23 December 2024

China's first 'premium EV brand' opens new base in Canberra – and it's not the only one

| James Coleman
Join the conversation
52
Inside the new Zeekr dealership on Melrose Drive, Phillip.

Inside the new Zeekr dealership on Melrose Drive, Phillip. Photo: James Coleman.

If you’re struggling to keep pace with the swathe of new car brands pouring out of China, there are at least two you’ll get used to seeing around Canberra.

Where John McGrath Maserati once proudly stood on Melrose Drive in Phillip (near the service station), there is now branding for ‘Zeekr’ emblazoned. And in Fyshwick, Leapmotor has joined the Gulson fray of dealerships.

Zeekr arrived in Australia earlier this year with two fully electric models, the X “luxury urban cross SUV” and 009 “pure electric luxury MPV”. And it comes with grand backing – its parent company Geely is the same one behind Volvo, Polestar and Lotus.

Other models, including the 001 “luxury shooting brake” and Luxury Sedan, are on the cards too.

And if you’re wondering about the name, yes – the ‘Z’ is a reference to ‘Generation Z’ and the rest, ‘geek’.

READ ALSO Canberra motorists left in a sticky mess after heatwave ‘melts’ three major roads

The X starts from $56,900 for the single-motor, rear-wheel drive model and $64,900 for the dual-motor all-wheel drive. The latter offers a claimed range of 470 km and can get from 0-100 km/h in 3.8 seconds – although not both at once.

Available with either six or seven seats, the $135,900-plus 009 only comes with a dual-motor that’s enough to overcome its nigh three tonnes of weight and get it to 100 km/h in 4.5 seconds. Range is a claimed 686 km.

Both models are covered by five-year, unlimited kilometre warranties, while the batteries get their own eight-year, 160,000 km warranties.

Zeekr dealership

Maserati has left Canberra and in its place is Zeekr. Photo: James Coleman.

A Zeekr Australia spokesperson told Region the brand aimed to “blend Swedish design and craftsmanship with innovative technology” and was “poised to reshape the EV landscape”.

“It’s the first time Australia will see a premium EV brand from China and we’re thrilled to introduce that to the market,” the spokesperson said.

“We’re thrilled to have opened one of our first dealerships in Canberra, a city leading the charge in EV adoption … Canberra’s commitment to sustainable transportation aligns perfectly with Zeekr’s vision and we’re eager to be a part of that future.”

Inside the Zeekr X.

Inside the Zeekr X. Photo: James Coleman.

Meanwhile, Leapmotor started in 2015 with the world’s first artificial intelligence (AI) microchip designed specifically for autonomous cars. The first car came along in 2019, but things really got serious when Stellantis bought a 20 per cent share in the company in 2023.

Stellantis is the automotive conglomerate behind Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Lancia, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, RAM Trucks and Vauxhall.

For now, Leapmotor is selling just one car in Australia – the C10 SUV, starting from $45,000.

It comes with a rear-drive, single-motor powertrain good for a range of up to 420 km and 0-100 km/h time of 7.3 seconds.

READ ALSO Driving to the South Coast these holidays? Here’s what you need to know

Leapmotor Australia head Andy Hoang told Region the C10 would be followed by the B10 electric SUV in 2025, “along with more products to be announced”.

“We see Canberra as a particularly exciting market given its reputation as Australia’s ‘EV capital’ and its residents’ appetite for new and innovative mobility options,” he said.

“We hope to play a key role in further accelerating EV adoption in Canberra, and across Australia, by offering practical, affordable and high-quality vehicles.”

The Leapmotor C10

The Leapmotor C10. Photo: Leapmotor Australia.

While it hasn’t announced plans to come to Canberra yet, another Chinese brand, Deepal, has also arrived in Australia with its electric SUV, the S07.

But at a time when EV sales are still slowing, the Federal Government has announced a plan to get them going again with $150 million worth of low-interest loans for workers earning less than $100,000 a year.

The loans, available through Commonwealth Bank, are also open to essential workers such as police officers, teachers, fire fighters and nurses, regardless of income.

