5 August 2024

‘Bashing landlords’: ACT Greens pledge to freeze rents for two years as weekly average hits $660

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
123
Man speaking into microphone

Andrew Braddock MLA says he has personal experience of the rental crisis. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The ACT Greens have pledged to freeze rents for two years as part of a raft of housing reforms they would implement if they lead the government after the ACT elections in October 2024.

Critics, however, claim this amounts to “landlord bashing” and would worsen the housing crisis by driving investors away from the property market.

The announcement comes after a year of relatively flat rental prices across the Territory, with an uptick the past month – average weekly rent is $777 for houses, $560 for units and $660 for all dwellings in August 2024, according to property information hub SQM Research.

Earlier this year, the Greens’ tried to make a rental freeze law in the Legislative Assembly, but the Labor and Liberal parties voted this down.

READ MORE Renters need negative gearing more than landlords (and so does government)

Under their latest election pledge, the party would also cap annual rent increases at 2 per cent per year after the two-year freeze and establish an independent rental commissioner, who would answer questions from tenants and resolve disputes with landlords.

“The commissioner will be empowered to enforce rental laws and issue fines,” Greens leader Shane Rattenbury said.

“This will ensure renters’ rights are protected without relying on renters to pursue matters themselves through a tribunal – a process that can be prohibitively costly, stressful and intimidating for renters.

“A rent freeze will provide a much-needed circuit-breaker for the many renters who are struggling with increasing rents alongside the increasing cost of living.”

Maria Edwards, CEO of the Real Estate Institute of the ACT, says renters are not the only ones impacted by cost-of-living pressures.

“The ACT Greens rent freeze policy is not only out of touch but harmful to the long-term supply of rental properties in the ACT. Rents have been falling in the ACT for units in the past 12 months, and houses have only increased marginally, so the need for such drastic policy is not warranted,” she said.

“The cost-of-living pressures are not isolated to tenants – landlords have had to absorb higher mortgage payments through sustained interest rate hikes, insurance, rates and land taxes, maintenance and mandated improvements such as the insulation minimum standards.

“Returns on rental properties have declined markedly since the pandemic and a rent freeze policy will make no difference to tenants currently in rentals in Canberra other than increasing the instability of their tenure as landlords increasingly consider cutting their losses and selling up. This policy has been defeated multiple times and has been rejected by all of the other states.

“It just doesn’t make sense to bring it forward again and create further anxiety for not only landlords but tenants as well.”

Canberra Liberals housing spokesman Mark Parton says the Greens’ policy will end up hurting renters.

“The Greens seem hellbent on completely trashing Canberra’s private rental market. If this suite of policies were ever implemented, it would result in a mass exodus of investors, which would dramatically shrink the private rental market,” he said.

“This will inevitably lead to an increase in rents. The removal of investors from the market will also heavily impact future housing construction.”

Belco Party candidate for Ginninderra and former Liberal Party ACT Housing Minister Bill Stefaniak called the proposal a “suicide note for rental properties”.

“Rent freezes and bashing landlords does not work,” he said.

“It’s bad enough already and real estate agents tell me landlords are selling up in droves and going interstate where the laws are fairer for all sides, or going into other areas of investment like the stock market .”

Former Liberal MLA and now Leader of the Belco Party Bill Stefaniak opposes a rent freeze. Photo: File.

Joel Dignam, an executive director of advocacy group Better Renting and a former Greens organiser, rejects the argument that rent freezes hurt rental supply.

“Most investors don’t provide new rental supply, in that they buy an established dwelling and rent it out,” he said.

“There’s very little evidence from other jurisdictions that tenancy reform has a material impact on investment decisions.

“Even if you do see that, an investor sells a property, someone else buys a property… it probably means someone has left the rental market and become an owner occupier … the vast majority of landlords are investing for capital gains.”

READ ALSO Farewell Terry Snow, businessman, philanthropist and true citizen of Canberra

ACT Greens Member for Yerrabi and renter Andrew Braddock says his personal experience suggests the balance needs to be tipped towards renters.

“A year ago, I was notified that my landlord had decided to sell my house vacant. I experienced the powerlessness of not being able to guarantee a roof over my head and a home for myself and my young children despite my immense privilege. I had to explain to my children why they needed to pack up their belongings and leave their home at short notice,” he said.

