18 September 2024

Leaders prepare to face off in Region’s ACT election forum

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
22
row of four party leaders

Greens leader Shane Rattenbury, Canberra Liberals leader Elizabeth Lee, Labor Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Independents for Canberra’s Thomas Emerson will lock horns at the election forum on Wednesday. Photos: Region.

The four leaders of the four main political forces vying for power at the upcoming ACT election will be grilled at Canberra Decides, to be broadcast on Riotact’s Facebook page from 6 pm on Wednesday, 18 September.

Chief Minister Andrew Barr, Canberra Liberals leader Elizabeth Lee, ACT Greens’ leader Shane Rattenbury and Independents for Canberra’s lead candidate Thomas Emerson will lock horns in a forum moderated by former Region Group Editor and now Hands Across Canberra CEO Genevieve Jacobs.

“I think it’s going to be pretty fiery and pretty interesting,” Ms Jacobs said.

“We are focusing on Canberra’s future. We’re at this interesting transition point where there’s a bit of uncertainty about the outcome of this year’s election. The chance to hear a pitch in real-time from our leaders with some well-informed experts on our panel will be a very valuable one.”

READ ALSO ACT Greens pledge to set compulsory minimum standards for all rental properties, including fixed heating

The Chief Minister confirmed he will be attending on Wednesday night.

“I will continue to outline Labor’s progressive, positive and proven plans for Canberra,” Mr Barr said.

“We know that Canberrans are proud of where they live and I’ll make sure we continue to deliver practical investments that provide more services in every part of the ACT.”

Mr Emerson said he’s pleased to be part of a platform with the major parties for independents to speak about how they intend to do things differently.

“I’ve appeared alongside Mr Rattenbury and Ms Lee in a number of forums, but Mr Barr has been nowhere to be seen. I’m glad he’s made the time to speak at this one,” he said.

“What I hear from people is they feel the government has become complacent and less interested in listening than they should be.”

The debate is the second in a series of three that are taking place at the Lonsdale St Studio in Braddon. All are interactive – audience members can vote in polls or ask questions by downloading the Slido app or going to slido.com. A Slido code will be provided at the start of the forum coverage.

“We had a strong discussion last week with just one MLA and three people who are hoping to be MLAs. This time, we’ve gone straight to the top. If you want to understand what leadership promises are being made and how differently that may play out, then this is the one not to miss,” Ms Jacobs said.

READ ALSO Tumut River Brewing Co to shut doors, but Kingston venue poised to remain open

An expert panel has been assembled to question the debate participants – Canberra Business Chamber Board Chair Archie Tsirimokos, ACT Council of Social Services head of policy Corinne Dobson and a newcomer to the forum, Australian National University marketing expert Dr Andrew Hughes.

“Professor Hughes is a well-known national commentator. One of his specialties is understanding the spin that candidates put out during elections. I think he’s someone that will ask some interesting questions and draw some interesting responses,” Ms Jacobs said.

A third and final debate will be broadcast on the Riotact Facebook page at 6 pm on Wednesday, 25 September. It will cover cost of living and include Independents for Canberra candidate in Brindabella Dr Vanessa Picker, ACT Greens Deputy Leader Rebecca Vassarotti, who is contesting Kurrajong, Liberal MLA in Murrumbidgee Ed Cocks and Deputy Chief Minister Yvette Berry, who is contesting Ginninderra.

You can register your intention to watch the election forum on Facebook. Full coverage of all three events is also being posted to Region’s YouTube channel after each debate.

Join the conversation

22
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

When’s last night’s video going on YouTube?

Actually if you had single member constituencies rather than Hare-Clark, the result would be majority Labor governments the whole time. Liberals would have less seats than they currently do and Independents would have no chance of getting anyone elected unless they had concentrated hyper-local support. Is that what you would prefer?

The ACT Government’s Record on Small Business: A Reality Check

Aspiring candidates have missed a crucial opportunity to address the Labor Government’s dismal record on small business. Here are the key issues and the record:

1. High Taxes and Fees: Businesses in the ACT face some of the highest taxes, commercial rates, and license fees in Australia. This heavy financial burden stifles growth, contributing to a high business failure rate.

2. Delayed Business Ministry: Labor was one of the last jurisdictions to establish a dedicated business ministry, reflecting a lack of priority given to small business concerns.

3. Inadequate COVID Support: According to the Grattan Institute, the ACT was the worst-performing state in providing business support during COVID. Other jurisdictions were quicker to implement relief measures, while Canberra lagged, exacerbating economic hardship for local businesses.

4. Lack of Commercial Water Rates: Unlike other regions, the ACT’s water supplier does not offer a commercial rate for businesses. This anomaly adds unnecessary costs to operating a business in Canberra.

5. Rising Insurance Costs: Business insurance premiums have been steadily increasing, placing additional financial strain on small business owners and further squeezing their profitability.

