in a new government. Many seem to be running on the same hostile and anti-government negativity we have seen in previous elections and preselected to IFC just to make up numbers.

Will they commit to a conservative agenda and join with the Canberra Liberals in a new government to water down hard-fought law and social reforms should they win power?

Will they turn out to really be aliens staging an invasion from the inside of government?

Are they really Lizard people?

Are they actually secret ALP members in disguise and will ensure Barr retains power?

So many questions that these so called independents won’t answer, Jack D is right to be worried….

Why do all the independents form groups and team up. Sounds more like DEI labor

The IFC “group”, so they are in fact a political “party” and not very independent or individual

>respecting and protecting the rights of people of all cultures, races, ages, abilities, genders, and sexualities

With rights come responsibilities.

e.g. if a persons’ culture is ‘terrorist’, it is their responsibility to abandon it.
I won’t run down the list of case specific responsibilities, it’ll get old very fast.

But, the point is, this looks like a DEI checkbox, and without a further statement acknowledging that rights and responsibilities are 2 sides of the same coin, I’d like the option of going 3rd party – but this, sorry, no.

@Tk
If a person is a terrorist:
1. How did they get into Australia to eventually qualify for permanent tesidence; and then
2. When eligible, how were they granted Australian citizenship – ie the right to vote and therefore be represented by these independents?

Perhaps you are over thinking it a tad? Or progressive independents were never going to be your ‘cup of tea’?

Family First perhaps?

What culture has ‘terrorist’ as part of its ‘ethos’. Cultures do not have homogeneity…they are what they are because of their history to this point in time, where they live geographically, which dictates how they live etc.

If you want to talk ‘terrorist’, can we include for imstance, those who would roll back climate change ,erasures? Eg. The Liberal Nat’s who advocate for more coal fired power etc etc.

‘Won’t hold the government to ransom’ strikes me as pretty naive. Independents are elected not to ask nicely if government if it was convenient and felt like it, to tweak their legislation. They are put in government to get things done otherwise, what is the point? The major parties only respect power & money, so independents had better be prepared to wield it.

Marc Tremblay4:09 pm 09 Oct 24

The Independents state they want to be a constructive and not an obstructive group, yet…

“All Independents for Canberra candidates have agreed to only support a government that meets the group’s 20-point statement of expectations”

So they will only support a government who agrees to their demands? I admit that my take on this could be wrong however, my understanding of collaborative relationships is one where we work together, not always getting what we want, but where we achieve outcomes. This means give and take. Bluntly, these Independents for Canberra are taking the p#ss…

Terrence O\'Brien2:28 pm 09 Oct 24

So, more green leftists then? Sounds like the poor ACT will get a Green-Labor-green coalition government. We’ll be net zeroed to death.

Thank you for clarifying all that, as if this joint isn’t stuffed enough.

Margaret Freemantle1:53 pm 09 Oct 24

It seems that we don’t know what we are getting if we vote Independent

@Margaret Freemantle
Funny – I read the article and realised exactly what I’d be getting if I vote independent … an MLA who “… was not about holding a government to ransom but was focused on getting the best deal for the community out of each piece of legislation”.

A government held to account on each piece of legislation, sounds better than an unfettered one to me.

“Respecting and protecting the rights of people of all cultures, races, ages, abilities, genders, and sexualities; and taking no backward steps on climate action, voluntary-assisted dying or abortion access.”

Sounds fair and sensible to me.

“respecting and protecting the rights of people of all cultures, races, ages, abilities, genders, and sexualities; and taking no backward steps on climate action, voluntary-assisted dying or abortion access.”

So they are greens lite and will side with Labor, and play culture and class wars, as I had initially suspected. Thanks for finally clarifying that Thomas. 🤣

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.