11 November 2024

NRL should reduce the number of teams in its competition, not expand

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
74

Rugby league administrators, once cautious about allowing a team in Canberra, are now keen to expand to Papua New Guinea. Photo: Jaye Grieshaber.

The National Rugby League (NRL) is behaving like politicians who think splurging is the best way to get out of debt.

Against all logic, they’re pushing ahead with plans to expand to a 20-team competition, even though we barely have enough talent and supporters to sustain the 17 teams currently in play.

To improve the quality of the product and grow the fan base, we need to reduce the number of teams rather than add more.

What reasons could a sporting code have for wanting to bring new franchises into their brand?

It could be that matches are always sold out, and fans are missing out on tickets. Or super skilful players are left on the bench because there’s no room in first-grade starting line-ups. Perhaps flamboyant teams are missing out on the semi-finals, given the competition for places is so intense.

None of this is happening in the NRL.

Even the grand final – the biggest match of the year – wasn’t sold out.

The average crowd for a rugby league match in 2024 at its flagship venue, Olympic Stadium, was 24,000, just a quarter of its total capacity. In April, one game between top-flight teams – the Roosters and the Bulldogs – attracted just 7000 fans, creating a dismal atmosphere in such a spacious venue.

It’s possible fans aren’t turning out in numbers as the competition is so predictable. Pundits could see a Penrith v Melbourne grand final coming as early as May.

READ ALSO Could V8 Supercars return to Canberra? Liberals say it’s a ‘no-brainer’

Seven of the last 14 matches of the regular season were won by 20 points or more.

We used to have to wait until cricket season to see half-centuries, but in the final round, both the Storm (50) and Parramatta (60) reached that milestone. The five teams who occupied the bottom spots on the ladder never really threatened to make their mark all season.

All this points to the fact that talent is sparse and spread too thinly. Adding more teams will simply dilute this further and push down average crowds, which already lag so far behind the rival AFL.

But the NRL now seems to live by the philosophy that more is always better. That’s why it expanded the final series qualification from five teams to eight teams in the 1990s.

This has diminished the quality of what should be the peak of the season. No team that finished between fourth and eighth has won the premiership in the 27-year history of the NRL. In 2024, none of the bottom half teams even made it to the preliminary final, as the favoured team won pretty much every contest.

The NRL has argued we can improve competitiveness by expanding the game to new audiences. That’s why it’s considering a franchise in Perth.

But it’s a zero-sum game – whenever an additional team comes in, an existing one must be culled to ensure the quality of matches doesn’t fall.

READ ALSO NDIS money spent on African safaris, Coalition’s FOI documents reveal

Rugby league administrators were once cautious about expansion. When the Canberra Raiders were introduced to the then NSWRL in 1982, there was concern about whether players would be prepared to go and live in a cold city away from the coast.

We proved the doubters wrong, but the optimism about attracting talent to Papua New Guinea shows we’ve gone too far in the other direction (not to mention the value of spending $600 million taxpayer dollars to support this venture).

It’s time to put the kibosh on this grand vision, to live within our means and focus on improving what we have now.

Join the conversation

74
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

As long as it’s an even number, the bye round is a nightmare for supercoach

Gregg Heldon11:10 am 19 Oct 24

I’m happy to expand to 18 teams. The big issue is where the 18th team is based.
The other issue is relocating a Sydney team elsewhere. There have been a few Sydney teams under performing over the last few years and have dwindling supporter bases and revenue streams.
Apart from bunker decisions, which is, at best, inconsistent, the games is tracking okay, as far as I’m concerned. I’ve been a fan for over 50 years.

It’s totally correct. Andrew Johns said the same thing probably because he needs to watch all the games each week – basically halve the number of teams to increase the standard.

As someone who grew up watching rugby league religiously as a kid I hate to say but I enjoy the AFL more now. They seem to have better athletes, the game is more exciting and unpredictable and it’s a much better product. The NRL has become far too structured, the bunker and general refereeing is a painful joke and most of the teams are just not worth watching.

The NRL gameplay in a way feels like it’s become too scientific. Plus players switching teams as often as they change their underwear hurts fans becoming really loyal to their own team in the way they used to be. Equalisation just doesn’t work in the NRL at all.

They also need to shorten the season by around 5-6 games because the long season is such a war of attrition and it feels like the top 4 and 8 is set by the mid-way point of the season anyhow and the season drags on for no good reason.

