Skip to content Skip to main navigation

Business

We mean business
Contact us today to get results

Most contractors employed via a recruitment agency to face around 7% pay cut from 1 July

By aaa123 14 June 2014 50

The ACT government proposes to implement a retrospective change to the payroll tax system which will apply from July 1 (although it is not expected to be passed until later in the year).

This is the details of the change, as best I understand it.

The change will affect most contractors who are employed via a recruitment agency and use a management company.  It will mean that most of these contractors will lose their payroll tax exemption.

In anticipation of the change becoming law in it’s current form, from 1 July recruitment agencies are expected to begin deducting 6.85% of the gross payments which are paid to the management company and then forwarded to the contractor by the management company after deducting such things as admin fees and insurances (and withholding super, PAYG tax etc).

As the payroll tax will be applied to the gross payment (with the recruitment agency having no knowledge of how much of that payment is returned to the contractor in the form of income and other benefits), the % of income that the contractor will lose will be greater than 6.85% as it applies to money the contractor never receives in the form of income, fringe benefits etc. I believe that if the contractor received a benefit from the management company that an employer might be exempt from a payroll tax liability under other circumstances, the contractor would still be charged payroll tax on that component.

It seems there will be no exemptions in place for contracts signed prior to the announcement ie where the contractor did not have the opportunity to factor this extra cost into their negotiations and rate charged.

It seems that contractors are faced with a choice:

  • Dump the management company and go direct through the recruitment agency (assuming that there would be a reduction in administration costs to somewhat offset the income loss).  However this would be a guarantee of payroll tax liability even if the legislation does not pass.  It may also not be a good option for people with salary packaging or other arrangements in place with their management company.
  • Hope that there is a change to the proposed legislation so that the tax is not retrospective or is delayed until next year.  If that happens the contractor would (hopefully) receive a refund of the payroll tax withheld by the agency.

I would think that there would also be a major impact on businesses providing the management company services.

What’s Your opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
50 Responses to
Most contractors employed via a recruitment agency to face around 7% pay cut from 1 July
Filter
Showing only Website comments
Order
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newst
milkman 4:20 pm 21 Jun 14

Frustrated said :

Good.

Considering all the PS bashing, contractors or consultants are one of the biggest drains on taxpayers.

Consultants and contractors are the ones making the decisions and doing the more complex work. If the regular p#$es were capable, contractors and consultants wouldn’t exist.

Frustrated 9:17 pm 20 Jun 14

Good.

Considering all the PS bashing, contractors or consultants are one of the biggest drains on taxpayers.

aaa123 8:42 pm 20 Jun 14

aaa123 said :

So, if I can’t afford the unilateral pay reduction then they will graciously allow me to become unemployed. Nice. Thank you very much Candle/Clarius

To add as this correspondence was so recent I had a whole weekend to decide if I wanted to become unemployed or not. After that I guess they charge me penalties if I want to get out. Nice Candle/Clarius.

aaa123 8:37 pm 20 Jun 14

Also sharing part of another email I got from my recruitment agency, Clarius, (aka Candle) recently:

Clarius will commence withholding the statutory amount for ACT Payroll Tax (currently 6.85%) as of July 1

Neither Clarius, (client name deleted) or (third party name deleted) will be increasing what they pay for your services based on these legislative changes.

I understand that these legislative changes may present a significant impact on your financial situation and appreciate that you may need to give it some consideration. If you are unable to continue in your role with (client name deleted) as a result, please advise us by COB Monday 23rd June so that we can convey this to (client name deleted) and work with them to ensure that a suitable replacement is found to minimise the impact to the project/business.

In amongst all their compassionate comments such as the above they managed to have a sob and cry about how low their margins are even though they freely entered into that and the margins costs have not changed at all for them.

So, if I can’t afford the unilateral pay reduction then they will graciously allow me to become unemployed. Nice. Thank you very much Candle/Clarius

aaa123 8:23 pm 20 Jun 14

Just out of interest, I thought I would share the “negotiations” my recruiter have been doing with their contractors and I encourage others to do so. Let’s compare how much we are being shafted and what if anything the recruiters are doing to help share the pain.

Love it how my recruiter says they will immediately advise. They still haven’t advised of the recent announcement to change the start date to 1 October.

It took them a couple of weeks to provide any response to the proposed changes (not even a we know you are all concerned but don’t know yet). All our emails were completely ignored by Clarius for some time. I got a response only after saying that I was going to change recruiters since they wouldn’t respond to me.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Nicole Shepherd wrote:

2014-15 ACT Budget – proposed Bill – removal of the ‘genuine employer’ exemption at Schedule 2, Part 2.3, section 2.14 (1)(g) of the ACT Payroll Tax Act 2011.

Good afternoon

As you may have already heard, in the recent 2014-15 ACT Budget a Bill was introduced to remove the ‘genuine employer’ exemption at Schedule 2, Part 2.3, section 2.14 (1)(g) of the ACT Payroll Tax Act 2011, effective 1 July 2014.

Our office has been involved in several discussions with industry lobbying groups and legal advisors on the proposed amendment, ensuring industry concerns and questions are appropriately filtered to the office of the ACT Commissioner. These conversations continue.

