2 September 2024

Climate change fears discouraging Canberrans from having children, inquiry finds

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
33
adult and child holding hand

The report found 43 per cent of young people in Australia were hesitant to have children due to climate change. Photo: File.

Lack of action on climate change and the high cost of housing and fertility treatment are discouraging Canberrans from having children, an ACT parliamentary inquiry has found.

A Legislative Assembly committee inquiry into raising children chaired by Greens MLA Jo Clay was sparked by concerns over the capital having the lowest fertility rate in Australia and the impact our ageing population will have on our living standards and government finances.

The final report, tabled in the Assembly, cited survey data showing 43 per cent of young people in Australia were hesitant to have children due to climate change.

“I didn’t want to contribute to the destruction of the climate by adding another carbon emitter to it,” one submission stated.

READ ALSO Watson has a new $3 million playground, so why aren’t parents rejoicing?

Australian National University demographer Dr Liz Allen told the inquiry this was a view she often heard.

“Young people, particularly young women, are saying, ‘I am seeing no action [on climate change], so I am going to take the action for you’, and that means I am not going to have children.”

The committee’s first finding was: “Young people are concerned about climate change and that a lack of action on climate change is an impediment to having a child or children”.

The report also said the burden of raising children was unfairly falling on women.

“Women have to work like they don’t have children and raise children like they don’t work,” mother Alicia Jamieson wrote in her submission.

Moreover, women weren’t being supported enough during pregnancy, due in part to a shortage of midwives in the ACT, the inquiry found.

The committee recommended that the number of endorsed midwives who can offer a midwifery continuity of care model be increased, that midwives should be able to prescribe and practice to their full scope of practice in hospitals and that the ACT Government investigate the benefits of establishing a chief midwife for the territory.

The high cost and lack of availability of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in the ACT was also cited in many submissions as a deterrent for having children.

“Just to be told we need IVF has cost us nearly $1000, and we haven’t even started the process yet,” an anonymous submitter wrote.

“The basic cost for the procedure starts at $13,000, and that too does not come with a guarantee that it always works the first time.”

READ ALSO Housing in Australia is a disaster, but public housing is not the solution

Almost all submissions highlighted the general cost of living pressures, particularly housing.

“We have … got to this point where we need dual incomes to service a house, whether that be renting or whether that be owning a home. [If] one of those in the household gives up a wage or lowers it, often going part-time [after having a child], it becomes very tricky,” Dr Allen said.

The committee found that a ‘baby bonus’ or one-off financial incentive to have a child was unlikely to encourage people to have babies. Longer-term support such as free child care was deemed more effective, with a recommendation made to “extend free early childhood education and work towards universal free early childhood education”.

All submissions, hearing transcripts and the final report on the inquiry into raising children can be found on the ACT Legislative Assembly website.

Join the conversation

33
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Fear of climate change? What a joke…our politicians must have nothing better to do than to come up with garbage like this. Only in Canberra…

Yes – my kids in their late 20s and early 30s have decided against kids because of climate change, and because they can’t afford to have them. Both issues are factors in their decision.

HiddenDragon9:07 pm 03 Sep 24

Fascinating stuff – this is most likely just another inquiry that will sink without trace, but in a sense, it is also a major Wake (Woke) in Fright moment for a Labor/Green government which, in tandem with its federal counterparts, has made Canberra a magnet for climate change obsessed careerists (i.e. reliable Labor/Green voters) and has worsened housing costs by gouging (and wasting) as much revenue as politically possible from Canberra real estate.

The reality is that Canberra will bumble along as a self-governing, and one way or another viable, entity so long as federal governments are willing and able to keep funding the place – but should that change markedly for the worse the problems identified by this inquiry would make for a precarious future.

What rubbish, find one person whose gone, it’s gunna get hotter (or colder) in the future and it might be wetter (or drier) as well so we won’t have children so they don’t get hot (or cold) and wet (or not).

pink little birdie2:45 pm 03 Sep 24

The whole maternity services is bad and it does put people off having more children.
There have been huge enquires into birthing services and experiences in NSW, Queensland and Tasmania.