The government said the loans would be offered at interest rates up to five percentage points lower than the standard rate, which could save more than $8000 in interest for a $40,000 loan repaid over seven years.

EV sales made up 7.4 per cent of all vehicle sales in Australia this year. Photo: James Coleman.

About 84,000 EVs have been sold in Australia this year, making up 7.4 per cent of total new vehicle sales.

The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) described this as a “disappointing result” and “well below” its forecast of 11.1 per cent.

“Growth in demand for battery electric vehicles is easing in markets around the world as governments remove incentives and consumers face the realities of making the shift which includes higher purchasing prices, availability of recharging infrastructure and models that meet their work and recreation needs,” CEO Tony Weber said.

He suggested the government take additional steps to support consumers by extending the fringe-benefits tax (FBT) concession for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which would come to an end on 1 April 2025.

“Increasing consumer demand for plug-in hybrid and hybrid vehicles shows consumers are prepared to move to low emission technologies,” he said.

“However, today’s announcement is a good initial step to support a small and specific group of consumers to make this step.”

Join the conversation

52
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I don’t care how good they are how, cheap they get. You could not pay me enough to buy a Chinese made car, TV or mobile phone. always buy Australian first if I cant find a Australian Manufacturer I buy Chinese last.

Incidental Tourist11:56 am 31 Dec 24

Shutting down Holden, Mitsubishi, Ford and Toyota local plants was a huge error of judgement. The reason was subsidies going to local manufacturers which by the way supported thousands of local quality jobs. And today they ended up subsidising foreign car manufacturers and mostly overseas workforce.

Capital Retro3:15 pm 31 Dec 24

If Australia was still making Holden, Mitsubishi, Ford and Toyota vehicles they would now be at least twice the price of equivalent imported versions. There was a time when we actually manufactured and exported some of those brands which were all foreign owned so we don’t know how the accounting was structured.
The problem has all ways been the cost of labour in Australia and it continues.
I, like thousands of others, bought some frozen cooked and peeled jumbo prawns for Christmas. They were less than $20 a kilo. The packet stated “Harvested in Australian waters and processed in Vietnam”. This means that if there were people willing to peel and de-vein the prawns in Australia and accept a fair wage they could be sold here for the same price.
It is difficult to understand that the cost of doing this in Australia is still more expensive than transporting the product to Vietnam for further processing and shipment back to Australia but that’s the way things are.
As the cost of energy rises in Australia, frozen foods may disappear.
I don’t agree that we subsidise foreign car manufacturers either so would you explain what you mean?

Logicalusername5:05 pm 31 Dec 24

Ford US was interested in the BF Falcon which was at the time the best mainstream product produced by Ford. The Unions in the US said no, the Australian market was too small.

GM Holden produced the Family 3 engines for export and also the Commodore to various countries including the US while the dollar was low in exchange to the US dollar. The dollar rose and people were moving away from traditional sedans. The last series Commodore was developed by Holden for a similar amount to ur beloved tram. Unfortunately developing new platforms was not worth the effort.

Just out of interest we manufactured or built up box form;
Renault
BMC/Leyland
Datsun/Nissan
Toyota
Mitsubishi
Ford
Holden
Chrysler
Triumph
Peugeot and Rambler.

Both political parties were in office during the above-mentioned companies time.

“As the cost of energy rises in Australia, frozen foods may disappear.” Complete drivel, along with the rest of it.

Companies have always sought to use cheap labour in undeveloped countries, this is not new. Australians should not be competing for low-end jobs on starvation wages with the third world.

.. and Rolls Royce in the early days!

Capital Retro5:21 pm 01 Jan 25

Did you have prawns at Christmas, Seano?