While the amendment was introduced on 5 June, the Commissioner cannot advise with certainty that it will be passed and enacted in August 2014. The Bill however is proposed to apply from 1 July 2014 to ensure that a full year is covered by these new arrangements. We have recently received an indication this date may be delayed until 1 October 2014, this is yet to be confirmed.

We appreciate this Bill amendment will have an impact on many of our Pty Ltd contractors.

In line with the ACT Commissioner’s announcement and in accordance with Pty Ltd contract agreements, Clarius will commence withholding the statutory amount for ACT Payroll Tax (currently 6.85%) as of July 1 (or a future date if advised by the ACT Commissioner) in anticipation of the legislation being enacted.

If the Bill is not enacted, Clarius Group will be happy to revert back to the current assessment of exemption, if applicable, and any monies held for payroll tax will be repaid to your subcontracting company.

We are continuing our conversations with ITCRA, industry and the ACT Commissioner. We shall immediately advise if any changes are made to the conditions explained above.

In the meantime, we are processing extensions and new contracts as usual, while taking into account the changing circumstances.

Other information as per Australian Federal Government changes from 1 July 2014:
• increase in superannuation guarantee (SG) rate from 9.25% to 9.5%; and
• Increase in minimum wage rates by 3%.

An industry meeting will take place this afternoon, we shall advise of any pertinent updates tomorrow or Monday.
Kind regards
Nicole

Nicole Shepherd | General Manager Clarius, Candle and The One Umbrella
t. 02 6113 7555 | d. 02 6113 7503 | e. nshepherd@clarius.com.au | w. http://www.clarius.com.au

Clarius Group incorporates: Alliance Recruitment | Candle | Lloyd Morgan | SouthTech | The One Umbrella | Jav IT | Ignite

Find me on LinkedIn or follow Clarius | Compare Salaries at MySalaryPortal.com

This email message and accompanying data may contain information that is confidential and subject to privilege and privacy laws. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately and delete all material pertaining to this email. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, by engaging a person or contractor referred to you by us, you acknowledge and agree to accept the terms and conditions of the relevant Clarius Group Limited division from whom such person was referred. A copy of such terms is available from us. Help protect the environment. Print only if absolutely necessary.

Dondon 5:59 pm 19 Jun 14

justsomeaussie said :

[
What value are they adding for their 30%-40% cut?

I wonder this too, I was in a fortunate situation to bring a role to an agency that was on the panel. Due to being a Federal Department and even though I had already been interviewed and offered a position I was still required to get an agent that was on the panel to represent me.

Some agencies still wanted to add 15%-20% on top of my hourly rate, for what. I still needed a payroll company to provide me my Insurance and Workers Comp. They are just rent seekers, luckily I had the opportunity to shop around and find one that would negotiate on rates all I have really gotten out of them is a couple of coffees.

Dondon 5:53 pm 19 Jun 14

Timmytron said :

aaa123 said :

I challenge Mr Barr to respond to the above

+3

Why should contractors suffer as a result of ACT Government’s poor planning?

Unfortunately it is because we are seen as a cash cow.

bikhet 4:29 pm 19 Jun 14

justsomeaussie said :

Private industry doesn’t do anything like this in recruitment so why does government?

Because private industry doesn’t have to go through all the rubbish involved in evaluation that the public service does.

If a company is on the panel they have been assessed as providing value for money and so if you choose them you don’t have to go through as rigorous a process to get a bum on a seat – or a paperclip or whatever. Whether or not they actually provide value for money is another question though.

BerraCitizen 4:08 pm 19 Jun 14

justsomeaussie said :

What value are they adding for their 30%-40% cut?

What value are they adding? Absolutely nothing! My pimp that is on the panel does absolutely nothing other than send one electronic invoice per month that is automatically generated from a web-based timesheet system I have to enter times into.

If I look at all of our family expenses (petrol, gas, water, petrol, phone, net etc), my pimp who does nothing, is the 2nd highest expense my family incurs behind my mortgage to the bank.

justsomeaussie 2:46 pm 19 Jun 14

gusmo said :

For many industries Federal government agencies employ via a panel arrangement. If you are a legitimate small business in one of those industries and not on the right panel for the right agency you have to subcontract through an employment agency who is on the correct panel. Most employment agencies are on these panels, despite not having any actual direct employees that could fill roles requested of the panel and in many cases not even understanding the fields they are on the panel for. New businesses cannot join the panels in any sort of timely fashion as they are tendered once every few years.

Can anyone explain why these panels exist in this manner anyway? Each week we see the same jobs pushed through multiple recruitment companies all taking 30-40% of the margin.

If would be much simplier for the government and the person doing the work to just cut out the middle men (recruitment companies) since they are primarily just throwing people at a position and hoping something sticks. Exactly what value add are the bringing? They can’t determine what someone’s skill set is because they aren’t a specalist, they aren’t the department so they can only read the requirements.

What value are they adding for their 30%-40% cut?

Private industry doesn’t do anything like this in recruitment so why does government?

Related Articles

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top
Copyright © 2018 Riot ACT Holdings Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
the-riotact.com | aboutregional.com.au | b2bmagazine.com.au | thisiscanberra.com

Search across the site