“A Rental Commissioner will help inform renters, who are often at a power and financial disadvantage, of their rights and provide accessible avenues to resolve disputes.

“Other practical help, including a portable bond scheme and rent freeze, plus permanent rent relief fund, will greatly assist renters who are struggling in an unaffordable rental market.”

Join the conversation

123
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I just came across this interview today. It will be interesting to see what Alan Kohler has to say about the housing crisis.

How Can We Fix Australia’s Housing Crisis? Alan Kohler Weighs Inhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efvOJ8aXUSI

Barmaleo Barmaley9:48 am 12 Aug 24

The major profiteer on the ACT renting market is the ACT Government. Its land tax strips off 3 months of rent from a property owner each year. The land tax is the thing which does not exist across the border of the ACT. How is about abolishing it? This would reduce the pressure on the rental market and put the rent prices down. Otherwise, it is plain right hypocrisy, I mean constant increases in rates and land taxes to gain more profit for the government and point fingers to landlords.

If it is truly your position that “land tax strips off 3 months of rent … each year” then I suggest you sell up and find an investment you can actually handle. About 15% might be closer to the mark. It is not unique; it is called taxation for services.

Regardless, more than half of landlords are profiting on operating income (rents) and all of them hope to do so on capital gain. In fact landlords are sufficiently keen that Canberra now has the highest vacancy rate in the country.

Byline, perhaps you should do some research. Allhomes provides very good data.

A cursory glance of the new rentals looking for a house provides this.
https://www.allhomes.com.au/9-frome-street-narrabundah-act-2604

It’s listed for rent at $605/wk. That’s $31,460 in gross rent per year or $2,621/mth.

If you scroll down the page to the Key Details section, you’ll find the annual Land Rates & Land Tax cost for that property. That information comes straight from the ACT Government. Land Tax is $9,774, Rates is $4,754. Combined that’s $14,528. And that’s an annual cost, not a one-off like Stamp Duty.

It represents 46.17% of the gross rent – a far cry from your 15% claim.

But then it’s always the greedy landlord at fault, never a pilfering money hungry socialist progressive left government is it?

Interesting article suggesting that the near disappearance of the private landlord in the UK in the 1970s was hailed as a good thing by both Labour and the Conservatives at the time. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/mar/19/end-of-landlords-surprisingly-simple-solution-to-uk-housing-crisis

Interesting thank you, and in one respect will lead me to look further into one of my own views below.

The comment “[landlords] are an economic deadweight” could get some people excited.

We are already selling our rental properties due to interest rates. To owner occupiers. This would just make it even worse.

For the new owner-occupiers? At some point they come from the same pool.

You have heard of population growth and the need to have more PPOR and Investments to house this increase in the population of Canberra. Poor Greens/Labor will be down properly around $5000 in land tax.
I would love to see the numbers of investors bailing out of the Canberra market.

Which part of your comment is related to mjnyc’s complaint about interest rates or my response about housing pools, Coffee-Time?

Given you have sailed in from over yonder, you might like to pause to read where I have previously commented on the importance of supply. I do not assume all should be small-landlord.

Should I worry about slightly fluctuating property-related revenue across 187,000 dwellings, or is that a question for the government? What would be your solution? Reducing the tax that gives the income in the first place?

From SQM Research, the current vacancy rate in Canberra is the highest in the country, and has climbed fairly steadily since 2022. That is the interesting number, implying that the balance of demand and supply is moving more favourably to renters. Nobody sensible cares “who’s leaving?” without also asking “who’s entering?” and “what’s the demand?”
https://sqmresearch.com.au/graph_vacancy.php?region=act%3A%3ACanberra&type=c&t=1

I was not aware of your previous posted dealing with the importance of supply, so thank you for bringing that to my attention.
Thanks for the SQM link and i agree with you about “who’s entering” the market.

No worries, Coffee-Time. Some impacts might appear only in the longer term, so vacancy rate was the best short term indicator I could see for now.

Landlords selling up is good news, as it allows the home ownership rate to rise. Bill Stefaniak and Mark Parton by supporting landlords, are coming out against renters getting into home ownership. The latest 12 months of ABS lending data says 75% of all investor lending was competing for existing properties. That Mark & Bill think it’s in renters interests to pay higher rents to stop rents going higher is simply an embarrassing display of circular reasoning. Mark and Bill would be well advised to stop echoing REIA talking points if they wish to be taken seriously.

