RiotACT media watch

Deb Foskey? I think she was in the line in front of me to pre-purchase an Inannarama choir CD on Wednesday night. Thought the name sounded familiar. I have such finely-honed political antennae. Hey, I know what electorate I am in now (Molongoollomooloo) and I believe the election is on 18 February, so I’m politically a(ny)where.

What are we talking about here?!

Quote:
DR FOSKEY: …Therefore, I am going to quote a thread from the RiotACT website.
Mr Mulcahy: There’s an authoritative source.

Tagline:
“an authoritative source.” Richard Mulcahy on the subject of RiotACT, 27 August 2008, Hansard of the Sixth Legistlative Assembly (page 3735).

Some new possible taglines from there… courtesy of our mate Dicky Mulcachy.

As I say, Dr Foskey relied on RiotACT. It was one of the more pathetic speeches I
have heard given in this place.

I can tell you that I am not surprised that RiotACT is saying what a terrible idea it is.

It has been pointed out that the above link may not work correctly for everybody.

So, thanks to the wonders of modular information webs, you can actually enjoy the google cache version in html if needed.
http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=site%3Aact.gov.au+Hansard+Histopathology+museum&meta=

(Click on the View in HTML link)

Was my name mentioned?

If not, why not?

Of that version, pages 8-25 are where we come in and liven things up, but 3732 to 3749 are the Hansard numbering.

Otherwise its pretty dull day in the Assembly.

Maternity wards don’t have wireless access?

Not quite Media Watch, but RiotACT gets used as an anti-Mulcahy amendment submission in Hansard from August 27.

(I mention it because not only do I get quoted, but a number of us do too)

I’ve been a bit busy having a baby. But I’m back ….

I make it onto WIN news quite enough, thankyou very much! Quackers is frequently embarrassed at school.

: )