Government management of rural land agreements slammed by Auditor-General

Dominic Giannini 7 February 2021 5
Rural land agreements

The management of agreements between the ACT Government and rural leaseholders has been slammed by the ACT Auditor-General. Photo: File.

Serious shortcomings and a lack of accountability and enforcement have been exposed within the ACT Government’s Land Management Agreements (LMA) with rural leaseholders.

The agreements are supposed to encourage co-operation between the government and rural landholders to establish environmentally friendly farming and conservation practices.

But the large number of out-of-date agreements, no regular compliance checks and no evidence of enforcement from ACT Government agencies led the Auditor-General to conclude that “the value of LMAs is questionable”.

The report analysed 63 LMAs in the ACT and found that half had not been reviewed and replaced as required in the last five years. Of these, 24 Agreements were over 10 years old, 10 were up to 17 years old and two were 19 years old.

“A significant proportion of Agreements are out of date and they often lack a depth of information and assessment,” Auditor-General Michael Harris said.

“The Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate (EPSDD) is not effectively managing Agreements to ensure that they are relevant as an active and ongoing land management tool.”

The report also found that leaseholders do not trust the agreements and only enter them as a “necessary inconvenience” to obtain their lease.

“Their attitude seems to be that the agreement should contain as little detail as possible, which minimises their obligations over the five-year review period,” the report notes.

“The LMA process has received scant regard from lessees in the past due to their awareness that [Parks, Conservation and Lands] staff have not been consistently undertaking compliance and enforcement activities.

“There is no evidence of any monitoring and enforcement activity being undertaken by any ACT Government agency in relation to rural leaseholders and their Agreements.”


READ ALSO: Rural land deals should go to corruption watchdog, say Libs


The report made six recommendations for the EPSDD, including establishing an ongoing discussion forum where issues can be raised, developing a policy to document and keep records of agreements, having a minimum level of detail for agreements and better compliance and enforcement initiatives.

The ACT Government has four months to provide a formal response to the report and a spokesperson said the EPSDD did not want to pre-empt that with a response at this stage.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
5 Responses to Government management of rural land agreements slammed by Auditor-General
Jesper Hauberg Jesper Hauberg 8:31 am 09 Feb 21

The government should manage their own lands too. Not much point spaying for weeds when you are surrounded by thousand of acres of reserves that get no maintenance at all. The seeds just keep blowing over the fences. It is a futile effort. They can’t even keep the weeds out of Northbourne Avenue!

keek keek 10:39 am 08 Feb 21

These LMAs are a joke. They are a completely unnecessary and intrusive condition being put on farmers.
Most of these places back on to poorly managed parks and reserves, full of noxious weeds and feral pests, yet only the farmers are expected to do land management? They already manage their land better than the Government manage their side of the fences.

    rationalobserver rationalobserver 1:43 pm 08 Feb 21

    Couldn’t agree more. And it’s not just the national parks that are poorly managed. Just look at the rabbits all around the lake foreshore, and the weeds all through the suburbs.
    Even when the ACT Government do attempt to “do something” they often get it wrong. Case in point the goverment kangaroo cullers using firearm suppressors illegally (hastily rectified once called out) and the recent deer cull using semi automatic rifles illegally (just overlooked and ignored).

    keek keek 4:20 pm 08 Feb 21

    The roo cullers should have been using suppressors the entire time, and professional cullers shouldn’t be stopped from using semi-autos. That whole thing is administrative stupidity.

Colin Trinder Colin Trinder 10:10 am 08 Feb 21

I don't think anyone would dispute the auditor-General's observations. Weed management on some properties in noticeably non-existent.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

 Top
Region Group Pty Ltd

Search across the site