Ross of Canberra6:19 pm 09 Aug 24

The house, the home as a tradeable commodity is fine. The use of housing as a wealth-creation device is flawed to the detriment of all future home-buyers. Investors and governments alike have cheated the public for decades. Vote to end contemporary serfdom.

This is a housing crisis, with rental costs rising as a result.

Territory, state and federal governments are responsible for this by reducing funds for public and community housing so private rentals became the only option for people aside from homelessness.

In the ACT the continually increasing rise in rates and land taxes pushed prices up further, whilst the increasing restrictions of landlord rights over how their properties are used, encouraged many landlords to sell, thus reducing supply and again pushing up prices.

There is no point in berating the Greens, because they are just being Greens and doing what Greens do. But what is curious is that the supposedly intelligent and educated voters of Canberra vote Greens into government. The real problem is not the Greens and their maniac policies, but the naive and immature people who vote for them. Or maybe these are people who vote Greens because they want dysfunctional government.

I suspect it’s because they don’t know enough about politics or the history of the Greens in Canberra. They were voted in with significant power, but they have just deferred to Labor and we’ve had dysfunctional government now for almost a quarter of a century.

We keep getting new voters who don’t know that history, nor understand the political system and how it works.

Incidental Tourist11:07 am 09 Aug 24

The problem with Greens is their “medicine” consistently causes more harm than treatment. In the past 10 years while Greens had balance of power we saw rents doubling up, public housing queue out of control, young locked out of housing market, territory budget deep in debt while doubling tax take. Let alone family friendly bush capital turned into glass and concrete tower jungle designed with singles in mind. Greens have magic ability of turning problem to worse under sweet disguise.

Alex Mihnea Moisescu4:43 pm 08 Aug 24

The Greens have some good ideas, but the rent freeze will cause them to lose a lot of votes..
It doesn’t even make sense.
How about freezing interest rates at their lowest for 30 years (as most American mortgage holders benefit from), how about freezing the price for petrol, electricity, insurance, food, tolls and other vital expenses??
How do you even enforce a rent freeze? What will stop a tenant to evict a renter (for many valid reasons) and start a new rent at the market price (justified for many valid reasons)?
Why does a government want to bash the little guys as most landlords are, but give free reign to huge corporations that suck the blood out of all Australians like banks that have 2x profit compared to European banks, mining and gas corporations that pay 25 x less royalty and tax compared to other resource rich countries, oligopolies like Coles and Woollies, toll companies that make a profit 4x more than their investment and so on…??

Governments do these things because they appeal to the economically illiterate.

Not all landlords are the same. Bought a townhouse off the plan in Coombs in 2020 for my daughter and fiancée to live in (yes she is lucky) as the available options for rental were very expensive, in more affordable cases unsafe and occasionally unfit for habitation. Her rent is below the market value so she can save for a home. When she gets the deposit and moves out (which is soon I hope), the townhouse will be on the market as the raft of maintenance and inspection issues, body corporate fees, rates and land taxes far exceeds any advantage in keeping it as an investment property. Younger brother has also has sold his investment property and says the Canberra market is a Mugs Game and since moved his retirement money to Queensland and NSW. Since I am retired and on a pension the negative gearing stuff has little effect for me. Many of these arguments are on a case by case. Generic policy such as freezing rents and other housing options to solve this will only create a loser either for a home owner, renter of landlord because someone has to pay IMHO.

Our tenants are paying way below the ‘market’ rate. We felt sorry for them. Came back from overseas with nothing, no furniture, not even a dinner plate and three kids. They’ve lied to us, broken things, stolen from us and they are ‘Christians’. Please stop the landlord bashing. We are people too, and that property is my superannuation!

Funny how many people claim to be Christians when they want to be seen in a positive light to take advantage of other people.

The only client who didn’t pay their bill from me for the agreed services to her daughter claimed to be Christian. She wouldn’t take calls from me asking for the reason, just avoided me and did not pay.

Then we can think of all of those priests, scout leaders, sports coaches and others who claim to be good people so others will trust them, enabling them to take advantage of that trust.