Capital Retro5:36 pm 01 Jan 25

Good research, Logicalusername.
The built up ones were commonly called “crated knock down” or CKD. Some of the wooden crates they arrived in were works of art and highly sort after. I think there was a Minister’s Directive (MD) giving sales tax exemption on anything that came into Australia that was subject to “further manufacture” at that time.
Then there was the Button plan.
I visited Argentina in 1984 and my host picked me up at the airport in his brand new Argentinian built Falcon. Well, brand new in Argentina but actually 2 models older than the current model in Australia. The global manufacturers had billions of dollars invested in the panel dies and they made sure they got every cent back.
The company that made Chrysler Valiants in Australia was coincidentally called Steel Pressings Pty Ltd.

Did you have Christmas in a country with a wealth of natural resources and a highly educated population who in the vast majority had the day off with family and friends and want to “fix” the Australian economy by having those workers compete with workers on starvation wages in third world countries…because that would be pretty dumb.

Logicalusername9:33 pm 01 Jan 25

One 82 Falcon I passed in my travels in Argentina appeared to be an XM/XP model with square lights front and rear and plastic bumpers, appeared about nine models behind the OZ XE Falcon. Correct me if I am wrong l.

Capital Retro9:55 am 02 Jan 25

I expect you are correct. The trims varied but the basic bodies and panels were always about 5 – 10 years older than the Australian ones.
In neighbouring Uruguay, they were still driving Model A Fords and MG TF roadsters, all right hand drive.

Sorry to inform all EVangelists that my 2013 Nissan ICE is still going fine, takes less than 5 minutes to recharge (refuel), doesn’t cause me range anxiety, comes without irritating beeping, dinging sounds and – has a spare wheel.
What I’ve noticed with many products made in the PRC is that after the initial launch and fanfare, quality of a known product deteriorates as manufacturers substitute cheaper less reliable parts. I would still trust a German, Japanese or Korean built vehicle over anything coming out of a factory in China.

Interesting, how far do you get on a five minute charge? What’s the range going on highway driving at 110kmph, like on the Hume? How do you find the recharge spots on the way? Is there plenty of them? Is there much of a queue? I’ve been waiting for technology to catch up so a recharge is only 5 minutes and I can at least drive Canberra to Newcastle at the speed limit on a charge and then only need to recharge for 5 minutes before driving similar distance to Queensland before recharging again.

Capital Retro4:11 pm 31 Dec 24

I fill the 88 litre fuel tank in my 15 year old diesel in about 2 minutes thanks to the “fast-flow” option most bowser pumps now have. That gives me 900KM range.
I also carry a 20 litre plastic container of fuel wherever I go so “range anxiety” is an alien concept when I travel.

CR,
Once again admitting he carries around a dangerous amount of fuel unsecured in the boot of his car.

Then regularly has the gall to complain about the fire risk of EVs. Too funny.

Capital Retro8:51 am 02 Jan 25

There is nothing dangerous about carry diesel in an approved container chewy. And when was the last time a container of diesel exploded spontaneously like the Tesla in Las Vegas did a few hours ago?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/01/tesla-truck-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas

Hmm, not a good choice of news article to attempt to justify your suggestion that EVs are inherently dangerous. The article states the truck explosion is unusual and still under investigation, while noting it was like a “detonation” and that the truck may have had “fireworks-style mortars onboard”.
Once again, if you did your research properly you’d find that an EV battery fire occuring through a battery fault (as opposed to external causes) is rarer than an ICE car fuel fire.

Capital Retro11:38 am 02 Jan 25

Whatever you say, StuartM.

Capital Retro,
Um, ICE vehicles catch fire at higher rates than EV’s as you’ve been shown repeatedly.

There’s only been a handful of EV fires in Australia in recent years. At the same time, there’s been thousands of ICE vehicle fires. ICE Vehicle fires are both higher proportionally and in total.

https://evcentral.com.au/ice-vehicles-80-times-more-likely-to-catch-fire-than-electric-cars/

And did you even read your own (selectively googled) link, that describes an explosion caused by a large amount of fireworks being carried in a vehicle?

And finally, LOL at you still claiming there’s nothing dangerous around constantly carrying a large amount of highly flammable liquid around in a plastic container in your vehicle, whilst still complaining about EV safety.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/01/01/us/cybertruck-fire-trump-hotel-las-vegas/index.html

Also even funnier that the authorities believe that petrol being carried in the vehicle was part of the reason for the large explosion, now believed to be part of a potential terrorist incident.