The Labor candidates’ optimistic portrayal fails to acknowledge these real and pressing issues. Labor is burying its head in the sand regarding business concerns. A high rate of business startups might be indicative of the general affluence in Canberra, the Government should not be proud of then pushing businesses to closure. A focus on business tax relief, reasonable commercial rates, and effective support programs is essential for fostering a thriving business environment and preventing further closures.

Why was Peter Strong not on this panel? The man bleeds small business.

This Labor-Greens coalition is burdening us with massive debt for years to come thanks to this tram. Why not invest *some* of the money in buses and maintaining the roads, rather than a parallel transport system. No wonder our rates are sky high.

Martin Miller3:12 pm 18 Sep 24

How come Fiona Carrick Independent wasn’t invited to any of the Region Media’s Election Forum . According to reports the most likely to get elected as an independent . https://www.fionacarrick.com/

Heywood Smith1:42 pm 18 Sep 24

I laugh at how these local candidates only seem to pretend to GAF pre election time? Apart from chasing a nice pay check and the perks that come with the job, they are all as bad as one another. Its like deciding if youre having Brussel sprouts or Okra for dinner, they are both sh&t.

an event like this could be good and yet you know at the same time that there’s going to be a definite firewall around the place so that questions that aren’t welcome can’t get through – such as those moments you see online all the time of someone really getting a politician in the corner, only for the host (and the security guard) to remove the democratically engaged citizen from the premises

How long have Labor and Greens been in government?
Labor has been in government since Oct 2001 (23 years);
Andrew Barr elected 2006 (18 years);
Shane Rattenbury elected 2008 (16 years);
Andrew Barr chief minister since 2014 (10 years);
Labor/Greens entered into their power sharing agreement in 2008 (16 years).
The Hare-Clark preferencing system means Canberrans are unlikely to vote Liberals into office. So the only way to disrupt and hold this cosy Labor/Greens coaltion to account for their multitude of sins is to preference Independents first.

GrumpyGrandpa8:38 pm 17 Sep 24

Hello Action,
You are correct about Hare Clark and how it’s pretty much guarantees an ALP/Greens alliance.

To disrupt the Alliance, it’s about who holds the balance of power.

Preferencing Independents first will make no difference, unless they take seats from either ALP or Greens and hold that balance of power.

The other issue of course is, in the event that Independent(s) holding the balance of power, is who they support as Cheif Minister?

When suggesting people Preference Independents first, do you mean Vote 1 Independents or Vote for the party of your choice and then give your 1st Preference to Independents?

I expect you mean to Vote 1 Independents, hoping they get elected. Preference after that vote become critical. Based on the intent to disrupt the Alliance, any Preference after Independents needs to EXCLUDE ALP and Greens, otherwise those Preferences could re-elect those candidates.

David Pollard - Independent for Yerrabi7:59 am 18 Sep 24

I can’t speak for Acton’s original intent, but you are right. The strongest and only way to vote for change is to list independents and minor parties BEFORE any major parties. Your eventual preferences for a major party will still help elect whoever you prefer.

If someone goes the other way and lists independents after their preferred major party, the way Hare-Clark works with our political landscape, your vote won’t be strong enough to focus on an independent, and will likely exhaust with the major parties.

@GrumpyGrandpa
Well done – a considered and erudite post.

GG – thanks for that clarification. Correct – vote 1 for an Independent as 1st preference, vote 2 for an Independent as 2nd preference, and so on… I vote for individuals, based on their proven individual performance, character and community profile, not parties. No votes/preferences for any Greens.

@Acton
A very practical approach.

I’m not interested in party-hack lemmings who vote along party lines. The good thing is, an independent controlled LA, for the next 4 years, won’t be any worse than what we’ve got – and if they don’t measure up, then they get punted as single termers.

I haven’t decided the order of my final independent vote – in my electorate it’s between IFC and Strong, but I will ensure that they are all preferenced ahead of Labor, Liberal and Greens thus ensuring the highest chance of one of them getting up.

Actually if you had single member constituencies rather than Hare-Clark, the result would be majority Labor governments the whole time. Liberals would have less seats than they currently do and Independents would have no chance of getting anyone elected unless they had concentrated hyper-local support. Is that what you would prefer?

My question is to Mr Barr. Will he vow to serve a full term if elected?

Will the future of the Canberra International Dragway and the V8 Supercars be discussed.

Gees I hope not!

Who wants to talk about bringing more environmental degradation to Canberra when there are more important issues to discuss!

I can see an argument for a dragway facility, but the idea of getting V8 Supercars back here is laughable at best lol. It was an utter disaster first time around, and would be even worse a second time. Just go and read the audit report and file it away in the ‘never again’ bin.

A question specifically for Shane Rattenbury. In the RiotACT article by Oliver Jacques Mr Rattenbury was quoted as saying “the Greens are a real alternative for people in Canberra”. Given his party has been part of a Government coalition for the last several terms how will they act differently if elected in the next? Will the Greens again form a Coalition with Labor or if the non-majority partner would they prefer to sit on the crossbench?

I’d prefer if Rattenbury was voted into.political.oblivion.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.