17 October 2024

‘Just doing my job’: Bushnell responds to being flipped off by Liberals leader

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
63

Liberals leader Elizabeth Lee gives Ian Bushnell the middle finger on Wednesday. Photo: ABC.

Veteran Region journalist Ian Bushnell says he’s frustrated at being made the centre of a viral news story after Canberra Liberals leader Elizabeth Lee made a rude gesture at him.

In an incident that’s made national headlines, Ms Lee was caught on camera raising her middle finger to Mr Bushnell while he had his back turned to her after questioning her at a press conference.

Ms Lee later went on radio to apologise for her actions.

“I was just doing my job,” Mr Bushnell said.

“It’s very awkward for a journalist to be at the centre of the story rather than just reporting on it.”

During a tense press conference, Mr Bushnell pressed Ms Lee on the costs of the promises she had been making during the campaign.

The Liberals leader responded by saying she was in discussions with Treasury about her policy costings.

“Isn’t it a bit late in the day to be having these discussions?” Mr Bushnell asked.

“Isn’t it late in the day for [Chief Minister] Andrew Barr to still have not submitted costings for his policies?” Ms Lee replied.

READ ALSO Lee needs to learn not to shoot the messenger

The Region journalist asked her not to deflect and to answer his question.

“Are you finished?” Mr Lee asked.

“I am, answer the question,” Mr Bushnell responded.

“Are you finished or not? I will answer the question in my own way, Ian. You don’t get to dictate how I answer the question,” Ms Lee said.

A minute later, when the press conference ended, Ms Lee raised her middle finger at the journalist after he’d walked away and had his back turned to her.

She expressed remorse for her action later in the day.

“Earlier, I engaged in poor behaviour that was unprofessional, and I apologise,” Ms Lee said.

“I don’t excuse my behaviour. It was poor behaviour, and I am disappointed in myself, and in a moment of frustration, I did let the emotional side of my reaction get the better of me.”

Mr Bushnell, a former news editor of The Canberra Times, has worked in media and communications in the capital for 29 years.

He said attacks on journalists were now more common than they were earlier in his career.

“Trying to attack journalists for just doing their job is something the public should be extremely concerned about. It undermines the democratic process,” he said.

Some commenters on social media have criticised Mr Bushnell for antagonising Ms Lee.

“I reject any suggestion of being unprofessional. As a practising journalist, I’m there to ask questions on behalf of the public. For me, it gets frustrating when politicians evade or deflect questions,” Mr Bushnell said.

“Ms Lee is the only politician I’ve had these sorts of exchanges with. I’m on good terms with everyone else, and I thought I was on good terms with her.”

The ACT election is on Saturday, 19 October.

Join the conversation

63
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I suppose journalists and the public for that matter are getting sick of politicians not answering simple but important questions because the public won’t like the truth.

For instance this is not the first ACT election where the Liberals have promised to somehow do more with less taxes and yet they still cannot answer how they think it’s possible.

Is that because the answer is something like “higher rates and levees combined with mass job losses within the ACT public service”?

For Lee, it’s both a good thing and a bad thing that this (potentially fatal) “Mark Latham handshake” moment, occurred only two days before the election.

The good thing – many ACT electors, who may be impacted by the action and as such consider it gives cause to (as per the survey) ‘worry about her performance’, will have already voted … particularly as there has been prominent encouragement to vote early.

The bad thing – many ACT electors, who may be impacted by the action and as such consider it gives cause to (as per the survey) ‘worry about her performance’, have not yet voted.

I think Bushnell has a hide claiming the high ‘journalistic moral high ground’, for he is far from a credible journalist, being more of the ilk of Andrew Bolt, a biased political commentator. Nevertheless, he was doing his job.

As a result of this matter, it’s harsh but fair to ask the question – if Lee cracks under the pressure of a few months of campaigning, how will she handle the pressure of the CM role over the next 4 years – and the inevitable barrage from the left-favourable media?

While it was always going to be tough for Lee to emerge victorious, from tomorrow’s election, the incline on that slope has just become steeper.

It is an insult to voters intelligence for any political party or candidate to offer uncosted policies. For many federal and state/territory election cycles we have been fed nonsense about releasing policy and, or, costing as late as the Friday before the official polling day, when pre-poll voting has been available already for two weeks. In Germany, policies with costings must be released six months before the poll, to permit, nay encourage, discussion, debate and assessment among voters. What a concept! We are insulted daily with distracting, often unverifiable claims and ‘promises’ from politicians. Those promising more with less just add to the insult. There are too few actual ‘journalists’ left, and I expect them to ask questions, especially of those seeking to woo us with sleight-of-hand promises.

