25 June 2024

Keating nukes Dutton over the Coalition's energy plan

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
16

Former Labor Prime Minister Paul Keating has severely criticised Peter Dutton over the Coalition’s nuclear energy push. Photo: National Press Club.

Paul Keating has launched a scathing attack on Peter Dutton, calling him a charlatan, a peddler of damage and an inveterate climate change denier.

The former Labor prime minister held little back in attacking the current Leader of the Opposition over the Coalition’s plan for seven nuclear power stations to be located across the country.

Last week, Mr Dutton named the sites where he wants to establish nuclear reactors as a way to secure Australia’s energy future.

He provided no costings for the plan and gave few details of how it would roll out or how he envisioned the nuclear stations would operate.

Mr Dutton ridiculed the Federal Government’s path to net-zero emissions, saying Labor’s over-reliance on renewable energy would not deliver that outcome.

But in a statement issued by the former Labor PM on Sunday (23 June) under the heading ‘Peter Dutton: Climate Denialist – Peddler of Danger’, Mr Dutton was ridiculed in one of the most severe Keating rebukes.

“Peter Dutton is a charlatan – an inveterate climate change denialist,” Mr Keating wrote.

“A denialist now seeking to camouflage his long-held denialism in an industrial fantasy – resort to the most dangerous and expensive energy source on the face of the earth – nuclear power.”

READ ALSO Dutton unveils his vision for seven nuclear power plants

The Labor stalwart also took a strong swipe at former Liberal prime minister Tony Abbott, who scrapped the carbon tax introduced by the Gillard government.

Keating said that in advocating for nuclear energy, Dutton was continuing his party’s “manic denialism, first articulated by Tony Abbott over a decade ago” and was turning his back on the “most debated, most discussed problem of the Industrial Age”, that being carbon and carbon sequestration.

“Dutton, like Abbott, will do everything he can do to de-legitimise renewables and stand in the way of their use as the remedy nature has given us to underwrite our life on earth,” Keating wrote.

“Only the most wicked and cynical of individuals would foist such a blight on an earnest community like Australia. A community which fundamentally believes in truth and decency and which relies on its political system to advance those ideals.

“Dutton, in his low rent opportunism, mocks the decency and earnestness which recognises that carbon must be abated and with all urgency.

“As bad as that, by his blatant opposition to renewables, Dutton calls into question and deprecates all the government has done to provide Australian business with a reliable and dependable framework for investment in renewables – the one thing, however late in the piece, the country needs to rely upon to lift the carbon menace off its back.”

Keating labelled nuclear energy technology as belonging to another world era and urged no one to listen to the Opposition Leader’s suggestion that renewable energy was an idea solely embraced and endorsed by leftwing advocates.

READ ALSO Government appoints former NSW Liberal Treasurer Matt Kean to lead Climate Change Authority

“No person interested in public policy – regardless of their affiliations or beliefs, should consider, let alone endorse Dutton’s backwardness, his unreal world view that the most lethal technology of another age is a contemporary substitute for nature’s own remedy,” he wrote.

“Dutton’s policy, of its essence, is that human-induced climate change is a fraudulent concept propagated by environmentalists and left-leaning fellow travellers – a concept he believes should be deplored and opposed.”

Mr Dutton has responded with a statement of his own, which in turn didn’t treat the former PM with kid gloves – describing the Keating statement as a “petulant outburst”.

He also took the opportunity to again condemn Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s push for renewable energy.

“There is zero chance of reaching net zero by 2050 without zero-emission nuclear power. Mr Keating should know this,” Mr Dutton wrote.

“Under Labor’s ‘renewables only’ approach, it will cost $1.3 trillion to rewire our nation. If you think you’re paying a lot now, wait until these costs are reflected in your energy bills.

“I’ll stand up for Australian families and small businesses for cheaper, cleaner, and consistent power.

“Mr Keating can continue to be a sad and despondent character, doing Mr Albanese’s bidding, while Australian families suffer under Labor’s energy trainwreck.

“If only we had Labor leaders like the late great Bob Hawke who embraced nuclear power as being ‘a win for the environment and an essential part of the attacking that must be made on this grievous and dangerous global warming. It would be a win for the global environment and a win for Australia’.”

Join the conversation

16
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

A lifelong Labor party member openly criticises Liberal party policy? I for one am shocked. What next, Howard criticising the Labor party? Nah, that’d never happen.

“He provided no costings for the plan and gave few details of how it would roll out or how he envisioned the nuclear stations would operate.”

It’s hilarious that in all of these articles, it’s never mentioned that Labor also hasn’t provided any detailed plans, costings or even estimates for their plans to get to net zero but never seem to be called on that fact by the media.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am critical of both sides of politics for this garbage but at least I am consistent; I’d just like to see our media hold both sides to the same standard.