Bahahahahaha, you’ve outdone yourself in the selective googling this time CR.

Having his dumb culture wars-driven comments about energy, EVs and/or renewables shot down with evidence Retro’s typical play is to disappear from this thread only to reappear later making the same dumb comments.

devils_advocate9:02 am 03 Jan 25

EV fires are far more dangerous than ICE fires because they
-burn at much higher temperatures
-are effectively impossible to extinguish, rather being left to burn themselves out and control the surrounding damage
-emit far more toxic smoke

So even if the incidence may be lower, the consequence is far higher

Capital Retro3:05 pm 04 Jan 25

The explosion and aftermath video reveals the petrol container was still intact. Petrol will not explode unless a certain amount of air is present. The perpetrator must have sloshed it around first. Indeed, if his intention was to kill himself this was the only way he could have done this.
I’ve seen a few vehicles burn in my lifetime, one was my own and none of them have have experienced a fuel tank explosion.
Methinks you have been watching too many Hollywood movies, chewy.

“So even if the incidence may be lower, the consequence is far higher”

Actually, the incidence is far lower, which is measurable. What’s not measurable and is just speculation on your part is the “consequence.”

Also, being rational, I have no idea what Retro is blathering about. The cybertruck explosion was a deliberate set-off. It had nothing to do with whether it was an EV or not, beyond possibly the Trump/Musk connection. Any speculation about the size of the explosion is the usual making things up.

Capital Retro,
No they didn’t as there were multiple containers, you don’t see the other ones literally because they burned in the heat of the fire. Are you that dense?

Carrying highly flammable liquids in your vehicle in a plastic container is clearly a safety risk that is advised against by fire and safety authorities. The fact that you keep doubling down on your own recklessness whilst whinging about EV safety is just icing on the cake.

But regardless, none of this negates the fact that once again you attempted to selectively google an example that supported your position but in doing so, shot down your own argument (again).

Methinks you should give up whilst you’re hilariously way behind.

Hogman Harold9:12 am 30 Dec 24

It’s all in the spin isn’t it? 7.4% of sales. In other words 92.6% of all cars sold in Australia were ICE cars.

Yes and a few years ago it was less than 1%.

Meanwhile, in the first three quarters of 2024: More than 85,000 battery electric (BEV) and plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) sales were sold, which is 17.7% higher than the same period in 2023.

Trendlines are imporant.

No one in their right mind is buying Chinese made cars. Your life is more valuable than that.

Capital Retro7:16 am 30 Dec 24

Well, a lot of people will think they are not buying a Chinese made car but they could also be surprised to find out something else:
https://www.drive.com.au/caradvice/cars-made-in-china/

Except for all the people buying Chinese made guitars. Willing to bet your house (like everyone’s) is chockful of Chinese made products.

Capital Retro7:09 pm 30 Dec 24

My Maton guitar was definitely made in Australia, 30 years ago.
I bought a new LG TV last week, it was made in Indonesia.
My Oral B toothpaste is made in Germany.
What made you choose guitars on a car thread, Seano?

Oscar, that’s a totally uninformed and biased statement. You should research before you type.
The quality of cars coming from China is very high, and certainly much higher than cars coming from the US. Why do you think that many European and US brands are getting cars built there now, and it’d not due to cheaper labour alone.
Further, cars coming into Australia are safety tested and given an ANCAP rating, and Chinese-built cars are assigned levels comparable (if not higher) to other brands/models.

GrumpyGrandpa5:01 pm 29 Dec 24

So growth in demand for battery electric vehicles is easing around the world and consumers are moving more to Hybrids.

My sister is one of them. She was keen on buying an EV, but after factoring, including things like not having a spare tyre, increased insurance costs, questions around what manufacturers would still be supporting their models in Australia in 5-10 years & access to charging facilities etc, she bought a Hybrid. Frankly, I’m in exactly the same position. I think I’d prefer an EV, but it’ll probably be a Hybrid, for the same reasons.