Love Ian Bushnell! Ian is right to hold Lee accountable to respond to the question. None of the liberal policy propositions make sense. They are not costed and they are misleading. Lee deflected the question. Poor form and poor behaviour. Not a good look for Liberal leadership.

Which Labor policies are costed?

Just doing his job says Bushnell. Yes, but the manner in which he does it is important. Good journalists ask questions rather than demanding answers in such a rude way.

The Region journalist asked her not to deflect and to answer his question.

“Are you finished?” Mr Lee asked.

“I am, answer the question,” Mr Bushnell responded.

Mr Bushnell was plain rude. How dare he talk to anyone like that, demanding an answer, rather than asking politely. He deserved a much more direct reprimand for his complete lack of good manners. To then complain about her very mild reaction to his rudeness. Pathetic!

Bright Spark6:58 pm 17 Oct 24

A firm favourite election moment for me too – flipping the bird to a biased, inflammatory left-wing reporter who is supposed to report on evidence? I’m sure many more flipping birds are heading the same way in the form of votes!

AnotherGrumpyOldMan6:33 pm 17 Oct 24

Elizabeth you’re a legend. If I hadn’t already voted I would vote for you

Yet another story on the ACT LNP and yet another story trying to paint the LNP in an unfavourable light. Must be an ACT election coming up? Talk about journalistic bias and its all favourable to the left and not the LNP. Now why could that possibly be?

GrumpyGrandpa3:44 pm 17 Oct 24

Lee was definitely of line, and for a person in her position, we expect better behaviour.
That said, Ian Bushnell doesn’t come across as an objective journalist. To me, his articles have a clear political bias.
In hindsight, maybe Lee just should have refused to take questions from him.

Scott Nofriends3:38 pm 17 Oct 24

Good on Ms Lee for showing some personality.

I’ll tell you the costings I care about:
Council rates up 10 % on average
Land tax up 9% on average
$15 for the privilege to park your car to get to work, and most importantly
$6 for a pack of Tim Tams

I agree with Mr Bushnell that’s he’s just doing his journalistic job to properly question Ms Lee. She reacted very poorly.

Unfortunately however , he hasn’t done his journalistic job to properly question Mr Barr’s endless budget deficits, record ACT Government debt, endless housing, education and health failures, and Mr Bushnell has repeatedly parroted ACT Government Light Rail media releases without fact checks or proper media scrutiny.

Good journalism has to cut both ways.

Indeed, but is that relevant to the non answer Ms Lee have?

Sure Andrew Barr should answer questions but how is Ms Lee’s response predicated on him doing so?

If she is transparent and open and wants to show up the incumbent why not answer the question to help her cause?

Regardless of whether Andrew Barr, Shane Rattenbury, or whoever else isn’t answering questions, why does she have to keep the bar at the same low level?

To be fair she did answer his question just not to his satisfaction. He then spoke over another journalist seeking to do their job to keep the argument going. That was the point she asked about Barr

Vickie O’Malley7:21 pm 17 Oct 24

Ian Bushnell should be asking Barr those questions. Elizabeth has only done to Ian what I’d like to do to Andrew Barr!

With insults, interjections and flipping off a journo for asking a question, the veneer of Elizabeth Lee as a moderate who will keep the far right loons in check is slipping.

Laurence De B. Anderson12:49 pm 17 Oct 24

Fabulous! Ms Lee gets my vote! Rude, biased journalism gets appropriate response!

My sympathies to Ian Bushnell to discover, quite spectacularly, that Elizabeth Lee has been poking fun at him behind his back!

Ms Lee has form with this type of behaviour, just ask Giulia with a “G”!

Bushnell has earned it with his abundantly clear bias. I’m honestly surprised she would bother to engage with him at all.

Ms Lee was out of line but it’s a bit rich of Mr Bushnell to claim he’s just doing his job. It’s clear from his articles (and the comments that follow them) that for whatever reason he holds her to a higher standard than Mr Barr. Does he care to comment on why that is? Is it because she’s a woman, or a Liberal? Or is he just mates with Mr Barr and so unwilling to use the same measuring stick? Either way, it would be good to hear from the man himself as to whether he believes he holds Mr Barr to a different standard and if so why.

A journalist’s Job is unbiased, balanced and fair reporting…..unless their Media Masthead has activist editorial tendencies.. and thereby limited reach and lower readership..

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.