News.com.au is reporting comments by the head of the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs on plans to equip public servants with iPads instead of laptops.
A device that’s not great for actually doing anything seems almost ideal for some sections of the public service.
And while they’re expensive for tablets they’re certainly cheaper than laptops.
(Although a lot more could be done with a cheap netbook)
Loading ...
touchscreen tablets are great for some things and terrible for others, for instance designers and developers often need more power and more screens. If all the apps, sites and accessories you need work, then it doesn’t really matter which device is running them.
I wonder how many gov sites and intranets are iPad compatible? Seems like a fair few are ancient and only support IE6.
At SES level they don’t do much real work anyway, may as well give them a shiny toy to play with, it might keep them distracted long enough for everyone else to get some work done.
Er… Centrelink and DHS have had them for quite some time now – It’s not a new development. They sure are handy for checking emails for the busy worker on the go, but in terms of full functionality they are hitting some pretty big walls. I use mine for facebook – It makes it fun, somehow.
Good luck getting any sort of innovation past the glacial IT mob in the APS before it is also out-of-date.
emd said :
No, what they want an iPad for, is so that next time they go to an inter-agency meeting, *they* have the shiny new toy to show off and studiously tap on to very little effect.
If you collected data on,
dates of inter-agency meetings
and
dates of Executive requests to their IT departments for iPads
you would find a spectacular correlation.
Complete waste of time. As JB says.
Obviously the girls at facsia want something to play around with in their numerous meetings. I cannot see how serious word processing and spreadsheeting is going to be done on these things. I think ipads are great, but they are not a replacement for a notebook PC IMHO.
Notebooks are for staff to remote connect to the network from out of the office (ie. home) and in alot of cases, replace their desktop pc at work so they can work from any office location.
frankie said :
Exactly…that’s the benefit. Shouldn’t the argument be “how many civil servants have their own fixed desktop PC when they only need it for a fraction of it’s capabilities”?
Many jobs are just inspections, enquiries, surveys, asset updates, production of work orders …they can be done better from the field with locationing and photographing added in, then you can also reduce the blanket cost on accommodation, permanent parking, staff travelling time to work just to clock in and check worklists or emails, then go out.
That’s where future savings come from if you want to protect the actual jobs. It’s cultural change and enhanced flexibility…..staff are performance managed on their production output, rather than what time they got in.
The employee benefits because they start work when they like, can go straight out to site, manage their own workload and go when the work is done…just like the private sector. If they don’t get the work done, then deal with them.
It’s not for every job, but there must be thousands of jobs where this would improve their efficiency.
I don’t know the deal with Apple….or if it could have been bettered by an Android tablet and app., but the principle is sound.
Filling out forms electronically and sending the data via 3g or wifi directly to an online database seems to be where an iPad or tablet would be particularly useful. The APS certainly does make Australia fill out a loooooot of forms 🙂
Agencies such as the ATO, FaHCSIA, ABS and others would definitely benefit from the portability and quicker access to real time data while out in the field with the public.
WoodenAgent said :
Looking at my iPhone’s keyboard settings now, for the software keyboard it offers QWERTY, AZERTY and QWERTZ only, but the hardware keyboard settings it has all the international keyboard layouts, including Dvorak.
AndyC said :
They are a Portable Electronic Device (PED) and are covered under the DSD guidelines for security of same (for what they’re worth, which is vanishingly little).
Gerry-Built said :
will said bluetooth offer non-qwerty layouts? Dvorak, for example, cuts RSI rates almost to nil, and I’ve been using it for about 8 years, with no recurrence of my RSI. However, I don’t know if IOS allows alternative layouts. (Blackberry doesn’t.)
Yes, I think you’re onto something there. The iPad is more or less a network-only device, and can be configured to not store anything locally. Maybe they will make the iPad secure that way.
But the bigger issue is that people are very vain, and will want the latest toys…. UNLESS the new technology is for the workers or the public, eg Sametime and SMS passwords, in which case, the technology ABSOLUTELY MUST be prevented from proliferating.
Only the demigods may have ideas or new tech.
Jordo said :
Bollocks. Apple didn’t even starting making stuff with Intel chips until 2006.
Middle aged execs with little real knowledge of IT are not going to use any device to the best of it’s capability, so part of the trick is giving them a device that intuitively works the way they expect it to for the task they are doing. If they want to read email, browse websites, and manage an address book and diary, an iPad or Android tablet sounds like a good fit. And a trial of 40 people sounds like a good number to really get a feel for how well it suits the user group. I would guess they already tried out a few devices of different types before they decided on this iPad trial.
As for usefulness, it might be a great idea. I use an iPad and travel sometimes for work. It has been great so far. I take meeting notes and email them to myself and others on way back to the office, I can look up maps to find my way to places, use Skype, read meeting agendas or bigger documents on the plane… I could do all the same things with an Android tablet or smartphone, I just like the iPad form factor and the customer service from Mac if there is a hardware failure.
Gerry-Built said :
so basically they should buy a netbook with 3g inbuilt.
tommy said :
Any Bluetooth keyboard will hook up nicely…
Davo111 said :
I got my macbook in 2003 with a core2 duo 2.something ghz and she’s still sweet as + runs all the latest whizbangery no worries.
Jordo said :
Call me in 8 years if you’re still using your mac book pro + iphone, but i doubt you’ll pull it off. Most laptops and computers have a life of around 3 years (perhaps 5 max) and most companies will have a policy similar to this.
Bennop said :
Still, its not necessary to buy 40 ipads. Buy 5, after the first 2 weeks interview them and find out what if they enjoyed using it fulltime. If they all want to keep their ipads (and surrender their blackberries on the spot) THEN order 35 more. I’m guessing the people who think this is a great idea have been playtesting ipads at jb hifi and have never used one for real work.
banjo said :
see this is the problem. These discussions should involve asking IT for suggested models and then the group choosing from that list. At least IT would be able to consider things like encryption, strength of product, battery life etc
Jordo said :
Did you just pull those figures from out of your arse?
Davo111 said :
If it was our choice (the IT department) they probably would be, infact we were hoping blackberry would hurry up with their “playbook”, atleasts we already have the infrastructure to support that. Unfortunately the horse has already bolted on this one…