12 November 2024

ACT laws making renters' lives better, says new report

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
14

While rents may still be high, increases have been lower and renters report feeling more secure. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

The ACT’s rental laws are helping to reduce rent increases and improve the lot of tenants and their interactions with landlords, according to a new report from the renters’ lobby group.

Better Renting’s Cost of Renting Report found renters in the ACT faced smaller rent increases than anywhere else in the country.

The report is based on a survey of 1400 renters across Australia, including 111 in the ACT.

While the number surveyed in the ACT is small, the report says renters here were also less likely to report a no-grounds eviction, which has been banned in the ACT since April 2023.

They reported greater compliance with rental laws compared with the rest of the country and felt more comfortable advocating for themselves without fear of retaliation.

READ ALSO Ginninderry enters next phase with key development announcements

While overall 76 per cent of renters had received a notice of rent increase, with a median increase of 11 per cent, in the ACT, only 64 per cent of survey respondents reported a rent increase, and the median increase was only 4 per cent.

One ACT respondent described how the ACT rental cap gave them the confidence to negotiate a smaller rent increase.

But landlords were still finding ways to get around the no-grounds eviction law by citing renovations or putting the property on the market and then relisting the property at a higher rent, prompting calls for more oversight and strengthening of rental laws.

ACT Campaigner for Better Renting Sabrina Clarke said that while increased supply was also a factor, the evidence was that the legislative approach in the ACT was working.

“We can be pretty confident that the rental laws we have in ACT have been working and have been giving renters better outcomes than renters elsewhere in Australia,” she said.

“We can certainly see from the data that those experiences have been better.”

Ms Clarke said the number of negative stories from tenants had fallen in the ACT compared to other states and territories.

However, there was more that could be done because while the rate of rent increases was lower than elsewhere, baseline rental costs and rents were still high.

Ms Clarke singled out rent bidding, or the practice of renters offering higher than advertised rents to secure a property, as one area in need of attention.

Apartment building

A boost to rental stock has also contributed to lower rents, particularly in apartments. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Asked if she was disappointed that the ACT Greens, who have taken credit for driving rental reforms, were not in government, Ms Clark said Better Renting would work with whoever was in power to improve life for renters.

“We have reached out to some of the new members to try to get meetings and make sure we can keep working on more progressive rental legislation in the ACT,” she said.

Ms Clarke rejected arguments from the property industry that the new rental laws, minimum standards and taxes were squeezing landlords, forcing many to sell up.

She said the research showed that landlords were motivated to sell by other kinds of personal factors and not because of rental laws or minimum rental standards.

“Renters deserve to live in affordable, healthy, safe homes,” Ms Clarke said.

“These standards are not really something we should be fighting against … renters should be able to live comfortable lives without having to skip their groceries or their medications to afford their rent and their rent increases, which is unfortunately also something we’ve seen quite frequently from our survey.”

Executive Director of Better Renting Joel Dignam also said the ACT still had work to do.

“People are still dealing with some of the highest rents in the country, and you still have one in two renters saying they are worried about retaliation,” he said.

“It’s important for the incoming government to keep building on a record of success in this area, both through strengthening rental laws and getting more supply online.”

READ ALSO What caused Canberra house prices to skyrocket since 2000? Let’s start with the capital gains tax discount …

The report’s other national findings were:

  • Nine in 10 renters were paying more than they were 12 months before.
  • Half of rent increases that took effect in full were over 10 per cent
  • One in six notices of rent increase was above 25 per cent.
  • One in two respondents said repairs weren’t fixed within four weeks.
  • In the past 12 months, 59 per cent of renters said they didn’t bring up issues because they feared retaliation from their landlord or real estate agent.

The report urges rental law reforms, adjusting tax settings, boosting supply, and a cultural change so renters are acknowledged the same way owner-occupiers are.

Better Renting is launching the report ahead of a planned lobby day in Canberra later this month, where 20 renters from across Australia will be meeting with Federal MPs to seek faster federal action on renters’ housing challenges.

The property industry says the focus should be on increasing supply, not demonising landlords and making it harder for them to operate.

