3 June 2022

Albanese steers APS back on course after Coalition storms

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
Glyn Davis

The early appointment of Glyn Davis set the tone for the APS under Labor. Photo: University of Melbourne.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has moved quickly to restore some sense of strategic and logical order to the Australian Public Service, as well as overall integrity, with three big announcements since Labor was elected.

First, Professor Glyn Davis replaced Phil Gaetjens at Prime Minister and Cabinet. Then he announced a ministry brimming with talent and more than a few women, followed by a more fit-for-purpose rearrangement of departmental responsibilities.

Mr Gaetjens going straight after the election was no surprise given his close association with Scott Morrison and the obvious political connotations attached to his time at PM&C.

Professor Davis’s appointment sets the tone for a more apolitical approach at the top of the public service and signals that Labor is serious about its plans to reform the APS, rebuild its shrunken capacity and regain the confidence of its staff.

As a former head of the Queensland Public Service and two universities, he brings plenty of leadership experience and credibility to the job, but he was also a member of the Thodey review of the APS and will come to the role with a reform agenda in mind.

That will suit Public Service Minister Senator Katy Gallagher who repeatedly said before and during the campaign that Labor would look to implement all of the Thodey recommendations and elevate the role of the Australian Public Service Commission, as well as wean the APS from the previous government’s contracting addiction, scrap the staffing cap and negotiate in good faith on pay and conditions.

Katy Gallagher

Finance and Public Service Minister Senator Katy Gallagher will be key to the APS’s fortunes under Labor. Photo: Auspic.

The new government will also look to Professor Davis and the Public Service Commissioner for advice on the appointment of any new secretaries through natural vacancies or otherwise.

While there has been little bloodshed so far, it is hard to believe that Mr Gaetjens will be the only casualty of the change in government.

READ ALSO Two new departments in APS shake-up

The allocation of ministerial portfolios and the announced machinery-of-government changes reflect Labor’s priorities, particularly on climate change, but also make sense after the Coalition’s politically motivated, destructive and counterproductive march across the public service since the election of the Abbott Government.

The new Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water is the right bundle in light of the climate emergency and now energy crisis, and the transition underway that should accelerate under the new government.

It also takes Water away from Agriculture, a legacy of the Nationals’ Barnaby Joyce that was likened to putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank.

The other notable change is the removal of the Australian Federal Police from the mega Home Affairs Department created by now Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, separating it from Border Force and some of the security organisations, including ASIO.

Moving the AFP to Attorney-General’s will please those, including the police union, who had been concerned about its independence in Home Affairs and the sheer size of the security apparatus that had been assembled.

The AFP Association President Alex Caruana said that the AFP returning to its original portfolio was an excellent outcome.
“The AFPA has been calling on this move since 2019 as we believe that the Commonwealth’s law enforcement agency should be closely aligned with the portfolio that makes the laws in Australia.
“This will also provide independence for the AFP. The AFP was buried within the Home Affairs portfolio. The Attorney-General sits a little to the side of government, and we welcome such an environment for the AFP,” Mr Caruana said.

More prosaic but increasingly important is data policy, including the Digital Transformation Agency, moving to Finance, but again that seems a logical home, particularly as Senator Gallagher is also Finance Minister.

READ ALSO Labor needs to wield a new broom to sweep the APS clean

It is good to see Arts return to a department title but still seems an afterthought being tacked on the end of the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications.

But having someone as senior as Tony Bourke as Minister should mean the arts, one of the most impacted sectors during the pandemic, will have more visibility after many years of bring relegated in importance.

A final word about gender. There are 10 women in Cabinet out of 23, and a further three in the outer ministry, and they occupy the key positions of Finance, Foreign Affairs, Environment, Home Affairs and Infrastructure, yet Mr Albanese was quizzed at the press conference about equity.

Ideally, 50-50 would be welcome but the tone of the questioning was simply churlish in light of what has already been achieved.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
HiddenDragon7:09 pm 04 Jun 22

An equivalent LNP appointment to the top job at PM&C would, of course, have been met with a hostile reaction at the “parachuting in of an outsider” (or words to that effect), with earnest opinion pieces and letters to the editor about “lack of faith” in the existing cadre of departmental secretaries and the “troubling messages” which the appointment would send about the government’s commitment to a career service.

By comparison, the purring reaction to Professor Davis’ appointment, and to Labor’s thus far announced plans for the APS, suggests that the new government will quite easily get away with doing whatever it wants to do with and to the APS and that the inevitably disappointed expectations (particularly for the Canberra component of the APS) will barely rate a mention.

The good times are here. Albanese will have us living well. Poverty and minimum wage are gone.

Might they start with the ABC?

Didn’t labor run a campaign against the libs for reducing the contractor numbers, now doing just that?

And here I thought some of the lightweight political cheerleading articles might lessen with the election of the ALP….

Seems not.

So where do you get the “lightweight political cheerleading” slant from Chewy?8 I like a bit of variety of opinions from journalists when it comes to political debates. There is a comments section where you can contribute your thoughts which I note you have never been hesitant to contribute to. I find your comment pretty limp.

Jack D,
You clearly haven’t followed Ian Bushnell’s articles if you can’t see the clear bias towards the ALP (or against the Libs) in this and other articles.

There’s no critical or objective examination of the changes made and the language used is so blatant he doesn’t even try to hide behind a patina of balance.

Everything the previous government did was either outright wrong or questionable.

Everything the incoming government has done is either good or reasonable without any evidence to support it.

The most obvious example in this article is where he talks about the “Arts”. Even though there’s no real change here and the Arts department is still tacked on to an unsuitable area, he turns it in to a positive for the ALP and a negative for the Liberals.

I’m quite happy to read opinion pieces from journalists of different backgrounds but when that devolves to such obvious bias lacking in supporting evidence or reasoning, I’m afraid it adds little to the debate.

Unthinking political cheerleading is boring no matter which side of politics it comes from.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.