GrumpyGrandpa7:29 pm 06 Aug 24

Thankfully, The Greens won’t be the party that leads the government after the election!

It does however raise an interesting question; why does the ALP think it’s a good idea to get into bed with The Greens and form an Alliance Government? By association, they muddy their credibility.

I’d like to see Mr Barr declare that the ALP intend to govern as a minority government and completely distance himself from the lunacy of their ideology.

Incidental Tourist5:03 pm 06 Aug 24

Responding to Greens/Rental advocate narrative

Myth: Each renter (like Green’s MLA Braddock) needs assistance.
Trick: Each renter’s income is less than landlord’s.
Reality: ACT Greens MLA and renter Andrew Braddock has base salary of $183,299. ATO anecdotal evidence was that many residential investors had approx $90,000 taxable income. Braddock is likely to be renting by choice because he wants to appeal to the renters demographic and he likes changing nice houses. With such salary Braddock can easily afford average house mortgage. Wealthy Braddock aside, there are many rich suburbs like Forrest and red Hill as well as large penthouses in the city and they certainly experience no power imbalance.

Myth: “Most investors don’t provide new rental supply … they buy an established dwelling and rent it out”
Trick: Fool reader that investor pays all 30 year mortgage.
Reality: A mortgage is a 30 years commitment which invested in the local economy to create jobs, pay taxes and provide accommodation. This mortgage is shared between many investors who take over mortgage one after another in a secondary market. So collapse of the secondary market means severe reduction of investors and collapse of mortgage commitments. And we already see fall now.

Myth: “Even if … an investor sells a property, someone else buys a property… it .. means someone has left the rental market and become an owner occupier”
Trick: Fool reader that there are “good” investors who only buy new properties.
Reality: Every property sold on a secondary market is a property not built. When investors can buy cheaper existent property they never buy off the plan. So when investors sells then there is no need to build one.

Myth: “Even if … an investor sells a property… it probably means someone … become an owner occupier”
Trick: Every renter can buy a property.
Reality: A well off renters by choice (like Greens MLA Braddock) can certainly buy a property and become owner occupier. It means renters by choice like this Green MLA will become asset richer and the rest of renters will be left poorer. And yet again if renters by choice like Braddock or Dingham buy an investment property as opposed to buying off the plan means less property built.

Yet again, the Greens show how out of touch, they are with reality. They should realise that Canberra voters aren’t fooled, by such an obvious attempt of unachievable, nonsense policy.

@ Oliver Jacques, have you been taking lessons from the major MSM, by only getting the opinion of the Liberal Opposition, while completely ignoring the Labor Housing Minister, and other Labor MLAs?
Used to seeing it on the ABC, Murdoch, and other MSM, with their completely biased anti-ALP coverage but, I thought the Riotact was above this partisan level reporting of local news.

I’m not a landlord, but this idea seems crazy. Unless you can also regulate interest rates (you can’t, RBA does that), insurance premiums (again, commercial decisions by insurance companies so that’s a no) and sundry other expenses landlords incur, this has not got legs. Further, the Greens seem to have a habit of demonising anyone who’s a landlord. Why? Is it part of their business model of divisiveness?

The example given by one of their members of having to vacate a property because it was being sold is disingenuous. Leases ensure that there is time provided on both sides. It’s also a reasonably known possibility in the rental market. So does he want to ban landlords from making commercial decisions in selling their property — which may well be their superannuation!

What a bunch of utter incompetent cretins these greens are. Firstly, do you honestly believe this will improve housing supply. No way will anyone invest in this city. Secondly I’m pretty sure Barr and his band of financial geniuses won’t freeze land tax. Why would anyone vote for this economic imbecile.

These policies just simply would not work and would actively harm renters over the longer term.

They are just ideological based sops to the party base which they know they will never have to enact.

Would the Greens be prepared to knock back increases in their pay for two years? Thought so

Serious question: Who are these people and what world do they live in that they keep coming up with these ridiculous, brain-fart policies? Surely they have at least one person over in their party with at least a basic understanding of economics?

If they weren’t attaching themselves to the Labor party like a leech, they would be entirely irrelevant and ignored.

devils_advocate12:07 pm 06 Aug 24

Serious answer:

They know exactly what the effect of these policies will be.

