31 October 2024

Will Leanne Castley last the distance in the Canberra Liberals hot seat?

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
13
Jeremy Hanson and Leanne Castley

The new Canberra Liberals leadership team: Leanne Castley and Jeremy Hanson. Conservative but pragmatic. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

What cost Elizabeth Lee the Liberal leadership? Was it her reaching out to the Greens after the election? Was it her brainsnap before the election? Was she just too moderate for a mostly conservative party room? Or did it simply come down to personality and her management style?

The fact is the Liberal vote went backward when voters were actually looking for alternatives after 23 years years of Labor or Labor/Green rule. Those elusive votes went to independents of a progressive bent, not to the Libs.

The party remains on nine seats and will be outgunned again in the Legislative Assembly, although it might be able to forge alliances on individual issues.

It’s a result that demanded change, but the question is, is this the change that’s needed?

READ ALSO We need to talk about early voting and the 100-metre rule, says ACT Greens leader

Leanne Castley was a big improver in the last term, becoming more polished as it wore on. She is personable, warm and loved in her home electorate of Yerrabi.

But as her Health counterpart Rachel Stephen-Smith noted on radio yesterday (31 October), she hasn’t necessarily been across the policy.

And she will need to be, up against wonks like Ms Stephen-Smith, a possible future Chief Minister, and Chief Minister Andrew Barr, both of whom have years of political experience on her.

No one knows how Ms Castley will perform in the constant media glare, carrying the hopes of her party on her shoulders.

She has identified a deficiency in party messaging because their policies are not making the sort of impact they hoped for. That burden will rest mostly with her unless she intends to delegate more to her front bench, in particular her deputy, Jeremy Hanson.

Mr Hanson says he was happy to accept the deal Ms Castley offered and has now put his baton back in the knapsack. That remains to be seen.

She’s the boss, he says, but there is already speculation, vehemently denied, that he will make another move sometime during the term.

However, the strategy could be for Ms Castley to be the friendly face of the party, leaving the more experienced Mr Hanson to do the tough work of taking on Mr Barr, who acknowledges him as his most formidable opponent.

Whatever the case, Ms Castley will need to lean on her deputy, at least in the beginning. The fact is that she will hold no fears for Mr Barr.

Labor has already branded the move a shift back to the right for the Liberals, a position that for many makes them unviable. But both Ms Castley and Mr Hanson want to dispel those fears, saying their focus will be on the basic issues that matter to Canberrans, not pursuing settled issues such as voluntary assisted dying and abortion access. Those topics are just not on their agenda.

In fact, they want to put to bed all this talk about factional wars in the Canberra Liberals and present a united and pragmatic face.

READ ALSO CIT faces complaint after student found dead in Bruce Residence

But if that was the case, then why hasn’t arguably the party’s most popular MLA, Mark Parton, been drafted to lead it? It was only he and Mr Barr who topped 9000 votes in their respective electorates

An excellent media performer and communicator, the former radio host is considered to be a moderate (although so was Ms Lee and that didn’t seem to help), cuts across party lines and lives in Tuggeranong, where the Liberal vote was highest.

He did contest the deputy leadership but that was a done deal.

Whether he actually wants to be party leader is another issue.

Mr Hanson says Ms Castley is the future of the party, but she faces a steep learning curve, and it is a long time until the next election. It will be interesting to see if she lasts the distance.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Canberra Optimist8:50 am 01 Nov 24

This analysis suffers from the same problem of so much of the ACT election commentary. Where is the evidence that Canberrans wanted a change? They have just elected essentially the same government (albeit with 2 pro-Labor Greens replaced by 2 pro-Labor “independents”).

As Seano says If the definition of madness is to keep doing the same things and expecting a different result then we are all mad in Canberra!

I’ll offer a slightly different take. A good proportion of Canberra DID want a change, but the Liberal Party didn’t offer a convincing ability to deliver that – just more chaos due to either individual political ambitions or overall inexperience. The least risk-adverse voters looked to the Independents, while the rest though “Better the Devil you know…”

Just putting it out there.

I think you’re both right in that Canberrans did want change as evidenced by independents winning two seats and taking votes from everywhere but they weren’t willing to risk independents who might give the Liberals power and that’s the issue the Canberra Liberals refuse to address.

The voters were looking for alternatives however no one (given their vote went backwards) either believed Lee was a moderate (because she’s not) or that she would keep the worst instincts of the likes of Hanson at bay.

If the definition of madness is to keep doing the same things and expecting a different result it’s difficult to see how the Canberra Liberals moving openly to the hard right is anything but madness.

There is nobody on the “hard right” in the Canberra Liberals. Your idea of what constitutes “hard right” is exceedingly distorted due to your clearly left wing extremist beliefs.

An enquiry, Ken M, to assist any discussions.

Please define what in your view constitutes “hard right” (or “left wing extremists” for that matter), giving examples of what is “in” or “out” for your dividing line(s)?

Sorry Ken, in the real world Anti-VAD, Anti-LGBT, Anti-Abortion access, Anti-Indigenous, Anti-Public transport, Anti-Action on climate, Pro-Keeping bigots in the party = Hard right.

Capital Retro10:06 am 01 Nov 24

And from your impeccable sources Seano, please tell us what percentage of the real world population do the aforementioned groups account for?

What’s that got to do with whether their rights should be protected?

Also, you might not know any but last I checked @Capital Retro women make up 50% of the population.

Capital Retro11:19 am 01 Nov 24

Women exclusively were not mentioned as a group you nominated so please dispense with the Unicorns and tell us what you were asked.

None of those things are “hard right” unless you are a left wing extremist kook. And not everybody who disagrees with your twisted world view and doesn’t want the place turned into Sodom and Gomorrah is a bigot.

Yeah sorry Ken here in the real world they are champ and that’s not just me that’s the electorate.

Women are concerned with women’s health @Retro. if you knew any that would be obvious.

And I’ll answer a dumb question when you answer a smart one, how are people’s rights affected by their numbers in the community? Do minorities not deserve rights in your worldview?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.