With slowing growth in EV sales and consumers preferring to buy Hybrids, I’m just not sure how governments around the world, including the Australian government are going rekindle EVs? Somehow, I don’t think the Australian government supporting cheaper car loans for EVs will make any difference. It just doesn’t address the reasons people are electing to buy Hybrids.

I can’t see President Trump supporting the rekindling EV sales either.

I think we might be approaching that Beta vs VHS moment where a promising (and possibly superior product) gets trumped (pun intended) by the lesser product.

Plans to cease sales of new ICE vehicles by 2035 must now be in question.

Hi GG, I am not sure all those arguments really stack up. I am sure that brands like Hyundai, Kia, MG, BMW, Audi, BYD, etc., WILL be around in 5 years. I agree with the spare tyre issue, but I think more brands are listening like Hyundai, who now offer a spare tyre with their Kona EV. There are also options for other EVs as well if – as an owner- you felt insecure without one. As far as charging goes, infrastructure is growing rapidly…that’s if you need that. The majority of EV owners will just charge from home as I do. Yes, sure, there are exceptions atm, but I just charge a 16 cents a kilowatt. Makes a full tank very cheap for my day to day travel. Insurance wise, well, it’s always best to ring around. My EV costs around another $250 a year to insure than my old Mazda6. The Mazda was insured for $12k, my EV is insured for over 50k, so I feel it’s a fair deal…Hybrids also come with the more expensive servicing as IVE vehicles do.

“So growth in demand for battery electric vehicles is easing around the world and consumers are moving more to Hybrids.”

Wrong.

https://www.iea.org/energy-system/transport/electric-vehicles

GrumpyGrandpa12:03 pm 30 Dec 24

G’day Rdq,
I agree entirely that the established brands are in a better position to survive, although my sister’s conclusion was that with companies like Honda & Nissan in merger talks etc, there was uncertainty about the future of some manufacturers given they are competing with lower cost imports from China. She was a Honda girl, but chose to move to Toyota because of its strength and outstanding dealer network throughout Australia.
Her view, which I agree with was that Hyundai/Kia would also be a good option, but she felt that anything European might also struggle long-term on Australia.
Personally, I think BYD and MG may end up being the pick of the Chinese owned EVs. I can’t see myself in any of the new brands that appear “from nowhere”.
I’m not dead to owning an EV. It’s horses for courses really. We have a lot family in rural areas of NSW & Victoria – gravel roads. A full-size spare is important to me. Mostly, we could re-charge at home too, although those living in apartments or parking on the street, without a garage will struggle

Logicalusername5:32 pm 31 Dec 24

Toyota and Mazda have been sitting on the sidelines in relation to full EVs, these guys know what they are doing. Europeans, especially the UK, France and Italy are seriously considering moving the ni more ICE

Logicalusername9:21 am 01 Jan 25

User error: moving the ICE phaseout beyond 2035, nothing set in concrete yet, the market is speaking in the UK, in particular. Have no data or announcements for the rest of Europe.

Sadly the Federal & ACT government having cocked up their electric vehicle tsunami are now trying again to fix what isn’t broke.

Thanks for the article, James. 2025 will be an interesting year for EVs as more chinese-made models come online here. Tesla’s release of the Model Y “Juniper” will need to be truly something to continue to be a viable option against Zeekr and Xpeng, in particular.

Otherwise, congratulations to the John McGrath team for taking on distribution of Zeekr. It’ll no doubt appeal to some cautious buyers to be able to buy an EV from a local (physical) dealership. I’d like to see Xpeng open up a location here also, but meanwhile they at least have an “experience centre” near Sydney airport now.

I’d encourage John McGrath’s principal to consider marketing bi-directional chargers alongside the Zeekr also. It’s V2L capability will be attractive to those people with solar arrays on their homes (common across Canberra), but only accessible with the right home charger.