However:
a) the people who would vote for them /benefit from such a policy by definition have zero understanding of economics or finance, and hence think it’s a good idea.
b) the people who either own property or understand finance and economics or both, would never vote for them anyway, so nothing lost.
c) they know they will never govern in their own right so will never enact these policies and never have to deal with the consequences. So they can score the political points and there are no consequences.

From a political economy perspective it actually makes sense.

devils_advocate10:11 am 06 Aug 24

Lmao this wil end well

Greens policy also includes a freeze on rates for landlords, a freeze on maintenance and upgrades to rental properties, a freeze on insurance premiums, and a cap on interest rates at 2% for property investors, NOT.

Seriously, this policy has already been voted on in the Assembly and rejected by the majority of Members, so this announcement by Greens is simply to seduce a vote from renters, on a promise Greens know they cannot keep.

Are they going to regulate the interest rates that landlords pay banks on the $ they have borrowed ?

devils_advocate10:08 am 06 Aug 24

Lol

Well they don’t control interest rates but they do control land taxes and rates

Surely those would be frozen under this bold plan?

Kek

Unless Andrew Braddock is being cute around timing of recent changes to tenancy laws, the implication of his words is that even the current option to sell a property untenanted should be eliminated.

Temporary freezes can work to break inflationary cycles provided both sides of the cost equation are managed thereby. This does not appear to be what is proposed by the Greens, nor are the circumstances particularly relevant, making their proposal economically silly. It is not only one-off private landlords who would be affected but also corporately operated rental.

Do the Greens propose all rental property be government-owned? If so, how will they manage capacity when a good is under-priced and thus over-exploited?

Leaving aside the fulminations of ideologues, I am yet to see economic credibility in Greens proposals.

Landlords seek to return the country to feudalism, while issuing shrill cries of communism against any intervention in markets that presently work to their benefit, while also accepting and calling for government support. Land is not a competitive market, it’s a monopolistic market. Monopolistic markets require government intervention to prevent economic rent seeking. Landlords should be made to work, and take risk for their profits. Put them all out of business.

Anybody who has ever worked for a living, rather than sat around benefiting from taxpayers like landlords, would understand that assidious’ entire post is nonsense.

Shame they aren’t launching an assault on rapacious strata managers and their hidden commissions, dodgy tenants and Mr Barr’s taxes and charges. Property investors need a tea party style movement.

Greens member Andrew Braddock “and leave their home at short notice” – 8 weeks is the notice period, yet when Mr Braddock finds his new home, he in turn provides the landlord 21 days…terribly fair. Further, 12 interest rate rises I copped in a 12 month period yet only 1 legislated increase a year on tenants – how any imbecile can see how a rent freeze is sustainable is beyond me and yes, I sold our investment and expect settlement next Friday. Will take the funds and invest in a term deposit where the Government cannot dictate how I control an asset.

This amounts to legislating theft of other peoples assets.

If the communist greens want to freeze rent and enforce below CPI rent increases, they should buy their own properties to do that with. Commandeering other peoples properties to use as government housing is theft.

You know that with their irresponsible spending, they sure as hell won’t be legislating 2% caps on increases to rates.

Actually it’s landlords that are the thieves… “It (land value taxation) guarantees that no one dispossess fellow citizens by obtaining a disproportionate share of what nature provides for humanity.” – William Vickrey, Nobel Prize Winner in Economics.

Your god Karl Marx died alone and penniless, and 5 people attended his funeral, including those conducting it. Because he was an insufferable idiot.

Maybe ponder that.

I have already sold one unit and will sell the other two by Christmas. The ACT government are singularly destroying any environment for investors. The housing crisis is of their own making.

Ah well, you had a pretty good run. Making a mint of mass immigration and inflated housing prices.

devils_advocate10:11 am 06 Aug 24

Lmao if you think house prices are inflated now, wait for the next 12 months.

Bookmark this prediction so you can come back to it periodically and reflect on how today, August 2024, you felt property prices were too high.

I got out awhile back with my investment, I was going to keep it till retirement, but it’s just not worth it investing in Canberra anymore, other assets to invest in.
A ton less hassle and much more relaxing without having to deal with all the Canberra landlord **** from the Greens and Labor.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.