Community support not enough to make Canberra-Eden railway feasible

Elka Wood 6 October 2020 15
Bombala railway station.

A feasibility study on the proposed Canberra to Port of Eden railway has deemed it not economically viable. Photo: File.

Despite strong community support, a Transport for NSW feasibility study of the Canberra to Port of Eden Railway has found the project is not viable because the costs are higher than the potential revenue.

The study was funded with $1 million provided by the NSW Government in 2018, and it found that the project would cost $6.3 billion to complete.

The proposed line would carry passengers and freight and would rebuild the existing line between Queanbeyan and Bombala, and build new line joining Canberra Airport in the north and Port of Eden in the south.

“Even on the most optimistic demand assumptions, with significant freight diverted from other NSW ports, the demand projections for the full project from Canberra Airport to Port of Eden only generate benefits of $225.8 million during the life of the project, compared against the cost to achieve this benefit of $5447.6 million (both in present value terms, discounted at 7 per cent real),” said the report.

The report said the proposed 300km railway would pass through rugged terrain and areas of significant environmental value, including national parks, and would require extensive works, including major tunnels, bridges and viaducts, especially between Bombala and Eden and the Canberra Airport.

Bombala Railway Station.

Bombala railway station. Photo: File.

“The costs of reinstatement of the non-operational railway are significant, and the cost to construct the railway down to Port of Eden is extremely high due to the topographical challenges and the environmental constraints,” said the report.

“While the sections from Queanbeyan to Bombala to Port of Eden are expensive and difficult to achieve, they could be delivered with substantial investment.”

While the railway line was originally identified as a potential economic opportunity for the Snowy Monaro region and southwest region of NSW by engineer Edwin Michell, community feedback since the report was published in late September 2020 has pointed out that the value the rail link would provide to regional communities is not a simple matter of cost versus revenue.

“The report does not take into account the benefits of the railway to us all in reducing our use of fossil fuels and making our roads safer, as well as connecting isolated communities,” said Cooma resident Peter Mirian.

Member for Eden-Monaro, Kristy McBain, said she will soon be meeting with Cooma and Monaro Progress Association to get its perspective on the rail feasibility study.

“We need a new way to assess big ideas in regional areas,” said Ms McBain. “The benefits often take longer to realise and are always more nuanced than in metro areas.”

For more information, visit Transport for NSW.

Original Article published by Elka Wood on About Regional.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
15 Responses to Community support not enough to make Canberra-Eden railway feasible
Shane Westmore Shane Westmore 2:49 pm 11 Oct 20

Governments seem to find $ billions to build roads & highways... it’s not a problem finding money, it’s profitability & many more reasons than that... it’s also part of the reason why our existing long distance trains are terrible

Russell Nankervis Russell Nankervis 12:28 pm 11 Oct 20

Build it and they will come. Also, public infrastructure isn't made for profit it is for the people.

maxblues maxblues 8:12 pm 10 Oct 20

Don’t worry about feasibility, just make it Stage 102 of Canberra Light Rail.

Karen Nicholson Karen Nicholson 5:13 pm 10 Oct 20

In these days of electric bikes, maybe a rail trail/bike trail?

    Julie Macklin Julie Macklin 6:10 pm 11 Oct 20

    A rail trail has been suggested for years.

Shirley Hadfield Shirley Hadfield 3:39 pm 10 Oct 20

We need a rail system that can transport everything. Canada has one of the best advanced rail systems in the world. Feasibility studies may not favour an advanced rail system in Australia, but we have to start some where!

    Rainer N Palma Busacker Rainer N Palma Busacker 7:58 pm 10 Oct 20

    Shirley Hadfield Yes, the NSW government was short sighted when they shut down all those rail lines years ago. Rail freight would take lots of trucks off our roads, provide cheaper transport for goods and be better for our environment. Perhaps rebuilding the rail systems across the country would enhance Australia's infrastructure and vital transportation options in a critical situation.

Capital Retro Capital Retro 3:10 pm 10 Oct 20

I could have supplied that feasibility study with a similar outcome in one day for $250.00.

It concerns me also that a lot of the “community support” may be coming from people who have authority to “invest” ratepayers money because they think something is for a “good cause”.

Steven Lloyd Steven Lloyd 3:02 pm 10 Oct 20

They just don’t want to make it happen we need a better railway in Australia it stupid we only can drive or take airplanes for travel so stupid and in the past

Kevin Hodder Kevin Hodder 2:39 pm 10 Oct 20

Action buses and light rail probably ain't feasible either but we have it

Paul South Paul South 2:10 pm 10 Oct 20

I wounder who did the feasibility studdy into the USA national rail system ?

The problem is there is no one in power with a vision or courage . The far south could hold a population similar to sydney . Some has to plant the seed.!

    Sue Sutton Sue Sutton 3:47 pm 10 Oct 20

    Paul South no thanks

    Chris Ellis Chris Ellis 4:20 pm 10 Oct 20

    Paul South who wants that many people down here?

    Jason Ezra Jason Ezra 1:35 pm 11 Oct 20

    Chris Cross fair point. The $5.5 billion that’s being put into fixing the NBN to nearly what it originally should have been is why we can’t afford other stuff.

steve2020 steve2020 1:05 pm 10 Oct 20

I don’t see the feasibility in the Canberra to Eden railway either. The Port of Eden is a small port in a town of just over 3000 people. The location of the port is exceptionally good, but seemingly lacking potential without much population and resources, such as mining or agricultural resources to sustain imports, exports and cruise ship tourism.

The only other way I could think of improving feasibility would be to have tourist and luxury train services that focus heavily on the train experience and journey. Otherwise, it’s seemingly founded on the novelty factor of reopening the railway line to Bombala for historical and heritage value and purposes, but with little economic value. It should benefit as many people as possible.

I think the most seemingly critical, beneficial and realistic railway project that should be advocated for and supported by political parties that would be of benefit is the extension of the Canberra/Sydney railway line from Kingston to Canberra City (Civic) that would be a more centralised location providing greater incentive for tourists, passengers, and potential for increased services and other luxury or tourist rail operators than the non-centralised remotely located terminus of Kingston.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top

Search across the site