Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Community

Quality childcare in a
welcoming & supportive environment

A short message from Girt_Hindrance to the Falsies Mob

By johnboy 13 November 2012 44

falsies

This in from Girt_Hindrance in relation to the falsies.

Get a f***ing hobby, or at least some talent

Got an image of Canberra you want to share with the world? Email it in to images@the-riotact.com .

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
44 Responses to
A short message from Girt_Hindrance to the Falsies Mob
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
Comic_and_Gamer_Nerd 10:18 pm 15 Nov 12

LSWCHP said :

NicholasBurns said :

Antagonist said :

The irony here is that you have offered no facts yourself. You have simply responded with assertions and sweeping generalisations, not unlike those that you have been so critical of.

Art is a subjective beast and as such finding any “facts” on the ability to grade, merit or criticise is entirely subjective and “facts” become murky territory.

You can decry the method of delivery, you can subjectively assess and appraise a work, but you cannot ever assert the personal preference of an artistic work as a fact. It is subjective opinion. That, I guess, is a fact.

Even those with opinions held in high regard are still considered to just have an opinion. An opinion can change and is a subjective thing. A fact, ideally, is disputable. I guess?

Whatever I’m done for now.

Well thank a random deity for that.

FWIW, I reckon C&GN is on the money. Screw these dimwits and their spray cans, in almost all cases they’re just introducing visual pollution that benefits nobody.

I probably should have preceded that with “My opinion is…”, but I really can’t be bothered doing that with every sentence I write here.

No it’s not your opinion, your just stating dem facts!

Never apologise for stating facts!

Sandman 10:02 pm 15 Nov 12

Dante said :

Either way, it’s eliciting an emotional response from you in one form or another, which art sets out to do.

I’m not sure that “art” and “eliciting an emotional response” are mutually exclusive. I can think of a little goings on in New York city one morning in 2001 that elicited the biggest emotional response in recent history, yet I’ve never heard anyone refer to that event as a defining artistic moment.

LSWCHP 8:32 pm 15 Nov 12

NicholasBurns said :

Antagonist said :

The irony here is that you have offered no facts yourself. You have simply responded with assertions and sweeping generalisations, not unlike those that you have been so critical of.

Art is a subjective beast and as such finding any “facts” on the ability to grade, merit or criticise is entirely subjective and “facts” become murky territory.

You can decry the method of delivery, you can subjectively assess and appraise a work, but you cannot ever assert the personal preference of an artistic work as a fact. It is subjective opinion. That, I guess, is a fact.

Even those with opinions held in high regard are still considered to just have an opinion. An opinion can change and is a subjective thing. A fact, ideally, is disputable. I guess?

Whatever I’m done for now.

Well thank a random deity for that.

FWIW, I reckon C&GN is on the money. Screw these dimwits and their spray cans, in almost all cases they’re just introducing visual pollution that benefits nobody.

I probably should have preceded that with “My opinion is…”, but I really can’t be bothered doing that with every sentence I write here.

NicholasBurns 7:59 pm 15 Nov 12

NicholasBurns said :

A fact, ideally, is disputable. I guess?

Sorry, indisputable. oops

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site