16 October 2024

Greens under siege over candidate's 'hateful' social media posts

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
12
man in black

Greens candidate James Cruz regrets posting the statements. Photo: ACT Greens.

Both Labor and the Liberals have tried to take advantage of another social media post storm hitting the ACT Greens, with Chief Minister Andrew Barr calling for a full apology and Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee attempting to tar Labor because they were in coalition with the Greens last term.

The Australian newspaper revealed that Greens candidate in Kurrajong James Cruz posted a decade ago that he wanted to “f—ing kill politicians” and “send them to The Hague and hang them in the street” over their treatment of asylum seekers.

It reported that Mr Cruz also posted that he did not “give a shit” about Israeli forces dying “when they couldn’t care less about indiscriminately slaughtering civilians and actively cheer as they die”.

He posted them on his personal Facebook account in 2014 and 2015.

READ ALSO Voice rejection a year on leaves a mixed bag of feelings and achievements

Mr Cruz has since posted a statement regretting the posts and disavowing violence.

“The suggestion of the use of violence was inappropriate. The feelings were expressed in the heat of deep pain at the deaths of civilians and the treatment of the refugee community,” he said.

“I regret using those words and would not use them again. I want to reiterate that I disavow all violence and I wholeheartedly support the Greens’ core values of peace and non-violence.”

A party member since 2011, Mr Cruz has previously run as an ACT Greens Senate candidate and works as a librarian at the National Library of Australia.

The controversy follows a similar situation where a Greens candidate in Murrumbidgee, Harini Rangaragan, was in the spotlight over a post under another name comparing Jesus Christ with terror mastermind Osama bin Laden. She explained that it was a creative writing exercise, not a statement of belief.

Chief Minister Andrew Barr said the Greens should consider disendorsing Mr Cruz.

He said the posts needed to be taken down and a full apology given.

“Hateful and risky statements such as these could have terrible consequences,” Mr Barr said.

“All it will take is one person to misinterpret them and we could have a tragedy on our hands.

“We are seeing in other Australian cities, some quite significant political violence occurring.

“It certainly demonstrates that a lot of people who run for public office have quite extreme views that they struggle with and that the vehicle of social media platforms seemingly provides ample opportunity for people to express quite extreme views.”

Pitching Labor as the sensible centre, Mr Barr said there had been repeat episodes from a couple of Greens candidates and a number of Liberal candidates.

“Labor remains absolutely committed to implementing the agenda that we’re taking forward in this election,” he said.

“We can do so in a progressive and practical way without the extremism that we see in this campaign.”

Ms Lee said Mr Cruz’s posts would ring alarm bells for most Canberrans and that Labor and the Greens had been in coalition for years and could not be separated.

She said that if Mr Barr were returned as Chief Minister, he would have to deal with the Greens.

Ms Lee said Greens Leader Shane Rattenbury he needed to step up and call out these comments that most Canberrans would find abhorrent.

Mr Rattenbury said some posts had fallen through the cracks and the party would have to review its vetting process.

But he stood by his candidate and his statement disavowing violence.

He said Mr Cruz’s clarification was very clear that there was no place for violence.

READ ALSO ‘The electorate is in a grumbly mood’: Experts have their say on the ACT election outcome

Mr Rattenbury rejected claims that the Greens’ credibility as a governing party had been damaged.

“The Greens have demonstrated significant capability to take on responsibility in government in my role as Attorney-General, a senior minister in the government,” he said.

“My other two colleagues have come in and been ministers this term. We’ve demonstrated a high level of capability.

“The people who are our leading candidates for this election are, are people who’ve got a proven track record.

“I think we’ve demonstrated a significant ability to be policy drivers and change makers.”

The Greens said in its initial response to The Australian that the social media posts all related to issues of concern to the Greens: violence against civilians, corporate accountability, drug harm reduction and people seeking asylum.

“The tone of the posts is impassioned and will be confronting to some, as are the issues themselves. Mr Cruz disavows violence and made those comments over deep pain at deaths of innocent civilians and the treatment of the refugee community, of which he has family and friends.”

Join the conversation

12
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

These candidates are not fit to run when they sprout extremist views. The greens have lost the green agenda that the party was founded on. They’re not even Vegans!

But it is OK for Lee’s leadership pretender to make some really off remarks at a recent community forum?

Careful Ian

You’ll have Rattenbury flipping you the bird next 🤣

I am not the greatest fan of the Green’s but I do know Shane would never be so uncouth!

spare me Barr and Lee’s duopoly cut-price outrage about ancient social media silliness which CLEARLY threatened no-one, especially considering how Aussies usually talk about pollies. What putrages me is politicians who do or say nothing about genocide or Australia’s illegal and shameful mistreatment of helpless refugees

Ah, the typical greens comrade, excusing their extremist behaviour. Imagine my shock….

And do you mean refugees who went shopping for a new home rather than following the refugee convention and going to their nearest safe country? Those aren’t refugees, they are queue jumpers who should be sent back immediately.

Gen-Z Greens don’t prioritise wild rivers and old-growth forests, instead they blather on about the revolution.

The WWF Threatened Species Report Card released in September 2024 says “Across all indicators, state and territory grades have stayed the same or worsened since our 2022 Report Card, with the Australian Capital Territory experiencing the largest decrease in both the recovery plan and protection indicators”.

Greens, you were elected to protect the environment, you have failed. Greens are FUBAR.

Now hold on a minute! Do you mean putting locked gates all through our National Park, preventing most people accessing 95% of it, then doing nothing maintenance wise and allowing feral pests to use it as a protected breeding ground has been a bad idea? That’s been the greens entire conservation plan! 🤣

The Greens would launch WWWIII on any other political party if a member stated the same bile. They’re not fit for any office

The greens are filled with extremists. This last two just weren’t smart enough to keep their extremist views off social media attached to their names.

>not smart enough
Well, they are greens after all.

Barb aside, yea, and apologists claim only the “far right” exists.
Yea, nah, far left is 101% a thing.

Add a 5 to the beginning of your percentage to be more accurate

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.