While I love my EV, the availability of high speed charging infrastructure is still an issue. I don’t always have an hour to sit there while it charges and there needs to be more availability of chargers. I’m still not game to do a long trip with the ev, I have a hybrid and my V8 for long trips and towing trailers

Capital Retro7:09 am 30 Dec 24

There has been some sort of charger installed at the BP Chisolm. It must have cost a fortune (hope we ratepayers didn’t subsidize it) as the work took several weeks and involved a lot of excavation and concreting.
It appears to be completed now but only invisible EVs are using it.

An EV charger only costs a few thousand dollars, they won’t have to charge too many cars to make their money back.

What culture warriors don’t get is they’re arguing against technology and technology almost always wins, the more it gets used the better and cheaper it gets.

Elle Cehcker10:12 am 31 Dec 24

Seano, by your logic regular Cars, Computers and TVs should’ve gotten cheaper because they are used more now than ever. Hint, it works the other way. Especially EVs as mining for batteries won’t be able to keep up with demand if EVs ever become popular.

Also, if EV chargers were so profitable… They wouldn’t need subsidies right?

Elle Cehcker, you are obviously wrong. All three of your examples have become cheaper in real terms over time.

Your further assertions also hover above a knowledge abyss.

Elle Checker,
“Seano, by your logic regular Cars, Computers and TVs should’ve gotten cheaper because they are used more now than ever”

Um, not sure what planet you live on but that’s exactly what happened for all 3 of those consistently over time.

The price for EV batteries is also 20% of what it was 10 years ago. Now that kind of proce reduction will likely not continue as economies of scale are achieved but it won’t likely increase significantly either.

As for the mining of raw materials for batteries, guess what?

Each year the estimate for global supplies of materials like lithium is actually increasing because it’s becoming more profitable to actually look for it. Current estimates show that the transition to EVs can be achieved with known supplies, even if we don’t find more (which we will).

But if you are actually concerned around the access to materials and fuel, you’re also concerned about world oil supplies right? How long do you think we’ll be able to power petrol cars for?

@Elle,

Hint no it doesn’t.

I don’t know where you’re getting your information from, but I’d suggest you discard it as a source. Even a cursory Google search should reveal that EV prices have come down significantly.

Tech always gets cheaper with uptake. Increased process efficiency, supply chain efficiency, learning curve improvements, the rapid rate of tech improvements (see Moore’s law), volume sales resulting in lower cost-to-profitability ratios…etc have resulted in lower EV prices.

The challenges in costs/competition for battery materials are well off set by these factors, they’re also not as bad as you seem to believe and I don’t think you’ve at all looked into the massive advances in battery technology that are coming down the pipe fast.

You also seem to have missed that EV owners benefit from very low maintenance costs for the life of the vehicle, low running costs (even lower for those with their own solar/batteries), low noise, faster acceleration etc.

Technology not only comes down in price with take up it also gets better.

Lastly, if you were genuinely concerned about subsidies (I suspect you’re not) you’d be concerned about fossil fuel subsidies costing taxpayers $65bn a year:
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australian-fossil-fuel-subsidies-costing-taxpayers-65-billion-a-year-imf-20230824-p5dz0l.html

Capital Retro10:03 am 02 Jan 25

And the Australian government is collecting how much a year from the fuel excise tax
which is a big earner?
The fuel excise which the 2021–22 Federal Budget was forecast to collect $13.9 billion in 2022–23, and this was projected to increase to $16.65 billion in 2025–26.
Those figures you have linked to are fantasies created by the World Economic Forum, you know, the mob that says “we are having a re-set and while you will have nothing, you will be happy”
Right up your alley Seano.

Yes and there are extra import duties on EVs and mooted additional taxes to cover fuel excise, given the low (but rapidly growing) numbers that’s just a matter of time.

“Those figures you have linked to are fantasies created by the World Economic Forum”

Once again you lose the debate when you descend into dopey conspiracy theories.

Capital Retro6:40 am 03 Jan 25

“….. extra import duties on EVs….”
Like, what are they?

The 5% tariff which was recently removed, thanks Labor.

The government is still looking at changing the fuel excise as EV take-up increases.

Dismissing the WEF because of culture wars is still dumb.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.