Bob,
The problem is that’s not remotely true, significant work has occurred on the net zero plans, although the longer term detail for full decarbonisation of the economy in each sector is still in development.

https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction/net-zero

For the electricity grid component, all of the plans are detailed and costed out by AEMO in the integrated systems plan

https://aemo.com.au/en/energy-systems/major-publications/integrated-system-plan-isp/2024-integrated-system-plan-isp

So no, Duttons plan to use nuclear for some? component of the transition is not remotely equal to the amount of actual research, plans and committed investment that is already being delivered and supported by government and private industry.

I’d also point out that when the Liberals were in charge, they also were backing a lot of this work, the current nuclear debate is just a political sideshow designed to buy votes, score cheap political points and cause delays. Dutton knows he will never have to deliver on any of it.

That’s wonderful chewy but as stated, there are lots of aspirational targets and high level plans without DETAILS, without costings and without even estimates of what this is going to cost the Australian taxpayer. You can try your usual strawman arguments and deflections but the fact is that none of this has been provided by the Labor party any more than it has for the Liberal plan and you know it.

Bob,
So you don’t want to read the actual plans and costings then, continuing your charade that they are somehow equal.

There’s no strawmen here, the plans to transition the electricity grid to renewables in particular are fully detailed and costed and even incorporated into long term investment plans.

The Liberal party’s latest policy is nothing but a thought bubble, chosen only for political reasons with no basis in reality.

And “you would know it” too, if you would actually read the detailed industry and government information available rather than pretending it doesn’t exist.

No, I 100% do want to read the detailed plans and costings from BOTH sides, as I have repeatedly stated. Where are they from either side? The difference is that the media only seem interested in commenting on the lack of them on one side of politics.

“read the detailed industry and government information available rather than pretending it doesn’t exist.”

You actually call the high level information that you linked previously “detailed”? Where are the specifics? Current and projected power use and how it will be generated, how and where will the energy storage facilities be built to replace the coal plants, using which technology? at what cost to the taxpayer? How many new gas plants will be required? Where will they be located.

You may be happy to accept high level ideologically based fluff and a “trust me bro” from your preferred side of politics rather than actual detailed, costed plans but most people won’t.

Bob,
They have lists of committed, planned and future projects identified in the documents. If you read the supporting references and modelling information, they have various scenarios, technologies costs, risks etc. compared and assessed. AEMO tracks the investment pipeline releasing regular information on how this is tracking to targets.

What exactly does Duttons nuclear plan have in comparison? You keep saying they are the same, but they clearly aren’t.

Your expectation on detail seems to be far in excess of what would exist for any long term infrastructure, investment and transition plan. You realise that the government is not actually proposing to fund most of this infrastructure as the industry is privatised right? All of the government investment is clearly outlined both in budget documents and policies like the Capacity Investment Scheme, with tenders already underway for the first project funding.
https://www.dcceew.gov.au/energy/renewable/capacity-investment-scheme

But you think Duttons plan is the “same”. Well sorry, I won’t take your “trust me bro” approach

Oh, I also forgot to comment on this:
“from your preferred side of politics”

Which side would that be Bob?

Given Keatings advanced age, i don’t think that the age of advanced nuclear reactors are going to trouble him.

Keyboard Warrior9:56 pm 25 Jun 24

Why does the media keep wheeling out old farts like Keating, Howard etc.
Their opinions are of no interest to the world, chuff off and live your life of luxury on the superannuation we have gifted you.
Do so gracefully, and quietly please.

I think Keating has been drinking too much CCP Koolaid

No surprises there. Keating should keep.his opinions to himself. He stuffed the country up back then so any opinions he has should be ignored. Was hopeless then but thinks he’s some sort of demigod figure people are interested in. Full of his own self importance.

David Watson2:50 pm 25 Jun 24

Mr Keating’s negative response to Nuclear was as predictable as the ABC’s negative coverage of the subject from day one. Haven’t we learnt from the Badgery Creek international airport fiasco where the inevitability and sensibility of the project was delayed by minorities for years. Find us leaders who can find long term solutions that benefit the country and not minority naysayers. Today’s AFR’s revelation that wind power generation from 1 Apr is flat compared to the same quarter in 2021 despite an increase of 2500 megawatts of wind capacity having been added to the Network should show that overpriced renewables alone cannot solve the problem.

It’s poked its head out again and had a whinge. 6 more weeks before another “recession we had to have”.

doomeddisciple1:17 pm 25 Jun 24

I’ll take a recession over nuclear waste for 5% of the grid

There is indeed a need for another recession that we had to have but haven’t had yet. Due to the gutless RBA that holds down the rise of the interest rate, the whole nation is propping up the real estate interests for far too long.

Capital Retro11:52 am 25 Jun 24

Sigh.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.