11 February 2022

Opposition accuses Greens of profiting from taxpayer money, says election 'profit' should be paid back

| Lottie Twyford
Join the conversation
ACT Greens

ACT Greens Andrew Braddock, Johnathan Davis, Rebecca Vassarotti, Shane Rattenbury, Emma Davidson and Jo Clay. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The Opposition has accused the ACT Greens of profiting from taxpayer funds throughout its 2020 election campaign and has called on them to pay the money back.

Canberra Liberals Deputy Leader Jeremy Hanson has also associated the excess funds from the campaign with the ACT Greens opening a new office in time for a federal election campaign.

According to the ACT Electoral Commission, the ACT Greens only spent a total of $136,839 on their campaign but received $313,539 in public funding.

“The ACT Greens have since opened a new campaign office in Braddon, saying they intend to use it ‘for the 2022 Federal Election,” Mr Hanson said.

“This is not how electoral funding is intended to be used. It is provided to reduce the influence of big donors, not use ACT taxpayer money to fund federal campaigns.”

Jeremy Hanson

Deputy Opposition Leader Jeremy Hanson wants the ACT Greens to pay their election profit back. Photo: Region Media.

But the ACT Greens say the $176,700 discrepancy is simply because they are not required to disclose all expenditure, and the ‘profits’ don’t take into account costs such as paying campaign staff.

ACT Greens Leader Shane Rattenbury disagreed with the premise of Mr Hanson’s claim of profits being used to fund a federal political campaign.

“The ACT Greens did not profit from the ACT Election in 2020. During the election campaign, we spent more than the income we received from the ACT Electoral Commission. However, the reporting categories didn’t include some of our costs, such as paying our campaign staff,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“To be clear, this funding was spent on genuine election costs.”

READ ALSO Greens MLA hits back at Chief Minister: $2000 for an e-bike is a financial burden for some

Mr Hanson moved a motion in the Legislative Assembly on Thursday (10 February) calling on the ACT Greens to pay back to the ACT what he says is a $176,700 profit.

Labor and the Greens, however, used their numbers in the chamber to amend the motion and remove the requirement to pay back any money.

Instead, the government will be required to consider the recommendations of an Assembly inquiry into the 2020 election.

Parties receive taxpayer funding at a rate of around $8 per eligible vote.

At the 2020 election. ACT Labor received $877,847 in public funding while the Canberra Liberals received $313,539. Both spent more than this on their campaigns, according to the ACT Electoral Commission.

After the election, the ACT Electoral Commission had recommended the Electoral Act be adjusted so that parties could not receive more public funding than they spent on their campaigns.

READ ALSO The Establishment’s outdoor gym, infinity pool and industrial style brings an edgy vibe to Gungahlin

In 2015, the ACT voted to increase the amount of public funding per vote from $2 to $8 and removed the cap on private donations.

Mr Rattenbury said it seemed Mr Hanson no longer agreed with these rules – which he’d supported at the time – because he was threatened by the Greens’ low-cost campaigning.

The now-Attorney-General was the only member of the Legislative Assembly who voted against the changes in 2015, arguing it served the “vested interests” of Labor and the Liberals.

“Unlike the Canberra Liberals, the ACT Greens are proud to be a party that is committed to enhancing Australia’s democratic process and transparent funding arrangements rather than accepting donations from corporations trying to buy influence,” Mr Rattenbury said.

Join the conversation

All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments

Show me an honest politician and I’ll show you the tooth fairy

The more things change, the more they stay the same! Those pots and kettles are rattling Jeremy! When criticising the Greens for profiting from taxpayers’ money Just don’t forget those little taxpayer bonuses the Canberra Libs have benefited from. Remember that jaunt throughout Europe by Vicki Dunne and Giulia Jones with a cost to taxpayers of $38,500 to investigate prostitution exit strategies. This was while you were leader and had your full support. Vicki, Alistair and the other ultras ran the show back then. And let’s not forget Zed Seselja and the missing Tio Faulkner, working for the Assembly while spending most of his time away from the office in his other job as the Liberal Party president. No timesheets and being paid by the taxpayer. But all was forgiven when Zed announced that he was being given a bit of slack. Gee thanks taxpayers!! Tio’s currently twiddling his thumbs in a NZ prison! Then there’s the recent investigation that found Alistair had breached the parliamentary code of conduct by failing to explain a massive increase in printing just days before the 2020 election.

Mr Rattenbury said “To be clear, this funding was spent on genuine election costs.”

No, it isn’t clear, at all. Greens proudly tell us their campaigns are run by a team of grassroots volunteers, and now say they spent $176,700 to pay campaign staff. If Greens provided a breakdown it may help us understand, did they spend $176,700 on 1 temporary person for the 3-6 months of the campaign, an excessive salary, or perhaps spent $22,088 each on 8 staff for that period, which seems like a lot of staff. A bit more detail from Greens is needed to clear up if they are profiteers or not.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Riotact stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.