Join the conversation

14
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Incidental Tourist11:51 pm 12 Nov 24

Canberra market for both renters and buyers was very soft recently given steep reduction of federal government spending, less interstate contractors and slowing population increase. The steady rent is more reflection of higher vacancy rate. Indeed renter’s law has nothing to do with high vacancies as it did not build any single rental dwelling. But it did impact the investors sentiment. When walking along any unit complex we can see many units on the market today. Landlords are leaving and this is a direct result of rental laws and higher land taxes.

Does the landlord’s sell off matter? Rental advocates claim that it does not as the property still remains. But this is not a full story. Any property sold is the property not built. And indeed we are reading in the media that “ACT housing approvals hit record low this year despite government targets” – google it to read full article. Most of well off new buyers recycle existing housing stock at a bargain price without building much. We had less than 790 new construction starts for the first 6 months this year in accordance to this article. There is no way ACT Government will reach its 30,000 new homes target by 2030. It will be lucky to reach 10,000 with their rental laws unchanged. And missing 20,000 dwellings is whooping $10-20 Billion dollars taken off the residential market. This is a huge price tag to pay for rental laws and collecting some $170 millions of land tax. In other words ACT Government is loosing almost $100 of investment for each collected $1 of land tax.

Another worrying stats is growing public housing queue. Check it out and you’ll see how quickly public housing wait time has recently grown. A renter displaced by an owner occupier or being unable to afford current rent ends up in the public housing queue. A landlord can sell off and leave but ACT Government can’t. So the government must find a way to build new public housing stock by borrowing billions more or sell land at a large discount to attract build to rent corporate businesses. Either way ACT Government must spend or borrow more which is yet extra cost for undermining investor’s confidence. So the euphoria from rental laws won’t last long given dramatic under-supply of new housing.

This report, prepared by the renters lobby group, lacks credibility. To be credible. Surveys like this need to be done by independent professionals.

@John Bell
With which particular aspects, of the survey findings, do you have an issue? The results outlined in the article don’t appear to be the sorts of things renters would need to lie about.

One of the risks of all surveys conducted by vested interests is that the questions are shaped to encourage certain answers whilst discouraging others. Survey design done well is incredibly technical with incredible care taken to ensure objectivity. Sadly, many surveys do not meet this standard, especially those with an agenda.

@psycho
Absolutely agree. However, there is no information as to who actually compiled the survey, nor what questions were asked. This doesn’t, of itself, show the survey “lacks credibility”, it’s more a reflection of poor journalism.

I can understand that property owners would baulk at any increased costs and maybe there needs to be room for some form of recompense? But everybody knows we have a housing crisis and from your story these steps sound like they are steps in the right direction.

The rent increases go nowhere near covering the increased costs that landlords have faced. With 13 interest rate increases, increased costs of insurance, rates increases, land tax increases, increased maintemance costs, property management fees, etc, etc. So if more landlords get fed up and sell their properties, guess what? Less properties avavable to rent. The way ro lower rents is to increase supply, not blaming landlords.

@dazzer
“So if more landlords get fed up and sell their properties, guess what? Less properties avavable to rent.”
Did you actually read this comment before hitting submit?

Actually, if existing landlords sell their properties, guess what? The property will not suddenly disappear of the face of the earth! It will be bought by another investor or someone currently renting … the net result being that property will still be available for rent, or another property will open up.

Are you sure your not a public servant

Michael M
Nope – I’m sure you understand the relevance of that comment.

You obvoiusly don’t understand my point. 31% of households in the ACT are renters. Not everyone wants to buy or can afford to buy. If the cost to hold a property in the ACT keeps going up (as I listed in my comment above) and rents are restricted, it means the out of pocket costs to the landlord makes the property uneconomical to hold. Therefore there is a good chance another investor will NOT buy it. Maybe a first home buyer will. As every year more and more people enter the housing market via children moving out of home and immigration, there is more demand for rentals but if there is less available, rents go up.

@dazzer
I understand your point, I just don’t agree that less investors is necessarily a bad thing.

If purchasers are competing on an equal plain – i.e. no financial assistance from the government, for one kind of purchaser, in the form of tax concessions, then perhaps potential owner-occupiers, who may well be renters, will have a greater chance of purchasing – thus potentially freeing up their rental.

The findings in a report written by activists are not exactly reliable.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.