Continuity programs are great for the women in it, but they are over subscribed so it’s basically a lotto if you get in but once in you can be in it for subsequent children – which means some mothers get multiple births in it and others who don’t get in don’t get a turn.
With the birth centre they also need to do an anti-shaming session as the biggest shamers of epidurals, c-sections and formula use even to safe sleeping and daycare use were birth centre participants with both years of my children were born.
I also think the care they get is hugely disparate level compared to women of equal risk not in the program (which means bring the care up to that level for all women).

I believe the have changed this now in the extension of the women’s postnatal ward but when I gave birth there was one shared room on the postnatal ward and it was absolutely a lie to everything they said. Either everyone gets a shared room and nobody can have a support person stay or everybody gets a single room with a support person. Not randomly these two people get the exact opposite of everything we said we would do
You couldn’t have a support person stay, sharing a bathroom after birth even zero postnatal care down to not even being given the book to log nappies and breastfeeding. Midwives were understaffed. Even when readmitted for weight loss they didn’t send a lactation consultant (but I guess we were ignored in a private room so I could have my husband with me).

Having the shared room a second time after the birth of baby number 2 as well definely made me done with having babies. The experiences were just terrible.
I am forever mad my husband missed the first night of my child’s life and couldn’t support me not by his choice – He continues to be an amazing partner and dad to our children.

Incidental Tourist2:41 pm 03 Sep 24

Hahaha. What a BS from Greens. In the baby boomer’s days parents had a lot of children because Greens were not around.

As if lefties needed an excuse to be anti-humanity; it’s baked right into their core beliefs – as seen time and time again by their fruits. And given that climate change is (essentially) just another leftie concoction, which (surprise, surprise) can only be dealt with by anti-humanity measures, you can be 100% certain that it’s just the left manifesting, getting restless after a long time since mass destruction.

Science – real or co-opted – isn’t the only way to gauge things; having history, psychology and philosophy also being handy

If they aren’t having kids because of climate change then its probably for the best, they would only be bring the average IQ down anyway.

“they would only be bring the average IQ down anyway”

Seems superfluous.

Stephen Saunders9:32 am 03 Sep 24

In purely numerical terms, it doesn’t matter if Canberrans, or for that matter Australians, don’t have children, due to the UN bogeyman of “climate change”.

The reality is, Australia is locked into high population growth for the foreseeable future. Eighty percent of that growth is coming from immigration.

Yeah, the aim is to dilute and destroy the culture of all Western countries.

Says Ken M, who has in writing here placed himself on the extreme right of politics. That is the culture many have fought to achieve what we have.

Many have been duped into cheering on the destroying of their culture, yes. Imagine my shock that you would be one of them.

Capital Retro1:58 pm 03 Sep 24

So, Ken M is on the “extreme right of politics” (and there is nothing wrong with that), where does that leave you?

…said the self-admitted extreme right.

That’s correct, byline. I’m glad it nakes you so upset. 🤣

It leaves me in the centre with most people, Capital Retro, give or take 1 SD. You are correct that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with being on the fringe, among the few percent, except to believe the view from there is much relevant; a problem from which Ken M constantly suffers.

Ken M, your fantasies mislead you as usual.

A lot of ranting to make no point, as usual, byline.

Capital Retro9:01 am 03 Sep 24

We should look at other countries like Niger having the highest birth rate in the world in 2023, with a birth rate of 46.86 births per 1,000 inhabitants. Angola, Benin, Mali, and Uganda were similar.

Obviously they don’t have a problem with lack of action on climate change.

No TV to distract the parents

Capital Retro, birth rates were considered to depend principally on per-capita income, ratio of population in farming, and infant mortality (Weintraub 1962). Current research (Götmark, Andersson, 2020) negatively correlates birth rates with education, contraceptive prevalence, and GDP per capita, and positively with religiosity. There are inter-relationships among those, e.g. education correlates positively with GDP per capita but negatively with religiosity; no surprise.

A sense of “what’s the future” may affect some people.

Thought you might like some research in lieu of your waffling.

Distinct lack of climate kooks.

Capital Retro3:24 pm 03 Sep 24

I think you have just explained why our birth rates are so low.
I mean, if everyone does the the amount of research and lecturing you do, there is no time left for procreativity.

So, climate kooks have mindbroken an entire generation with their fearmongering nonsense. 🤣

It’s all so tiresome.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.