3 January 2025

ACTCOSS puts the heat on government as rising energy costs bite

| Kim Treasure
Join the conversation
10
powerlines at sunset

A new report looks at the impact of energy hardship in the ACT. Photo: EvoEnergy.

The ACT’s peak community sector body is calling on the Territory government to take decisive action to end energy hardship in the wake of a new report that shows many residents are unable to effectively heat or cool their homes.

As the capital braces for a string of 30-plus-degree days, the ACT Council of Social Service (ACTCOSS) has launched an analysis of energy hardship, which it says has taken a “significant human toll”.

ACTCOSS said the number of ACT residents struggling to pay their energy bills had increased by 78 per cent since 2021, highlighting an urgent need for comprehensive and immediate intervention.

It said priority groups, including low-income households and renters, were disproportionately affected by rising energy costs and inadequate housing conditions, leaving many unable to heat or cool their homes safely and affordably.

READ ALSO Canberrans broke records last year for arts and culture venues across the capital

“High energy prices, combined with inefficient housing, low incomes, and outdated or inefficient appliances, have left many households trapped in a cycle of financial stress,” ACTCOSS CEO Dr Devin Bowles said.

“This is exacerbated by lack of access to consumer energy resources and the burden of market complexity.

“Renters face unique challenges as past poor building standards and split incentives prevent critical upgrades to energy efficiency in rental properties.”

ACTCOSS CEO Dr Devin Bowles is calling for swift action. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Dr Bowles said the ACT Government should be praised for its leadership in the transition to a clean energy future, but that wasn’t enough.

“While the ACT leads Australia in clean energy policies, the benefits of this transition are not reaching everyone equally,” he said.

“Energy is essential for a healthy and dignified life. When families are forced to choose between heating or cooling their homes and buying food, we are failing as a community. This is a wake-up call for immediate, targeted action.”

energy cost and income graph

Energy costs have been rising faster than incomes for more than a decade. Chart: AER.

Dr Bowles said the report underscored the devastating impacts of energy hardship, with low-income households spending up to five times more of their income on energy than high-income earners and more than 76 per cent of renters reporting cutting back on heating or cooling to manage costs.

He said older adults, people with disabilities, and those with chronic illnesses were disproportionately affected, often requiring higher energy usage for medical needs.

According to Dr Bowles, the human toll of energy hardship includes poor mental and physical health due to inadequate living conditions, an increased risk of homelessness driven by mounting energy debts, social isolation as families withdraw from community activities to save costs, and long-term financial insecurity, especially among older residents who deplete their retirement savings to cover energy bills.

READ ALSO Tuggeranong Parkway roadworks to begin Sunday night

The report outlines a roadmap to address energy hardship effectively, calling for:

  • Minimum energy efficiency standards and incentives: Establish further standards to define baseline energy efficiency requirements for rental properties and incentivise landlords to improve the energy efficiency of rental homes.
  • Reform of retailer hardship obligations: Ensure the focus is on preventing and alleviating hardship rather than on debt management and compliance.
  • Accelerated energy efficiency upgrades: Fund moderate home energy efficiency measures and access to renewable energy resources for households with lower incomes.
  • Measures to end long-term energy hardship: Set targets to end chronic energy hardship, review the functioning of utility concessions and energy support voucher schemes and improve cross-portfolio cooperation.
  • Enhanced consumer support: Establishing a one-stop shop with case management services to help priority households navigate upgrades and financial assistance while increasing funding for ancillary supports such as financial counselling services.
  • Amplified advocacy: Provide sustainable funding for consumer advocates to ensure vulnerable groups have a voice in the energy transition process.

“We need bold and immediate action to protect our most vulnerable residents,” Dr Bowles said.

“Policymakers must prioritise ending energy hardship as a critical goal, setting clear targets and allocating the resources necessary to achieve them.

“The time for incremental change is over. We must act decisively to ensure every household in the ACT can afford safe and reliable energy. Without swift intervention, the human and economic costs of this crisis will continue to mount.”

Region has approached the ACT Government for comment.

Join the conversation

10
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
GrumpyGrandpa7:06 pm 04 Jan 25

I’m not going to comment on renewables or other; evangelists on both sides won’t accept the other’s arguments.
Unfortunately, it’s an impossible situation. The government has introduced a raft of requirements on landlords to improve property energy efficiencies, however, if we are speaking about our lowest income earners, I’d expect a large number of them may very well be in government owned public housing. It will take time for both the private & government sector to upgrade properties and in both cases at substantial cost.
It’s probably unreasonable to expect private landlords to dig even deeper. If I were a landlord, I’d just sell up and walk away.
We live in an East-West house and it’s freezing in winter, despite us topping up the roof insulation and frankly, the cost of double glazing a house with a lot of windows is eye-boggling.
Sadly, I think it’s a case of wearing extra clothing in winter, using a fan to move air in summer (or maybe a portable evaporative cooler- this is what we did as a kid, living in a house with no insulation at all).

Roger, Tracy10:29 am 05 Jan 25

“If I were a landlord, I’d just sell up and walk away.” That would make you a sensible enough landlord. If you will not improve the house, somebody else can, and will.

I hope your evaporative cooler was ducted out a window, or else you were just raising the dew point, by both temperature and humidity. Better to have a spray mist bottle to use on all your exposed skin.

What are you talking about? There’s no evangelism on the renewables side. It’s a simple fact that renewables are the cheapest and quickest form of energy and nuclear in Australia would be the most expensive and slowest.

Investing in energy efficiency pays for itself over time (so do renewables given the resource is free).

Leon Arundell5:02 pm 04 Jan 25

If people on low incomes can’t afford to keep cool in summer or warm in winter, then the federal and ACT Governments should give them more financial support. That may well be cheaper than paying the extra medical costs that result from heat- or cold-related illnesses. Energy providers can make it easier for them to budget by billing fortnightly (in line with wage and pension payments) rather than quarterly.

bev hutchinson8:10 pm 04 Jan 25

Then there would be even less incentive to get a job or save if the taxpayers just paid your way!

You can pay energy bills fortnightly. I pay my electricity, gas & water bill by fortnightly deductions. The companies willingly set up such arrangements as it saves them the hassle of customers defaulting on bills.

Transition to clean energy means transition of your savings to power companies

You use government propaganda, I use my power bills. They’re more accurate for assessing the cost of energy

wildturkeycanoe7:41 am 04 Jan 25

The problem with this approach is that landlords won’t go spending a fortune to bring their investments up to new energy efficiency standards, unless government funds a big proportion of it. If they do, it’ll then make the property more attractive and obviously increase the rental costs. If they don’t, due to the exorbitant costs involved in retrofitting old houses because of their design, it’s likely they will sell off or do knock down rebuild. Neither of the above scenarios are beneficial for the low income earners, especially ially in the current market where cheap rentals are a forgotten concept.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.