5 April 2022

Federal Budget 2022: ACT snubbed again in infrastructure spend

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
AIS Arena

The Commonwealth-owned AIS Arena is being used as a COVID-19 Vaccination Clinic, but its reopening as an entertainment and sporting venue is a priority for the ACT Government. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The ACT needs a change in Federal Government for it to get a fair deal on national infrastructure spending, Chief Minister Andrew Barr said.

Mr Barr noted that Coalition governments continued to shortchange the ACT when it comes to the spread of infrastructure funding across Australia.

He said Commonwealth infrastructure spending in the ACT was the lowest of any state or Territory – again – by some margin.

Of a nearly $18 billion national infrastructure spend, the ACT has received just $51 million, much of which will go to just one project – the duplication of Athllon Drive.

In comparison, $639 million went to Tasmania and $369 million was given to the Northern Territory.

“Despite the ACT being home to 1.68 per cent of Australia’s population, just 0.3 per cent of the Commonwealth’s infrastructure spending will make its way into the ACT in this budget.”

“This means the ACT Government will, once again, do the heavy lifting on job-creating infrastructure investments.”

READ ALSO Icon Water releases a game to flush-away wastewater problems

Mr Barr said the Commonwealth had failed to invest in the AIS precinct, especially the reopening of the AIS Arena, and the precinct continued to face an uncertain future.

“This is an urgent priority for the ACT in the Federal election, and we will continue to advocate for a renewal partnership with the Commonwealth after the election,” he said.

The Minister for Homelessness, Social and Community Housing, Michael Sukkar, speaking at Wednesday’s Budget breakfast at Parliament House, would not answer a question from Region Media about why the ACT can’t get its fair share of infrastructure spending.

The Budget did find nearly $40 million over five years for the National Capital Authority to upgrade Scrivener Dam ($38.5 million over four years from 2022-23) and to honour key figures in Australia’s democracy.

A total of $1.3 million will also go to commissioning and installing new sculptures in the Parliamentary Triangle to commemorate the first two women and first Indigenous Australian elected to Federal Parliament.

READ ALSO Canberra’s Aspen Medical makes multi-million dollar investment in life-saving biotech development

An ACT Government spokesperson earlier said many other ACT projects deserved funding in the Budget, such as the AIS and National Cultural Institutions, especially the much-needed expansion of Questacon and repairs to the National Gallery and improvements to Commonwealth Park.

The spokesperson said the Budget could have also paved the way for an additional public service agency in the Gungahlin Town Centre, something Mr Barr had recently lobbied for with a prospectus sent to the Public Service Minister, Ben Morton.

The Commonwealth could also have partnered with the ACT Government to fund social housing renewal and expansion, and further health infrastructure.

Forgiving the $115 million in historic housing debt to the Commonwealth, and land and building debt of $2.2 million, could have enabled the savings on borrowing costs to be redirected to more public housing.

The spokesperson said the interest rate on the building and land debt of 12.6 per cent has recently been agreed to be reduced to 4.5 per cent and a fixed interest rate of 4.5 per cent applies to the housing debt, but the ACT cost of borrowing is significantly lower than these rates.

“The ACT Government has repeatedly called on the Federal Government to match our commitment to grow public housing, for example, by waiving historic housing debts, as was done for Tasmania,” the spokesperson said.

But Mr Sukkar said the Federal Government would only consider forgiving the debt if the ACT Government had a plan to reduce barriers to new housing and increase supply.

READ ALSO Union says teachers under pressure because of uncertainty over non-classroom work

Liberal Senator Zed Seselja has trumpeted Commonwealth spending in the ACT over previous budgets, including the $115 million Monaro Highway upgrades, $51 million for the Tuggeranong Parkway, $26.5 million for the duplication of William Hovell Drive, the $500 million redevelopment of the Australian War Memorial, and $137 million for upgrades to Commonwealth Avenue Bridge.

But the ACT Government spokesperson said infrastructure investment from the Commonwealth in the ACT remained consistently behind the per capita investment made into other states and territories.

Analyses of the Budget’s national infrastructure spending show that it is skewed towards must-win marginal seats, and just 15 per cent have been endorsed as priorities by Infrastructure Australia.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

Ironic that this article popped up in the feed for me today.

Wonder when the similar article is going to be written bemoaning the lack of infrastructure spend for the ACT in the ALP budget?


So what was Barr’s plan to make housing more affordable?

Interesting comments but from memory when Federal Labor were in Government the ACT received zilch. Hawke made the ACT self sufficient as a Legislative Assembly and responsible for governing the ACT. It seems that when Federal Liberal is in Government and because we have a Federal ACT Senator the ACT receives Federal funding and other funds for roads, infrastructure. Sadly the Labor Senator and Labor HOR members have done very little if anything to afford the ACT any funding. OK Barr is not happy with what the Feds give him but he is quick to burden Canberrans with rate rises and levies to suit his agendas. The light rail is sucking up so much of the ACTs finances just to appease the Greens and retain power.

HiddenDragon7:15 pm 30 Mar 22

With Albanese promising to govern like Hawke (among others), it’s worth remembering that in the Hawke-Keating years there was one excuse after another for not proceeding with the National Museum of Australia, which Keating, at one stage, dismissed as just another “mausoleum by the lake”. It’s also worth remembering that self-government was inflicted on the ACT primarily as a saving to the federal budget – self-determination, democracy etc. was just the window-dressing for the benefit of the credulous.

The Museum was, of course, finally delivered by the Howard government – perhaps out of a twinge of conscience over all the other cuts imposed in Canberra in the early years of that government.

Contempt for Canberra is bipartisan – fueled, as has already been noted, by the relentless predictability of Canberrans’ voting patterns.

It’s funny, isn’t it? AB and Andrew Leigh both running this line about how Commonwealth funding should be based on a percentage of the population. Doesn’t it sounds like their ideology of having predetermined quotas for everything?
And to think the money we did get, is to partially fund the duplication of Athllon Drive; the duplication that the ACT Government has promised election after election and never delivered on!
Something on the Southside!
And for all those who want Zed out, maybe without him, we would have had to continue to wait for the AB to fund it?

Vinson1Bernie1:52 pm 30 Mar 22

Spending has always targeted marginal seats – Perhaps if ACT had a few marginal seats it may help – People should vote Coalition to get noticed as Zed may squeak over the line yet again in the Senate so Coalition in the lower house and Green in the Senate. Pocock would have to explain why the ARU subsidised his Japan sojourn during the height of his career.

“Analyses of the Budget’s national infrastructure spending show that it is skewed towards must-win marginal seats, and just 15 per cent have been endorsed as priorities by Infrastructure Australia.”

This is the main problem here, that spending is happening far too often for political reasons rather than solid infrastructure investment ones.

Although you do have to laugh at the ACT government complaining about this when they’ve behaved in exactly the same way for many years now.

You can’t complain about the Federal government’s behaviour without also complaining about the ACT Gov in this space. Unless you’re happy with Pork Barreling, but only when it suits you.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.