You can tell the AFL invests in grassroots. My daughter is 6 years old on the Gold Coast – rugby league heartland – and she has done a couple of seasons of Auskick at the school already, they give them a free Suns bag and merch and some free tickets to the AFL. And the NRL is invisible and does nothing like it at all.

Heywood Smith11:22 am 17 Oct 24

@peter – So why does the Australian taxpayer need to fork out $600mil for a team in PNG is the NRL are loaded from all this revenue you speak of and ‘know what they are doing’. Where is all this money disappearing to?

BTW all this talk of whether the league can expand misses that the Dolphins have two very successful years to start, they’ve just missed the finals twice despite horror injury runs and have already established a fantastic rivalry with the Broncos.

Suspect Observer9:41 am 17 Oct 24

This period of dominance by the Panthers and the frequency of lopsided matches in the NRL is largely a product of the six-again rule, which has changed the game at such a fundamental level that it’s effectively a different sport to the Rugby League that existed prior to 2020.

PVL has basically morphed Rugby League from a sport with a dedicated hardcore fanbase to mindless garbage for unthinking consumers, and the NRL is more than happy to lean into the hype and spin around it at the moment. Anybody hoping for positive change any time soon is fooling themselves.

I agree the six-again rule sucks and it should go. But that’s not why the Panthers have been dominant. They’ve been dominant because of the effort, money and time they’ve put into their junior development.

Suspect Observer10:47 am 17 Oct 24

The Panthers junior development is a convenient myth to obfuscate the real issues.

The Raiders, Newcastle, North Queensland, Broncos, etc, etc, all have similar junior programs, many of which were considered more successful until five seconds ago, and the Panthers own juniors system had existed for decades beforehand…

Penrith go 7th, 5th, and 10th in the three seasons prior to 2020. Rules change for 2020, largely through chance their team happened to be best placed to exploit the new rules (mobile pack, lighting quick backs, not carrying much weight, capable of dealing with cardio and up-tempo play style the rules now forced), and they appear in every grand final since. They only lose 1 game in 2020, 3 in 2021, 4 in 2022, 6 in 2023, you get the idea.

Something has to go seriously, seriously, wrong for that to happen in a professional league with strict competition balancing and a salary cap, and it’s clear what the major change between 2019 and 2020 was, and it wasn’t Johnny the local 18 year old making his debut in 2020.

“The Panthers junior development is a convenient myth to obfuscate the real issues.”

Over their four-title run, the Panthers have lost the following test and Origin players:
James Tamou
Matt Burton
Kurt Capewell
Viliame Kikau
Api Koroisau
Stephen Crichton
Spencer Leniu
Jarome Luai
James Fisher-Harris

They’ve also lost Mansour and Turuva (who is still young and has the potential to play rep footy) on big-money deals.

So this is a nonsense take.

I don’t mind the addition of new teams. As long as they provide a healthy local appetite.

Not too sure how the PNG experiment will go but I can imagine most teams won’t want to play over there. Maybe a PNG team could base itself here?

With crowds – you won’t always fill out capacity. However, all clubs should at least get a quality stadium to play at. An improved spectator experience will absolutely generate more fans.

Locally a PNG team will have massive support. IDK how the PNG team would go with the security arrangements, it will be a focus of the bid. But if they get that right and their junior development it will be a boon for Rugby League.

And very sensible of the Federal government to support the PNG bid to develop “soft power” in the Pacific region. One of the dumbest things that Tony Abbott did (and there were many) was killing Radio Australia which fed Australian news and views into the Pacific only for China to seek to fill the void.

What a load of absolute nonsense.

Firstly crowds are up in the NRL:
“The NRL is on track to break its crowd attendance record for the second consecutive season as fans flock to the football ahead of the finals.” See SMH August 31.

Viewership ratings on Nine and Kayo are also up (do a quick Google search to find numerous articles discussing the figures).

As for this ” Pundits could see a Penrith v Melbourne grand final coming as early as May”…oh please, the Roosters were one of the red hot favourites early in the season, everyone also assumed the Broncos would finish what they started in 2023 when they were literally 10 minutes from the title.

“No team that finished between fourth and eighth has won the premiership in the 27-year history of the NRL.” You do get that’s by design right? The top 8 keeps fans engaged for longer into the season and the top four ensures that the best teams have the best chance of making it through. Eventually, some team will win it from 5th-8th and it will be glorious for that club and their fans.

As for Penrith dominating that will end one day too. That’s part of the fun.

PS. A 50 pt scoreline in rugby league doesn’t mean it wasn’t an entertaining game, neither does the low score.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.