CRS lodges DA for Fyshwick waste plant despite government opposition

Ian Bushnell 26 November 2020 5

An aerial view of Capital Recycling Solutions’ proposed plant and already approved rail terminal. Image: CRS

The proponent of the controversial Fyshwick waste processing and recycling plant in Ipswich Street has pressed ahead with its development application after the ACT Government rebuffed its pleas for talks on the matter.

The fate of the proposal now rests with the planning authority, although the government has confirmed pre-election commitments to oppose the project and is looking at ways to block it, including via the zoning rules.

A coalition of inner south community groups and the Fyshwick Business Association oppose the proposal, arguing it will be a noxious activity and generate an unacceptable number of heavy trucks and traffic issues.

They also argue that the proposal is out of step with a business district that is evolving into a home for lighter industry and bulky retail.

Their arguments found favour with Labor and the Greens before the election, and the government has since restated its commitment to block the proposal.


READ ALSO: Government vows to block Fyshwick waste proposal as standoff continues


Capital Recycling Solutions director Adam Perry said the company had run out of patience with the government, which had argued it could not discuss the proposal because the proponent had submitted the DA, although it had not been lodged officially for assessment.

Mr Perry said the company wanted to negotiate on areas the government was unhappy about and possible changes, but there had been no response.

”So why shouldn’t we put the DA in? How long do we wait, the election was some time ago?

”We’ve come this far, we’ve already spent millions on the EIS and holding costs for the land. We may as well go the final step and have the DA assessed.”

Transport and City Services Minister Chris Steel has said the government would also not allow the city’s household garbage or so-called red-bin waste to be used as a waste stream for the plant.

But Mr Perry said this would not affect the viability of the plant, and would even make the operation easier.

It was a difficult waste stream to sort and had little recyclable material, he said.

It could also make the proposal more acceptable, given concerns about odour, litter and truck traffic.

Mr Perry said there was still hundreds of thousands of tonnes of waste that was going to landfill either at Mugga Lane or on the road to the Woodlawn bioreactor.

He said recycling rates were misleading and the most significant number was the number of tonnes of landfill per person per annum.

”That’s the number they don’t talk about. In the ACT it’s around 2.6 tonnes per person per annum, that’s one of the highest in the country because there are few opportunities to recycle properly in Canberra.”

His CRS partner, Sydney-based Benedict Industries, recycles more than a million tonnes of waste per year, achieving 90 per cent recycling rates through advanced separation systems.

”Canberra’s ripe for the picking. It should be happening here but it won’t happen here unless private enterprise is encouraged to invest in it,” he said.

”There are a lot of signals being sent out that would discourage that.”


READ ALSO: Barr has a couple of on-the-nose messes to clean up


Mr Perry said the company had engineering solutions for odour, litter and noise, and consultant Aecom had found the traffic impacts would be minimal and manageable.

”At what point do we say, ‘Fyshwick is full, we can’t have any more businesses here because there is too much traffic?”’ he said.

CRS plans to process waste at Ipswich Street and use its rail terminal to ship recyclables to Port Botany and the rest to Woodlawn.

The DA outcome could have implications for other waste proposals in Fyshwick such as the Hi-Quality facility in Tennant Street.

The government has said that it wants waste facilities to be co-located in Hume.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
5 Responses to CRS lodges DA for Fyshwick waste plant despite government opposition
Martin Budden Martin Budden 4:28 pm 27 Nov 20

The government has been very clear: CRS are welcome to do it in Hume, but not in Fyshwick. CRS just needs to switch to Hume.

ACT resident ACT resident 8:46 am 27 Nov 20

This latest CRS thought bubble promises flammable construction waste to be diverted from landfill and delivered for processing, storage and transfer at Ipswich St. Adjacent is the CRS associated metal waste plant recently approved by ACTPLA to use fragmentisers in a toxic open-air operation which has in the last 6 years required ESA attendance at 8 fires including one explosion heard all over Fyshwick. Waste required for the proposed waste hub is more than Canberra produces. The current situation allows cross border waste including from Sydney for the purpose of recycling or processing to be transported by road in those huge double trucks without limit on distance or amount. Welcome to Canberra the waste capital, largest future producer in Australia of processed engineered fuel (PEF) for incineration in power stations, waste to energy plants and cement kilns located elsewhere – somewhere. Do we have any conscience at all about climate change, community health and the future of Fyshwick?

Samwise Geo Samwise Geo 8:23 pm 26 Nov 20

development application (DA)

simm simm 6:19 pm 26 Nov 20

FYSHWICK is the wrong location for a high volume waste tipping station where that would interfere with surrounding investments
Think…. Future Urban renewal of EastLake LAND, a Capital Beer Brewer, other emerging DairyFlat developments, existing bespoke Cafes and Service industries, Retail Pushbike and Sport Specialists, the FYSHWICK markets,
ACT Gov. at 255 Canberra Ave, and hundreds of service retailers including Harvey Norman bordering Ipswich St. Important to note , CRS DA for 16 Ipswich Street is a former Shell Fuel receiving and storage site. It is contaminated due to known subterranean petrol
EIS No: 201900001
BLOCKS: 8 and 12 SECTION: 28 DIVISION:Fyshwick
An Arup EIS related report * released this week mentions underlining Petrol. PP4 /118
That there is petrol underneath the site, which if disturbed, may spread or it may affect the health of contractors and staff. While there are appropriate measures to prevent this from happening, the assessment did not fully appreciate that the main building would be enclosed to stop odours, and therefore petrol fumes (vapours), from escaping.
* Arup EIS related report https://www.planning.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/1567938/Appendix-4-Independent-review-ARUP-Report-alias2.pdf

Waste sites are prone to fire.
A DA approval combining the two Hazards may have a blast radius of hundreds of meters one might say …should a fire trigger an explosion.

    chewy14 chewy14 10:19 am 27 Nov 20

    Jeez,
    The NIMBYs are out in force today.

    Firstly, the fact that more commercial operations now exist in Fyshwick does not change the underlying land use which is still Industrial.

    Convenient that those commercial properties would be worth a lot more if the land was rezoned isn’t it. But I’m sure that has nothing to do with the opposition.

    Secondly, the fact that the land is contaminated with petrol and other hydrocarbons actually hurts your argument that the land could ever be used for anything but industrial purposes.

    And the fact that a building is enclosed doesn’t mean it has no air movement. This is pure ignorance. The building is enclosed to stop fugitive odours, with active odour controls put in place to ventilate the building through a centralised location. It’s actually less likely to cause a problem than if the building was left open to the environment or not actively ventilated.

    Well done on shooting down your own arguments.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site