Religious exemptions for mandatory bicycle helmet laws in ACT

Dominic Giannini 24 January 2020 122
Jagdeep Singh with Shane Rattenbur

Jagdeep Singh wrote to Shane Rattenbury to ask for an exemption to mandatory helmet laws, to make it more inclusive for the Sikh community. Photo: Ssupplied.

The ACT Government has amended their mandatory helmet laws, providing an exemption on religious grounds to people whose religious convictions require them to have headwear.

Under the regulation, a person is not required to wear a bicycle helmet if they are a member of a religious group that requires the wearing of headdress where wearing the headdress makes it impractical to also wear a bike helmet.

The law came into effect in December after Jagdeep Singh, a member of Canberra’s Sikh community, wrote to the Minister for Road Safety, Shane Rattenbury, asking for the exemption.

“I always loved to ride bicycles and I used to live in Melbourne and I got the exemption. But when I moved to Canberra, there were no exemptions up here,” Mr Singh said.

“I wrote the email because I wear a turban and love to ride bikes but I could not fit the helmet on my head.

“I believe that many more people in my community will be able to ride bikes without the fear of getting a fine.”

Mr Rattenbury said that the law would only apply to a small part of the community and make Canberra a more inclusive city.

“It is part of ensuring that Canberra is an inclusive city and that we can make life a bit easier for one part of our community here in Canberra,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“The Territory supports individuals practising their religion or belief and this regulation ensures that sections of the community are not excluded from active forms of transport.

“This will not be a wide-applying rule. The mandatory helmet rule will still be in place for the rest of the community except for those that have a very specific religious conviction and headwear is an important part of that.”

However, the laws will not include motorbikes because of the high risk of serious injury or death, and Mr Rattenbury stressed that individuals should still be wary of their own safety.

“We have been very clear that this does not apply to motorbikes from a risk assessment point of view because of the speed a motorbike can travel. We have drawn the line at bicycles and e-bikes,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“This is an individual decision. Clearly there is research that shows that wearing a helmet does reduce trauma injuries when someone has an accident.

“I think people who do choose to ride without a helmet because of their religious convictions need to exercise their own care. I would say to them to stick to footpaths and bike paths and keep your speed down.”

The laws bring the ACT in line with other Australian jurisdictions; however, there are no plans at the moment to expand the regulation to other members of the public.

“The changes bring the ACT into line with Queensland, Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia which already have similar exemptions in place,” Mr Rattenbury said.


What's Your Opinion?


Please login to post your comments, or connect with
122 Responses to Religious exemptions for mandatory bicycle helmet laws in ACT
Brett Brett 10:01 pm 06 Feb 20

How dies legalising Cannabis work with compulsary Drug testing fo Newstart recipients for example in Centrelink ..As is known of still happening ??

pete056097 pete056097 11:43 am 30 Jan 20

Over a thousand people die in Australian car accidents every year. That number could be reduced if everyone wore a racing harness and full face helmet, perhaps these should be made compulsory.

Geoff Briggs Geoff Briggs 7:27 pm 28 Jan 20

So when's the exception come into force when riding a motorcycle? How do two tied laws work for people in one country?

Capital Retro Capital Retro 7:26 pm 28 Jan 20

“I wonder what nudists will have to say about this?”

That’s a hard one.

pete056097 pete056097 4:28 pm 28 Jan 20

There is arguments for and against bicycle helmets. Wearing a helmet should be a personal choice.
https://crag.asn.au/the-myth-that-bicycle-helmets-protect-against-brain-injury/

Capital Retro Capital Retro 2:29 pm 28 Jan 20

I have made an appointment with my counsellor.

Gavin van der Hout Gavin van der Hout 1:34 pm 28 Jan 20

Really... Well, as long as your belief protects you when you crash...

Everyone knows your headwear won't save you, but hey, your "god" will protect you...

Peter Athey Peter Athey 1:32 pm 28 Jan 20

3 words;

flying spaghetti monster

serious - look it up. buy yourself a colander

Jac Bec Jac Bec 8:57 pm 27 Jan 20

Unbelievable

GrumpyMark GrumpyMark 7:05 pm 27 Jan 20

Interesting response from an Indian doctor, Neelesh Kumar, to the question posed on Quora, “Why don’t Sikhs wear helmets in India? Can the turbans save them from accidents?” – https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-Sikhs-wear-helmets-in-India-Can-the-turbans-save-them-from-accidents. He is echoing the safety concerns of many on here.

Daljot Singh Daljot Singh 6:33 pm 27 Jan 20

It's good to see people care about us but in all honesty no one discriminating this ruling wears a turban. So you really don't know how thick a turban is or how long. A traditional turban is about 5.5m long and 1.5m wide. Hopefully this gives all perspective 🙏 😊

Amber Dickson Amber Dickson 3:09 pm 27 Jan 20

Someone could design a helmet that fits over a turban

rationalobserver rationalobserver 1:11 pm 27 Jan 20

The long term effects of catering to every minority on every issue must surely be chaos.
When we are no longer bound to a common set of rules which apply equally to everyone, then no one will have any respect for the rules.
Couple this with the blatantly obvious failure to enforce the current helmet laws by ACT policing, and it’s no wonder we are a laughing stock elsewhere in Australia.

Paula Jan Loustos Paula Jan Loustos 12:50 pm 27 Jan 20

I’m sorry but every ones skull cracks the same. Fact.

Acton Acton 7:48 am 27 Jan 20

Sikh males are required by their religion to carry a dagger called a kirpan. This creates problems when Sikh boys take their kirpans to school. Do we make religious exceptions for them and what happens if a kirpan is used in a school fight?

    GrumpyMark GrumpyMark 11:57 am 27 Jan 20

    So how does that work with airline security or do Sikh males not fly?

    Pandy Pandy 10:09 pm 27 Jan 20

    Only where they are “baptised”. U till then they can also drink alcohol.

Capital Retro Capital Retro 7:16 am 27 Jan 20

“…who cares if he wears a helmet or not. It’s his choice. It’s not the beginning of lawlessness…..” says Nicole Honchera.

I don’t care either as long as he pays for his own medical and associated services when he lands on his head without a helmet.

    GrumpyMark GrumpyMark 11:58 am 27 Jan 20

    Finally!!!!! Something with which we both agree

    Capital Retro Capital Retro 2:27 pm 28 Jan 20

    I have made an appointment with my counsellor.

Nicole Honchera Nicole Honchera 7:04 am 27 Jan 20

In this beautiful multicultural melting pot where we live in peace and relative harmony, who cares if he wears a helmet or not. It's his choice. It's not the beginning of lawlessness. Only the beginning of massive overreactions.

    Jac Bec Jac Bec 8:59 pm 27 Jan 20

    Nicole and strain on our health care because someone chose religion over safety

Patrick Rezek Patrick Rezek 6:43 am 27 Jan 20

I wonder what nudists will have to say about this?

Peter McDonald Peter McDonald 5:56 am 27 Jan 20

Ive never seen anyone or Heard of anyone getting booked.

Michael Drew Michael Drew 3:08 am 27 Jan 20

This may be problematic from an insurance perspective especially if lifelong head injuries were sustained in an accident with a vehicle.

CBR Tweets

Sign up to our newsletter

Top

Search across the site